₦airaland Forum

jaxxy:
She ia full of lies cos she couls have said this since not when u know it can be used by his political enemies.

Defend which bad reputation? Did obama do kill gadaffi and fight wars? Was clinton not more corrupt than trump? So who is defending bad reputation?

Bro what do mean she was investigated by the FBI and it was a credible accudation so much so she was compensated by the Epstein Estate. The question is why was that case redacted from the Epstein files? Your excuse is pitifully inadequate.

So because Obama and Clinton did what they did we should condone a PDFile? Why are you defending a PDFile? Or you just like corruption in general?

QuinQ:
Not me personally, but I've read you arguing it with people.
They always defeat you by telling you there has to be a first cause that has no cause that is entirely outside our existence. Otherwise how do you explain existence?!

LoLz. Just say the first cause argument appeals to you.

Tell me why the first cause cannot be the universe itself or any other thing that is not a being.

QuinQQ:
Oh, didn't even know you replied.
God Almighty of course. Father of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ.
You always lose this argument, so don't start.

That God doesn't exist so no I have no fears concerning it.

Always? When have you and I discussed it before?

ijebosb:
Comedy.
Trump disagrees with the Prosecutor who he hired who initially lied for Trump then after realizing there was more tant enouh evidence that it was a "rushed and botched" job, feared for her license and dropped the case.
Trump is really a deranged person.

Pirro is going to go the way of Bondi.

jaxxy:
Anybody can come up abd accuse trump or anybody of such nonesense if they hate them enough without evidence codms they know people who hate him will believe her unprovable lies.

How is that reason to redact it? If it is unprovable then why not sue her for defamation? Abi you don't know Trump is one of the most litigious persons in the US?

Mind the way you defend people with bad reputations it'll bite you in the arse someday.

jaxxy:
Some of those american demonic democrats are very stupid and silly. U dont say such without concrete evidence on national tv. There is a place for certain language.

Many people where seen with epstein during his life time and were not part or in support of his activities. Unless u can provide incontrovertible proof it is unfair to accuse everybody.

Why did they redact the case of the girl who accused Trump from the Epstein files?

AderonkeOlaniyi:
Every intelligent person knows that these media outlets like FOX, CNN, etc are controlled by the Democrats, the APC of the United States.

You must be in lalaland to say Fox is controlled by Democrats. LoLz.

Google who Rupert Murdoch is before you respond.

TunezMediaTV:
Budding Nigerian actress and influencer, Kam Debbie Okolie snapped in beautiful behind the scenes shot with a baby python wrapped around her shoulders in a new upcoming Nollywood flick named, Rebirth of Thunder... See photos below...


https://www.instagram.com/reel/DbIQQ_gMM5_/?igsh=MTViZnFycGMzOTFjOQ==

Bro why is your arm around her waist? Not cool.

QuinQQ:
OMG, seems you haven't changed one bit.
But seriously, do you ever consider what happens if you don't reconcile yourself to God while you still have the chance?

Which god?

QuinQQ:
You actually did say that. I totally forgot. So we kind of agree on this. I say it doesn't necessarily make him a simp. I also say it doesn't necessarily make him a man's man either!

So you're no longer an atheist. Are you now an evangelist for Christ?

Yes I am an evangelist of Cheesus.

QuinQQ:
So sorry folks, we just need more votes and more comments. Here are some comments so far below. LordReed, as an atheist (are you still an atheist?), what say you?

I have told you, it is fine for a man to say I love the kid no need for a test. It NOT fine to have the GOVERNMENT tell a man he cannot do a DNA test because he has been playing the role of a father.

He is not a simp if he chooses it.

nlfpmod:
Man publicly proposes to a lady he sponsored through university, only for her to reject him at her graduation amid a crowd of onlookers filming the scene.

The moment a man who trained a graduating student in the univeraity revived the shock of his life while trying to propose to her .

Guys be careful pic.twitter.com/tXUHskSScJ

— AFRICAMUSTBEFREE!!!!!!! (@engrICO2015) July 29, 2026

But was the slap necessary? The slap makes it look like a skit.

Na skit jor.

Goosethetruth:
You have been here long enough. You should know what I mean. The guy only does what suits his agenda.

That is the thing I have been here long and I don't know what agenda you are talking about. Tell me what agenda you think he has.

Goosethetruth:
I know that,but I don't trust him one bit. It is not beyond him.

Why?

