₦airaland Forum

If you're not the ediot here, can you show me a SINGLE proof of the interception; apart from the childish , crap-grade animated poo you guys are throwing around on the web? Can you gladly oblige me on that, Mr. Dumb?

Just30:
you might be a special case of dumb to believe non was intercepted
When Syrians themselves have prove of their missile defence launching missiles .
The fact is , US tomahawks are useless
It will be expensive on any country to strike Syria with more Russian rods being supplied to the Syrian government

I love how South Front, a Kremlin outlet, is trying to soothe the butthurt of those angry over the spanking Assad just received with a bunch of laughably fake news.

If you want the truth, there are many serious outlets. Here's one of many:

________
https://www.militarytimes.com/pentagon/2018/04/14/us-launched-105-weapons-against-syria-with-none-intercepted-dod-says/
________

Just30:
actually , the only thing keeping the peace of this world is Putin's restrain and patience.
His parliament and cabinet is ready to give him war orders.
His defence industry is already ready producing rapidly for war as ordered .
Everyone knows tomahawks are a mess
Those newest and smart weapons are not a match to the Russian ones
Now the Pentagon is investigating why so many of the 105 or 103 missiles were intercepted by updated missiles defences
https://southfront.org/pentagon-is-concerned-about-results-of-syria-strike-prepares-to-launch-internal-probe-sources/

You guys are just making all these Russia-glamorization noise online, but you have no clue how powerful the US is.

See, America can virtually shut the entire earth down in 24 hours if it boils down to it - and that's without firing a single missile. Self-restraint is the only thing that keeps the US in check, not your pathetic Russia or third-world China.

mojeer678:
Let America be the "victor" in Syria if it stops the conflict.

America got it's tech handed to it in an old oil pan from bob's garage, there are endless videos of America's missiles being shot down and everyone knows it, yet the Pentagon is claiming complete success. FACT: Pentagon propaganda won't fool Russia, intact targets are the proof and Syria is off the hook largely unscathed. At this point the best thing to do is let the Pentagon be the "five year old that beat uncle at chess" and forget it. For the first time America attacked a nation that was actually able to bring a gun to the fight

There are claims that Russia was hitting nothing because all the missiles they fired went too high for cruise missiles that "fly 100 feet off the ground". But the missiles were dropped from aircraft this time around, and approached from above, which means the videos everyone saw with high air bursts were consistent with actual shoot downs. Syria had no trouble with posting pictures of a university research facility that got hit, why are there no photos of anything else? That's your answer in a hand basket.

I think you are the one being unreasonable here. And the fact that you wished the man kept quiet betrays how diabolical some you are.

Go back and re read the article,.now without buharism.

GEJ paid 71% of the govt's stake on the project which was so "tiny" in comparison to the total project value (only 30b out of 117b).

Now, based on the writeup, the work was supposed to be completed in 2017 (probably with the assumption that GEJ would win the 2015 election). But two years before the deadline, the job progress neared 40% with GEJ at the helms of the govt...

Fast forward to three years of PMB, the project progress is still hovering around the same level it was at, 3 years ago. If PMB was any thing near interested in competency or being detribalized, the project would be at least 80% done by now, considering that over 35% was done in less than 2 years under GEJ. Plus, let's not forget the fact that GEJ also released over 70% of govt's part of the required funding.

No wonder you felt that Okupe should have kept quiet.

#HypocritesEverywhere.

NOC1:
But it was quite unfortunate that for solid 5 years nothing happened except a 3d drawing on a flex.
If I am in loupe shoes I will keep my mouth shut, but him knowing that we operate in a country where you take in trash without reasonig he has decided to impress the lazy citizens who only masturbate on topics and issues without looking back, who only read and reference on the history that favours them.
It is an act of stupidity to campaign with the construction of second Niger bridge for 18years that shows us the stupidity of our leaders.

Stop this hallucinative theory.

The message was sent to Asaad and his backers - clear and direct. Mission accomplished. No stories.

