₦airaland Forum

frosbel: Okay , reinstated.

Nice one!

frosbel: ^^

I changed the topic, please delete your comment, I promise to revisit this later on this evening.

Thanks, Pal.

[quote author=m.k.o2005]I dread the kind of posts i see here on NL ! most people here have little or no respect for God.I'm beginning to think if i should be on this blog ![/quote]lol....you cant debate or handle the truth and so you wanna run away!


At least, you can see that people have a valid reason for not believing in god

[quote author=m.k.o2005]700 wives with 700 regrets !No wonder he said vanity upon vanity.Will you like to go his way ?
Abraham with two baby mothers but only one approved of God.Abraham was unknowingly asked to contradict the word of God by his wife which he regretted.That was the reason for two baby mothers.Jesus had no wife becos HE came to earth for something very different-The MESSIAH !He was called to redeem man kind and not to get married.Why get married when HE knows he has limited time here on earth.Marriage is for earthly people becos angels and all heavenly beings dnt get married.
Talking of inbreeding,check out the laws of old concerning whom u are expected to get married to and the reason why it wasn't spoken of in the new testament.
Thanks Bro.[/quote]lololol


lets start with inbreeding. It was okay at first with God and then, God put a law in the old testament against it? Is that a honest God?

Then you say that the second baby mother was not of god but Sarah (who is the step sister of Abraham) is of God?


Furthermore, was god just chilling when Solomon was marrying all his wives?

Frosbel, your copy and paste fails.


1)It assumes that all atheists are atheists based on a scientific reason (Physics). There is logic
-I became an agnostic towards the Abrahamic faiths mainly because of slavery. Any god that sits and watches as people get castrated and shipped like sardines so tight that they shytt on each other in the ships is a not a god worthy of my worship. Or better yet, possibly doesnt exist- which is a great explanation.

-I became fully atheist after reasoning that an omnipotent god should be able to show himself to all people around the world rather than appear to few people or priests who then tell their people stories. Each story of god remains different and rooted in the different cultures. God is a human creation

-I became firmly atheist after realising that following his absence, there is no proof for god. The big bang and evolution are not even necessary for this. There is no evidence for god. If one claims that the big bang is done by god, then god is a retard- waiting biillions of years or the galaxy to form and then millions for organisms to evolve to humans and then make 70% of the earth uninhabitable for humans.


2) God is not in the big bang equations/calculations/theory. So how does god come into the big bang? Did he leap from the creationist mind into the theory? Yes. I could claim that the flying spaghetti monster caused the big bang as well as christians and muslims can claim that their gods did it.
=======================


Edited!

What just happened to this thread?

3 days to the debate in london!

[quote author=Mr_Anony]@thehomer, Here's something I'm willing to defend: An irrational skeptic is one who asks questions but doesn't seek an answer. The aim of his skepticism is not to understand but to undermine. Usually, the irrational skeptic does not have a basis from which he makes his counter arguments[/quote]The moment you get debunked, you run to your corner and claim that others are blind to your points and unwilling to learn. You failed to realize that the moment that you started quoting Ayn Rand, you failed.

Good write up!

[quote author=Mr_Anony]Not necessarily(because it is more like a blanket definition)

The quote from Ayn Rand paints the picture more colorfully

A few more descriptions of what irrational skepticism looks like.[/quote]Doesnt irrational skepticism point towards you rhetoric on nairaland?


Anony; God is omnipotent

Mac ; Then God doesnt exist because omnipotence is a self-refuting paradox.

Anony; God's omnipotence is not a paradox. God exists and is omnipotent.

Mac at his wit's end comes up with an idea to show that an omnipotent god can not exist.

Mac; Can god create a rock that he can not move?

Anony; god s the almighty creator that does not bother with rocks. It is beyond him

obadiah777: NL,S WISEMEN DO NOT NEED TO BE DECEIVED. THEY SEE THE WRITINGS ON THE WALL AND ARE DOWN WITH THE LORD SEUN IS A DOUBTING THOMAS BECAUSE HE WENT TO CHURCH. I SAW ONE OF HIS POSTS WHERE HE SAYS SOMETHING LIKE I AM TIRED OF THIS CHURCH THING SEF BECAUSE OF THE WAY THE WORLD IS MESSED UP AND GOD IS NOT INTERFERING IN IT. THIS IS THE REASON FOR HIS APOSTASY. SEE IF HE HAD COME TO A REAL PROPHET LIKE ME I WOULD HAVE EXPLAINED TO HIM WHY THE WORLD IS MESSED AND WHY GOD IS NOT INTERFERING IN IT YET. HOWEVER HE WAS LISTENING TO CHARLATANS LIKE TD SNAKES AND EDDIE LONG DONG AND PASTOR TITHE AND REVEREND PRIVATE JET. THESE CHARLATANS DONT HAVE THE ANSWERS BECAUSE THEY ARE SATANIC MEN

Who annointed you? When did you become a prophet?

frosbel: What do you think ?

