₦airaland Forum

elated177:
Forget that mind game. I wasn't born yesterday. Your satanic way of always twisting things out of context was not exposed today. This is a very good thread that exposes how abominable homosexuality is. I will continue to proclaim it. I will open more soon.

Ezekiel 2: And whether they listen or fail to listen—for they are a rebellious people—they will know that a prophet has been among them.




Actually, Reed, as a saint and prophet of the Most High God, YHVH Almighty, everyone, even those who hate my Father in heaven and me, will always desperately wait for what I will say. Ehehehehe!

You see, Reed, as a saint and prophet of the one and only true God, the Creator of heaven and earth, when he says something through me, elated177, if you refuse to listen, it will be a case of "anything you see, you accept it".


Ọtụtụ okwu adịghị ya.

elated177:
Oh! How you delude yourself, Reed!

You have taken the way of muttleylaff/bassreeves/nntr, the homosexuality apologist, who is of the opinion that anyone who vehemently condemns the abominable act of homosexuality must be a closeted homosexual. Chai! That, right there, Reed, is a blatant attempt at emotional blackmail aimed at hushing those who see homosexuality for what it is --- unnatural, disgusting, abnormal, abominable and detestable. Mtcheeeeew! Ihe efu!

Homosexuality is disgusting and abominable and, therefore, deserves every kind of derogatory name associated with it. Would I be wrong if called a faggòt a faeces packer?

donnie:
What has the graph below proven? Where are all the shouting covid19 headlines on frot pages? You think we are fools enh? We know the propaganda behind the covid19 PLANdemic dominating the news.

Princewill1:
Zelensky is currently the dumbest president in world today.

Imagine plugging a poor country like Ukraine in a war between US and Russia.

While there are wanton human and infrastructural destruction going in Ukraine. People in Washington and Moscow are sipping their coffees.

How dumb can a president be?

Rostikol:
Putin's Table.

Any estimates as to the length of this table?

https://cdn.wionews.com/sites/default/files/styles/story_page/public/2022/02/09/239617-putin.jpg

donnie:
The Russia-Ukraine war has removed Covid19 from the news,for nearly 9days now, nobody has died of Covid19

INSIDE LIFE

elated177:
Isn't homosexuality deserving of every kind of derogatory name? Such an abominable act.

elated177:
Point to where it was stated in my Scriptures.

LordReed:
Read the OP again.

elated177:
Show me the record, Reed.

donnie:
.

To Russia, Ukraine is a loophole…and it’d be a gang up if they join NATO, because now Ukraine can do anyhow & if you fight one NATO state, they will all come for you. So Russia will be perfectly surrounded.

Russia does not like that NATO is coming too close to their borders & has asked NATO to stop coming EASTward.

….but you may ask…Ukraine is a sovereign country, why can’t they do what they want? one - there was an agreement, before USSR disbanded; that Ukraine will NEVER join NATO.

My guess is that Putin wants to do one of two things:

1. Either take over the ENTIRE Ukraine.
2. Or support the rebels & break Ukraine up (By the way - if a nation has territorial dispute they cannot be allowed into NATO - supporting the Rebels means Ukraine has Territorial dispute)

Based on this, what do you think is the solution for this Crisis. I think it is Obvious

elated177:
The Scriptures contain the great, mighty and awesome Word and works of the only true God, YHVH Almighty, the Creator of the heavens, the earth, the seas and everything in them.

Ehehehehe! It appears you know the implications of answering it.

elated177:
How is faggòt derogatory? Isn't homosexual act itself derogatory through and through, kimco. Ihu kwa la!

elated177:
You don't know what you are saying.

elated177:
What is your problem? What names are you talking about? Isn't any male who has sexual relationship with another male a faggòt?

Keyboard warrior? Give me your Facebook address and I will call you a faggòt there. Or better still, come and identify yourself as a homosexual and see if I will not call you a faggòt to your face.

Inu kwa!

Piptocoin:
I am not attempting to support my view with empirical evidence. Rather, this dimension of awareness at best falls under experential evidence. Empirical evidence, in an attempt to study the invisible dimension, will always fail.

You believe in the existence of love but have you ever studied the properties of love or hate or envy using empirical analysis?

Take the intuition for another example. It is unarguable that the intuition manifests as knowledge without proof and occurs almost regularly in human daily affairs but does it lend itself to empirical or biological or chemical analysis? If it doesn't then why aren't you denying its existence? If you affirm its existence without the certainty provided by logical evidence what then makes the difference from others like spells, incantations, supernatural recovery from fatal conditions like cancer, hiv/aids, leukemia without medical intervention through prayers....?

