₦airaland Forum

ubunja:
the Cancel Culture just took off in the West. You say anything controversial they deplatform you. You become a pariah. And we talk so much about whats happening in the West because that's the blueprint of where the world is going.

Red Pill is noble. But it's enemies are too strong. We will enjoy pussy like no man's business, but in the real world the Blue Pill simp will get the money. Because he's not controversial and does what is expected from men.

The things that are usually cancelled in the west:
1) Redpill and MGTOW truths,
2) Conservative ideas,
3) Anti-liberal and anti-globalist ideas,
4) Anti-feminist ideas,

5) Science (when it supports that there are two genders instead of many, when it supports differences in IQ among races, when it supports the fact that chromosomes determine gender, etc.) The liberal left wants it imposed on everyone that there are more than two genders (48+) with their specific gender pronouns, and it's a crime to "misgender" a person (call them by their wrong pronouns). The liberal left wants us to believe that all humans all literally alike in IQ even though science disagrees (they call such scientific fact "racism" and promotion of "harmful stereotypes" ). The liberal left wants us to believe that a woman is someone who identifies as a woman, and a man is someone who identifies as a man. The left wants us to believe that both male and female are alike in almost all aspects to the extent that James Damore, an ex-employee at Google, was fired for publishing a piece of gender difference that accords with science. He was said to be "advancing harmful gender stereotypes”.

6) Anti-Islamic ideas.

ubunja:
You think it's a bed of roses being red pill? Which public figure do you know who is openly red pill? When red pillers on social media are censored daily.

This is one topic we will have to agree to disagree.

There are few public figures that are redpill but they dare not express their redpill ideas openly. The blue pill is so strong that in western societies, people can even lose their jobs and source of livelihoods by expressing certain ideas and going against feminist rhetorics. Hollywood celebrities can't even express redpill ideas, support Trump or conservatism, etc. without backlash.

Skepticus:
It's a "tough" route to take, and I salute the courage of you and kennedyiheme02

We just have to be realistic. There is no point giving equal benefits to both genders if the male will still end up being the provider while the female is afforded the liberty by society to offer little or nothing in return in the name of liberation and feminism. Men are still seen as providers by the society, and women, despite claiming to righteously uphold feminism, demand men to pay/provide; it's fair to give men more privilege and empowerment to fulfill that role. There is no point giving equal benefits to both genders if the female will still be pampered and given free passes just because she is a woman.

Seun please confirm this or close down this thread for the violation of Rule 8: Don't post false information on Nairaland.

Hmmmm. I don't really hate any gender, but I would prefer male children (my preference). Also, when sharing my properties and money, I will give more to the male children since men will invariably be the breadwinners and providers despite the talking points of feminists. As for the girls, I will leave a little for them to be able to sustain themselves until their provider husbands come along. The reason why kennedyiheme02 and many men give the business to boys is because men are usually risk takers as seen by the gender that dominates the forbes's billionaires and millionaires list. Even many female business owners prefer to hire men.


The moral champions that know how to treat women right (White Knights) are coming for me.

ubunja:
you don't know how weak men are today. The pussy worshiping is too much. I Don't wanna bring my son into a world where he'll be hated for being alpha and red pill. Simps outnumber us by 4 to 1.

Red Pill men enjoy pussy and rule women but out there the world only supports the Blue Pill Mangina Simp that worships women.

Make it 90 to 1.

I get your point; It's possible. First class gold diggers will swim in a pool of faeces just for the Benjamins.

hahn:
Understatement

Money is God here

Even in our churches and mosques.

GreatResearcher:
Ishilõve

why are you calling her here?

A human life, just like all lives, is simply an interruption of eternal nothingness and oblivion. Never worry about when you will die; death can come anytime. Just make good and cautious decisions and live your life to the fullest.

Kennedyiheme02:
lol never knew it could be waved off.. what kinda disastrous era of weak men are we in?.. in the days of american godfathers like Abraham lincoln, no woman tries that rubbish....

It's common knowledge that prenups are glorified toilet papers. A basketball player in America (I can't remember the name but you can google him) signed three papers for his prenup but the judge waved it aside and placed him on alimony and child support. Go and ask anyone over there; they will tell you that prenups are glorified toilet papers of the divorce courts.