Stephen0mozzy:
Isn't it hilarious that after all of this, it still won't stop a well placed metal from an Avtomat Kalashnikova 1947 😅

If you have to fortify deceive yourself like this for an outing it's only because of two things:
1. You're going to a place where you're obviously not wanted nor loved.
2. You don put your hands for bad things, hence, the evil man runneth when no one pursueth.

Just marry this with this:

Mynd44:
A Christian going out prays, some take an handkerchief that their pastor has prayed on, some use annoiting oil, some hold rosary, some wear a Jesus piece to even places they are wanted and that is seemingly okay

A lot of Muslims will go out with a Tesbih, or carry a pocket Quran even after praying at home and that's okay too.

He has his beliefs and he is staying with it. He is just following his religion and the two instances you have put there might not even count as those might be against spiritual attacks not physical ones

Then understand that all religious practice is for the practitioner's comfort. None of them will stop a bullet.

Goosethetruth:
You had me laughing out loud,buda. On a side note, I get a feeling that Seun is the moderator in the Christian/etc section. The OAM4J listed as the mod is just a place holder in my opinion. I could be wrong.

Seun is an atheist so that is unlikely.

Goosethetruth:
@Seun,
Good day to you.
I appreciate you sincerely for creating this wonderful forum that is divided into different sections. Initially there was a Religion section that harboured all forms of religion as well as free thinkers,agnostics and atheists. At a point in time the Islamists threatened your person and Nairaland.com as a forum that led to you creating an Islamic section for them.
It is pertinent to state that the Christians have become as intolerant as the Islamists and in a parochial way believe that the Christian and etc belongs to them solely.
This is juxtaposed with the fact that whoever is the moderator of this Christianity and etc section is a biased Christian that has been hiding any posts opposed to Christianity and hiding such posts.
No free thinkers/agnostic/free thinkers posts are ever moved to the front page by whoever is the moderator of the Christian/etc section. However that is not my grouse. The moderator has been banning and hiding posts from free thinkers/agnostics and atheists while consistently promoting threads from Christian posters.

In my humble opinion, the time has come to separate the wheat from the chaff. Please create a Atheists/Agnostics/Free thinkers section so that the Christianity section can sink into oblivion like the Islamists section.
Thanks.

We don't even need to lebel it Atheists/Agnostics/Free thinkers section, just call it Philosophy section and we are good to go.

Seun we've been calling on you to do this for some time now, I dunno what the hang up about it is.

Glimpsetv:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pwWw2DCW-cQ?si=JECb5wjq9UUHAwUO

Greed

naptu2:
https://x.com/i/status/2081548775361777804

They straight up tortured and murdered this guy.

nlfpmod:
Media Personality Mardiyyah Reveals How a ₦1.2 Million Loan She Took in 100 level to Fund a Flashy Lifestyle Grew to Over ₦9.6 million After She Stopped Making Repayments



Source

She was a greedy fool who bit off more than she could chew, now she's complaining.

CyynthiaKiss:
That Islamic terrorist on suit in New York should say bye bye to his political career.. That clown has overstepped his boundaries simply because Nyorkers showed him love, now the ant is seeing himself as a bird..

He should have copied from the mayor of London, though that one has his own garbage, but you can never see him rubbing it on the faces of people because he understands what a diplomacy is all about.

Wait was he the one who stabbed someone? What has he done that makes him a terrorist?

Dtruthspeaker:
No. That is not the issue in dispute MaxindHouse moved the issue from your "scientists work evidence" to scientists confirming that they see and perceived God of which you used the word "perceived" in acknowledging his argument.. And that is where we are which now that you see that you do not have any valid counter to it, you are now trying to take it back to where it has left. In law, we call it relitigation and relitigation is not allowed for it has become is res judicata.

None of the people he quotes say they perceive an invisible god in the science they were doing. Their faith in a god is a separate thing from the science.

BTW perception still is not scientific evidence.

HeatSeeker:
You

Or haven't you been proselytizing for years on nairaland?! Each time you defend, explain, or push forward based on what you believe...

Your arguments affect susceptible minds, emboldens those with similar thinking, and causes those with doubts to question what they claim to believe in.

Whether you accept it or not, you have promoted the cause of atheism on nairaland.

Did I come to your house to talk to you? We are in a public space where there is freedom of expression so if you don't want to be influenced by other people's ideas then don't be here.

BTW by your definition everybody with an opinion is proselytizing with religious zeal to win converts even that person talking about how Agege bread is the best. If that sounds silly that's because it is a silly definition.