If anything else, Trump wants out of Syria. The vast majority of Americans - INCLUSIVE OF MOST OF TRUMP'S BASE - do not want the Syria conflict. Even Germany could not join the coalition - even though they endorsed the operation. This shows that this is just a warning signal.

And please, get off that your Russia-worship narrative. Russia's best effort is America's starting point.

mojeer678:
the way they want it, NOT!

My initial conclusion last night, based on social media, was (mostly) correct
The only mistake is I thought S-400 missiles were used. Instead, S-200 and less expensive missiles were used. There is a false claim that only 12 cruise missiles were hit. In fact, 12 cruise missiles were shot down defending ONE base, which equaled 100 percent of what was fired at it. Sub sonic cruise missiles are obviously useless against Russia's missiles.

I am going to stick with my assessment that something big was going to happen that caused the U.S. to stop the attack. All the cruise missiles could report their status to the launch site, and the U.S. was sitting there watching them vanish before they reached their targets. "reporting back" was early 90's tech, that the cruise missiles had even then. So it would have been ominous to watch them vanish, And then suddenly, Russian planes were in the air, preparing to attack. That did happen, regardless of whatever any claims are. And within 20 minutes (before they reached their targets) it was suddenly announced that the attack which was supposed to last for days was suddenly over, after only about an hour. Something big happened, and no one is saying what. My guess is that Russia made the right threat. Here is the next day report from RT:

"The majority of rockets fired in Syria by the UK, US, and France were intercepted by Syrian air defense systems, the Russian Defense Ministry said. Russian air defense units were not involved in repelling the attack. The warplanes and vessels of the US and its allies launched over 100 cruise missiles and air-surface missiles on Syrian civil and military facilities, the ministry stated.

The strikes were conducted by two US ships stationed in the Red Sea, with tactical air support from the Mediterranean and Rockwell B-1 Lancer bombers from Al-Tanf coalition airbase in Syria's Homs province, according to the statement.

Syrian Al-Dumayr Military Airport, located 40 km north-east from Damascus, was attacked by 12 cruise missiles, the Russian MoD confirmed, adding that all missiles were intercepted by Syrian air defense systems.

To repel the attack, Damascus deployed Soviet-made surface-to-air missile systems, including S-125 (NATO reporting name: SA-3 Goa), S-200 (SA-5 Gammon), 2K12 Kub (SA-6 Gainful) and Buk.

Russia did not deploy its air defense systems located in Syria to intercept the American, British, and French missiles.

Earlier, the ministry issued a statement saying that none of the missiles launched by the US and its allies reached the Russian air defense zones that shield facilities in the port city of Tartus and Khmeimim Air Base.

MY SALIENT COMMENT THAT I HAVE MADE BEFORE: Gee, if all those trillions did not go missing from the Pentagon on 911, trillions of dollars, which were hit by that "plane" that impacted right where the records were kept maybe old Russian tech would not have had such a high kill rate against American missiles, which would have been a LOT BETTER if those trillions stayed in the budget!

The U.S. military can talk all it wants about blowing destroyed or totally weak nations away, and talk all about how great it is and how invincible it is, but if Russian tech even hit half the incoming missiles the U.S. military had better start thinking twice, and all the war hawks had better figure out where all that money went!

Syria hit 70 plus percent of America's "nice, new, "smart" missiles with 15+ years outdated Russian crap! Syria did not even use anything "good, " and it was Syria, not Russia, that repelled the attack. That dear folks equals DOOM. You can't win if a relatively small economy nation who bought old Russian toys was able to repel you with no help from Russia, and partied the next day!

The bottom line is that unlike the gulf war, where America had real superiority, this time around America went against technology that happened to be "enough". All it takes is "enough", it really does not matter if your missiles have 128 bit tech when 16 bit is "enough". The game has changed.

