₦airaland Forum

Dtruthspeaker:
Yet your folks are desperately trying to run away from Him.

Nope.

PoliteActivist:
*Politeness*
That's one of the pitfalls of a forum like this. I could actually be debating with a bot and not know it.
Listen closely:
Once again, if you were asking a real question and not a rhetorical question, you would ask "why should we care?" right after someone had said "Einstein was never a Christian". You DON'T first ask the person "what religion was he?" then follow with "why should we care?". If you do, the question is rhetorical and just part of your continuing aggression towards the person.
Hope you finally get it

Dumdum stop trying to assume you can read my mind. If you had an honest bone in your body you'd have accepted my explanation and provided a response but because you are only trying to deflect you persist in nonsense. You've dragged this out over how many days now just to not answer a simple question. You stink.

DeepSight:
With every respect, old friend, I friend this a little escapist, to be mild. Because I doubt that most people involved in discussions on the existence of God can genuinely claim to have no idea of what the word "God" as used in these discussions refers to. And no, its not a question of "which god?" Because while there may be differing conceptions of "God" there is no doubt that in these discussions the concept of God is basically that of a supreme being said to be the creator of all else that exists.

Whether he is Jesus, whether he sent Mohammed, whether he cares about the way you live or die, where he is even a "he" at all, all of these things are secondary and vary from conception to conception. What does not vary is the fundamental idea of a source creator being.

There is no attempt at escape here. I have recently begun to see that the entire conceptualisation captured in the word god is mostly nonsensical.

OneCandleAway:
I was just scared now. Someone one hasn't experienced before.

Ah I see.

OneCandleAway:
I had an experience in an hospital a long time ago. I was just screaming nurse, nurse, let them come and carry the boy away ooo. It was just me hooked on a drip and the little boys body.
Cc mordson
Themanderon
Zeuss
Arantess,
Ruggedtimi

The dead boy's body tried to harm you?

PoliteActivist:
*Politeness*
I honestly have been grossly overestimating you. You really are not too smart. I mean, for real! Not just because of this, but your other statements.
If you interject to ask someone who just said Einstein was not a Christian, "what religion was he", then followed it up with "why should we care?", it can only mean "we don't care", otherwise you wouldn’t have asked "what religion was he", you'd have simply asked "why should we care (that he was not a Christian)".
Geez. Feels like I'm explaining to a 4-year-old!

You are just a dummy and I say that without any reservations.

Why should we care is a question designed to elicit a response outlining why Einstein's religion is an important part of your submission. Your dumbarse self failed to understand such a simple concept and even repeatedly spelling it out for you still fails to stimulate what ever geriatric brain cells you still have left.

You are intellectually no different from a nursery school pupil whose only ability is to recite from rote.

PoliteActivist:
*Politeness*
Since everything has to be spelled out for you, "Why should we care?" is what is called a rhetorical question. It means same as "we don't care" or "nobody cares"

Dumdum stop making an arse of yourself by assuming you know my mind.

I wrote a question and was expecting a reasonable answer not your pathetic attempts to deflect.

If I wanted to say nobody cares I'd have written nobody cares. I am not like you who needs tortuous nonsense to say what I mean.

OneCandleAway:
It can be scary trapped with a body.

What an interesting thing to say. Are you afraid the dead body will hurt you or what exactly?

petra1:
That doesn’t matter . Formular is formular . Component is component . Besides its obvious to all true scientists that it was not a vaccine

LMAO! Lemme ask you a question that will reveal your sincerity.

Should we believe any pastor that leaves Christ Embassy and says that the Pastor Chris is a devil worshipper?

Dtruthspeaker:
Thats why no ome has prepared for unreal things like big foot and co but bunkers and moon explorations prove that they are trying to runn away from Gods's promised wrath.

Your god is as unreal as Big Foot.

Lucifyre:
In the vast expanse of Christian scriptures, amidst the intricate narratives of creation, prophecy, and salvation, there exists a notable absence – the explicit mention of planets. While the Bible which was divinely inspired to the extents of crafting how everything came to be, the celestial bodies known as planets are conspicuously absent from its pages. Why is that?? Why does Christianity, with its profound theological depth and breadth, lack explicit references to planets? which God also created by the way.

