₦airaland Forum

Enhem..@Op, first of all compose ur writing properly next time ok.

Now I want to prescribe my secrete recipe for that yeye girl that is about to turn u to a badt guy.

This yultide season is a season of sharing na! Common lets share.....so u are going to go out there and get her some gift, and a bottle of red wine (to make up for that mama put u carried her to) ..now lace that bottle of wine with [size=13pt]Otapyapya[/size] ..and ring her doorbell with a season greeting smile on your face

Trust me this is romantic.

adeebayo:
pls what does it mean to be friend zoned by a gir?

Friendzone : is when you are holding a girl's handbag, while another guy is sucking her boobs right in front of you..

Getting my ex back?...no, no..i make all my exes drink [size=13pt]Otapyapya[/size].

Automatically no ex.

I want to be speeding over 180km/h on a highway with no one in control of the wheel, while am making love to my girl sipping vodka, plus loads of C4s in the trunk...and some huge amount of stash.- is that romantic enough?





















#TeamAmNotRomantic

This is going to be interesting *spreads matt*

yorex2011:
Baby mi, sweetness, honeypie, strawberryna ...

Plus vanilla, almond, coconut,ice-cream, pancake, fish-roll, eggroll, pof pof, donought..

Damn! Am hungry already

Can I just call wifey?

*yawns*...Op is too long.

Why una dey abuse the guy na?

He just made his own observation

kristina1:
He has my full blessings,i wnt be angry o

Tahhh.....see this one, may someone dump u for a richer babe..can I get a big AMEN for that?.. later they will say dey want true love, regardless money..

Go and make money..with the right amount of money in your account..you will be handsome/beautiful.

So no fear of an unfaithful partner

OLAADEGBU:
Have you been able to arrive at the exact date yet?

Of-course is sept.11

OLAADEGBU:
How did you know that?

The world was transfixed by the year 2000--worried about the'Y2K' bug in computers,
millennial madness in cult groups,  political union in Europe,  and a proposal to make
Mary "co-redemptrix" in the Catholic Church.  While Rome flirted with blasphemy, few
realized that the true 2000th lunar anniversary of the birth of Jesus was August 22, 1998,
or on September 11, 1998 by the solar calendar dating we now use. 

      Many may live to see the consequences of the anniversary, if it foreshadowed a coming
fake Christ.  Or at the  least, there were  dozens of lunatics eager to take advantage of the
year 2000 hysteria to get the attention of the gullible. 

      Yet the 2000th anniversary of the Nativity actually came 475 days before year 2000
began.  The correct anniversary date was about sundown, Jerusalem time, the end of the
Sabbath, Saturday August 22, 1998.

      How can we know the exact day--and nearly the hour--of the birth of Jesus?

      Simple arithmatic.  A child could have done it, if only the basic assumptions had been
correct.  But they weren't.  In the 19th century, critical scholars made a crucial decision to
reject a total lunar eclipse in January 1 BC and to accept instead one in March 4 BC, as
the chronological cornerstone for dating the death of Herod the Great, and thereby, the
possible birth years for Jesus.

      By so doing, the critics could argue Jesus had to born before 4 BC,  contradicting
Luke, who tied Jesus' 30th year to the 15th year of Tiberius Caesar, 27-28 AD.  Luke
effectively placed the birth in 3 BC, as did many of the early church fathers.  Ironically,
even the date used by the Pope during the Christmas Eve midnight mass ritual is itself 
consistent with the last half of 3 BC.

      The dirty little secret is that virtually all the available evidence has always pointed
at the harvest period of 3 BC as the focal point of the Nativity--including the possibility
of a late summer birth. 

      By rejecting Luke, scholars also threw out the date of the birth Luke gives in his
Gospel.  In his second chapter, Luke tells what happened the day Mary came to the
Temple for purification 40 days after the birth of Jesus.  All one has to know is what 
day this was.  And Luke plainly names the day.  In fact, he includes three statements 
identifying the day.  So what day was this?

      Yom Kippur.  The Day of Atonement.  The 10th day of the seventh month of the
Hebrew calendar. 

