|
Christianity Etc › Re: Bible God And His Share Of Virgins And Other War Booty by malvisguy212: 5:50pm On Jan 03, 2015 |
Rilwayne001: Stop lying abegg, stop it
If you don't read how will you learn?
But he was offered a whole town (including humans) as burnt offering isnt it
We all know numbers predates deuteronomy in the bible OT chronology, which means that the actionsof moses and his jihadist has been done in numbers b4 this one. further reading the context of deut:
Deu 12:29 The LORD your God will cut off before you the nations you are about to invade and dispossess. But when you have driven them out and settled in their land ,
This further shows that your god drove them out of their land
Deu 12:30 and after they have been destroyed before you, be careful not to be ensnared by inquiring about their gods, saying, "How do these nations serve their gods? We will do the same."
Your god dont want them to serve other gods that was why he lied that they do ofere there sons and daughters to their gods.
And we all know thegod that want his son as sacrifice, don't we?
We all know the god that want a whole town as burt sacrifice dont we?
I'll do justice to your other posts. because deutoronumy come before number meaning Moses action was don long before number, DO YOU KNOW THAT THE OLDEST BOOK IN THE BIBLE WAS THE BOOK OF JOB? But genesis come before job. God did not approved of human sacrifice,the 32 virgin was not sacrifice because burn offering required male. 2 Kings 16:3: He walked in the ways of the kings of Israel and even sacrificed his son in the fire, following the detestable ways of the nations the LORD had driven out before the Israelites. Psalm 106:38: They shed innocent blood, the blood of their sons and daughters, whom they sacrificed to the idols of Canaan, and the land was desecrated by their blood. the OT doesn't prescribe or require human sacrifice. All the rules concerning what sorts of offerings were acceptable for various purposes mention only animals, birds, and grain - humans are never mentioned as an option. In fact, humans in general would not be acceptable as sacrifices because their sin made them imperfect, and only perfect sacrifices were acceptable.1 (Hence Jesus is the only human who could ever be accepted as a sacrifice.) |
Christianity Etc › Re: Bible God And His Share Of Virgins And Other War Booty by malvisguy212: 4:06pm On Jan 03, 2015 |
[quote author=Rilwayne001 post=29454744][/quote]God is against human sacrifice; Deuteronomy 12:31: You must not worship the LORD your God in their way, because in worshiping their gods, they do all kinds of detestable things the LORD hates. They even burn their sons and daughters in the fire as sacrifices to their gods. Deuteronomy 18:9-12:
When you enter the land the LORD your God is giving you, do not learn to imitate the detestable ways of the nations there. Let no one be found among you who sacrifices his son or daughter in the fire...Anyone who does these things is detestable to the LORD, and because of these detestable practices the LORD your God will drive out those nations before you.
The Midianites conspired with the Moabites to curse Israel ( Num 22:1-7). When the curse was turned into a blessing instead ( 24:10-11), the Moabite and Midianite woman agreed to seduce the Israelite men and in doing so entice them to serve their idols ( 25:1-9, 31:15-16, Rev 2:14). The Israelites who fell prey to this and engaged in idolatry were also held responsible, and were executed ( 25:4-5). Virgin women and young girls were obviously not participants in this, so they were spared.
