₦airaland Forum

Dtruthspeaker:
Can't wait to be rid of you lying devils twisting demons. Like when a banker can no longer log into his system that is not a firing!

LoLz! A so called lawyer that doesn't know the difference between being fired and not having your contract renewed.

Like people do not know that Mathew 6:5 is talking about the wrongfulness of using prayer for show off purposes which of course you know but you are just here to show the world that you are a devil.

Yeah praying on a football field in front of players and spectators is not showing off just like Kim Kardashian wearing her designer clothing and posing in front of cameras and a crowd is also not showing off. LMFAO!

OLAADEGBU:
Not at all. The more reason you atheists need eye salve to read God's spiritual book.

Dtruthspeaker:
You are the devil who said it!

Then why quote something that runs counter to what Jesus said as though it supercedes it? The only way that is possible is if Paul is superior to Jesus so I guess for you Paul is superior to Jesus.

budaatum:
She said: "I just had the ambition to do it like the Christmas lights.

"I remembered going to visit the Christmas lights with my sister when I was growing up and I also had an opportunity to live in the Middle East and I wanted to bring that joy and magic to London, the city that I'm from."

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-65030988

Me I want to eat roasted ram meat.

OLAADEGBU:
Correct, Jesus is not a god He is the Almighty God.

https://www.openbible.info/topics/jesus_is_god_almighty

Well Paul is superior to Jesus so Jesus can't be the almighty god.

OLAADEGBU:
God is superior to Paul. God is the author of the inspired Word.

Right. Jesus is not god.

OLAADEGBU:
“I will therefore that men pray every where, lifting up holy hands, without wrath and doubting.” 1 Timothy 2:8

Right. Paul is superior to Jesus.

OLAADEGBU:
Football Coach Who Was Fired For Praying With Players Wins $2M Settlement

He WILL return to work.

Full Story

1. He was not fired, he's contract was not renewed.
2. What about this: Matthew 6:5 Whenever you pray, do not be like the hypocrites because they love to pray while standing in synagogues and on street corners so that people can see them. Truly I say to you, they have their reward! 6 But whenever you pray, go into your inner room, close the door, and pray to your Father in secret. And your Father, who sees in secret, will reward you.
So this passage means nothing I guess. The school board offered the coach a private place for prayer but he refused. Disobeying his own religious tenets. Wonderful.

histemple:
Prophet Odumeje said he will soon die. He made this statement during his Sunday service at Onitsha Anambra State.

According to him, His time on earth is short and he has instructed his Son David to look after his Family.

Source: https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=pfbid02AG75Af7NecRiTqb5X58A58ZiE6JAw5KGhd9KseLxbQNr41cXAos725w5iefr1zZel&id=100044640874926




https://tribuneonlineng.com/i-will-die-soon-my-purpose-has-been-fulfilled-anambra-pastor-odumeje/

I won't be surprised to learn he has a terminal illness.

ExAngel007:
Lawyer Shares Before And After Photos Of Herself 6 Years After Walking Out Of Her Marriage

Olasumbo, a Nigerian lawyer, has gone online to talk about the marriage she left.

She took to Twitter to share before and after photos showing her amazing transformation six years after walking out on her marriage with her two children.

The 30-year-old mother of two shared her story via Twitter when she celebrated Mother's Day on Sunday, March 19, 2023.

“This is what I looked like when I walked out of my marriage in 2017 with two toddlers. I just clocked 30, I was mentally,
emotionally and financially drained. I was tired and i knew i had to walk away. Did i know what i was going to do next? No but i walked,” she wrote.

"Okay let me tell you why it looks all shitty, I left my marriage clueless about the next thing to do but knew I had to run for my life yet I has no family support. I was not lucky to come from a stable family background, my ex saw this and capitalised on it.

"The marriage was 4 years old as at when it officially ended but it was dead from the beginning. I know the judginas will ask if I didn't see the red flag...well story for another day but well the deed has been done and now I have two kids who had no fault.

"My entire desire was to protect my kids. I mean they know nothing about the folly and stupidity of the parents that brought them to this world. I saved up and got my own apartment. I remember crying so much the first night I moved into my new home. I was scared.

"I had never gone on this kind of journey before and i don't know how to walk this path. I was totally confused and clueless. I was more afraid for my kids, scared they would suffer which i do not want, what if they fall sick and I can't take care of them? So many what ifs.

