₦airaland Forum

Cornpop:
Look at this nigga making my point for me once again.

Notice the quote from his spin plus the bolded part.



It clearly says a crime can be committed to a fetus when it is killed. And in his post they call it fetus or unborn child.

Bro. Has a woman ever gave bet to a chicken? Do babies become old man? If your answer is yes then babies starts to grow when the sperm of a man fertilize the egg of a woman. A baby at that point starts to grow. A human starts to grow till he or she gets old and die. Life begins at that instance.

The section below is talking about fetuses having personhood. Which is why when you kill a pregnant woman you have killed two persons.
The bill also say there is an exception which is bolded in the quote below. That exception says it is not murder if it is relating to abortion or permission from the pregnant woman backed by law.

So which is it bro?

Cornpop:
Another brainwashed simpleton with no effort to reason for himself.

So since when that killing a pregnant woman counts as double murder? I thought killing a cell or fetus is not killing a human or baby?

Cornpop:
Notice now he talks about child consent. But he does care about child consent when they kill babies

Myer:
The analogy isn't faulty, your interpretation is faulty.

The point being Islam can be practised as a peaceful religion.
Just as Christianity can be practised as a non-judgmental religion.


The Extremist Muslim is the one who becomes the terrorist turning Islam to a weapon of mass destruction.

Likewise the extremist Christian is the one who becomes the JW turning the Bible upside down, judging and sometimes condemning everyone who isn't part of their organisation.

jesusjnr2020:
You disturbing me? It was a demon I suppose controlling you that tempted me which I refused to yield.

I pass that demon!

I hope you get delivered from its influence soon though.

budaatum:
He knows he sticks it in his hands.

Myer:
He finally realised he was blinded by religion.

JW members honestly are extremists.

JW is to Christianity what ISIL/Boko Haram is to Islam

Muslims who practise Islam like JW's practise Christianity are the islamic terrorists of today.

DappaD:
The OP should go and take the frustration out on Paul himself for penning 1Corinthians 3:19 & Colossians 2:8 that discourages higher education. Or the OP should go and tear out 1Corinthians 14:34 & 1Timothy 2:12 from his/her Bible which says women do not assume teaching roles in the congregation with a baptized and qualified male present. Compare 1Corinthians 11:5

Martinez39s:
I am convinced, though not certain, that Dtruthspeaker and truespeak are the same person. What a hopeless idiòt.

lucky999:
God said He will cast devil in the pit of hell that's why devil is decieving many people so that many soul will follow him to hell..

aadoiza:
You're wasting your time with those two whose sole existence hinges on winning on a faceless forum.
I'm so waiting for that stupid MILF to mention me make I give her the hard phallic lashing she dey crave

aadoiza:
Automation ti take over...

basilico:
From

e
Even Oprah Winfrey was not amused.
Sadly this boy raised as a girl committed suicide in his forties


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eQJHPQpf6mI

kingxsamz:
Breakfast...

budaatum:
The hungry are usually lazy, my Lord, hence their insulting hunger. I'm not letting them eat my time though or I might be hungry like them.

budaatum:
My Lord and his troll, lol.

My troll is better than your troll, my Lord, because my troll is self-sufficient and does not need encouraging so I need not feed my troll my time.

budaatum:
Liar!

HellVictorinho:
I am not happy to speak to you like this.
I am actually sad concerning what budaatum did to you.
Budaatum should be condemned for this.

HellVictorinho:
He's wrong.
Should you accuse people of not understanding fairytales

aadoiza:
.

Image123:
You are not getting me right. Basically, anything He does has to be examined in His standard and attributes of Omniscience, Omnipotence, Omnipresence, being Eternal, being Creator, being Judge. Give me an example or two of God for proper comparison.

HellVictorinho:
LordReed's brain is under the influence of budaatum's statements which are worse than acts of terrorism!!!

HellVictorinho:
How did budaatum capture your brain??
Someone just wakes up to accuse people anyhow and you swallow those accusations like you are under a spell!!
You are worse than those that believe in God right now!!!!