The 32 virgin were not sacrifice, they were use for different reason, burn offering had to be male not female. |
|
|
Christianity Etc › Re: The Lying Deity by malvisguy212(op): 8:01pm On Jan 02, 2015 |
ayinba1: I doubt anyone caught this on tape. Rub that smudge comot for the side of ya mouth; ah ah good job!  testimony seem weird to Muslim because according to Muslim ,miracle does not exist only magic. Truthman2012. We give God the glory, thank God you are here to shere this testimony for us. May God continue to guide you. |
Islam › Re: Since Muhammad Knew The Remedy For Poison, Why Did He And His Men Die Of It? by malvisguy212: 5:12pm On Jan 02, 2015 |
tartar9: so you are implying the Holy Prophet(SAW) is suppose to live forever.and he wasnt killed by poison. all soul must test death, including Jesus (but was alive) but in the case of muhammed, even when the lying spirit(Gabriel) pray for him, nothing happen. Muhammed confessed he still feel the pain of the posion that lead to his death. |
Christianity Etc › Re: The Lying Deity by malvisguy212(op): 4:28pm On Jan 02, 2015 |
malvisguy212: If you strongly believe that Muhammad can guide you to gain eternal salvation, please consider the following confessions of Muhammad in the Qur’an: Surah 46:9: “Say: I am not the first of the apostles, and I do not know what will be done with me or with you: I do not follow anything but that which is revealed to me, and I am nothing but a plain warner.” (Shakir)
Surah 7:188: Say: “I have no power over any good or harm to myself except as Allah wills. If I had knowledge of the unseen, I should have multiplied all good, and no evil could have touched me: I am only a Warner, and a bringer of glad tidings to those who have Faith (in Allah).” (S. V. Ahamed)
Surah 72:21: Say, “I possess no power to harm you, nor to guide you.” (Khalifa) “It is not in my power to cause you harm, or to bring you to the Right Path.” (Hilali-Khan)
Do you really understand the gravity of Muhammad’s statement when he said, “I possess no power to guide you” or “to bring you to the Right Path”? Is it not a prophet’s duty to guide the congregation of God to the “Right Path”? Can you now depend on this man to guide you to salvation? Would it be wise for you to do so? |
Islam › Re: Since Muhammad Knew The Remedy For Poison, Why Did He And His Men Die Of It? by malvisguy212: 4:26pm On Jan 02, 2015 |
Abdulsalam20: I Should have interfere but i wasnt aware of the topic infact the topic is very funny............ ..........ALL THOSE QUESTIONS HAVE ALREADY BEEN ANSWERED BUT i discover that you dont want to learn you only come to critcise you eventually run away after seeing the truth
if it is about terror in the old testament
https://www.nairaland.com/1869607/christianity-religion-terrorism
if it is about new testament you will see it here http://www.skepticsannotatedbible.com/cruelty/nt.html
contradictions https://www.nairaland.com/1869664/contradictions-bible
you said quran is full of lies.........then yoy shold have pointed it out 
THE CASE OF PHARAOH SHOULD BE A PRACTICAL EXAMPLE FOR YOU
YOU SHOULD HAVE UNDERSTAND THE MAIN TOPIC IF YOU WISH TO LEARN BUT I DISCOVER YOU ONLY WANT TO CRITICISE
5:72 They do blaspheme who say: "(Allah) is Christ the son of Mary." But said Christ: "O Children of Israel! worship Allah, my Lord and your Lord." Whoever joins other gods with Allah,- Allah will forbid him the garden, and the Fire will be his abode. There will for the wrong-doers be no one to help. you claim all those question has been answer but unfortunately no Muslim post a coment on that thread. Here is another prove that allah lied. https://www.nairaland.com/1970166/lying-deity |
Christianity Etc › Re: Why Is Allah/yahweh So Brutal And Vindictive? by malvisguy212: 8:14am On Jan 02, 2015 |
sakaguchi: Deuteronomy 20 contains Yahweh's instructions about war. If a city does not accept Israel's offer of peace and open its gates, then "when the Lord your God delivers it into your hand, put to the sword all the men in it" (verse13). With regard to other cities, the command is (verse 16), "Do not leave anything that breathes." You probably also recall that the walls of Jericho came tumbling down, and then the Israelites "destroyed with the sword every living thing in it - men and women, young and old, cattle, sheep, and donkeys" (Joshua 6:21). This certainly seems brutal and vindictive, doesn't it? Or consider Joshua 11:20, "For it was the Lord himself who hardened their hearts to wage war against Israel, so that he might destroy them totally, exterminating them without mercy, as the Lord had commanded Moses." From our twenty-first century point of view, we ask, "What good was accomplished by all this annihilation?"