"All these was in 2017....this is 2023 and yes it has not been a smooth journey...my life has taken a pause because I was not opportune to have a family support and I had to learn, unlearn and relearn on my own. My career has suffered so much. Yes.

"My wants, desires has all been pushed to the base because I can't afford all at once so my kids come first..it has not been an easy ride doing this alone, no single financial support from the man who bore them even though he has 100% access to these kids.

“I look back today and ask myself if it is all worth it and Yes I am happy I made that decision. I am proud of the pains, the tears, the laughter. I am proud for holding myself strong despite the stigma and backlash that comes with being a single mom. HAPPY MOTHER'S DAY TO ME.”

https://www.tori.ng/news/230638/nigerian-lawyer-shares-before-and-after-photos-of.html

LoLz. I just knew they would compare amateur photos to professional ones.

endsarrrs:
Mother 100k. Father is in his resting place

Same here.

Janosky:
Oga, go and protest to the Owner of the Lockheed shares to bequeath the proceeds to you.

Luke 16:11, Jesus Christ recognised the value of unrighteous riches,Oga continue WAILING ooo.

LoLz.

A JW member with shares in Lockheed Martin? The same member who would say they don't carry weapons of war?

Also I guess Jesus doesn't care that the money is coming from the sale of weapons of war right?

Janosky:
Is War their major business?
What about the Lockheed profits earned from Aeerospace, information security, and technology corporation & other worldwide interests?

This is a list of all Lockheed Martin products:

https://www.lockheedmartin.com/en-us/products.html

count how many are not for defense and let me know.

Janosky:
Is War their major business?
What about the Lockheed profits earned from Aeerospace, information security, and technology corporation & other worldwide interests?

Aside from the US Governement's defense contracts what is the next biggest source of Lockheed Martin's revenue?

Janosky:
The Owner of the shares bequeathed the proceeds to JWs.

JWs didn't buy anything from Lockheed ,neither invest there.

So JW is profiting from the proceeds of a company making weapons of war?

oteneaaron:
You heard me right.

The only true religion aka The Jehovahs Witnesses Organization is accepting free money from the Norwegian Gambling Authority.

I know you might wonder - what is wrong with accepting free money from a Gambling Authority?

As background information, I told you sometime ago that the Norwegian government canceled the free grants being given to Jehovahs Witnesses because of their shunning practices which the government of Norway called "an abuse of human rights" - you can check out the thread here - https://www.nairaland.com/7122544/breaking-news-norway-no-longer

Imagine my surprise this morning when I heard the news that the Norwegian Gambling Authority is giving free grants to "all religious organizations" in Norway including Jehovahs Witnesses.

In this thread, I will show you proof from the official website of the Norwegian Gambling Authority, and show with proof why it is quite strange that Jehovahs Witnesses are accepting free money from a Gambling Authority.

Let us begin.

I recently learnt they have shares in Lockheed Martin. Yep JW has shares in a company that makes weapons of war. Can you look into it?

FxMasterz:
If we want to start talking about dates, that's a different topic entirely. The current discussion is not in your favour so you shifted the goalpost to date anomalies. Meanwhile, you and I know that no one can be perfectly correct about dates. We can only approximate and yet in the approximations, there's never a guarantee.

I don't want to engage in fruitless arguments just for the sake of it. It's just another way of wasting time with folks who are totally sold out to their own biases. I have better things to do with my time. I'll rather engage in things that edify my spirit than waste time on useless arguments to no profit. It wouldn't end, it's endless argument.

The more you write, the more I counteract you and vice versa. So, I'll just ignore. We can argue on other topics later on. I'll stop wheh I have already driven home my points. I've done that here already, so bye, except you want to be arguing with yourself.

Bwahahahahaha! Keep faking yourself. You were the one who brought up the date not me so how is it me who is deflecting? Meanwhile you counteracted nothing, you flailed about like a headless chicken. LoLz.

Bye to you too. Make sure you register it well in your brain that you can't fake your way through discussions about facts.

jaephoenix:
The years is what is used to date floods

Are you minding the hypocrite. He was the first to mention that it was dated to 5000BCE

FxMasterz:
They agreed that a catastrophic event must have happened with the dating of that event going back to about 5,000 BC which is about the same time as the flood of Noah according to the article.