From the Genesis account of creation to the apocalyptic visions of Revelation, the Bible unfolds a narrative that delves into the depths of human existence and the divine plan. Yet, amidst this exploration of the cosmos, planets as astronomical entities remain notably unaddressed. The creation story doesn't tell us when any of the planets where created or why. If it was divinely inspired wouldn't it have featured basicallly how and what time God created the planets?? maybe even the asteroids and black holes. But all these are noticeably absent all through despite the divine inspiration.

The absence stands in contrast to other religious traditions, some even older, where planets, play significant roles in cosmological narratives and religious symbolism. I Was recently reading a version of the sumerian recently, about the aliens( Enllil, Enki) from the planet Nibiru it got me thinking. Even in Greek mythology, planets are personified as gods and goddesses governing various aspects of existence. So once again why does Christianity, with its profound theological depth and breadth, divine inspiration lack explicit references to planets?

Maybe there are theological reasons which could answer this but i very much doubt it. My pov?! These people where simply limited by what they knew and saw at the time and crafted a narrative around it. Heck the writers of the story of babel believed they could use their limited technology at the time to build a tower and it'll reach God. We've built way taller structures and that's putting it lightly and we still haven't reached the skies. Heck we've even travelled past the skies using other means and found way more phenomenal stuff like planets, asteroids, blackholes, solar systems that they couldn't comprehend then due to obvious limitations ergo they weren't part of the narrative or story. If divinely inspired, these limitations ought not to exist and these phenomenons ought to have been added to the creation story. Or maybe there's a theological pov, but i doubt it.

Why the doubt?! Because even when men of science without divine inspiration found out these phenomenons and proposed their theories (heliocentricity) which later became fact, the divinely inspired church which ought to have known by the divine fought against it with its own, now proven wrong theory (geocentricism, where they believed the sun stood still). Even going as far as persecuting and forcing those who found the truth of what we now know today to recant their theories. This was until they finally admitted they were wrong and accepted fact.

Shouldn't the church have known the right reality of things first since it's divinely inspired?? Shouldn't the divinely inspired texts also have featured these later discoveries. So i end with saying again why does Christianity, with its profound theological depth and breadth, divine inspiration lack explicit references to planets and other celestial bodies apart from what was visible to the naked eyes as at then?? Why aren't they featured in the creation story??

The fact is all human works are limited by the extent of human knowledge. If the Bible were just written today, it would include mentions of DNA, black holes and other scientific discoveries. Alas it was written in the times when the knowledge of the universe had not advanced and so all the characters in the book could only speak with the voice of that limitation.

Today ask any believer if their god can reveal any specific information that they are not already privy to and watch them mumble some tired apologetic.

Stephen2324:
Do you guys think people can tell when they are about to pass away?

It depends. If a kidnapper or Boko Haram are standing in your front pointing a gun at your head fully intending to snuff out your life of course you know you are going to die. Even aside such obvious situations like dying in a car or helicopter crash, some people can tell. When my grandmother was going to pass at 88 years of age, she knew it was time. After my mum saw her for the last time alive, she told us grandma is going to die soon and she passed on the next day.

On the other hand many people die with no inkling that the end has come. People who otherwise we thought are health just drop dead for one reason or another, most often health related. Or those who through some freak accident or unfortunate chance get killed.

It all depends on the circumstances of the death.

Drjones109:
Depression is a serious problem with in the greater atheist community and far too often, that depression has led to suicide. This is something many of my fellow atheists often don’t like to admit, but it is true. I know a lot of atheists, myself included, would all like to believe that atheists are happier people than religious believers and in many ways we are. But we also have to accept the reality that in some very important ways we are not.

There are of course many valid reasons why atheists are sometimes more prone to suicide than religious believers. Interestingly enough, one of those reasons is religious believers themselves. We live in a world dominated by people who often fervently believe ancient superstitions and who many times demonize, harass, ostracize, and disown those who lack belief in those ancient superstitions. Atheists on the receiving end of this treatment are understandably stressed and isolated. They often experience anxiety and depression as a result.

Imagine you are a young person who has just come to the realization that God is imaginary. You have just realized that everything your religious tradition and your parents have taught you is make-believe. Your whole world has just come undone and for the first time in your life, you now have to wrestle with the great existential questions of life on your own and without any support networks. What does it mean to live a meaningful life without a supernatural deity? Without an afterlife to live for, what is the purpose of life?