It appears Russia was going to attack, and the U.S. was threatened into stopping the attack
This is probably the case. When this started, it was "going to be sustained, lasting days". Then a large number of Russian planes took off, and suddenly America stopped attacking after only about an hour. Here's what that adds up to:

A threat was made that a 7000 MPH hypersonic missile was going to go into the center of the U.S. fleet with a megaton warhead. This is pure speculation, but think about it -
How do you go from "we are going to attack in waves, for days" to "an hour into the battle let's call it quits"? And it is now confirmed that the Russian missile systems knocked out virtually ALL American cruise missiles, resulting in a totally failed missile attack. A few planes dropped bombs and then went home, with nothing returning. I think America quit because:

1. Russian defenses worked perfect, and America was watching it's missiles go POOF on computer screens before they reached their targets, and

2. Russian war planes took off after the air defenses were very well proven, with confirmed destruction of practically all cruise missiles. That alone would not stop an American attack, but if any planes were carrying nukes it sure would, if it was proven Russian air defenses would escort those planes to their targets unscathed.

The big proof: the "days long attack" lasted about an hour. SOMETHING HAPPENED.

Thank you my dear.

MrMystrO:
My good friend no one wants the united states to go down get me right. Of course that would mean the other major Powers would be left unchecked and that would be very bad for the world. But Then the united states has started developing Monopolistic and imperialistic tendencies and they have shown that over recent years by destabilizing countries who don't align with them, and so they themselves cannot be left unchecked too or else we will have something similar to an authoritarian regime Ruling the World and that would spell doom for the world and for third world countries like ours in Particular. So yes i believe these checks and balances Keep the stability of the world in place and is good for both the United states and for the world at large.


**Modified**
And one more thing.. Please stop watching BBC, CNN and other mainstream news media. Independent Alternative news media would give you a much more unbiased perspective on sensitive issues like this. They are the future of Real News and the only hope we have against these Biased western propaganda Machines. Thank you.

I don't think that there is anyone denying that chemical weapon was dropped from an helicopter in the affected area. What Russian govt and Asaad do is deny responsibility.

But in this current case, besides other covert intelligence operations, the West, based on public records, made it clear that no other entity but (Russia cum Iran backed) Asaad regime uses helicopters in that area.

Plus, this particular operation was purely targeted at Syria's research facilities, not Iran's and certainly not Russia's. So this is merely another warning signal, and there had been zero report of civilian or military casualties to it.

So, please, tune down that your anti-US narrative. And be guided. If the US goes down, this world will collapse into total anarchy, and the concept of individual liberty will be a thing of the past.

MrMystrO:
You should be the one to question what you're told. I'm glad you used the term "allegedly" to describe the chemical weapons use. However i want to ask u a question. Will you agree a man on the street accused of stealing be lynched when No EVIDENCE whatsoever can be provided that he stole anything, or will you be skeptical until it is proven, that's if you had the power to Order his lynching.. would you??

Why is it that if America and the West says so, Then its True even without any Evidence presented..Why?

Did you ever bother to ask why you were not told the total number of missiles dropped?

Personally, I think it could be up to 100 or more. If that's the case, it means the targets were successfully hit over 80% of the time. Americans do not want war. Trump does not want war. But this is the second time this guy would allegedly use chemical weapons on his own citizens in just a year or two. That should get you worried. If you listened to the US ambassador to the UN, she said that folks are starting to normalize the use of chemical weapons and the UN council had been doing nothing about it due to Russia's obstruction.

Of course, I know that the coalition of Western Europe and Saudi Arabia may have a hidden agenda for wanting to remove Assad. But still, unchecked terror anywhere will soon spread everywhere.

So, again, learn to question what you're told.

MrMystrO:
What is this one even saying? Can't you Read? 13 Of their Missiles just got DESTROYED and you're here spitting gibberish. How do you think those missiles were destroyed? by Syrian air power alone? The era of US dominance is over and special Thanks to Vladmir Putin and Russia for making that happen. And if them try "Anyhow" them go see "Anyhow". THIS IS NOT LIBYA!!!

Well said.

Don't mind that fake and self-appointed igbodefender.com on Nairaland.

Shove your gullibility and gross irresponsibility down your azz.

God's willing, if I were to be in Nigeria in 2023, I will vote against any igbo man that dares contest for presidency.

Selfish folks like you are the reason this country is messed up. If you guys have any iota of regard for the country, everyone of you would be taking to the streets and boycotting all elections until your roguish elites succumb to creating a valid and people oriented constitution at least.