No systemic racism they said.

HeatSeeker:
There are several ways to look at it.

1). Maybe because religious people are always in your face. Every corner you turn in modern day Nigeria, you see or meet religion. Even in everyday language, people always reference God. Nigerians are among the most religious people on earth. So, it makes sense for a Nigerian atheist to act in a manner that suggests that they are obsessed about religion. The religionist simply will not leave you alone.

2). Atheism is itself a belief system. And every belief system requires adherents to convert people to their ways. What you call obsession on the path of the atheist can be likened to religious zeal to win more converts.

Which atheist came to preach to you?

Dtruthspeaker:
I know that you are zeroing on the fact that Darwin "appears" to sit on the fence in this issue. However, unlike you atheist, if he does not expressly declare that God does not exist, it will be construed against him that he supports the position that God exists because of implication. There is no demilitirize (agnostic) zone here.

I don't understand what you trying to say. The bone of contention was never about whether a scientist can believe in God. The question is which of their scientific work did they claim was evidence for a god.

BTW FWIW I know Darwin was a Christian when he started out and eventually expressed non belief later.

Dtruthspeaker:
The way you openly lie and twist Truths, you truly are Satan's best child

The quotes clearly say "i do not deny the existence of God," which means that charles Darwin perceives God and upholds Him. Same for Thomas Edison who says that God is The Best Engineer, which means that he perceived God too. Same for the last guy who said shallow knowledge of science will make you an atheist whereas a deep knowledge of science will make you know that there is God and you shall believe In Him.

Yet, here you are lyeing by twisting it, . Smh

You are the ones trying to twist things. How is "i do not deny the existence of God," the same as I saw the invisible being in the science I was doing.

MaxInDHouse:
Here they are:
Oya present what you have achieved with the knowledge you have in science!🥱

None of these say there is an invisible being whose hands they keep perceiving in everything they achieved.

In fact they are saying science and faith in god are two different things.

MaxInDHouse:
Scientists are telling you that there is an invisible being whose hands they keep perceiving in everything they achieved but you who sat down in the corner of your room doing nothing say no one is out there! 😂

Guy no noise show me the scientist who said they perceive an invisible being in the science they are doing.

MaxInDHouse:
Their belief in God is enough for me at least they know far better than you who has never invented anything other than relying on their works to condemn their faith.

Is that not hilarious?😂

As long as it is clear you have admitted that belief is not scientific evidence. LoLz.

MaxInDHouse:
If scientists who depends on scientific evidences say they believe in the existence of God i believe the rest is your cup of coffee!😂

They do not say they believe in god because they have scientific evidence of a god. If you say they do then produce just ONE scientist saying they have scientific evidence for a god.

NerdCat:
The United States Constitution literally codified a secular government, which completely debunks you here.



State-mandated anti-theism in Marxist systems is an instrument of political subjugation. It has absolutely nothing to do with religion. Please get your facts straight. None of those regimes you mention codify non-belief because they love rationalist philosophy. They just enforce it to demolish competing centers of authority and force total submission to the supreme leader. They systematically eliminate independent institutions to eliminate dissent and churches simply happen to be organized rivals for popular loyalty.

It's always been all about power. Faith and belief is completely irrelevant. So treating political tyranny as the canonical doctrine of everyday secularism is a hilariously desperate category error.



Tell that to millions fighting for bodily autonomy against evangelical lobbies in the West. Religious fundamentalists routinely weaponize legal loopholes to ban books, restrict healthcare, and legislate scripture into public law daily. Having theoretical individual freedom doesn't mean pious loudmouths aren't aggressively invading public life.



This lazy semantic trickery is getting remarkably pathetic, my guy. Calling any organized set of principles a "religion" is a cheap equivocation tactic meant to mask the total lack of empirical evidence for your faith. There is a vast, unbridgeable chasm between dogmatic submission to unproven supernatural myths and the energetic defense of rational, evidence-based inquiry.

By your completely broken logic, a passionate belief in the scientific method, human rights, or environmentalism makes someone an ordained priest. Please stop stretching basic semantics before the English language utterly loses all meaning.



Anyone living in 2026 with a functioning brain can spot your desperate equivocation tactics from a mile away

The guy has been on the atheism is religion track for a while now. I think it assuages his feelings of the insufficiency of his own religion because of the devastating challenge reason brings. It's always laugh worthy.