Is this the same loving God preached in the new testament? The unstated assumption is that the people who God ordered destroyed were morally equivalent to the Jews, who replaced them. However, this is what the Bible says about the people who were destroyed: "It is not for your righteousness or for the uprightness of your heart that you are going to possess their land, but it is because of the wickedness of these nations that the LORD your God is driving them out before you, in order to confirm the oath which the LORD swore to your fathers, to Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. ( Deuteronomy 9:5) Okay, how "wicked" could those people have been? How about killing their own sons and daughters by burning them in sacrifices to their gods: "You shall not behave thus toward the LORD your God, for every abominable act which the LORD hates they have done for their gods; for they even burn their sons and daughters in the fire to their gods. ( Deuteronomy 12:31) The wickedness of these people is confirmed in other verses of the Bible. The Canaanite nations were punished because of their extreme wickedness. God did not cast out the Canaanites for being a particular race or ethnic group. God did not send the Israelites into the land of Canaan to destroy a number of righteous nations. On the contrary, the Canaanite nations were horribly depraved. They practiced “abominable customs” (Leviticus 18:30) and did “detestable things” (Deuteronomy 18:9, NASB). They practiced idolatry, witchcraft, soothsaying, and sorcery. They attempted to cast spells upon people and call up the dead (Deuteronomy 18:10-11). The Amalekites attacked the Israelites without apparent provocation as they were traveling during the Exodus ( Ex 17:  . "When you were weary and worn out, they met you on your journey and cut off all who were lagging behind" ( Dt 25:17-18). They later attacked Israel during the time of the Judges (Jdg 3:13) and often raided the Israelites' land after they had planted crops, leaving them with nothing ( Jdg 6:2-5). God punished the Amalekites by ordering Saul to destroy them ( 1 Sam 15:2-3) - over 300 years after they had first attacked Israel. During that time, the Amalekites had contact with the Israelites and would have heard about God. They could have repented and changed their ways, but they continued to raid and plunder other cities up to the time of Saul and David (1 Sam 30:1-3). The Amalekites that Saul and David warred against were clearly no better than their ancestors who had first waylaid Israel. Did God "blot out the memory of Amalek" or not? The LORD said to Moses, "Write |
Christianity Etc › Re: Killings In The Bible Are Not The Same As Killings By Muslims by malvisguy212: 7:37am On Jan 02, 2015 |
Elkewwty: read thank you for the insult, am very sure you got this morals from the book you are recommending to us. I will not respond to you again. |
Christianity Etc › Re: Atheists And Their Stupidity by malvisguy212: 8:30pm On Jan 01, 2015 |
1ord: so you wipe out a nation because of sins committed 300 years ago. You agree with the principle of killing someone who doesn't bend to your will or worship your sky daddy? I see .....Thats code for bigot . the amalakites are since been judge but God speared themn until they fill up there measure. God did not wipe out the nation,The LORD said to Moses, "Write this on a scroll as something to be remembered and make sure that Joshua hears it, because I will completely blot out the memory of Amalek from under heaven." Moses built an altar and called it The LORD is my Banner. He said, "For hands were lifted up to the throne of the LORD. The LORD will be at war against the Amalekites from generation to generation." ( Ex 17:14-16) "Blot out the memory of. Amalek" refers to the extinction of the descendents of Amalek. Clearly God was not referring to the world's knowledge that Amalek existed, else he would not have commanded the Amalekites' defeat to be recorded. He wanted the incidents to be remembered, so that future generations would realize that God, not the Israelites, defeated the Amalekites and avenged their unjust treatment of others. The Amalekites presumably would have been wiped out by Saul in 1 Samuel 15 if he had followed God's instructions. He did destroy the city of Amalek, but other raiding parties/nomadic bands of Amalekites survived. These were defeated by David in 1 Samuel 30 with the exception of a few hundred who escaped ( 30:17). The remnant of the Amalekites were finally destroyed by the Israelites many years later ( 1 Chr 4:43). Thus, while God did blot out the memory of Amalek by wiping out his descendents, he was at war with them for many generations. I don't defend God, I defend the truth, God will defend himself very soon, I assure you bro, mark my word, I Moses say this. |
Christianity Etc › Re: Atheists And Their Stupidity by malvisguy212: 8:19pm On Jan 01, 2015 |
sufido123: Yew is a ninepins. You can't defend the indefensible. You are an expert in defending things that are pure nonsense anyway . you quote verse that pronounced judgment on the amalakites but fail to provide details of there evil deed. |
Christianity Etc › Re: Atheists And Their Stupidity by malvisguy212: 5:54pm On Jan 01, 2015 |
sufido123: The Amalekite Genocide Nothing much needs to be said about this one.