As regards knowing the invisible through other senses, there is no way you can tap into the spiritual dimension at will like you do this physical dimension with your physical senses. However, faith is the only door through which the spiritual dimension becomes real. Of course, since the spiritual world is out of the reach of scientific study the only other way to know about it is through experential evidence.

Don't forget this. Since science is not certain of the existence or the non-existence of the afterlife all you are left with is the assumption of both but in your case — the latter. Eternity is too great to gamble away your soul on assumption. investigation must not always be empirical in nature because empirical analysis is severely limited to account for every phenomenon in existence much less those beyond physical existence.

elated177:
What reasonable conclusion? Why didn't you answer the question above?

Padipadi:
I ll frustrate you n you ll cry

Padipadi:
You are running mad small small. Lemme reprr you to Seun before you bite him

posty56:
looks Photoshopped

Padipadi:
koshi lo werey!
Stop thinking with your anus. Go for counseling

elated177:
Posts like this particular one gladden your heart.

Have you ever used a narrow bush path before?

Padipadi:
throw it their. Then you can follow join like follow come charger!
You this baby atheist!

HedwigesMaduro:
Oh yeah! Big bang and evolution were theories given by priests. Thanks for correcting me.

posty56:
you have been posting a lot of good food here and I am suspecting you what will fake life benefit you.

Dtruthspeaker:
Or he lived rightfully for several several years and died 2 verses later.

No Road!



As I Said "No Road"!



Proof of "No Road"!

GodIsDead:
Let's talk about the god that kicked Yahweh's butt

---

When discussing the "Gods", pagans are often challenged by Christians with the God of the Bible known as Yahweh, and Yahweh gets laden with these attributes of omnipotence, omniscience, omnibenevolence and sometimes omnipresence. Now, disregarding the incoherence of the Trinity for the moment and how often the "omni-" traits are meaningless to define anyway, it's difficult to figure out exactly how Christians come to the conclusion that their God has these traits. Some arguments connecting him to the creation of the world would argue that these traits are necessary for his existence, but I don't see power sufficient to create the universe as necessarily omnipotent, nor do I see the ability to establish a connection between being the creator and the God of the Bible beyond simple scriptural claims. Nothing about the Christian experience of their God implies that he must be the only one, nor does it imply that he must be the creator.

To make this case, we can assume the response to prayers as claimed by Christians as legitimate, and we can even grant their various miracles, but NONE of these suggests their God is all-powerful or even the most powerful, because in order to grant all these for one God, we have to grant them for all Gods accross traditions, given that we have no reason to dismiss other Gods. So we look to scripture and we find the various events with Moses, who historians don't think existed, or is based on any real events... but that aside, locusts and frogs do not make for omnipotence. And even splitting the Red Sea and destroying the walls of Jericho are nothing compared to creation which can't even be connected to Yahweh except through scriptures, and even then, you have to overlook the various scientific errors in the narrative which are handed down by a "perfect" and "all-knowing" God. But Christians will point to PROPHESY to show the superiority of their God - that each prophesy that comes true is the true revelation of their God's omniscience and/or omnipotence in order to bring these events about. But surely, if that were the case, then ALL prophecies would have come true... except that's not what we find, and to discover this, we only need to look at the Bible.

Now, Christians mean many things when they talk about "false gods". Sometimes they mean Gods that do not exist. Sometimes they mean Gods that they simply re-label as "demons" for their own reasons. The interesting part about this is that often, Christians do not deny the existence of other Gods, they simply namecall them as "demons" in order to avoid being considered polytheists (even though their God has a son, but that's besides the point).

So in this story, we'll discuss a deity mentioned in the Bible multiple times called Chemosh. The worship of this God is called "The Abomination of Moab" and is introduced in Jerusalem by a wise polytheist named King Solomon as recorded in 1 Kings Chapter 11, and here's the passage:

11 Now King Solomon loved many foreign women. Besides Pharaoh’s daughter, he married women from Moab, Ammon, Edom, Sidon, and from among the Hittites. 2 The Lord had clearly instructed the people of Israel, “You must not marry them, because they will turn your hearts to their gods.” Yet Solomon insisted on loving them anyway. 3 He had 700 wives of royal birth and 300 concubines. And in fact, they did turn his heart away from the Lord. 4 In Solomon’s old age, they turned his heart to worship other gods instead of being completely faithful to the Lord his God, as his father, David, had been. 5 Solomon worshiped Ashtoreth, the goddess of the Sidonians, and Molech,[a] the detestable god of the Ammonites. 6 In this way, Solomon did what was evil in the Lord’s sight; he refused to follow the Lord completely, as his father, David, had done. 7 On the Mount of Olives, east of Jerusalem,[b] he even built a pagan shrine for Chemosh, the detestable god of Moab, and another for Molech, the detestable god of the Ammonites. 8 Solomon built such shrines for all his foreign wives to use for burning incense and sacrificing to their gods. 9 The Lord was very angry with Solomon, for his heart had turned away from the Lord, the God of Israel, who had appeared to him twice. 10 He had warned Solomon specifically about worshiping other gods, but Solomon did not listen to the Lord’s command. 11 So now the Lord said to him, “Since you have not kept my covenant and have disobeyed my decrees, I will surely tear the kingdom away from you and give it to one of your servants.
- 1 Kings 11: 1-11 NLT

King Solomon, though depicted here with a little bias, seems to have been a loving husband with tolerance towards the faiths of the women that he married. In his tolerance, and given his own polytheism in respect for the personal agency of his wives, he created a space for his wives to practice their faiths - much to the frustration of future record keepers who don't seem to deny the events but feel compelled to colour it with disdain, and they cast their deity as upset with him but powerless to stop him. Among the Gods for which Solomon creates a space is Chemosh - the aforementioned "Abomination of Moab" who functioned among the Moabites in a similar way that Yahweh did for the Israelites, and some of the evidence of this is the Moabite Stone, describing the power of Chemosh written by King Mesha of Moab, and in it he says:

I am Mesha, son of Chemosh, King of Moab, the Debonite. My father reigned over Moab for thirty years and I became King after my father, and I made this high place for Chemosh - the High Place That Delivers for he hath delivered me from all that hath attacked me, and because he made me see my desire upon all my enemies. Omri, King of Israel. Oppressed Israel many days because Chemosh was angry with his land. And his sons succeeded him. And he also said, "I will oppress Moab". In my days he said this, and I saw my desire upon him and Israel was humbled with everlasting humiliation. Omri had taken possession of the land of Madiba, and his people occupied it during his days, and half the days of his son. Forty years. But Chemosh restored it in my days.

He goes on to describe his various victories, the slaughters associated with them. The lands taken from Israel despite their attempts to defend from him. And he attributes every bit of it to the glory of Chemosh. He even describes taking from Israel the vessels of Yahweh and bringing them before Chemosh, implying victory over Yahweh. But the Moabite claiming victory and attributing it to Chemosh isn't quite enough to say that Yahweh was defeated by Chemosh. And it could be argued that a struggle between people isn't quite a struggle between the Gods. But we have the Bible!...

18 This is an easy(A) thing in the eyes of the Lord; he will also deliver Moab into your hands. 19 You will overthrow every fortified city and every major town. You will cut down every good tree, stop up all the springs, and ruin every good field with stones.” 20 The next morning, about the time(B) for offering the sacrifice, there it was—water flowing from the direction of Edom! And the land was filled with water.(C) 21 Now all the Moabites had heard that the kings had come to fight against them; so every man, young and old, who could bear arms was called up and stationed on the border. 22 When they got up early in the morning, the sun was shining on the water. To the Moabites across the way, the water looked red—like blood. 23 “That’s blood!” they said. “Those kings must have fought and slaughtered each other. Now to the plunder, Moab!” 24 But when the Moabites came to the camp of Israel, the Israelites rose up and fought them until they fled. And the Israelites invaded the land and slaughtered the Moabites. 25 They destroyed the towns, and each man threw a stone on every good field until it was covered. They stopped up all the springs and cut down every good tree. Only Kir Hareseth(D) was left with its stones in place, but men armed with slings surrounded it and attacked it. 26 When the king of Moab saw that the battle had gone against him, he took with him seven hundred swordsmen to break through to the king of Edom, but they failed. 27 Then he took his firstborn(E) son, who was to succeed him as king, and offered him as a sacrifice on the city wall. The fury against Israel was great; they withdrew and returned to their own land.
- 2 Kings 3:18-27 NIV

This is 2 Kings Chapter 3. The verses leading up to this discuss that Mesha, the creator of the Moabite Stone, saw a change of power in Israel, and decided to stop paying tributes of a hundred thousand lambs, and the wall of a hundred thousand rams. The King of Israel, angered, rallied his soldiers and united with Judah to the South, and marched through Edom, gaining the support of the Edomite King on the way. In their uncertainty, they consulted a prophet about the upcoming battle - the Prophet Elisha (not to be confused with Elijah). Elisha tells the prophecy shown in 2 Kings 3 18-27. He tells of a miraculous event, giving water to the horses without rain, and that the Lord will hand Moab over to the Kings. The following day, the prophet's words come true and water miraculously appears without rain. The army drinks, and moves in on the Kingdom of Moab, and the Moabites flee before the might of the Israelite coalition. The passage talks of cities that fell before the coalition. They destroyed the good trees, sabotaged the good lands and destroyed water springs until finally they found Mesha, King of Moab. And Mesha assembles seven hundred swordsmen and goes out to meet the Edomite King in battle, and break through his lines. But he fails. And this... This is where it gets confusing.