That's further buttresses by the the opinion that says the witnesses of that catastrophic event must have passed down the story to their descendants.

but now that he can see that the fact demolishes his argument suddenly it is irrelevant. Bwahahahahaha!

FxMasterz:
This is absolutely empty. Nothing in reference to the main discourse here. Just a defensive rant.

Bwahahahahahaha! Hypocrite, when you made this response:

FxMasterz:
Irrelevant.

Was it not a defensive piece of nonsense. LMFAO!

You cannot argue the facts so just hang your head in shame.

jaephoenix:
Oh your sky daddy. Well, that's interesting. I would have believed you if you can prove that he exists in the first place, but you can't. So your point goes up in smoke

LoLz. When I asked him to prove his so called Witness he declined. Bwahahahahaha!

FxMasterz:
If you're a honourable man, you wouldn't start talking about years when we're talking about floods.

FxMasterz:
A more honorable person would have made a more noble response after I argued that the existence of the legend itself is confirmation and that the Bible painted more details about it.

You should go and ask the writers of the article to examine how the black sea flood covering an area of 150,000 square kilometers could suggest evidence for the Noah flood. At least you know better than those archeologists who made the deduction. Am I the writer of the article?

Oga just make it make sense. You can attempt to tap dance your way around the stern facts but facts don't care about your stories. The facts destroy your arguments thoroughly so you refuse to examine them instead you cling to stories. Bwahahahahaha!

FxMasterz:
Irrelevant.

Bwahahahahaha! Just make it make sense my guy. LMFAO!

FxMasterz:
Chai!

They agreed that a catastrophic event must have happened with the dating of that event going back to about 5,000 BC which is about the same time as the flood of Noah according to the article.

That's further buttresses by the the opinion that says the witnesses of that catastrophic event must have passed down the story to their descendants. They believe that this stories so passed down by the survivors could have influenced the biblical stories of Noah. What could be clearer than this?

We know that the biblical story wasn't influenced externally. It was a divine revelation to Moses. The event was vividly described.

If Noah's flood really happened, then there should be legends preceding the biblical account. If there are no such legends, then the biblical account could be faulted.

The fact that survivors have their own side of the story passed down apart from the Biblical account gives credence to the biblical account. The biblical account provided fuller details so much so that a date could be fixed for the event.

Now, if there are no such legends, atheists would be the first to ask why it is that only the Bible is talking about an event that happened to everybody? Now that there are references to it in other cultures, they've got to change the narrative to ',it could be infiuenced'. They can't even talk in absolutes. Whatever the Bible claims, it does so in absolutes. There's no 'it, may', 'it could' nonesense in any biblical position.

BTW the estimated date by Christians for Noah's flood is 4004 BCE not 5000 BCE. Some Christians even make it later than that, I have not seen any Christian say it was 5000 BCE. If you put the the date at 5000 BCE then the Earth cannot be 6000 yrs old according to Young Earth Creationist timelines. From Adam to Noah's flood beginning is 1600+. 5000 BCE + 1600 + our current 2023 CE will mean the Earth is 8600 years which by the Bible doesn't make sense.

FxMasterz:
Chai!

They agreed that a catastrophic event must have happened with the dating of that event going back to about 5,000 BC which is about the same time as the flood of Noah according to the article.

That's further buttresses by the the opinion that says the witnesses of that catastrophic event must have passed down the story to their descendants. They believe that this stories so passed down by the survivors could have influenced the biblical stories of Noah. What could be clearer than this?

We know that the biblical story wasn't influenced externally. It was a divine revelation to Moses. The event was vividly described.

If Noah's flood really happened, then there should be legends preceding the biblical account. If there are no such legends, then the biblical account could be faulted.

The fact that survivors have their own side of the story passed down apart from the Biblical account gives credence to the biblical account. The biblical account provided fuller details so much so that a date could be fixed for the event.

Now, if there are no such legends, atheists would be the first to ask why it is that only the Bible is talking about an event that happened to everybody? Now that there are references to it in other cultures, they've got to change the narrative to ',it could be infiuenced'. They can't even talk in absolutes. Whatever the Bible claims, it does so in absolutes. There's no 'it, may', 'it could' nonesense in any biblical position.

Bwahahahahaha! The article repeatedly says there were legends preceding the Noah's flood tale and here you are accusing me of cherry picking. LMFAO!

Which other cultures talk about Noah's flood? None. Even Noah's flood is a copy of a different flood story so what are you on about.