You only need to read the first three verses from 1 Samuel 15 to know for sure that the God of the Bible is evil. (Thank goodness he doesn't exist!)
Still, it is good idea to look at the story in context.
(Bible believers often tell us to look at the context. But context nearly always makes Bible stories worse, not better. This story is no exception.) Samuel also said unto Saul ... Thus saith the LORD of hosts, I remember that which Amalek did to Israel, how he laid wait for him in the way, when he came up from Egypt. Now go and smite Amalek, and utterly destroy all that they have, and spare them not; but slay both man and woman, infant and suckling, ox and sheep, camel and ass. 1 Samuel 15.1-3 Notice that Samuel speaks here for God. Why would anyone believe that then or now? Was it because it sounded like something God would say?
And if the genocide was so important to God, why didn't he tell Saul directly?
But let's assume that the Bible is right and Samuel quoted God correctly. If so, then (unlike many of God's killings) we know why God wanted to Saul to kill all the Amalekites -- because God remembered what their ancestors did hundreds of years before they were born (they defended themselves when the Israelites tried to kill them and take their land).
And Saul pretty much did as God commanded. He sent 210,000 soldiers to kill everyone and everything among the Amalekites: men, women, children, babies, animals -- except for the king, Agag, and some of the more valuable sheep, oxen, and lambs. Saul gathered the people together … two hundred thousand footmen, and ten thousand men of Judah. … And Saul smote the Amalekites ... And he took Agag the king of the Amalekites alive, and utterly destroyed all the people with the edge of the sword. But Saul and the people spared Agag, and the best of the sheep, and of the oxen, and of the fatlings, and the lambs, and all that was good, and would not utterly destroy them: but every thing that was vile and refuse, that they destroyed utterly. 15.4-9 Saul killed the old men, the pregnant women, the children and babies. But he spared the king and some of the more valuable animals, and God would never forgive him for it.
Samuel cried his little eyes out all night and God repented of making Saul king. Then came the word of the LORD unto Samuel, saying, It repenteth me that I have set up Saul to be king: for he is turned back from following me, and hath not performed my commandments. And it grieved Samuel; and he cried unto the LORD all night. 15.10-11 It's good to know that God repented. When you order someone to commit genocide for stuff that happened centuries ago, you should be a bit sorry about it.
But that wasn't what God was sorry about. God wanted all of the Amalekites to be killed. In some sick way it made God happy every time an old Amalekite woman or a little baby was killed.
No, God repented of making Saul king because he didn't kill everyone, and God wanted everyone killed. And if you believe in the Bible, you wanted them killed, too.
[If this Bible story is true (which it isn't, of course), how many Amalekites were killed at God's command? I originally gave it the usual 1000 for a standard massacre, but Saul sent 210,000 soldiers to do the killing. He wouldn't send that many soldiers to kill only 1000 civilians, would he? So I increased it to 10,000.]