You are here talking crap about igbo presidency in 2023 as if you are sure of your life this night.

[s]

igbodefendercom:
The gift is: Buhari's listing of our member state Anambra as a 13% derivation (oil producing) state. Which other government has done such in Nigeria's history?

Now if we attract oil companies to exploit Anambra's oil, Anambra will be getting the same 13% derivation that made Rivers, Bayelsa, Delta very rich. Yes we may not need the oil money, yes it might not be much at first, but a few more billions per year is something. And it is our money. Oga Buhari, God bless you.

Now we can get oil sector jobs in our member state, Anambra. Isn't that wonderful?

Other governments said our oil was for 'strategic reserves' but Buhari said that is nonsense. List these people.

Ndigbo, it will be well with us, and it is getting better for all Nigerians. The icing in the cake will be Igbo Presidency 2023. Vote Buhari to make it happen.

I rest my case.

[/s]

Your assertion here is totally false.

1. Facebook does not GIVE out your personal data WITHOUT your permission.

2. The data used for Facebook advertising is merely based on group demographics and behavioural classifications. The data is NOT personally identifiable and cannot be used to identify INDIVIDUAL users. Besides, such data is only usable on Facebook. And the ads are delivered by Facebook - to which you subscribe. So it is not Spam..

3. Any personally identifiable data that comes off of Facebook is either legitimately given by you when you interact with approved or associated Facebook apps. It can also happen when third-parties ILLEGALLY exploit and harvest Facebook data in pure violation of Facebook terms.
In both cases, you cannot blame Facebook for your exposed privacy, just as you could not blame Samsung for your nude selfie that was maliciously shared by your ex.

Maxcollins042:
What are you saying? You can't give out my personal data to a third-party without my consent merely because he/she needs it for research purposes. This act contravenes Facebook's policy regarding the user's security. Providing marketers with my data to enable them purvey their products and services is tantamount to spamming if you don't know.

Okay. Noted. Thank you for clarifying your stance.

Maxcollins042:
Let me correct a false impression here, I do not belong to any herd much less a blind one regarding the legitimacy/illegitimacy of Trump's presidential status.

As for the legality or the illegality of the electioneering process that brought Trump into the oval office, those running the gauntlet at Zuckerberg regarding the data misappropriation are those that are yet to come to terms that Trump is their president. Another faction are those that are not happy for his success.

The bolded is what this whole brouhaha is all about. And I tell you it's super sickening that even the obviously smart folks like you fall for this blind herd mentality.

What the Bleep is wrong in audience research and targeted political advertising?

Obama campaign was literally in bed with Facebook. Same with Hillary. So what the heck is the problem?

It is so delusional to keep denying that Trump was duly and legitimately ELECTED as POTUS.

So freaking retarded, mad and treasonous to claim that Trump election was INFLUENCED by Facebook or anyone but the AMERICAN PEOPLE.

Maxcollins042:
The problem here is that facebook users are peeved for the fact that Zuckerberg after he discovered that around 50 million data of his network users were mined illegally, he did little to nothing to inform them of this development.

Quite alright he made us to understand that after the Cambridge Analytica sickening modus operandi was revealed, that they had assured him that the illegally acquired data have been erased but what efforts did he make to ascertain the veracity of this claim?

This has even lead to many making an assumption that he influenced the last American presidential election which saw Trump emerge victorious. This has also amounted to humongous dip in the market capitalization of facebook and its investors are losing serious cash.

One of the best measures that they can employ currently is to rejig the board of directors as this will somehow restore the trust people have in facebook, curtail the increasing loses and drive up their market capitalization.

You are just ignorant.

1. Give a link to where Zuck admitted to data breach in relation to Cambridge Analytica.
2. Every darn thing you listed there was a result of the silly propaganda.

Learn to think straight.

EmmyDJourno:
Price shares of Facebook have fallen by $50B, Zuck has admitted there was a breach, issued an apology now investors are calling for him to step down from the board, relinquishing his 60% decision making stake on the board

And you are here calling it a propaganda

You must be stuck on Lai Mohammed's stunts

Igbos are one and with very large indigenous population in 7 states NOT 5.