HellVictorinho:
Why can't you use your brain to do your stuff?
Must you agree with budaatum?

budaatum:
Meaning
A well developed critical mind informed with eyes (senses) that see (work).

One must detheistise, as in, become as a child, to see things anew - a project we agree you have undertaken, my Lord.

keppler:
Let me point this out first, I have engaged your argument fairly by treating what you say, but you seem to be making a red herring fallacy as seen in most of your response here
Show me where historians have acknowledged a supernatural creation apart from what the Bible said
Now this is a red herring as it can easily distract one from the point I raised earlier. So, I'm not falling for it and won't address it

Is how did the universe begin a philosophical question or a scientific one?
This is part of group of philosophical questions that science can be used to attempt to answer. Anyway, science cannot also answer HOW the universe began because it is a one time event which cannot be repeated, hence cannot be observed and tested - not following the scientific method.
This should not distract your fallacy of false analogy anyway

Did I say consciousness does not follow physical laws? I don't understand your objection. You very well acknowledged emergent properties how then is consciousness different?

Again, I never said nor implied what you wrote here. I said "...atheists never provide the laws that the matter in the brain follows (OBEY) to[b] produce[/b] consciousness/reasoning"

A study that shows that consciousness is not an emergent physical property of the brain will disprove what I am saying won't it? Find such a study to show me that I am wrong.
It has been proposed that emergent properties of neural cells produce consciousness, but there is no way to show that it is. In fact, it is a fallacy of affirming the consequent. Matter is known to have new properties when it combines in a way which is usually known by physical laws. I used the absorption and emission of photons of different wavelength earlier; it is repeatable and KNOWN. But here, we are being told that conglomeration of the different parts of the brain (magically) produce consciousness which is not even a property of matter in the first place

Give example of an absolute truth.
A rectangle has two lines of symmetry

Start here: https://www.britannica.com/science/abiogenesis
After you've read it let's discuss it.
I was disappointed when you showed a link that definitely explained what was not different from what I said earlier that abiogenesis talks about LIFE FROM NON LIFE and went on to accuse me of not knowing what it meant. This is just funny
The first line which provided the definition according to your link reads "Abiogenesis, the idea that life arose from nonlife more than 3.5 billion years ago on Earth" [All emphasis are mine].
And despite the billions of dollars poured into such research to just help show that God is not needed for origin of life (consistent with an atheistic worldview), this is one of the conclusions made from your adored link (which is supposed to teach me what I do not know about abiogenesis):
[center]There remain many unanswered questions concerning abiogenesis. Experiments have yet to demonstrate the complete transition of inorganic materials to structures like protobionts and protocells and, in the case of the proposed RNA world, have yet to reconcile important differences in mechanisms in the synthesis of purine and pyrimidine bases necessary to form complete RNA nucleotides[/center]

Pecuman:
The only stuff that I think are Hyperbolic are the numbers and those are for numerological reasons.

Yes the Jews (or a significant portion of their ancestral near east component) surgeoned in Egypt for a long while.

budaatum:
A [url=https://classic.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Mark+4%3B1-24&version=NIV]formula for confusing some[/url]. For as is written:

10 When he was alone, the Twelve and the others around him asked him about the parables. 11 He told them, “The secret of the kingdom of God has been given to you. But to those on the outside everything is said in parables 12 so that, “‘they may be ever seeing but never perceiving, and ever hearing but never understanding; otherwise they might turn and be forgiven!’” 13 Then Jesus said to them, “Don’t you understand this parable? How then will you understand any parable?

While for some, it makes ask and seek and knock with all their souls and minds and beings in order to gain an understanding.

Perhaps consider what seems like the "mix of half truths, hyperbolic tales, allegories and truths" to you, as the cherubim and a flaming sword flashing back and forth to guard the way to the tree of life on the east side of the Garden of Eden so the underserving may not pick of its fruit and refuse to die.

DCatt:
Your leaky ass is as trash grade as they come and you even showed the gutter where you hang out with your buddy, so what is there to insult about you? Iddiot my dates are loaded and that's why they are not meant for your zombie kind. Just pray to survive it, this shitt is just getting turned.