God's next killing: Samuel hacks Agag to pieces before the Lord
- See more at: http://dwindlinginunbelief..com/2010/01/gods-63rd-killing-amalekite-genocide.html#sthash.qmo9NFRP.dpuf the amalakites, are they innocent? Did you read the whole story? The Amalekites attacked the Israelites without apparent provocation as they were traveling during the Exodus ( Ex 17:  . "When you were weary and worn out, they met you on your journey and cut off all who were lagging behind" ( Dt 25:17-18). They later attacked Israel during the time of the Judges (Jdg 3:13) and often raided the Israelites' land after they had planted crops, leaving them with nothing ( Jdg 6:2-5). God punished the Amalekites by ordering Saul to destroy them ( 1 Sam 15:2-3) - over 300 years after they had first attacked Israel. During that time, the Amalekites had contact with the Israelites and would have heard about God. They could have repented and changed their ways, but they continued to raid and plunder other cities up to the time of Saul and David (1 Sam 30:1-3). The Amalekites that Saul and David warred against were clearly no better than their ancestors who had first waylaid Israel. "It is not for your righteousness or for the uprightness of your heart that you are going to possess their land, but it is because of the wickedness of these nations that the LORD your God is driving them out before you, in order to confirm the oath which the LORD swore to your fathers, to. Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. ( Deuteronomy 9:5) Okay, how "wicked" could those people have been? How about killing their own sons and. daughters by burning them in sacrifices to their gods: "You shall not behave thus toward the LORD your God, for every abominable act which the LORD hates they have done for their gods; for they even burn their sons and daughters in the fire to their gods. ( Deuteronomy 12:31) The wickedness of these people is confirmed in other verses of the Bible. https://www.nairaland.com/2032869/did-god-realy-killed-innocent |
Christianity Etc › Re: Atheists And Their Stupidity by malvisguy212: 5:43pm On Jan 01, 2015 |
1ord: Correction. The bible says the earth is round and flat and not a sphere, theres a diffrence.Do not attribute a mans life work with a work of fiction. Give honours when due. The bible also says nothing about the expanding universe. Job 9:8 8 Who alone stretches out the heavens And tramples down the waves of the sea; Psalm 104:2 2 Covering Yourself with alight as with a cloak, Stretching out heaven like a tent curtain. Obviously, there is something unusual about these "corners." Actually, the Hebrew word translated "corners" is kânâph, which actually refers to the wing of a bird (translated literally in the Literal Translation of the Holy Bible, LITV, above). So, the phrase is an idiom that refers to the four points of the. compass (north, south, east, and west). The verse has nothing to do with the earth being flat. The next thing you know, the atheists will be claiming that the Bible says the earth is a bird, since it has wings! |
Christianity Etc › Re: Killings In The Bible Are Not The Same As Killings By Muslims by malvisguy212: 5:15pm On Jan 01, 2015 |
Elkewwty: Take your time and read about "deism"
Now, after that, take your time and read a book titled "the age of reason" by thomas paine. trust me you will throw that you bible into a trashcan.
I want you to reply the questions you evade the othwr time
What sin? and who told you dat he created them? why did he kill d whole of egypt in the first place instead of crossing over the sea to kill the natives of those lands? what sin has those little infant done dat warrant dere head to be smashed to the tree? why would your god order moses to kill every breathing creatures? (60cities were massacred and there lands were taken). is your god dis powerless that he cant find another way in dealing with them? meanwhile, in the bible we see that this god of israel is only of israel amd not of the whole world.
Was'nt jesus the one commanding all those killings? Why didnt jesus come in the first place b4 moses was ordered to kill people? how about those dat died in tsunami, earthquake and other natural are dey not sufffering from your gods anger (as u believed)? What he one die without believing your jesus, isnt jesus going to roast unbeliever in hell (as in your delusions)?
tell me the different between the person that think i must die and the one dat think i will roast in fire? the book were writing against the Christians faith, I google the man, he is full of controversy, some believe he belonged to a cult called freemason. |
Christianity Etc › Re: Killings In The Bible Are Not The Same As Killings By Muslims by malvisguy212: 2:37pm On Jan 01, 2015 |
Some people claimed they believing in God is assurance to heaven, that is a big lie, first, you must accept Jesus as your lord and saviour.