Thats why people of olden days will tell you a womans place is in the kitchen... i read an old scroll from i think persian mythology... a part of it says... if you give a woman power, she'll destroy you both.... we see all these laws and say its archaic.. its actually not.. it's a truth that is ageless and everlasting... we are so civilized we believe we don't need old knowledge

The truth is that redpill knowledge on female nature are not new. These truths were even known thousands of years ago. In fact our distant forefathers will laugh at you if you told them you wanted to marry for love. They didn't do love. Romantic love is a relatively recent human invention that has captured many minds. It's just that the present world we live is blue pilled, and feminists, the media, and white knights have all successfully distorted history and convinced us that our forefathers were misogynists who hated women. Little do people know that our forefathers were masculine men that understood women and knew how to handle them.

• If you ask feminists in America how men were misogynistic in the past, they will quickly mention how men didn't allow women to vote. What they don't tell you is that voting was restricted to the ruling class, and many men couldn't vote too.
• Nigerian feminists might point our that women in the past were left out of inheritance due to misogyny and sexism. What they failed to mention was that since men had the burden to be breadwinners and protectors, men were empowered with the whole inheritance so they could provide for their families. Women were left out because their husbands (who, possibly, also solely inherited properties, money, and lands, and made his own money) would take care of them.
• What about men going to school while women stayed at home as they learned to be good wives and housekeepers? Feminists act like this male positon, then, were made out of misogyny and sexism. They failed to tell us that the reason men were made to go to school and hold jobs wasn't because of sexism. It was because these were thought to give men the means to provide for their family. Society saw men as workhorses for their families and empowered them to serve as proper workhorses. The women? They were seen as housekeepers who would provided for by their husbands. Housekeeping doesn't require sound education so women stayed at home and were groomed to be housekeepers. These were gender roles not sexism. It's now okay if feminists don't want these roles but they shouldn't lie that it's slavery and sexism and that men didn't have their burdens too.

I could say more but I will reserve them for a topic i will soon create.


Ubunja, Omar09, emmaodet

Administration1:
Ashawo na money you pursue, now u dey find prick

Westernlove:
No na heaven I dey chop....

No mind am.

foolbuster:

Skepticus:
The NAWALT crew! Lol

They always learn the hard way!

The NAWALT crew are in for a big shock.

Arthur21:
what stops the men from signing a prenup? I guess Trump did so with his wife.

A moniker,casalinda ranted for weeks of her genuine love for a wealthy dude,after proposing,the dude brought a prenup...the girl started to feel uncomfy and open a thread complaining.

Men are their own problems,that is why I rarely blame ladies,who go see free food no chop?
Or is it great researcher that was dealt with heavily by a lady? Still talking about marriage in less than a year and paying for sex people get for free?

Please stop preaching red pill till all my kid sisters are married,they most milk foolish men first

Kennedyiheme02, don't listen to this prenup bullshit. Prenups are nothing but glorified toilet papers in the western divorce courts. The judge could toss it aside for any reason and place you on alimony, and child support.

NB: Arthur21, please don't bother replying me. I will ignore 'cos I have no time and energy to go back and forth explaining the simplest things to you.

GreatResearcher:
Christ too

True.

Probably not.

mrpaedo:
You aren't trying to 'employ' him to do anything.You are just trying to control him.That is a female tactic.Trying to control overly masculine men.Methinks you need more testosterone in your body

Ariza:
And you let out all these just to prove an opinion which isn't even a fact. My heart goes to ladies who get so serious, trusting and relaxed with Nl guys.

BTW as a married man are you supposed to be that close to a lady? Moreover makes you think you are that different from the last lady? Smooched and suck boobs? Married man? Nawa ooo

Leave him alone, and don't take things too seriously. Let him gist me in peace.

Mermaids don't exist.

emmaodet:
Most of these ladies are really not what they portray themselves to be.
A female nairalander complained bitterly last year on a thread about how she do give her best to guys blah blah blah but guys are not serious just like dis gal.
One thing lead to other, we became close and exchanged numbers, then started chatting and calling.
It was when i got closer that i knew she is not different from most girls out there.
We were so close and free with each other that when she started telling me about her past and present relationships, oboy i shuddered.
Meeting sugar daddies, old men, sleeping around, fvcking around, snapping and sending nude pix to guys.
From most of our conversations, i noticed virtually every week she must meet a man in the bus, office, event that she gives her number to.
She is constantly meeting new guys or men every week.
Also most weekends, she must have one party or event or cousin or uncle to go and meet which i believe are her clients.
She is working and earning 40k per month yet living a life far above that.
Met her once after she has been disturbing me for us to meet and bang each other, just went to her office place, smooched and sucked boobs and gave her a Red card.
Not interested anymore because i noticed she also wanted to turn me to a maga, constantly complaining about money yet worried about not getting younger and needs a serious relationship to lead to marriage Asap.

