Martinez39's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Martinez39's Profile › Martinez39's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 (of 157 pages)
Kentuforchrist:I don't know how life came about. I never said I did. It's still a question science hasn't answered. Only a fool will conclude without any evidence that god did it. |
Abbeynomics:I am an atheist. |
madridsta007: ![]()
|
Nicklaus619:Only fools believe in a judgement day. |
Marvins0009:Muhammad actually existed. He was a crazy conquering warlord who spread Islam by the sword. He invented Islam but he was just a man never a divine prophet. |
Nicklaus619:Only a fool believes in the day of judgment, heaven and hell. |
Abfinest007:The human body has been repeatedly dissected and studied for over 500years and the universal features of the body has been spoted. These universal features include a single brain, a single heart, a pair of eyes, a pair of lungs, a pair kidneys, a single liver etc. If you doubt the existence of any, go do a scan. |
Fact007:Only fools think think Jesus exists and he is their lord and saviour. Satan does not exist. |
oyetunder:Oshisco. I don't exist even though I am replying on nairaland and dishing statements way more coherent than any bot. You will continue to be a christian because you are too foolish to ask the appropriate questions and think critically. Fools will always maintain their chains and even kiss them. |
Praktikals:Only a fool believes Jesus is his lord and personal saviour. |
tactius:I did. It's no sound argument at all. No one is talking about a mere man. We all care if the Jesus of the bible ever existed or not. If a mere man existed but the miracle worker never did, christianity is invalid. If anyone says Jesus exist, he must bring his prove. Go and read it. It is not an argument for Jesus the miracle worker. It is an argument for his actual existence.(not whether he did miracles).How stupid can one get?! So when we atheists talk about Jesus, we are referring the Jesus the fisherman or Jesus the tailor? An argument for a mere man called Jesus is not an argument for Jesus the miracle worker. If such a man as Jesus existed, there would be contemporary accounts of his existence. Writing material were already in existence long before Jesus' supposed time on earth and historians were very active in the society. The facts that historical accounts are silent on Jesus the miracle worker should make you think twice. If we were talking about a mere man then argument from silence is not enough to discredit the existence of such a person because not every mere Tom, Dick and Harry gets into historical records but we are talking about a miracle worker, I repeat a miracle worker. If someone like that existed, he would be so famous and sought after and his name and life events would be in historical records. And your argument from silence is a flawed one.No it is not. Most of the evidence we have for many historical figures comes from sources written centuries after they existed.False. That's why I said that you should study history. This thread If we took your argument to its logical conclusion, you would end up with riddiculous assertions. Like 'Hannibal Barca never existed because no contemporary writer mentions him"SMH. Good day. |
Nicklaus619:A fool believes Jesus is his lord and saviour. |
tactius:I don't know any mere mortal called Jesus. I never said I did. |
tactius:Why are you acting like evidence for a mere man named Jesus is equivalent to evidence for Jesus the son of god? "It is based on the 'argument from silence'" Okay, if you think it's an argument from silence, then you should be inconclusive on whether Jesus of the bible existed or not. To say Jesus of the bible existed, you must have prove. So where is your proof that Jesus of the bible existed? Remember, evidence for a mere mortal named Jesus is not equivalent to the evidence of Jesus the god because both are mutually exclusive. If a mere mortal named Jesus is shown to exist, it doesn't mean that Jesus the son of god existed and vice versa. So where is you proof for the existence of Jesus the son of god? |
NPComplete:Are you minding tactius? How can a man as powerful as Jesus have existed without a shred of evidence? Do you know what it means to have the power to perform miracles? Do you know the fame such a person would have? How come there are contemporary accounts of such person? People are just stupid and love to kid themselves. Jesus of the bible never existed. |
tactius:Are you kidding me? So you call that proof? SMH. Let say that only a mere mortal called Jesus existed, does that make christianity true? Please go read up on history. |
tactius:Those who want to fooled shall be fooled. Go and study history my friend. |
anonymous1759:The alleged grave of a nonexistent being will obviously be empty. How will you know Jesus' grave if you see it? |
fisheryems:STFU and make that bold decision to start thinking and be honest with yourself. My existence is sufficient proof that I have great grandparents. Nobody existing is without great grandparents. I am not concerned about their identities. However, if Jesus never existed, the validity of christianity collapses hence the importance of investigating and verifying his existence. As it turns out, he never existed.