Not only does this young person have to struggle with these existential questions on their own, but they also have to do so under the backdrop of fear and anxiety about revealing their doubts and atheism to family and friends. Maybe they already have and as a result, they have been ostracized and/or disowned. Left with no friends, no family, no church community… they are alone, in the philosophical dark, and probably facing the bullying and harassment of their former religious community.

I wrote about atheism’s suicide problem before and got a variety of responses. Some atheists questioned whether the statistics actually showed that a problem exists at all. For the record, it does. I can also tell you anecdotally, that it does. Like I said in that previous article, I have had friends who have died or who very likely have died from suicide. Since that post, I know even more atheists who have taken their own lives. But even if the suicide rate among atheists were exactly the same as among religious believes, that doesn’t mean we shouldn’t work to lower that number. This life is after all the only life we have.

There were Christians who responded both privately and publicly to my previous article on this subject. They were often quick to point fingers and say things like, “See, atheism causes suicide,” or “Maybe atheists have a higher suicide rate because they know that their life means nothing without God, but are too arrogant to beg him for forgiveness even though they know inside they are guilty, they choose to die forever with their sin.” Yes, those were real comments from real religious believers. It is what has been called, #ChristianLove. Even the odious Bill Donohue of the Catholic League got in on the action. In his book, “The Catholic Advantage: Why Health, Happiness, and Heaven Await the Faithful,” Donohue mentions me by name as he misrepresented and flat out made stuff up about my previous article, which he was attempting to use as source material. These responses, of course, entirely missed the point. Let me lay it out. Yes, atheists like many other marginalized minorities can be prone to depression and even suicide in large part due to the horrible behavior of many in the religious majority.

I acknowledge that while ignorance really is bliss and people may be happier when they believe in magical paradises after death, it is only when people accept reality that they are in a better position to make themselves and others truly happy. It is the difference between being high on drugs and being high on life. Or in this case high on Jesus vs. high on the vast wonders of the universe. Obviously, I think being high on life is the better kind of happiness. But that is just my opinion.

As a community, atheists should be reminding each other about the wonders around us. It is far too easy to get lost in our day-to-day struggles and problems. To paraphrase Ferris Bueller, life moves pretty fast sometimes and if you don’t stop and look around every once in a while, you just might miss it. We only have one life. There are no do-overs and no magically perfect kingdoms awaiting us when we die. This is it. Life’s too short to waste. If your life sucks, work to make it better… if not for you, for those who come after you. Again, there is a vast cosmos out there and we are links in the chain of human achievement.

One thing I have noticed is that after someone commits suicide, there is suddenly an outpouring of support for them. If only that outpouring could have come a little sooner… Well, it kind of can (not for them obviously, but for the next them). That’s right; we can be there for our friends and family right now. We don’t have to wait until someone commits suicide to say nice things to and about them. We don’t have to wait to check in with people we know are struggling. We can be there for people right now. This is one area in which religion has an actual advantage. They have a support system and a community. But atheists can have that too. There is no need to believe in ridiculous superstitions on insufficient evidence to have a community willing to help each other. We got this.

Atheists are notorious for being contrarians and people who are not always joiners. You get three atheists in a room together and it won’t be long before there is some minor issue that divides them. South Park famously satirized this and in the past few years, we have seen this at our local and national meetings and events. But the fact is that if religion has done anything right, it has been to form actual communities for people to gather and share their struggles. We don’t have to all agree on every issue. There are going to be both minor and major issues that atheists are going to have with each other. However, we are all on this tiny blue dot together and we need to be there for each other because there is no magic deity to help us and no one is perfect.

But it cuts both ways. Not only do we have a responsibility to help each other, but we also have a responsibility to communicate our struggles with each other and ask for support. There is no magic deity peering into our souls. Hell, there aren’t even souls to be peered into. Did I just say “hell?” That’s not even a real place. But I digress. Anyway, my point is that we have to offer help to others and we have to ask for help when we need it. That’s on us and there is no shame in admitting that we need help.

OAM4J)

What scientific study was carried out that showed that atheists are over represented in suicides?

Dtruthspeaker:
Na lie, Nuclear bomb is just the cover explanation..