According to the story, the King of Moab sacrificed someone to Chemosh. It's questionable whether or not it was the son of the Edomite King or his own son. Now, ignoring that the Bible often accuses enemies of human sacrifice where there's archeological evidence revealing a different story, or the irony of Christians looking down upon a kingly figure sacrificing his own son for his people, the story does have an interesting moment: Chemosh enters the battle, and overturns Yahweh's prophecy! It is described that as a result of the sacrifice, a great wrath came upon Israel, causing the Israelite coalition to retreat from King Mesha.

Now, the Moabite Stone and 2 Kings tell slightly different stories, but the differences are interesting. Both admit that the Moabites won, and both attribute the victory to Chemosh. But the Moabite record doesn't include any reference to the cause of sacrifice. It infact seems quite proud of how well things went, while the account in 2 Kings admits in embarrassment that their prophecy was overturned by the actions of another God. So now we're stuck in this position: Yahweh can fail. And therefore, he is not omnipotent. If he does have omnipotence however, that would mean that there are lies in this story, and that the Bible is NOT the perfect word of God, sacrificing Biblical authority.

But either way, the story reveals that even in a Biblical worldview, polytheism is true. And so the Christian that places their faith in the Bible must not only hold that polytheism is true, but that there are Gods stronger than Yahweh!

Padipadi:
Baseless thread recommended to be thrown in abyss

Evidenx:
Argue with the scripture psalm 14 vs 1.

Dtruthspeaker:
Since before Isaac was even born and married long before he remarried, Abraham was already what you call "about to die". So it is not that the case.

It is rather that He Noticed that God had stopped Talking to him and he definitely knew what that meant. So, he took steps to redress his error.

So, no thing here. No Road!

Satan of Nairaland and prince of Lies, everyone knows that Judah, including you that judah did not commit adultery for his wife was dead. But Satanreed and lies are always inevitable.

You were the one who raised up thr case, of "concubine to warm his bed" so you know already.

No Road!



Bye: OUT OF POINT!

No Road!

PastorMIsBack:
Lol I say 'Amen' to most things especially if it's in Scripture. Amen.

Dtruthspeaker:
He put them all away and paid Damages. Genesis 25:6

The confessions in Psalms clearly tell you that he was punished for all of his sins.

The LORD hath chastened me sore: but he hath not given me over unto death

Remember not the sins of my youth, nor my transgressions:

8 Look upon mine affliction and my pain; and forgive all my sins.



And that was the Examination God used to Save him, for clearly HE LEARNT, THAT, THOUGH GOD IS PATIENT AND GOD IS GOOD AND HIS MERCIES COULD BE LONG (Because sentence against an evil work is not executed speedily,...), HE IS GREATLY, GREATLY, TO BE FEARED. (Hence all his warnings in Psalms and Proverbs about Fearing The Lord)

AND DAVID PASSED THE EXAMINATION FOR HE NOW KNEW WHAT THE LORD TEACHES AND REFRAINED FROM DOING SIN AND DID NOT SLEEP WITH HER.

Which is why we see him shout out his Warnings;

14 I was almost in all evil (Many an evil followed him) in the midst of the congregation and assembly.

THEN HE WARNS!

15 Drink waters out of thine own cistern, and running waters out of thine own well.

So you see, NO ROAD! Satan!

NNTR:
You heard above, Image123



Matthew 24:4-8
4Jesus answered, “Be careful that no one misleads you
[deceiving you and leading you into error].
5For many will come in My name
[misusing it, and appropriating the strength of the name which belongs to Me],
saying, ‘I am the Christ (the Messiah, the Anointed),’ and they will mislead many.
6You will continually hear of wars and rumors of wars.
See that you are not frightened, for those things must take place,
but that is not yet the end [of the age].
7For nation will rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom,
and there will be famines and earthquakes in various places.
8But all these things are merely the beginning of birth pangs
[of the intolerable anguish and the time of unprecedented trouble].

Where is the guesswork in Matthew 24:4-8 above?

_{Personal text: Jesus is not a theologian. He is God who told stories.}