|
ifada123:Bring those shapes. ![]() |
Karlebolu:True. All the religious relics you see in religious tourist sites are fake and were forged. They have no actual affiliation with with any supposed religious figure. |
CodeTemplar:Sorry, you didn't read the OP. How is he lazy? He didn’t say he depends on the system. He said that the engineering curriculum is outdated and devoid of the expertise need to strive in the modern world, it's all theory with no practical and lecturers are not updating themselves. These ought not be in any university but if op is serious about engineering and have money, he can go elsewhere to study. |
hopefulLandlord:Lol. Creators and defenders of Yahweh. |
Here is what really happens. They've been sleeping around during their twenties. As a result of different dick sizes, the ρussy is now wide and won't satisfy any man except those with very large ρenis sizes. Since they now want to settle down and they know no one will want a wide ρussy as a wife, they start acting churchy in order to create the false impression that they are good and descent ladies. They then make the vow of no sex until after marriage to avoid you detecting their wide and worn out ρussy. Their hopes are : 1) if they play the good church girl, men will want to marry them because men want a good and morally upright wives. Many of them are usually far from being good and morally upright. 2) by saying no sex until after marriage, men won't detect their wide ρussy until it is too late (ie. they've already been hooked to the wide ρussy by marriage and there is nothing they can do). Most of them, especially the ones in their mid twenties, may lie that they are virgins or drastically minimise their body count only for their victims to meet a wide ρussy on his wedding night and he will have difficulties opting out since marriage has taken place. Dude is stuck with a wide ρussy for life. Check it out for yourself. In rare cases, they are trying to cover up the irreversible damage of past abortion(s) and hook the brother. ![]()
|
It's bad that a university isn't a center of ideas, reasoning and intellectual maturity instead, it is, for many parts, a centre for the forceful subservience of students by lecturers and a centre for the protection of these lecturers' ego, wickedness, corruption, incompetence and insecurities. If you are going to think and seek the truth, you must risk being offended. |
dalaman:For this reason, I brand them the defenders of god. |
Jesus never existed. He was a version of early mythical figures. This is just a tourist scam. ![]() |
Barca will rape this mediocre scam called OGS. |
GreatResearcher:His stupidity and dishonesty are incorrigible. It's best to stop engaging him. Sometimes, you just have to leave people to wallow in their rationality. |
budaatum:Your usual dishonesty is disgusting but I shall continue. There is a difference between daring god and praying a prayer of faith. Satan did the former and Jesus promised that if christians do the latter, he will grant them whatever they ask for. MARK 11:24 King James Bible. "Therefore I say unto you, What things soever ye desire, when ye pray, believe that ye receive them, and ye shall have them." This what the bible says and it is clear on that. To say a different meaning, you have to make up your intended meaning and force it on that verse. Is this verse wrong? Did Jesus lie? Please let's not kid ourselves. 'You must think "faith" is something one has in things one does not see.' So despite spending so much time reading the bible, you still can't get simple things right? Let me educate you HEBREWS 11:1 King James Version "Now faith is the substance of things HOPED FOR, the evidence of things NOT SEEN." Have you read buda's toe? It ends:I have explained what faith is. To call this biblical faith is the height of dishonesty/stupidity. If your cousin prayed and died then Jesus lied in the following verse or it was made up: MARK 11:24 King James Bible. "Therefore I say unto you, What things soever ye desire, when ye pray, believe that ye receive them, and ye shall have them." Faith does not mean sitting on your ass praying, 39. Some pray by reading, studying, storing wealth where moths can't get at it, and the faith and trust they have in the work they have done to acquire that wealth of knowledge is what we trust and have faith will cure us which is what happened in my case where a mountain moved.SMH. The height of it. I can't argue your doctrine with you 39. Not when you have an idea in your head of what my doctrine must be. I would advise you learn more about a person's beans before saying its the same as your beans though.You are free to kids yourself and make up your beans for your comfort. I don't have a doctrine. There is nothing like "my facts" or "your facts." A fact is a fact no matter what. If one tests ones faith by moving mountains, the mountain moved or one has not got faith, understanding, in the wisdom and the knowledge one has. Otherwise, they'd be using their faith to [url=https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matthew+22%3A36-40&version=KJV]love their neighbours[/url] by [url=https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=John+21%3A15-17&version=KJV]healing and prolonging life[/url] because that is the doctrine of Christ. I apologise that many don't appear to have adopted this doctrine, but we look to the face of the Lord and tarry not that you too may comprehend.Good day. Buda "religion and god is nonsense but the bible is valid and hold deep truths" atum. |
paxonel:cancer, AIDS, Lukemia, AIDS (Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome), Lesch-Nyhan Syndrome, Heart Disease such as Severe Coronary Artery Disease, Ebola Hemorrhagic Fever etc. are all beyond the capacity of man as at now and man is working tirelessly to find the cure. Since this is beyond our capacity, why can't god step in? Remember, millions are dying and suffering from these diseases. What if humans begins to protest, baba God, you have taken my responsibility in the scheme of things?What a daft thing to say! No offence intended. Who would protest if god cures cancer and other terminal illnesses? Only a daft, very wicked and psychopathic individual would protest such. So you think people will revolt if god does something about their terminal illnesses? Really? Dont you think humans have right too?Humans have rights but healing their diseases isn't a violation of human rights expect if they say that they don't want to be healed. This is ignorant and stupid. No offence intended. If God begins to heal all the sick people who will then patronize medical doctors?If man invents telephone, Gmail and WhatsApp, who will patronise mail men? How will they make money and feed their family? I guess we should do away with phones, Gmail and WhatsApp so we can depend on the less efficient and relatively slow mail men? If God starts healing, it would be a welcome development. Doctors will go and look for another job. So you mean god should let others suffer and die because doctors need to feed? |
paxonel:Where cometh evil? Who created evil? With our fight against evil and suffering, we are still limited and our limitations have seen billions suffer and die for terminal diseases. Would it not be moral for an all powerful being to step in an take responsibility? Why is it sensible to live it in the hands of man when he can take it responsibility and achieve much better results? You keep saying nonsense. |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 (of 157 pages)