      In Luke's time, Yom Kippur was called three things: The day of the "Fast," the day
of the "Purification,"and the day of "Redemption."  Luke uses all three to identify the
day Jesus was brought to the Temple.  And he even quotes the Torah rule that mandates
the 40-day period for the mother to wait after the child's birth [Lk 2:22-38].

      And if there were any doubt that it was Yom Kippur,  Luke tells of a woman named
Anna who had been in the Temple for a "night and day" without leaving.  There was
ONLY ONE DAY A YEAR when a person could pray overnight in the Temple: Yom
Kippur.  All other days, the Temple was locked at sundown.

      This shows the 40th day of Mary's Purification had begun at the end of Yom Kippur,
the end of the 10th day of the 7th month, because we know the Purification was done at
the earliest opportunity--at the beginning of the 40th day after birth.  And since the 6th
month normally had only 29 days, simple arithmatic shows Mary's 39 days of Purification
had to have begun around sundown on the 1st day of the 6th month, called Elul.

      This was the night of the first sighting of the new moon of Elul.  The Magi in Babylon
were recording this sunset sliver of the new moon on a clay tablet.  The cuneiform tablet
the Magi made at that hour 2000 years ago, along with thousands of others from Babylon,
resides in the British Museum.  It is possible that this clay tablet was inscribed by one of
the famous Magi who later brought a strange set of gifts to Bethlehem.  So the new moon
seen by the Magi in Babylon at the very moment of Jesus being born is recorded on one of
the tablets now in London.  Cuneiform scholars have identified the date on this tablet as
equivalent to September, 11, 3 BC.

      The Hebrew lunar calendar dates vary with respect to our solar calendar.  So the 1st
of Elul was September 11th in 3 BC, but began on August 22 in 1998.  The same was true
in the days of the early church, of course.  In a given year, the 1st of Elul could have fallen
on September 8th, for example.

      This may solve another ancient mystery.  No one seems to know how Rome came to
honor September 8th as the birthday of Mary.  There is no Biblical,  historical,  or church
tradition to explain it.  It just emerges out of nowhere.  Rome keeps the 8th of December as
the Feast of the Immaculate Conception of Mary [ie. conceived without original sin].  It is
a holy day of obligation for all Catholics to attend Mass.  This feast is clearly based upon
September 8th also, and mortal sin is attached to the failure of a Catholic to observe it, yet
the origins of these dates are unknown.

      On the other hand, we can now see that if Jesus were born on September 11th as Luke
indicates, then Jesus would have been conceived around December 8th in 4 BC. The now
mysterious Mary dates fit Jesus quite well.  How might this have happened?

      In the late 4th century, in early 380 AD, Pope Damasus I was endeavoring to force all
Christians in the Roman Empire to yield to his authority.  He got the Emperor to issue an
edict requiring them to practice the religion of  Rome.  We know that it is about this time
the Christmas midnight Mass was first celebrated and December 25th first identified as a
Catholic holy day.  It is said Damasus was seeking to lure the people away from pagan
rites honoring the birth of the sun god at midnight by compelling Catholic attendance at a
memorial in honor of Christ's death, ie the Mass. The people confused this Mass with the
pagan solar birth rituals conducted at that same time.  Gradually, the Christ-Mass became
associated with the Nativity. 

      Meanwhile, the true feast around September 8th, which naturally honored Mary in
giving birth to Jesus, was converted into a day commemorating her own birth, and an old
holyday honoring the conception of Jesus was converted into a day commemorating the
conception of Mary on December 8th.  Strangely, there is still widespread belief among
non-Catholics that this is the day Jesus was concieved--a possible lingering remembrance
of the original meaning of this date.

      We can also tell from Luke's Gospel that Jesus had been born in early evening, for
Luke says the shepherds were keeping watch by night, but still had time to go into town
and tell the people what they had seen earlier that evening.  People rose early with the sun
in those days, and would have been asleep by 9 or 10 pm.  Therefore, the birth had taken
place no later than 8 pm, and probably before 7 pm.  Yet Luke says it happened at  night,
which means after sunset--surely after 6 pm in September.  Hence, it follows that Jesus
was born within a few minutes of 6:30-7:30 pm on the evening of September 11th, 3 BC.