That's why I don't just believe a story that comes out of a woman's mouth, especially one in which she is an angel or victim. I prefer to investigate.

ubunja:
reminds me of that Meme where a guy is asking his sister why she always has money and his sister explains that He has a GF but She has a BF.

Point being that in relationships money always flow from guy to girl. So, no girl, money will be saved.

Arthur21:
that aside,our argument was only in respect to slut shaming. How about simp shaming? Do you and/or cohort simp sham men in arguments? Some people said the excuse for shaming ladies is that non virginity is permanent. Is simp-hood permanent?so why still simp shaming since a simp can turn redpilled?

I don't have the energy to go back and forth with you, and explaining the simplest stuffs, especially with a fellow that isn't straightforward. Believe and think what you want while I believe and think what I have. Case closed.

It depends. All things being equal, I would say a house should come first.

Arthur21:
him off course,your slavery ain't permanent,he may have sold you off to another master....go wash the dishes boy,you master needs the kitchen tidy

Werey. You knew I was correct yet you feigned ignorance. Weh done sah. Ubunja is not my master.

Arthur21:
:
:
I didnt call anyone's name na.why assume I was referring to him?
:
:

Na so. Oya, who were you referring to as my master?

Biglittlelois:
I'd rather vomit than sit and listen to you disgrace yourself just to blindly support, not even a whitey that you guys drool on, but a YELLOW MANGINA, probably becos you are also a mangina correct? Lmao ALAILOPOLO OLORIPELEBE.

Have a nice day.








.
.
.
.
Wheww! What a crazy woman.

Biglittlelois:
Are you that clueless you don't know when a question is rhetorical? Lol not surprised

Emotional? You think you and ubunja are capable of making me emotional? Do I sound like your regulars that goes apeshit cos of your regular baseless banters on a faceless forum? Lol I put you and him at par cos you both have the same level of thinking dude, so don't kid yourself.

Are you really this minimal intellectually that you can't understand a simple statement? Believe me you both aren't worth it at all.

Very good, I'm glad you finally eat your words and own up to it even though it hurts to admit it, especially with the way you keep using different smiley to cover up, lol.

Well, no point going back and forth. Have a nice day.

Arthur21:
you first post on this thread was rebuking the fact people in general attach importance to ones financial status, your tone was beyond mere broke shaming people as a rebuttal in banters but the general disdain towards broke men

My first post on this thread is on something else relevant to this topic. Haba! My post is even the third on this forum. Get your facts right. My grievance was that during arguments, people usually stray from the intellectual path and insinuate, or outrightly proclaim, that someone is jobless or has an abject financial situation intending such as an insult, rebuttal, clapback, and/or silencing tool. I then attributed this to the huge money worship in this country. Get this into your head.

I don't see berating ladies(saying ladies are h0es,non virgins are sluts,used products,worthless,losers) like your master does as any different from looking down on broke people or being wary of financial status(not merely as rebuttals or personal insults).

Ubunja is not my master. The redpill movement and manosphere isn't a cult with a supreme leader every man answers to. As I have said, we don't berate or use ad hominem. We say things as we see them.

Except you chose to lie or wanted to lick your master's a$$, you were wrong about him and atroG not disparaging SM.

Well, there is no point going back and forth. We can agree to disagree. Have a nice day.

Biglittlelois:
Lmao what a smello

My round table is set. There are three empty seats and a white board behind me. Make sure you come with those two guys so I can educate you all on human rights, and teach you that a business owner has the right to deny his services to any potential customer. OLODO RABATA

HMarshal:
Damn! You dey vex o!!! Hehehehe

I am not angry. Money is good, sweet, and important, but one must not take money worship to the next level like Nigerians. People worship money so much that "I am richer than your generation" is now a rebuttal and many people's "logical" counter during an argument. It's even used as an insult.