LoLz. Mythic beings need no covering since they are just that, mythic. No one prepares defenses against Big Foot or the Loch Ness monster.

jesusjnr2020:
What Bible Says About The Rich And Powerful Building Doomsday (Underground) Bunkers

Revelation 6:15-17 (KJV)

And the kings of the earth, and the great men, and the rich men, and the chief captains, and the mighty men, and every bondman, and every free man, hid themselves in the dens and in the rocks of the mountains: And said to the mountains and rocks, Fall on us, and hide us from the face of him that sitteth on the throne, and from the wrath of the Lamb: For the great day of his wrath is come; and who shall be able to stand?

So even the doomsday underground bunkers being built by the rich and powerful will not be able to save them from the day of God's wrath if they don't repent.

https://edition.cnn.com/style/article/doomsday-luxury-bunkers/index.html

God bless.

They are more afraid of nuclear bombs than of a mythic sky wizard.

Valar Morghulis. Rest in peace.

kkins25:
Seen Sam Altman requesting for $7T That guy is on some good shit... 😁 I want what ever he' s having.. Need that kind of confidence in life.

I swear. I was looking for 1 million to set up my business, Lucky Igbinedion told me my business it too cheap. Make ehin kon invest for Sammy naa. LoLz.

petra1:
Do your research on claims Michael yeadon ,the former vp of Pfizer.

He was not a VP of Pfizer when the vaccine were made so what weight does his words have?

petra1:
You were not after the proof . It’s all over the internet .

I asked you repeatedly to prove your evidence and you had every opportunity to present your evidence. Don't expect me to do your homework for you.

politicoNG:
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/WtG2dHhrPV4uHECN/?mibextid=2JQ9oc

Dummies Oil & Gas?! Chai these people are so blatant with this thing.

PoliteActivist:
*Politeness*
I can assure you everyone else can see it is very aggressive to interject the way you did. It was even beyond aggressive, you were advocating for the guy. Everyone else can see it but you!

Just as it is only you who can't see that "why should we care?" is same as "nobody cares."

Your arrogant stupidity assuming you know what is in people's mind stinks.

Dumdum I am not so stupid like you if I wanted to say nobody cares I would have written that. Instead I asked you a question to elicit clarity but what a disappointment I was expecting sense from an insane fellow.

PoliteActivist:
*Politeness*
I don't do name-calling neither does it have any effect on me whatsoever. So have fun.

If someone just countered someone else that Einstein was not a Christian. It is very aggressive to interject with "what was he?", when you are not the person addressed.
The rest is obvious obfuscation. You said nobody cared what religion he was. It was pointed out to you you obviously cared because you interjected. And also that the person who first asked the question obviously cared. You went bizarre that you had a right to interject in any convo, and that you were not the C
Francis (none of which had anything to do with what was being argued!) , and later even more bizarrely said you were starting a new different discussion by interjecting!!
If that's not madness I don't know what is!

Dumdum when you were sarcastically calling me genius and Mr Know It All what were those? You are so freaking stupid you think everyone is stupid like you. LoLz. Watch, I expect you to come and attempt to twist it and say calling me genius and Mr Know It All are not name calling. LMAO.

"What was he" is aggressive only to a snowflake of an insane fool who lacks the capacity to grasp the simplicity of a question.

See deliberate twisting. I asked why should we care and here you go twisting it to nobody cares. This is how you deceive your own brain cells into believing nonsense.

No amount of explanation gets through your bizzaro brain does it. You just create a fantasy and stew in it. You are insane and need help.

OKOATA:
Wait let me ask you a question ⁉️ The Supernatural Being who created the sun 🌅 that's hot and very powerful, it's miles away from us. You can't even look at a very hot sun 🌞 on a normal day for 5 seconds without going partially blind. Some soldiers who absconded from war used to face such punishments that most of them can go blind permanently.

Even if the god was a billion times hotter and brighter than the sun it means I can see him. He just needs to position himself far enough away and I will use a telescope. Or why would this be impossible?

nlfpmod:
https://nairametrics.com/2024/02/09/cbn-edges-towards-free-float-of-naira-with-discontinuation-of-cap-on-forex-transactions/

I think this is the problem with people who think market forces are self regulating. This is especially true of a place like Nigeria where price gouging is the order of the day. There is no way market forces are going to keep the price of dollar down.