The Bible never states that believing in God will get you into heaven, and confirms that such is the case in James chapter 2, verse 19. Satan (the Devil) believes God exists. In fact, he talks with God in Job chapters 1 and 2. Yet, he is not going to heaven —he is going to be cast into the lake of fire and brimstone (hell). This is recorded in Revelation chapter 20, verse 10. Angels that sinned were cast into hell —and they knew God. Read 2 Peter, chapter 2, verse 4. Sorry, believing in God is not enough to allow you to enter heaven. |
Christianity Etc › Re: Killings In The Bible Are Not The Same As Killings By Muslims by malvisguy212: 12:11pm On Jan 01, 2015 |
truthman2012: Spiriual ignorance. How did the first man come to be and the first woman? Evolution?
Atheists and muslims have a meeting point, they are under the same Deity. Satan would do any to blindfold atheists to see God. The same Satan who blindfold muslims to see the true God. I advice, we have said enough, it is only God that will free there soul. Century before athiest even came to existence satan has been using the same trick he use for eve to deceive mankind, you guys shuld realy consider this: satan not only rejected God by attempting to supplant Him, but he urged humans to do likewise. Satan urged Eve to choose against God for her own self-fulfilment: in genesis3:1-5. He said to the woman, “Did God actually say, ‘You shall not eat of any tree in the garden’?” And the woman said to the serpent, “We may eat of the fruit of the trees in the garden, but God said, ‘You shall not eat of the fruit of the tree that is in the midst of the garden, neither shall you touch it, lest you die.’” But the serpent said to the woman, “You will not surely die. For God knows that when you eat of it your eyes will be opened, and you will be like God, knowing good and evil.” NOW, LET US ANALIZE GENESIS1:3-5. The tactic is clear: firstly, question God’s statements, then, contradict God’s statements and, finally, urge rebellion in seeking equality with God. How dos this relate to athiest? This manifests in atheists as 1. Questioning whether there is a God to make statements in the first place, so God did not say anything. 2. Contradicting the statements said to have been spoken by God. 3. Seeking equality with God by replacing God with the self. This satanic deception appeals strongly to atheists as it bolsters two of their desired delusions: 1) absolute autonomy—being free to do as they please, and 2) the lack of ultimate accountability—there are no eternal consequences for doing as they please. THIS IS EXACLTLY THE TRICK SATAN USE ON EVE THAT IS WHAT IS HAPPENING TO ATHIEST. |
Christianity Etc › Re: Killings In The Bible Are Not The Same As Killings By Muslims by malvisguy212: 12:06pm On Jan 01, 2015 |
Elkewwty: So dashing their babies head to the tree is the best remedy for it? smh I don't understand you, who is dashing the babies head to the tree?. You want to know about God, you chose wikipedia, I see, satan is manipulating you guys, I tell you the truth, the time will come when you will regrets every word coming out from your mouth. |
Christianity Etc › Re: Killings In The Bible Are Not The Same As Killings By Muslims by malvisguy212: 10:31am On Jan 01, 2015 |
johnydon22: exaclty my point... its the same child sacrifice you accuse the other nations of practising... gerit? 1.the girl was not a baby. 2.it was not God that ask for the sacrifice, the man make a vow.God ask Abraham to sacrifice Isaac, but it was a test, that was the first time God ask for human sacrifice,moreover it was a test. |
Christianity Etc › Re: When Will People Stop Believing This End Time Shii by malvisguy212: 10:25am On Jan 01, 2015 |
johnydon22: mehn am tired.... i wan drink orijin  you open a thread that you can't defend the lie against God. May God forgive you. |
Christianity Etc › Re: Killings In The Bible Are Not The Same As Killings By Muslims by malvisguy212: 10:22am On Jan 01, 2015 |
johnydon22: didnt jesophath sacrifice his daughter to yahweh in the bible?... habaaa nawa oo.. owk they were doing child sacrifice and the isrealites came and still killed the children by dashing them against rocks, the same innocent babies.habaaa. we all know the number of babies and children that must av been killed during that massacre will be far greater than the ones you claim they must av allegly sacrificed to their god. not even to talk of the pregnant women ripped open with the sword... what is this... what type of human is still defending and justifying this... seriously no offence but ur heart is evil for trying to justify this... God did not ask him to sacrifice his daughter to Him, he make a vow , and he must fulfilled it, in those days, the Jew are afraid to break vow. The reat of your post has been answer, start from page one of this thread. Thank you. |
Christianity Etc › Re: When Will People Stop Believing This End Time Shii by malvisguy212: 10:15am On Jan 01, 2015 |