[s]

themosthigh:
Enugu people are the one of the only few wise and visionary Igbos.
Though proudly Igbos, they are not tribalistic and religion does not enter their head. A typical Enugu man will not care if you are Igbo or Yoruba, Christian or Muslim unless you openly offend him or try to take something from him.
Unlike Anambra people that are rash,aggressive and ended up leading other Igbos to the Biafran onslaught, they are tactical, visionary and still not timid or primitive.
Go to some of their villages and you will see mosques and churches together without problems, igalas and idomas living side by side with Igbo people without conflict and problems settled by diplomacy and wisdom not violence.
IMO/abia people are not aggressive but are too dishonorable and tricky and many are not proudly Igbos, leave their land to live in Lagos for decades without coming back.
Ebonyi people are divided into the IMO like people,Enugu like people and primitivist people.
If their is ever going to be an Igbo president, it has to be an Enugu man. Even I myself can vote them.

[/s]

You have ZERO private information on a FREE server and a totally free service. Any content you put up on Social Media is legally retained and used by that platform. Their is zero music to face here. And Mark is done apologising or appeasing those envy ridden haters. His users love Facebook and don't care what you or your ilks think.

STILESGANG:
Beefing for monetizing users private information?. Unlike you these guys don't reason with sentiment. He made a grave mistake and he should face the music. Nigerians and their mentality sha.

You guys are just being phobic over silly propaganda. This whole crap you read are pure falsehoods sponsored by closet communists because they cannot stand the resurgence of nationalism. There was zero data breech at Facebook. And there is nothing wrong in giving advertisers insightful data to help make their messaging more relevant to you. If you hate adverts so much, then stop using the platform and migrate to a paid alternative. Facebook is free because of paid adverts.

EmmyDJourno:
I raised this issue two months ago, when I bought a new device and within 15minutes my whole life was moved from my old device to the new one

It made me realize all my data was somewhere at a back-end where I have no day over what is done with it, I argued that it could be monetized to Marketing Consultant firms to maximize product outreach, but they beat my imagination and used it to manipulate elections

Very sad

Guess the herdsmen to whom El-Rufai paid money for the killings in Kaduna were politicians, right?

Guess Miyeti-allah which claimed responsibility for Benue massacre were politicians too?

Guess the IG was asleep when he called the ongoing massacre a mere "communal clash", right?

Guess the Fulani lecturer who claimed that Fulanis own the Benue state by conquest, was a politician too?

So your "excellence" is now too weak to protect the country, right?

I'm sure you are probably 13 years old, so no need to bother.

Euouae:
Every crime is now perpetrated by Fulani Herdsmen.

The earlier we started knowing that all this killings are political to just deface the administration of His Excellence, President Mohammadu Buhari (GCFR), The better.

Isnt this same Fulani herdsmen that have been cohabiting with farmers for decades in Nigeria? Why suddenly they just started being portrayed as terrorist?

Moreover, The Fulani`s spread across western Africa in this trade but Nigeria seems to the be where they are portrayed as violent.

Politicians just using human life's to play politics

Many raving e-diots littering the web-space these days. Guess "Fulani herdsmen" now equals "all Fulani people" in your alternative universe, right? May be we can start calling them "Yoruba herdsmen" to appease you hypocrites. Where were you when the buzz-word "Niger Delta Militants" was en-vogue? Or have you ever heard such a thing as "Hausa Boko-Haram" before?
[s]

Nairalanddist:
It's unfair how the media and the PDP are working in vain to paint fulanis as killers. The fulanis are hardworking and peaceful people but the activities of few miscreants amongst them doesn't mean we demonize all Fulanis. Should we conclude that all Igbos are drug dealers due to the activities of the numerous drug dealers from the east? Should we call all Igbos terrorists just because IPOB is a terrorist group?