PoliteActivist:
*Politeness*
Ok, you're clearly out just for baseless, ad homine name-calling.
For the benefit of anyone reading this, here are reasons I said it seemed you were losing your mind:
1) You aggressively asked what was Einstein's religion. When answered, you asked who cared about Einstein's religion!
2) When told you must care because you jumped into the discussion to ask that question. You bizarrely replied you had a right to jump into any conversation (totally offpoint)
3) When reminded someone else started the conversation not the person you asked, you bizarrely replied that you had started a separate conversation!
4) Then you kept saying you were not Francis that started the conversation (totally offpoint. Who said you were him?!)
If these are not signs of an eroding mind, I don't know what is!

*To be continued*

LoLz! Look at this fickle dunderhead trying to form high road. When you started with the name calling you didn't know it was ad hominem, now you want to cry crocodile tears. LMAO!

Bomboclat, explain what is aggressive about this question:

LordReed:
What was he?

I guess when you look in the mirror you see how bizzare you are so you must label the whole world as bizzare cos you can't cope with your bizzaro self.

How does me asking a question mean I care? Or you can read minds now?

I had to point out I am not FRANCISTOWN because you kept saying he said something. Dummy my question has nothing to do with what he said, it is about what you said. If I wanted a conversation about what he said I'd ask him not you. Even my 5 year old knows that but because you've lost your damn marbles you just had to go on a stupid rant didn't ya. Bwahahahahahaha!

PoliteActivist:
*Politeness*
See him trying to be too clever by half again😅. So why didn't you carry the anology to the end? Because you know it will show the absurdity of what you're saying
YOU jumped in and asked what party Tinubu was in.
Same YOU later asked who cared what party Tinubu was in. You were reminded it was YOU who asked what party he was in. You replied you asked only because I said Tinubu was never in PDP. You were then reminded I was only replying to someone who started it all by saying Tinubu was in PDP. You then bizarrely replied you were not that person! Instead of accepting you sound stupid, you later doubled down by saying you were STARTING A DIFFERENT CONVERSATION!!
You see how utterly STUPID that sounds??

You are truly insane. And it is unfortunate that you probably will not seek the help you need.

The stupidity exhibited here is all yours and it's so bad you can't see it.

Oh oh, he's back with his "god" obsession. You forgot "Appeal to Authority falacy"!😆

Your insanity must be playing up. Who said this:

PoliteActivist:
If Einstein says he doesn't believe God plys dice with the universe, LISTEN!

You are so disingenuous and insane. You will write something then start claiming someone else is obsessed with what YOU wrote just for asking a question. It is the same thing with the Einstein religion thing. YOU said Einstein was not a Christian then when I ask you why I should care you claim me asking is a sign I care. What an utterly moronic fellow you are.

The calculations and thought experiments were always in his head. If you can locate his brain...

Bwahahahahaha! After claiming he did calculations you can't produce it. I swear you are on cheap drugs that are rotting your brain.

Anyways, Einstein was NOT like you when it comes to the nature of our existence. He spent months on end thinking and calculating in his head about things regular people would never think about. Which is why, when he comes out with a statement about nature of our reality, you pay attention. Don't call it appeal to authority!
About expanding, that's the mistake he himself said he made - he overrode his own genius. His genius told him the universal was expanding but he overrode it by adding a constant because it didn't make sense to him. As for his comment on quantum mechanics I already told you he was only commenting on Neils Bohr's work, which he probably wished he himself did!

Dum dum he was wrong any way you try to spin it which means genius doesn't mean swallow hook line and sinker.

LoLz. He overrode his genius by insisting it was static for years and years until he finally accepted that others like Lemaitre (who had been telling him he was wrong) were right? You're a damn slowpoke.

I understand you are brainless so you need others to think for you that's why you are behaving this way. LoLz.

PoliteActivist:
It's either u r lying (most likely) or you have a warped mind. Someone says Tinubu is not a thief. Another person replies that Tinubu is a thief. You jump in uninvited with an aggressive question to the second person : "How do you know Tnubu is a thief??"
Only a warped mind can see that as a separate discussion. Everyone else can see what's going on. Ridiculous!

Look at this bozo that can't even tell their own story right. Someone says Tinubu used to be in PDP, you say no he wasn't. I come along and ask so where was he, you say he 100% was never in PDP. I then ask why is any of this important and a crazed lunatic like you starts shouting didn't I see that someone said he was in PDP. Dumbo what has my question got to do with your crazed rant?