      A confirmation of this time is in the book of Revelation.  Historian Ernest L. Martin
consulted NASA lunar-phase tables and found the image of the heavens in Revelation 12
showed where the sun and the moon were, relative to Virgo, at the time Jesus was born,
pin-pointing sunset of September 11th of 3 BC.  It seems the moon moves so quickly it is
"beneath the feet" of Virgo only a few hours every month.  Moreover, the moon comes
within two lunar diameters of Virgo's feet at the time of a new moon but once in  30 years.
The only such occurance any time near the birth of Jesus was on September 11th, 3 BC.

      Most previous attempts at determining the birth time were based upon astrology and
dating the Star of Bethlehem.  No one considered 3 BC because that year had erroneously
been assumed to follow Herod's death.  However, Dr. Martin has proven that Herod did
not die in 4 BC, but in 1 BC.  Scholars are now generally accepting the new chronology for
Herod, and this in turn has allowed the confirmation of the New Testament date for the
birth of Jesus.  Unfortunately, many churches continue to promote the critics' errors and
paganized traditions about the Nativity.

davien:
So is the bible wrong about its views on homosexuals?

I didnt write the bible am not in a position to answer that

davien:
how do you feel about homosexuals or a woman's right to opt for an abortion?

I dont feel even the slightest twitch of neuron about them, Their lives, their choices, their consequences.

dmcdad:
Of course it can be found... Although I must admit, it's not common.

Hmmm..ok O

DrJoe1:
afraid ke? bring it on.......

Bring what on again..something you think does not exist?...is this dude alright?

Spread matt wait for me.

davien:
Really...do people who believe in Cinderella shove it on your face and restrict peoples rights?

Who shove the believe in God to your face and restricted your right? Get real jor!



Restrict kor restrict ni

deleib:
You two(maamin & Drjoe1) are unserious homosapiens

No mind us jaré..sorry for derailing ur thread

DrJoe1:
hahahah! evidence of jesus sitting in the right hand of yahweh, or forget it

"We are captives of our own identities, living in mental prisons of our creations.”
- Theodore “T-Bag” Bagwell

I see..you are afraid of double standard and you went ahead asking for heaven abii?..confused atheist.

ooman:
That's because those who watch animated cartoon do not tell me that I will spend eternity in some fire created by some monster, neither do these people try to bring a really dumb creation idea into science, neither do they try to choke me with their gospel everyday. Got it?

Lol... the last time i check, no one is pointing a gun at your forehead to believe in anything or come here to refute the existence of God....and Oh! cartoons defy logic and science, start a thread on that and I will take you serious. Got it?

Wisdom is profitable to direct..pick the phone first coz it is perishable, the bible as in the word of God is settle in heaven and in our heart...the hard copy paper can be dried after removing it from water.

DrJoe1:
is that the answer to my question?

Evidence for your 8.8 billion earth size planets or I dont believe it.

Why asking for heaven that does not exist..in the first place?

ooman:
If about 95% of the world population believe in those things you listed, then we'd create threads about them, definitely.

No..95% or more love watching animated cartoon, why is there no thread yet

DrJoe1:
well, NASA data calculates in our milky way galaxy alone there are at least 8.8 billion earth-size planets, so the question is where is heaven?

was it NASA or you DrJoel1, that put the 8.8 billion earth-size planets there? ..why asking where heaven is..have you travel beyound earth let alone the stars.

ooman:
"Hate" is not the word.

Any argument that destroys one religion will destroy all others, so by debunking one, we are actually debunking all.

Go and debunk confusianism,hinduism..in fact open a thread we shall all gladly come there to see and witness it rather.

davien:
Even fairy tales are founded on something....

Of-course you bother way too much on something that does not exist.

When you start creating thread about cinderella,snowwhite,sleeping beauty,repunzel etc..then I will take you serious.

Shebi na una(women) dey always pretend for everything..as if una no like am till the point of faking orgasm..

davien:
lol...I hardly "attack" anything....most theists here just post anything that comes to mind...remove one faulty foundation and the entire building crumbles down...

Removing the foundation of what exactly?..something that does not exist?

*unbelievable*

Search for money and ladies will search for youuuuuuuuuu...*in soldierboys voice*

make money, make more money, make a lot of money...and your world is set. ulala!

davien:
No

dont you think you will be seen as a deranged fella, if you keep posting and quoting comments on religious threads?