johnydon22: congrats for trying to twist it as u guys usually does... the verse was clear "Jesus meant they will not taste death until he comes back which means some of em will still be alive then...hahahahahahhaha oya now that all of them are long dead and dust from their bones forgotten, 2000 years later you say it means spiritual death... hahahahahahaha you guys are just too funny... weldone my guy  Jesus say know that after more than 2000 years he will come back, yet he told his disciples that they will not test death, does this sound logical to you? What was the message Jesus is trying to preach? Even Abraham our ancestor died, yet Jesus say his disciples will not test death, I REPEAT ,THE SAINTS ARE NOT DEAD BUT ARE SPIRITUALLY SLEEPING. Thank you for your time. |
Christianity Etc › Re: Killings In The Bible Are Not The Same As Killings By Muslims by malvisguy212: 10:04am On Jan 01, 2015 |
johnydon22: Must u insult to make ur point?.... their is nothing u say that can justify it. EVIL is EVIL no matter how u paint it... the order was simple "the jews to wipe out every city that worships a different god... seriously my bros by trying to justify this evil i find it hard to argue with you cus it sadens my heart that a human being will believe and justify such evil, cruelty and wickedness... Am sorry but i am done with you dear!!! peace very good,little by little you are exposing there evil deed. How are this people worshipping there idols? Sacrificing babies to there gods, is this what you called good ? |
Christianity Etc › Re: When Will People Stop Believing This End Time Shii by malvisguy212: 8:59am On Jan 01, 2015 |
johnydon22: The world should have ended with the first failed end time prophecy of Jesus in matthew 16:28
Truly I tell you, there are some of you standing here who will not taste death before they see the Son of Man coming in His kingdom. (i.e) He was addressing his apostles and we all know all those dudes are dead like 2000years ago..hehehehehe  the saint's are not spiritually dead, but they are sleeping. ◄ Matthew 27:52 ► The tombs were opened, and many bodies of the saints who had fallen asleep were raised; The dead saint's will be the first to meet the lord and we who are alive will joint them. 1 Thessalonians 4:16-17 For the Lord himself will come down from heaven, with a loud command, with the voice of the archangel and with the trumpet call of God, and the dead in Christ will rise first.17.After that, we who are still alive and are left will be caught up together with them in the clouds to meet the Lord in the air. And so we will be with the Lord forever. The book of Hebrew teaches us how Christ makes it happen. Hebrew 2:9. But we do see Jesus, who was made lower than the angels for a little while, now crowned with glory and honor because he suffered death, so that by the grace of God he might taste death for everyone. Christ has already test death for those who believe in him. You claimed to be Christian once in your life but you dint know all this? It's a shame. You know what hausa man called kristoche na baki? That the type of Christian you are before. |
Christianity Etc › Re: Killings In The Bible Are Not The Same As Killings By Muslims by malvisguy212: 8:22am On Jan 01, 2015 |
johnydon22: what dah heck does darwin genocide have to do with this op... as far as am concern all of them are wrong... no matter the name and pattern it comes in... whether darwin silent genocide, allah genocide, yahweh genocide or christian genocide... they are all evil and inhumane and can never be justified by anybody... simple if God should send brimstone and fire to wipe out boko haram, 30 years later when you read how it happen on the web, you will called God a wicked God caused he wipe out this wicked boko haram generation, right? You say God killed innocent people, why dint you give us the whole details how it happened? Corrupted minded atheist. |
Christianity Etc › Re: Atheists And Their Stupidity by malvisguy212: 8:12am On Jan 01, 2015 |
|
Christianity Etc › Re: Killings In The Bible Are Not The Same As Killings By Muslims by malvisguy212: 8:10am On Jan 01, 2015 |
johnydon22: this is what i hate about christians... always trying to twist the obvious truth and justify the god of the bible of all his murder and genocide. Tell me how what the God of the bible did with the isrealites in the OT and what the christians did during the dark ages when the church was in power is different from what islam is doing now... they are all the same no justification. and for those saying the god of the bible created humans and have the right to kill em or judge remember the muslims believe that same shii that allah created humans.. I believe the op answer all your question. Have you read about darwin and the silent genocide? They silently reduce the population of the poor and marrying between family just to protect the family wealth. https://www.intellihub.com/darwinism-eugenics-and-the-silent-genocide/ |
Christianity Etc › Re: Atheists And Their Stupidity by malvisguy212: 8:42pm On Dec 31, 2014 |
cloudstar: sufido123
Interesting article, I will jump in a respond
I believe slyfox5555 was trying to compare how a belief can be true or false. Basically, how one can use logical, historical or even physiological evidence. So, let's use your parents as an example; what proof would you present that they are your parents?
