Martinez39s's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Martinez39s's Profile › Martinez39s's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 (of 238 pages)
Biglittlelois:Hahahahahahaha. So it's about that thread? You can call them. When you do, I will properly educate both of them, you included, on human rights. ![]()
|
Biglittlelois:The emboldened part wasn't necessary in your question. The inclusion of that part just shows you are emotional about the whole thing and you hold a grudge against Ubunja and Martinez39s. Anyway, if you made that statement sincerely as a statement of fact where relevant, it wouldn't be counted as broke-shaming. You have just simply made a statement that's either valid or invalid. if no one can determine for a fact that this is how you both are in real life, since this is just a faceless online forum, but still Martinez and ubunja are dirt broke, right? Okay good to know.This is unintelligible. Your emotions and grudge against me and Ubunja are hindering you from making an articulate and lucid write-up. You need to claim down and compose yourself. Even if you hate me and Ubunja, at least make your statements understandable. ![]() Listen up ladies, you are allowed to use shaming words, not as a rebuttal, just say it for saying sakeNo one says you are not allowed to use shaming words. In fact, you are free to insult, belittle, and make scathing remarks about anybody, even when inappropriate. No one is stopping you. You are even free to insult me, including my parents and siblings, however you like. ![]() |
Arthur21:You are trying to be cunning. "Evening newspaper" and "broke" are descriptive terms indeed, but if you have a scintilla of honesty in you, you wouldn't act like you don't know or haven't observed people use the term "broke", "jobless", "broke and frustrated" etc. as insults, rebuttals and clapbacks during a heated quarrel, exchange of words, or as ad hominem and silencing tool when someone says something they don't agree with. This is very common in Nigeria, and to deny this is to make yourself an embodiment of dishonesty. These terms are usually thrown in when they have nothing to do with the issue being discussed. Do people also use the term "evening newspaper" as an insult? Yes, but it's rare and not as frequent as broke shaming. Even women, during a heated exchange of words with one another, do throw in the term "evening newspaper" intending it as an insult. However, my point is: have you even seen redpill guys on the forum use a woman's non-virgin/newspaper/olosho/single mom status as an insult, rebuttal, or clapback when they express ideas or make statements we don't like? "Used up products" "damaged goods" "second hand products " are descriptive,fair point. I don't see you use it as a rebuttal. Is your complaint against broke shaming because it was used directly at you or cohorts ,like "Martinez is a broke a$$" or because some ladies use it to describe men on the forum without making a particular reference to them like "all this broke boys on NL"BROKE-SHAMING: insinuating or outrightly proclaiming that someone is broke with the intention of insulting the person, countering his/her point, silencing the people, and/or making a clapback. Such insinuation and proclamation are mere emotional devices and usually have nothing to do with the argument at hand. From your post it seems you draw a margin between description and shaming.I am not drawing any margin. Either you are being dishonest or your brain has gone to sleep. I agree with you that shaming is when its used as ad hominem or rebuttal and making direct reference to the person while description is stating your opinions and choices.So you even know. ![]() From your first post of people attaching importance to financial status,was it strictly because broke shaming was directed at someone or because ladies openly stated they spec and choices and how they detest broke guys? If yes to the two then I will say you should allow them the liberty of stating their choice and how they feel about broke guys.Read my post again, and understand better. PS:kindly share with me links or posts to your feud with Michelle.When I have the energy. |
Biglittlelois:Can you point out where I have been clueless and/or incapable of engaging in a meaningful conversation outside the romance section? Let's start from there. |
CAPSLOCKED:I know you can do better than this. Don't make the intellectual error of conflating ideas with which you don't agree with hate and shaming. I expect you get your facts right. (1) Redpill men on this forum do not insult or hate non-virgin/evening newspaper/olosho/single mom. All we have ever done is give reasons why we would never consider these set of women for dating/marriage. My mum is a single mum, and the mother of Ubunja's child is a single mum as well; so it's unlikely that we would be the ones to hate and disparage single mothers. We just say the truth without bias and sentiments. If people don't like our reasons for not wanting to date/marry these set of women (or they want to pretend that we haven't given any reasons), they can either counter our points logically or they could ignore us instead of deliberately and cunningly misrepresenting our views as hatred, discrimination, disparagement, and insults towards these set of women. You can't say the same about broke shaming as inappropriately used as a rebuttal and comeback by dull emotional Nigerians during an argument. (2) You will hardly see Ubunja, Martinez39s, Omar09, AstroG, etc use a woman's non-virgin/evening newspaper/olosho/single mom status to insult her when she says ideas that we don't like or agree with instead of logically countering her points. You will never see us launch an ad hominem using the status of these women to win an argument. Michellekabod2 had a bitter clash with me before she stopped talking to me. She even went against her supposed principle to insinuate all sorts of belittling things about me but I never used her single-mom status as