If Einstein says he doesn't believe God plys dice with the universe, LISTEN! It is NOT same as Biden or Putin saying it. He was commenting on someone's work. But if he himself together with whatever his source came up with something, he was right. Einstein would spend weeks on end pondering where our thoughts come from - something a regular person will never ponder. After his calculations and tought experiments he came to the conclusion that free will is an illusion, it is not something you just dismiss off hand with "Appeal to Authority falacy"!

Kindly show us the calculation he used to arrive at the conclusion that our existence is orchestrated by some sort of god.

His genius is not sufficient to override his own fallibility. Not only was Einstein wrong about quantum mechanics, he was also wrong about the universe being static i.e. not expanding. Tell me again why you think this genius' opinions need to be sacrosanct.

PoliteActivist:
*Politeness*
My obtuse friend, there is no way you can read what I wrote without seeing I was responding to him. You were obviously in effect advocating for him, genius. Which I'm sure is obvious to everyone except you!
I've defeated you many times. Didn't start today.
Of course quantum mechanics is part of our reality, and? (Another defeat loading😆)

person I explained to you I wasn't interested in your conversation with him, I was starting my own. You are too dense to get it through your thick skull plates I guess.

Einstein was wrong about quantum mechanics and yet here you are making like he could never be wrong about our reality. What else are you bringing to the discussion apart from his genius? Evidence? Scientific facts? Nada. Because you are stupid.

The genius left his wife for his cousin, I suppose we should all do that simply because he's a genius who knows the nature of reality.

You are just a dum dum I swear.

PoliteActivist:
*Politeness*
😅This would be soo funny if it weren't embarrassing. See him trying to be too clever by half.
Below is what you responded to. How can you respind to this and say the conversation was separate?? Funny guy😂
Another QED!

What a blithering idiot. Was I responding to FRANCISTOWN or to you? Sounds like your brain has melted and run out your ears.

See your idiot self, you ran away from my question: Is quantum mechanics part of the nature of our reality, yet you are dreaming of defeating me. What a benighted twát. Bwahahahahaha!

PoliteActivist:
*Politeness*
You must be pulling my leg. No one can be this obtuse. After asking what religion Einstein was, you STRANGLY followed it with asking why you should care. When reminded it is same YOU who asked about his religio. You said it was because I said he was not a Christian. You were then reminded Francis started it all by saying Einstein was a Christian!
What has any of these to do with whether you are Francis or not?!
Still confused? See a shrink. I've done my best!

You're a stark raving idiot. Even after explaining to that my conversation is entirely separate this is what you come back with? Stupidity at its finest.

PoliteActivist:
*Politeness*
Where did I say everything he said was right?? Here's what I said verbatim:
When such a person talks about his field of expertise (nature of our reality) you listen!

Is quantum mechanics part of the nature of our reality?

You are still confused about the Francis convo despite my best efforts, posting the screenshots and all.
Let me try one more time:
Francis said Einstein was a Christian. I retorted that Einstein was not a Christian. You jumped in without being mentioned and asked me what religion he was. When I answered you strangely asked why you should care. I replied you that you're the one who asked his religion. You replied it was because I said he was not a Christian. I then said you knew quite well how it started - THAT FRANCIS SAID HE WAS A CHRISTIAN!!
If you're still confused, sorry I can't help you!

What part of I am not FRANCISTOWN is discombobulating you? My conversation while based on your earlier conversation is entirely different. I wasn't responding for him and went in an entirely different direction so for you to keeping referring to what FRANCISTOWN said makes you the befuddled one.

PoliteActivist:
*Politeness*
You sure you ok sir? All these Bwahahha.. like a crazy person. Makes we wonder..
Seems you've developed another obsession besides "god": "Appeal to Authority"! Is that your favorite logical fallacy?
Already told you, the one person who fundamentally changed our understanding of our reality is not just authority - someone whose very name is synonymous with genius in our dictionary! When such a person talks about his field of expertise (nature of our reality) you listen! Especially when other geniuses of our time are also saying the same thing!

Good grief! You are jaw droppingly stupid. Does being a genius mean every thing you say is right? What a dullard.

As for the Francis guy, seems you've become totally confused. To clear up things a bit for you, see the entire thread below. The issue was who was first to say Einstein was a Christian.

The cells in your brain must have looked in a mirror and become confused. What has what I asked you got to do with who was first to say Einstein was a Christian? You must be discombobulated.

Oh and BTW my laugh is to frustrate idiots like you who can see that I am laughing at their stupidity. Bwahahahahahahaha!