Why can't we allow Nigerians live in peace and harmony? Why not condemn killers rather than tag them Fulani herdsmen? Whether we like it or not, the unity of Nigeria is not negotiable

[/s]

This situation started about two years ago after the merge of oDesk and eLance. So this makes Upwork the largest freelance job board on the planet - with literally millions of of freelancers.

But I still think that getting accepted on Upwork depends more on your specified skill set as opposed to your location. Common skills - like writing - seem ti no longer guarantee your entry ticket at this time due the vast number of writers on the platform already.

One thing you should know really is that the platform is primarily designed for outsourcing, which essentially means getting quality labor at way cheaper rate than the average rates obtainable in the developed countries

So, rather than restricting people from developing countries, Upwork encourages them. In fact, Upwork (plus maybe Google) is the only global internet company that will remit your earnings to your local Bank account in Naira. That gives you an idea of how many Nigerians they have onboard. This may also be the reason - if at all - they restrict entry from Nigeria - so the platform will have enough diverse representation from most nations - not just Nigeria.

Fidelmalek:
upwork rejects ypur profile without much ado...
They'll bot sends you their regret message an hour after applying....
Anyone saying otherwise is bullshiting you

I am not sure about this. There are way too many Nigerians on Upwork with real Nigerian addresses. And, to the best of my knowledge, signing up with any form of fakery - both in ID and Location may mean you won't get your pay. So, be frank and forthright from day one.

Fidelmalek:
it's just a matter of professionalism.
But never register with a Nigerian ip. They'll automatically reject you. Use an ip and create an account, fill rare skills and submit, you should be approved in no distant time

Alright noted. Want a definition that's based on personal conviction and insight though.

hakeem4:
no, I don’t say it’s god. I’d rather say I don’t understand

I see. So, to you, anything that's unknown is god, right?

hakeem4:
God is a term used to define the unknown. Eg people could not explain what hurricanes were so they decided to say it was the god of Neptune that causes hurricanes. This is what philosophy calls god of the gaps.

CC: @alBHAGDADI

I Think That The Word Tag "God" Does Not Mean A Person Nor The Name Of A Person.

Change My Mind.

Define God For Me.

But please note that I am not asking for His attributes or what He can do. Just a plain ol definition of the word "GOD".

If you're an atheist, please pass. I don't need your opinion.

Thank you.

I will absolutely vote him if he contests.

To me he is the only mature politician in today's Nigeria.

How about the tag "fake jews"? or the "

Idiotic Pigs Of Biafra"

or "Igbos are politically naive for voting GEJ and PDP" or "Igbos should confess their sins of refusing to vote PMB and move on to ask PMB for forgiveness"?

Mr hypocrite, quit your virtue signalling nonsense and get a cure for your hypocrisy first, then go and research the roots and causes of the tags "yoruba muslims and fulani jihadist" before you come online to shame igbos.


[s]

resurgentxtian4:
I strongly feel that the religious profiling and wholesale demonization of a voting demography through such appellations like “Yoruba Muslims” or “Fulani jihadists” will only ensure that Buhari’s supporters double down on their support for the current regime. On numerous occasions, our igbo brothers have made me make some remarks I don’t really mean as a way to spite them for their blackmail of my tribe’s (Yoruba)voting choices.

Just as I was obligated (at some point in history) to support the current regime, Nigerian Muslims will also want to ensure that Buhari wins in 2019 to prove a point to the igbos. It is no secret that more than my dislike for igbos, I dread Islam more. My islamophobia is not due to any personal slight done to me by any Muslim but a result of my realization that Muslims can separate their religion from politics thus giving birth to political Islam.

That being said, it is important that we anti regime elements acknowledge that we can’t vote out this regime if we demonize Muslims who have a large voting strength in Nigeria. The task of effecting change in aso rock next year should be a collective one and not circumscribed to a religious or ethnic slugfest. The major contenders for the Presidency in 2019 are Muslims from the north, so why should we demonise some Muslims (notably Yoruba Muslims) for their support for Buhari?