an insult against her in coming back at her. You can't say the same about broke shaming as inappropriately used as a rebuttal and comeback by dull emotional Nigerians during an argument. (3) I have repeatedly said on this forum that I have no problem with a woman choosing to be a non-virgin/evening newspaper/olosho/single mom. It's her right and freedom. Also, I, just like other men, have the right to disregard them in the dating market, and I am at liberty to express openly why I don't want them as my significant other. Not wanting to marry a non-virgin/newspaper/olosho/single mom is not bigotry and hatred, it's simply called preference (which I am entitled to). If not marrying any of these women is discrimination and hatred, then women not marrying broke men is discrimination and hatred. (4) The phrase "evening newspaper" is not an insult. The phrase refers to the natural biological fate of every woman. At a point in time, everyone women (including our mothers and sisters) will become an evening newspaper. An evening newspaper is just a woman who has passed her period of sexual attractiveness. If we redpill men don't want an evening newspapers, can you blame us? Can you say we are full of hatred? So, CAPSLOCKED, hope I have put you in the proper perspective. ![]()
|
ubunja:Nigerians take money worship to a whole new level. |
proclinician: |
Illuminated993:The purpose of the redpill is not to make you safe in your sexual relationships. The redpill is just the truth on female nature and other peripherals. What you do with the knowledge is left to you. If you intend to use the redpill knowledge to play safe in your sexual relationships, that's up to you. However, one can be redpilled and still reject romantic relationships and marriage. There's a thin line between being an incel and a redpilled man.There is no thin line. A blue pilled guy can be an incel; a redpilled guy can also be an incel. A blue pilled hot guy can be drowning in pussy; a redpilled hot guy can also be drowning in pussy . One mistake many so called redpilled nairaland guys keep making is to think Pick Up Artistry is what the redpill is all about, and every redpilled man is player. Sorry, the redpill isn't all about laying chicks. There are many deeply redpilled guys (especially MGTOW) who are not interested in romantic relationships, marriage, and laying chicks. Also, not everyone who doesn't have sex is an incel, and getting pussy is not a criterion to determine who is redpilled or not. When a person like Kennedy says he needs no woman, you see a lying man who would never admit that he has no game. Calm down. Women and sex are not must-haves for every man, and people's needs are different. A man does not need women, sex, relationships, marriage, or children to be happy. Not every man places women and these things so high that they feel these things are so essential. A man can be happy and great in life without these things. A woman who likes you doesn't even need your money (the redpilledman is an adherent of Ubunja's concept of chosen), they just want the life your money can provide.Hahaha. You are contradicting yourself without knowing. I leave it up to you to see the contradiction. Anyway, a blue pilled man can still be "chosen" by a woman. You seem to place a prodigious amount of value on women, sex, relationships, women's attention and validation etc. You can't use these to decide on who is redpilled or not. The redpills are a menagerie of truths, and either one embraces them or not. You are redpilled once you realise and embrace these truths. Redpill is knowledge, not body count and garnering of women, their pussy, their attention, and validation. You need to realise that getting a woman's and having romantic relationships are grossly overrated. A man can be happy and great in life without having these things. These things don't really matter as much at the end of the day, so no man should squander copious amounts of time and money chasing women. And that life isn't so expensive, it has nothing to do with impressing her. When she even asks for money, what happened to saying "I don't give women money, I like my woman getting her own money through her own creative efforts?".No one said women force us to give them money against our will. Ultimately, the woman who wants to be with you does so because she thinks you're greater than her, and not because of the money she wants from you. Redpill gives you the tools you need in making her see you in this light. SMH ![]() Some of the guys who talk down on women here are incels.Maybe. Good thing you used the word "some." As a redpilled man, I assume you have a proper understanding of female nature, and this understanding serves as your manual that helps you in making better decisions when dealing with women.True in many case. |
Kennedyiheme02:Nothing is inside the brains of many Nigerians except money, job, and business even though many lack the mental capacity and skill to achieve these. Even intelligence and the ability to maintain a civil and intelligent discourse don't make the cut. Say something they don't like and they either say directly, or insinuate, that you are broke and jobless instead of refuting your points. I wonder what a man's financial situation has to do with the validity and truthfulness of his arguments. Honestly, it's disappointing. |
There is no doubt that a man will save more money if he stops chasing women, live a single life, and focus on himselves. |
Somebody shout hallelujah. Can I get an amen? As the Lord saith, all members, while coming to this crusade/revival, are mandated to bring, without fail, their tithes, offering (1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 4th ), seed offering, building offerings, special donations, sin cleansing offering etc. Tattered and decrepit money are not allowed, and don't bring lower denominations, for our mighty god shall not be disrespected. Shibarababababahh! Kai! Heed the divine mandate and ye shall be blessed. For now, let's bow our heads....