Wassap Frosbel?

I havce two questions for you. I am not here to argue since you seem tired of me nowadays. I am even losing interest in debating christians when in the NL islam section, atrocities are happening.


1) Why the attacks on different denominations?

2) What denomination are you? Or is it that you read the bible but dont go to church?

ribechi: Well aparently they are and if you are basing your life on theirs, you are too. But the buttom line is you all are. You know the truth but are refusing to accept it. That makes matters worst. even the asians have what they worship. Which means they believe there is an over all power entity which gives them strength and hope. That means your case is worst off.


I am not trying so hard to defend anybody but I am only pondering on what your end may seem like. I am already having pictures in my head.

load of nonsense.


the 64% of Japanense were asked if they believed in god and they said "no".

Why do you hesitate to call them fools? Are you seeing that you are wrong.


There are murderers, rap.ists and thieves. If a god in his wisdom chooses put me in the same class as those rogues and send all of us to the same hell, then he is a fool.

The beginning of the article is a fail.


Rational skeptics are progressive not conservatives. Conservative does not change tradition. A rational skeptic is progressive in thinking, changing and improving as new facts come out.

A conservative will not change what works for him or her unless the thing is broken.

tidytim: Mods kindly remove this offensive article where Christ is called a bastard.

I am sure if this was about Muhammad, it would have been removed eons ago. !!!


https://www.nairaland.com/1048756/jesus-b-d

lol....are you now a muslim sympathizer?


Christians understand free speech.

ribechi: So her getting pregnant makes her a harlot. Besides i now understand and the caliber of person i am responding to. Isn't it foolishness that doesn't believe in God?


Foolishness of the highest order. I wonder why people like will get down so busy disuading people from their faith.

Apparently, the father of her teen pregnancy is not the husband that she got married to and is divorcing. Harlot.


64% of japanese do not believe in god, are they fools?

Bill gates doesnt believe in your god, is he a fool?


What is foolish about saying that since there is no evidence for God, I do not believe in god

[quote author=Mr_Anony]Well mazaje, I could answer you bit by bit but I won't bother because we have been flying off on tangents with you making lots of emotional arguments that really have no bearing so I'll give you the summary of my position and you can either take it and come up with a logical rebuttal or you can leave it entirely and blow some more hot air. Here it is:

Premise 1: God is omnipotent and omniscient therefore He is able to prevent suffering.
Premise 2: God is not omnibenevolent rather He is All-loving. Love allows some suffering if it achieves a greater purpose.
Conclusion: Suffering exists but since we know God is omniscient and omnipotent and all-loving, He knows the purpose of our suffering and we can trust God to do what is best.

I would appreciate it if you can show me logically how my premises might be wrong or don't follow from each other. If you can't, then please accept the validity of the argument and move on.
.............or you can just say "I don't believe in God"[/quote]Premise 1;
An omnipotent god can not exist. Omnipotence does not exist because it is a self-refuting idea.
-Omnipotence = ability to do anything
-But an omnipotent being should have the ability to be beyond (not succumb) to emotions but then, tha being should also have the ability to love. Paradox.


Premise 2;
Love allows suffering if it is beneficial in the long run. Accepted but where is the benefit in klling sinful people with a flood only tohave more sinful people? What is the long term benefit of rape? What is the long term benefit of child molestation?


Conclusion from premise 2;
When something bad happens to Anony, he prays to god to help him. However, when millions die or sold into slavery, suffering is in gods plan. Anony is wicked.




Cyrexx, you can thank me later

[quote author=PAGAN 9JA]no. chicken is only for wednesdays and saturdays. today it is fresh xtians.[/quote]Count me in if it is a tithe preaching pastor. I hear that they roast well well when they are set on fire with naira bills.


Just kidding oooo!