Explain how this Black Sea flood covering an area of 150,000 square kilometers can be remotely compared to the Earth's total area of 510,100,000 km². Just make it make sense.

FxMasterz:
I have always known atheists to be seriously biased. They cherry pick sentences in articles and distort the context to look as though it's supporting their atheistic fallacy.

LoLz! Like you cherry picking yours right.

From where you stopped:

"It probably was a bad day," Ballard said. "At some magic moment, it broke through and flooded this place violently, and a lot of real estate, 150,000 square kilometers of land, went under."

The theory goes on to suggest that the story of this traumatic event, seared into the collective memory of the survivors, was passed down from generation to generation and eventually inspired the biblical account of Noah.

It DOES NOT say it was Noah's flood or even suggest that it could be. It says that it could be what inspired the legends that eventually inspire the Noah's flood tale.

Even the area the flood is said to have covered 150,000 square kilometers is insignificant compared to the Earth's total area of 510,100,0000 square kilometers. How can it remotely be compared to a global flood?

kkins25:
You forget the repercussions.

What are the repercussions?

FxMasterz:
You should quote the article to perfectly include these lines bolded above.

I quoted it already. You quote where the article says this flood could be Noah's flood.

FxMasterz:
How can anyone say some floods are the flood of Noah? The said they found evidences that suggest that Noah's flood happened.

No, they found evidence that suggests the flood could be what was legendised and formed the basis for the stories that serve as the source for the Noah tale. If you are disputing this quote where in the article it says these findings suggest Noah's flood happened.

FxMasterz:
The bolded was a Digression in the article referencing what others said. Read objectively with no bias. The writer of the article was pointing out that judging from recent discoveries, the fliood story might be true, and that there's a researcher who is hoping to find something bigger that could ultimately confirm the flood story.

Oh I thought anything the article says is what we are going by. LMAO.

Just mention where in the article they say there was a global flood. Or that the flood in the Black Sea region is the flood of Noah. I'll wait. LoLz.

FxMasterz:
The writer wrote for the topic and not against the topic.

That 'enormous wall of water from the rising Mediterranean Sea' is what you would fail to see.

No one can unearth flood, whether recent or ancient. What you can see are clues that suggested a flood Happened. And that's exactly what the article set out to achieve. To give us pointers. Rather than argue with me, you'll do well to go argue with the writer against his topic.

The writer did not say there was a global flood anywhere in the article nor did it suggest that because there was flood in the Black Sea area that may have been the source of the Noah story therefore it means Noah's flood is confirmed. What you failed to see was this right in the article:

Some of the details of the Noah story seem mythical, so many biblical scholars believe the story of Noah and the Ark was inspired by the legendary flood stories of nearby Mesopotamia, in particular "The Epic of Gilgamesh." These ancient narratives were already being passed down from one generation to the next, centuries before Noah appeared in the Bible.

Read it with your eyes, Noah's story is not the original.

FxMasterz:
Go back and read. They never said it was a local flood, did they? There were examples of local floods in the article. The title of the article itself says Evidence that Noah's flood Happened. You guys love deceiving yourselves.

Yes they did. Right here:

According to a controversial theory proposed by two Columbia University scientists, there really was one in the Black Sea region. They believe that the now-salty Black Sea was once an isolated freshwater lake surrounded by farmland, until it was flooded by an enormous wall of water from the rising Mediterranean Sea.

The one deceiving himself is you.

FxMasterz:
That yoruba story position is your opinion.

There are many such legends. I wouldn't bother myself with them because they still wouldn't profit you.

There's an ongoing archeological effort in the black sea. You may want to read about it through the link below:

https://www.google.com/amp/s/abcnews.go.com/amp/Technology/evidence-suggests-biblical-great-flood-noahs-time-happened/story%3fid=17884533

Science generally is on shifting grounds. You can die today hanging your life on the current scientific knowledge or findings. After your death, science would find new things and therefore change position. Meanwhile, you're already a loser.

Again not a matter of opinion but of facts. The omoluwabi nonsense is from a book of funny Yoruba stories.

You won't because you can't, it doesn't exist.

So a local flood in the Black Sea area is what you bring to support your global flood story. LMAO! For Andromeda's sake it was limited to the Black Sea region, it is not evidence of a global flood.

LoLz @ already a loser. Between me with facts on hand and you with nothing but stories who really is the loser. Bwahahahahaha!