|
ichidodo:Indeed it is. The betas on this thread are easy catch. Look at how she drew their attention and had them making proposals. Such is the sad state of simphood. I hope she is now satisfied in achieving whatever her aim was in opening this thread. ![]() |
SweetCunt97:Too many lies. Just too many lies. Remember that moderation is key. ![]()
|
ichidodo:Lol. Any man who falls for the OP's nawalt signalling is far from taking the red pill on female nature. As I was reading the OP, I just kept laughing. Who does she think she is fooling? OP had cleverly cooked some lies with high grade spice, and simps on this thread are falling for it. ![]()
|
iammo:@Emboldened I was right then. I will go through this recent link. |
iammo:Okay. I just skimmed through the act, I am yet to see the laws that says a woman automatically has sole custody of the kids during divorce (and even when she is remarried), and the man is obliged to pay child support. The act was just about the legitimacy and conducts of a court wedding in accordance with the Nigerian constitution. In all fairness, I will still go over it again to be sure I didn't misrepresent anything, and I will properly look up the divorce laws here. Cc. Angelfallz |
emmaodet: Not bad. I pray you get the job. |
emmaodet:True. Many men's third leg are restless indeed. However, the woman should have planned a replacement instead of leaving the husband stranded. She should have considered the husband. Anyway, how is life and your wife? |
emmaodet:We never can tell since we don't know the couple very well. We can only make assumptions on what's most likely. |
emmaodet:Maybe, but it is highly unlikely. If the man had been a flirt and cheat to the knowledge of his wife, I don't think he would be puzzled by his wife behaviour to even open a thread on nairaland. Either the wife is overprotective, or she is playing "away match" during her travels and she suspects her husband will cheat just like her in her absence. |
angelfallz:No one should pay attention to fear mongering divorce tales of iammo. |
Akinbahm:The mentality killing many married Nigerian men involve: 1) Dissolving the marriage or send the wife packing isn't an option. This is a big lie, and marriage is not a point of no return. This mentality in men is what makes women feel invincible and untouchable when they get married and it makes them misbehave when they tie the knot. 2) The children belongs to the mothers alone. This is a big lie and men had better start realising that the children are theirs also, and no woman has the right to keep the children to themselves and alienate them from their children. 3) Enduring a toxic wife/marriage and brutally compromising their peace of mind are okay and they are best for the children. ![]() |
lilmonarch:No one should pay attention to the fear mongering divorce tales of iammo. A man too has the right to his children. In Nigeria, who gave the wife the audacity to take the children away? Where is it written that the children belong to her alone? Men who think the children belong to the woman alone and sending their wives packing is never an option are only going to suffer. As far as we are in Nigeria, fathers are not prohibited from fighting for their children. |
Akinbahm:One thing husbands don't realise is that if they become a doormat today, they will likely be doormats tomorrow. Shit tests are real. If they can't stand their ground today, it will be harder tomorrow. Marriage is not an excuse to be a doormat to a woman. |
iammo:This is the problem with many men. Marriage makes a woman secure, invincible, and dominate over the man as much as he let's it. It's not written anywhere that a woman can't be sent packing because she is married. Maybe it's because I am a stubborn and strong-willed man, but I will never be a doormat or compromise my peace of mind just to maintain a marriage with a bad and toxic wife just because of the children. Let the marriage scatter if it means I get to keep my peace of mind. As for the children, I can keep them and the mother will visit. If she wants to keep them to herself, we can go court and fight for joint custody, at least. (a family friend did it, why can't I). Besides, Nigerian judicial system is notoriously slow that the process MIGHT be completed when your children are seeing their grandchildren... just kidding. If the children wants to stay with their mother, then I must visit them anytime I want or else, they and the mother can fend go for themselves. ![]() By the way, you are indirectly admitting that children are indeed pawns women use to manipulate their husbands. It's true depending on the type of man and the society he lives in. In developed countries with their misandric divorce laws, children are always readily used as pawns by women and the courts to fleece and manipulate the father. Besides, children have always been desired by mothers to be used as pawns where they can since human history. Your remark always begs the question, do mothers really love their children more than fathers? ![]() Not to digress, marriage doesn't make a woman invincible, and there is no law that says you can't send her packing. Marriage is not something you must "kill and suffer yourself" on top. Once a woman has insisted on your being a doormat, withhold sex and weaponizing it, depriving you of your peace of mind, etc. send her packing. Recently, a man made the news for sending his wife packing when he discovered her vagina was too wide. With man like that and myself, marriage is not a security for any woman, and it doesn't make them untouchable. I have one life to live and I can waste it be miserable because of a woman and enduring silently because of children. Fùck all that! ![]() |