I am also guilty for making snide remarks against a whole faith because of the deeds of the President and his Fulani kinfolk. But I have realized that that is a myopic way to tackle the problem of how to vote out this regime. Accordingly, we need to constructively engage and convince Buhari supporters who are Muslim of the need to view the politics of 2019 with patriotic lens. We do not oppose this regime because the President is a muslim or Fulani. Rather, we oppose him because he is not good for the continued cohesion and progress of a multi ethnic and religious nation like Nigeria. He’s also inept economically to steer us out of the economic ditch he got us into in the first place.

So, I urge the igbos (I don’t mean to intentionally single out a whole ethnic group but they are the ones guilty of this transgression) to play politics with tact by eschewing the politics of prejudice, blackmail, blame and hasty generalization. We need as much Muslim votes as we can muster to vote out Buhari in 2019. We should resist the temptation of dividing ourselves on ethnic and religious basis in this onerous task to rescue Nigeria. Most of us are still in the process of emigrating but in the meantime, we should make sure that we play our part in ensuring that this regime doesn’t have a second four year stint in the saddle. The consequences of another 4 years for this regime are better imagined than experienced. As it is, Buhari is poised to snatch a re-election due to the lack of cohesion amongst the opposition and the division amongst Nigerians of different religious and ethnic persuasions.

Removing Buhari is not about hate for Islam or Fulani. It is a call to duty for every patriotic Nigerian. If we succeed in getting Buhari out, it is still a Muslim and Fulani that will occupy the Office, just a more liberal and fair one.

Let us stop demonizing Yoruba Muslims who still support Buhari as that will radicalize and drive them to the other side (side of the regime). This will inexorably mean we lose large votes that could have been vital to remove Buhari.

Igbos please take note of my advice and your insults are welcome as usual.

Happy Easter. He is risen.

Selah.

Cc: ikworiko
FRESH G
Imhotep

[/s]

Yes, Ego. $60

Egonne1:
Payoneer funds needed in bulk..

Bitcoin also needed. Small and large.

Fastest payment guaranteed.

Contact is on signature

Just $60

Donkunxex:
bulk payoneer seller.
quote me abeg.
legit verified sellers only.
Thanks.

They did not TAKE any information ILLEGALLY. Stop spreading the lies.


[s]

GavelSlam:
You don't live under a rock do you?

The Cambridge Analytical matter is a burning issue in the UK as we speak as they were found to have illegally taken people's private data from Facebook with the intention to sway voting patterns, targeting individuals with subliminal and persuasive messages.

They are being shown in this writeup to have carried out the same unethical method in Nigeria in 2015 at he behest of Jonathan's cronies.

Apparently, the effect of their experiment hasn't waned on some Nigerians.

Cambridgegate much like Watergate was enough to bury a president.

[/s][s][/s]

Mynd, sorry to break it for you, you are not information literate.

1. The poo up there is nothing but a silly rant and propaganda from a serial and grossly hypocritical liberal loser who's stuck in the rot and could not get over brexit and trump election.

2. The hypocrite does not care about Nigeria one bit. What you read up there is a bunch of fiction, twisted facts and false narrative designed to feed the thoughtless liberals since their false Russian collusion and Brexit reversal narratives have crumbled.

3. Noticed how the ediot quietly glamorized Buhari's team's use of the same strategy he/she/it was trying to condemn Jonathan for? This shows you how unprincipled the writer is.

4. Finally, what the hypocrite is projecting here against CA is actually what the DNC, DOJ and FBI did with the help of Russian and British spies against Trump campaign in the US. But the hypocrites in the media call the weaponized outcome a "dossier" and "opposition research".

5. But since CA did not do anything criminal (like the DNC and Obama's FBI and DOJ did in the US) in the work with Trump campaign, this poo of a writer wants to create the false Nigeria narrative to mudsling CA, and make unthinking liberals think that CA did something wrong in the US.

This is not about Nigeria Mynd44.

Mynd44:
So Isreal (allegedly) actively tried to influence Nigeria's elections and they were expecting Nigeria to vote in their favor?

Now it made sense why President Jonathan abstained from the UN vote that would have granted Palestine freedom. Against common sense, against decades ofNigeria's foreign policy, against our views on freedom, it all fits

But here is the punchline

it didn't work


Lmaoooooooooo