That is very lousy conclusion. How in the world can I verify you are the one I am responding to? Is there a possibility it could be your sister, brother, wife, uncle or a hacker that has taken over your account? Mere communication is no "evidence or proof". No one knows both us to confirm that we are the actual people that communicated on this day and time. Are there any eye witness account to verify this?
.
Again, slyfox5555 was trying to point out that something is either true or false. The issue here is the verification or proof of God. My question to you would be - are there things you believe in that can't be traced or verified or proved?
The problem with this idea is that 'gods' such as Zeus and Thor are not comparable with the biblical understanding of God. There is a vast distinction between all of the Ancient near eastern gods and the God of the Bible.
This kind of statement ignores that there are different kinds of 'proof/evidence'. "Can you prove that there is a God?". In the mathematical sense no, but proving anything is very difficult. The word proof has two meanings. There's the rigorous meaning in maths that is very difficult to do and rare. But then there's the other meaning – beyond reasonable doubt". That's the kind of 'proof' we can present: arguments to bring someone beyond reasonable doubt
Again, it was an example of belief and comfirming where something is true or not.
Your position seems to be absolute! which if I am correct seems to be flawed. Except you are confirming that you know absolutely everything - then you are claiming that God doesn't exist
You are missing the point by over a mile. The example was to show that we can prove within reasonal doubt that you are a product between two humans. However, I can use the theory of evolution draw conclusion that you are a product of two he-goats . Again, the point was to show that proof is subjective - what you are requiring of proof or evidence is not a standard to prove God.
Let me ask you a question - Can you prove the origin of the following. In otherwords - what is:
1. Energy? 2. Consciouness?
Remember, I am asking what these things are, where did they come from? hi bro. Happy Christmas and new year. |
Christianity Etc › Re: Killings In The Bible Are Not The Same As Killings By Muslims by malvisguy212: 6:33pm On Dec 31, 2014 |
|
Christianity Etc › Re: New Year's Resolutions: Why You Can't Keep Them by malvisguy212(op): 4:20pm On Dec 31, 2014 |
MzNelly: To wait till the year ends to resolve to do a certain thing is something I will never comprehend. you are very correct, for hope of repentance, new year Resolution is another chance for the unjust to repent. |
Christianity Etc › Re: Killings In The Bible Are Not The Same As Killings By Muslims by malvisguy212: 4:16pm On Dec 31, 2014 |
Elkewwty: I'm not a supporter pf islam but i am telling you that both the god of the bible and dat of the koran saction unjustly genocide
Now please i want you to answer this honestly, what is the different between the above and what jesus the father commanded moses, david , saul and other prophet ofthe bible did in the OT? wasnt dis jesus the one commanding dem to kill? will dey go to paradise after dey av been killed?
Repent from what exactly? you accused the true God of genocide but you fail to provide evidence that God killed without a cause. Go through this thread https://www.nairaland.com/2032869/did-god-realy-killed-innocent |