iammo:OP, don't listen to this advice. No one is asking you to quarrel with your wife. This is not a issue of gragra. Also, there is nothing bad in getting a male house help. However, it's imperative that everyone in a family must do the right thing and know their place. If your wife didn't trust you and wasn't comfortable having the maid around in her absence, she should have done the right thing by talking to you about it (usually from the onset) and thereby leading you or her to make plans for a male replacement way before she travels instead of just sending the housemaid you are paying for away against your will, and leaving you stranded. That's wrong, thoughtless, and selfish. She doesn't complain of the housemaid when she is around but all of a sudden, she sends the housemaid you are paying for away against your will, without your permission, and leaving no helping hand in her absence. To make it worse, it's all happening in your own house, your own house. Since the house belongs to you, you are the one paying the maid, and your wife didn't complain about the housemaid's stay from the onset, your wife has no right to send her away against your will leaving you stranded with no replacement. That right is reserved for you. That's wrong and selfish of her. Had it been she had complained from the onset, we could say she did the right thing she could and you should have employed a male house help. Give your wife the options I listed and stand on it. If you are man enough, call your wife out on her thoughtless behaviour. This time around, if there is going to be a male replacement, your wife must be the one to talk to you about it way before she travels again. It's funny how women who don't trust their husbands freely, to any extent, investigate any possible shenanigans of the husband, and take every precaution and measure to ensure the husband doesn't cheat regardless of what their husbands think. However, if a man doesn't trust his wife and insists on a DNA test, or decides to check his wife's phone, all hell break loose and the man gets told "don't you trust me?", "are you trying to say I am slùt?" etc. The op can as well play these cards on his wife. Ubunja, emmaodet, akinbahm, Solex2364 |
iammo:Lucky me, arguably. Nevertheless, my advice to the op is sound common sense. Haters can go eat śhit. ![]() |
iammo:Who told I was going to get married or have children? |
Purplekush:Yen yen yen yen yen yen yen... is that all?
|
Why are today's men so spineless and incredibly stupid? Even a man with Down Syndrome would know why your wife sends your maid away during her travels. To future buttress my point that you are spineless, consider that you are the one paying the housemaid's salary (which means you are the one who is supreme in determining if she goes to her family's place or not, not your wife), and your wife doesn't leave any alternative to your house maid when travelling. Nothing stops you, as the man of the house, from standing your ground and giving your wife the following options: (1) She accepts the housemaid stays while she travels, (2) She provides another alternative to the housemaid to help you out while she (your wife) is away, or (3) She pays you to compensate for the absence of a housemaid during her travel. How can your wife have the final authority on the housemaid you are paying for in your own house? What nonsense! What a spineless man! To make it worse, your wife provided no alternative leaving you to stress yourself and hopelessly grumble while she is away. How selfish of her. Instead of you to do something about it, you are complaining and grumbling like a weak child. Where is your spine? Gerarahia mehn
|
crackkhaus:It's ironic that all over the world, the safer the environment and the more progressive and empowering a society is for women, the likelihood of more radical feminists, and non-stop virulent complaints of nonexistent misogynistic patriarchy. The victim mentality therein never stops. Australia, which is listed as one of the safest places for women, is surprisingly the grand hub of radical feminism. Australian feminists still whine about the patriarchy, the mythic rape culture, the perpetually debunked gender wage gap, and, as declared on public television by a feminist, the murdering of women by men. Lmao . The whining went so far as to the bashing of men during the Australian fire outbreak when it was men that were mainly involved in firefighting. Australian feminists had the temerity to accuse male firefighters of being domestic abusers who would still go home to beat their wives. This can be likened to the situation of rich, privileged, and over pampered children who won't just stop whining about everything. Women in western societies/developed countries today (and even women in Nigeria) are the most privileged and pampered set of women in human history yet they won't stop whining. It just shows you that women can't be satisfied. If you check, you will see that the women whining online and offline about patriarchy and oppression of women are usually those residing in societies where they have the same rights and opportunities as men. These set of women have never lived a heavily misogynistic society for a day. Worse is that western women have more rights and privileges than men, and their societies are gynocentric. |
bukatyne:You are just rotting in the victim mentality. Emmaodet and crackkhaus are spot on. You bleat and whine about patriarchy (which you cunningly changed to "Nigerian patriarchy'' when confronted by emmaodet) like all feminists. If I may ask, 1) what rights and opportunities do YOU not have under this "Nigerian patriarchy" that Nigerian men have? 2) In what way does this "Nigerian patriarchy" prevent you from making it in life and being who you want to be as a woman? You women always create something to whine about and make yourselves victims even when there is no reason to. |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 (of 238 pages)
Can I get an amen? 
