₦airaland Forum

MightySparrow:
÷№

Not at all, my requests keep on changing everyday, thus far, anyways, He has been faithful.

Hashabiah:
I call them assumptions because they are not provable...or are they?

Hashabiah:
You said you can justify why you consider something good or bad. So I said, " let us hear your assumptions '.

Hashabiah:
Let us hear your assumptions

Image123:
Poor perspective. You missed the whole point. It's a substitution death.

Hashabiah:
Did you steal from God to get those moral standards? Let me ask you a question : as a self-proclaimed atheist, can you possibly justify why something is good and something is bad?

Hashabiah:
[s][/s] Atheist do not have any known moral standards and this is a known fact.

Hashabiah:
According to what standard are you judging God? Because the last time I checked , atheist do not have a standard.

taiwo850629:
I just had a dream and I think God is telling me State Police is coming soon to Nigeria...

Kobojunkie:
God, whose Kingdom is not of this world, is telling you that state police is coming to Nigeria? And this has to do with God?

hiddendude:
Experience! But I do not use my experience in arguments because the other party has no way of verifying whether or not my experience is true.

queenjoseph:
Because that is the way He wants it.

He can do anything.

That is the way He wants it and no one can tell Him how He should act as far as His creation is concerned.

hiddendude:
I did point out that I believe in an objective moral standard. Immanuel Kant believed same but according to him, morals take root in intellect. To know what is moral according to him, is to envision what it would be like for an action to be universalized and if it produces a conceptual contradiction, then it isn't moral. He states this formally as:

"Act only according to that maxim by which you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law without contradiction"

Take stealing as an example. If one has the urge to steal, they should first consider the maxim of stealing (i.e the rule behind the concept of stealing or what stealing assumes or presupposes). Stealing is a concept that presupposes that there is such a thing as a private or personal property and if one intends to make a thing their own by illegally obtaining it, then they're universalizing stealing (saying there is no such thing as private property) and if there cannot be private property, there cannot be such a thing as stealing because it begs the idea of private property to be a thing. Hence, stealing is self-contradictory and cannot be moral.



This way Kant said, we'd realize moral truths without God. The objective moral standard in this case, is logic or intellect.

Ps: Kant actually believed in God.

Hashabiah:
Except you are in denial, there is an objective standard for morality. And if there is no objective standard, then how can we be sure that what we are doing in society is right?

kingxsamz:
Lmao, wetin be this?

Cornpop:
I dont see nazis today spreading hate, lies and destruction. it is only coming from the leftist mob. you sir is worse than a nazi

Cornpop:
Nazis are better than the Coons we have here and the left as a whole

Pecuman:
Okay, wait.

The Author's intent is more important to know where the numbers are being used as actual numbers or as code for the supernatural or as a mix of both.

The numbers that have some significance in Jewish numerology that I can vouch for the source would be.

7 from the 7 days in Genesis to make the world.

3 from the sons of Noah/races of the world as known to the israelites.

12 from the 12 tribes of Israel.

144 is just 12 squared so this gets its numerological significance from 12.

Million there is a general trend of using million to refer to great hosts.

There are others like 300, 400-and-something etc. Which may have a numerological significance but I don't know for sure.

salford1:
That tells you how dumb these Maga supporters are. I actually saw the phone too, but how do you explain how networking works to brain-dead nincompoops

salford1:
No comment

keppler:
Sorry I was busy all this time.
Alright, you've accused me of many things here and I don't know why you would do that.

For a start, you said "You quote positions that have nothing to do with anything I have said then say you have justification for lumping me in? Are you listening to yourself"
I gave a simple analogy. I thought you would explain from the analogy, how Person C should not see Person A as his enemy (in the context of the analogy) or simply show how it does not relate with you (maybe by showing how you coincidentally use virtually all atheistic arguments, yet should not be seen as representing atheistic worldviews)

Where did I say anything about epic of Gilgamesh as an example,
I never said you gave epic of Gilgamesh as an example. (simple answer? or you may go through my response again for clarity)

yet you said my position is like that of those saying that the flood story of the bible is similar to epic of Gilgamesh
Again, this is an accusation. I never said what you accuse me of saying. In fact, this was what I wrote
My aim was to tell you that people easily see parallelism between Biblical flood and other flood stories and I had to wonder why you seem to have decide not to acknowledge such parallels, concluding that it is due to your bias of not wanting to see the Bible true.
So how what I wrote implied what you accuse me of is surprising.

I have never expressed such a position and in fact I expressed opposite of that
Like I explained above, I did not say or implied that you expressed such position.

but you are obviously incapable of interacting on an individual level
As shown already, my response was on an individual level.
It seem you have this statement in mind

When you are ready for that may be we can discuss meanwhile no more answering you
It's quite frustrating anyway since we both have our bias, and I can't be fighting a defensive battle just because my "enemy soldier" (or "ally" of my enemy army) seem to disown "his army" anytime I launch a counter attack

SolomonYHWH:
Everything about life is truly good as you feel. Because life itself is good. But God gave us dreams to warm and correct us when there's an imminent crash due to our mistakes. That's why you see this kind of write ups to further lead you back to the Lord Jesus Christ.

And mark you. Your disbelief can never change the truth to become a lie or vice versa. Thanks.

Maestro21:
If someone was not experiencing a headache will it be apparent what tylenol or panadol was doing in the system? You sound so uneducated. The HCQ pill in the system of one suffering from Lupus does not have enough intelligence to know if another host is suffering from COVID-19. LOL. It is simply absorbed into the system and goes to work from there.

What is risible is how HCQ dose is usually 50- 100 mg yet when "experts" wanted to test it on COVID-19 patients, they were giving them 1200-2400 mg. 24 to 48 times the regular dose - just to kill them.

Meanwhile, more than 100 doctors in the USA alone, have had 100% success rate with the same HCQ, yet the mainstream media refuses to give them coverage. LOL

Pecuman:
That the Authors obviously thought so and obviously were alluding to the numbers having some divine significance.

Tobbit:
Pure and simple. Witches are shameless. I no longer embrace the ideology of casting out demons. In the ear of the Earlier church, fine. Now, people love the demons and have no desire to part with demons. Hence, any form of casting out isn't as impact full because they love their demons.

Maestro21:
Hahahahahahahahaha.

Each time you reply I know how ignorant you are. Does HCQ that people were taking for 65 years need corroboration? Does HCQ that WHO termed an emergency drug for 65 years need corroboration? What about Ivermectin? As soon as many other scientists announced that it works for COVID-19 guess what happened? They discontinued its sale and distribution. Hahahaha.

aadoiza:
.

Pecuman:
But those are computers not history. You don't expect these numbers to appear in significant frequency randomly in History.

Numerology is any belief in the divine or mystical relationship between a number and one or more coinciding events. The appearance of these numbers don't necessarily mean something supernatural happened in the event it is talking about but it could mean the author is trying to communicate ideas thru Jewish numerology.

Like 7, 12 and 144 are all related to perfection and completion in Jewish numerology so using or emphasizing these numbers or their multiples might not necessarily be communicating hard numbers but communicating a range of numbers and an event or people considered to be perfect or complete, like those numbers are.

budaatum:
Aha, my Lord! That's what it is! The 2.8m people did not really die of coronavirus but were just shot with bullets are now hiding somewhere waiting to be the uprising in May! How could I have forgotten that's when they will be inaugurating president orange turd!!

Have they published the date yet or is it wait and see?