Mavenb0x's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Mavenb0x's Profile › Mavenb0x's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 (of 17 pages)
Php 2:4 Let each of you esteem and look upon and be concerned for not [merely] his own interests, but also each for the interests of others.Prolegomena: If we can agree that Earth is a temporal place with respect to Heaven, and mankind is utterly finite with respect to God, then we see that every occurrence on earth is very much like the happenings in a book or a movie: pre-determined by the author or script-wright, but each character in the book/movie is oblivious of that fact. Now, let us consider an autobiography or self-directed documentary, in which the author himself features. Truly, the finality of the matter is known and determined by this author in reality, but that does not prevent the reader / observer from having a thumping heart, or the other story-characters from frenzied actions, as the excitement in the story grows. In light of this, I will start by saying that this side of existence is relatively virtual, with respect to eternity. As seen in Php 2:4-7 above, Jesus was an "actor" in the "reality show" called Earth. In his essential nature outside the "movie" Earth, he is still himself, God. It cannot be seriously asserted by anybody that Jesus is the Father. I crafted that question carefully because of the trinitarian problem of identification whereby all three are said to be God, but never identified as being one another: in other words - is the son the Holy spirit as well? You keep referring to "the three of them", which is an assumption that you have made, thinking I believe in the Trinity. I do not. I repeat, God is not 3-in-1, He is 1-as-3. i.e. A Singleton, who, relative to mankind, has been seen (and still is seen) in three various perspectives. Analogy: Jackie Chan's Who am I, a 1998 Jackie Chan film (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Who_Am_I%3F) which he wrote, starred in, and also directed is a good example here! Since he wrote the movie, I will say He FATHERED it, c.f. the role of God (as) the Father. As he starred in it, that means his own script "gave birth to his character" i.e. He did EXACTLY what the script described for his role (that is what SONship is all about!). Directing the movie is like the role of the Holy Spirit, whom the Bible says, knows the things of God (1 Cor 2:11-13), and is the one qualified to GUIDE us into all truth, as God is truth. Would it then be right for an observer to ask "How can Jackie Chan condescend to such a level as to allow himself lose his memory (as it happened in the movie)? Since he wrote the script, why couldn't he let it all be an easy, smooth & magical macho ride?". Valid question, but then who would buy such a movie? ![]() In light of the analogy above, if we say that 1. Jackie Chan (the real guy you can eat dinner with), 2. his movie-character (A black-OPs CIA agent also named Jackie Chan) and 3. the movie director (an ambitious guy named Jackie Chan) are all the same JACKIE CHAN, would we be wrong? So why is it hard to understand that God wrote a script called Eternity, and one of the seasons of that long movie is called Earth, and he decided to feature himself in it? Some minutes into that season, he allows the "himself" character to die (as was planned from the start) and the script goes on? And that, exactly, is the case we have right here. Jesus is a projection of God into human form (a la projection of Jackie Chan into the TV screen), and I will employ this analogy to answer |
I can't retype it all here, but I and a friend called Deep Sight have once had this discussion (about Jesus) on NL. See these posts: His Questions: https://www.nairaland.com/nigeria/topic-369330.0.html#msg5156122 My Responses: https://www.nairaland.com/nigeria/topic-369330.32.html#msg5159346 https://www.nairaland.com/nigeria/topic-369330.32.html#msg5159464 https://www.nairaland.com/nigeria/topic-369330.32.html#msg5159555 https://www.nairaland.com/nigeria/topic-369330.32.html#msg5159717 https://www.nairaland.com/nigeria/topic-369330.32.html#msg5159805 https://www.nairaland.com/nigeria/topic-369330.32.html#msg5159970 and his refuttals https://www.nairaland.com/nigeria/topic-369330.64.html#msg5165832 and the next 7 posts on the thread and my responses here https://www.nairaland.com/nigeria/topic-369330.64.html#msg5168493 https://www.nairaland.com/nigeria/topic-369330.64.html#msg5171439 Best Regards. |
@No2Atheism: Hey I didn't mean to be nasty, and I'm really sorry. Below is some really good stuff right here, bro. http://www.joshharris.com/2007/02/feeding_the_flesh.php In view of some of your above posts, I think you will also find these useful. http://www.covlife.org/resources/series/Purity or, if you prefer to check out the messages one by one, http://www.covlife.org/resources/2831357-WisdomGuided_Sexuality God calls Christians to pay close attention to God's truth about sex. http://www.covlife.org/resources/2671290-The_Truth_About_Temptation Joshua Harris teaches on a passage that helps us understand how to think about temptation in light of the real temptations the Corinthians faced and in light of our freedoms as believers in Christ. http://www.covlife.org/resources/2671297-Holiness_and_Media Joshua Harris teaches us four things that holiness requires as it specifically relates to our cultures emphasis on TV and movies. http://www.covlife.org/resources/2671300-Resisting_Lust Joshua Harris continues the series on purity and leads us in considering how lust deceives us and how we can learn to resist it. http://www.covlife.org/resources/2671296-Pressing_on_in_Holiness In the final message in our Purity series, Joshua Harris considers further reasons for pressing into holiness: for God's glory, fellow Christians, and the lost. I also recommend Joshua Harris' really wonderful books: I Kissed Dating Goodbye, Sex is not the Problem (Lust is) and Boy meets Girl. |
Kai! No2Atheism has converted this thread into his graffiti book ![]() |
Enigma:If I get you clearly, Enigma, it means that because an Enigma, asides referring to a secret that baffles understanding, is also considered to be an abstruse problem that we would do anything to do away with for peace and sanity to reign, it is a necessary definition of your personality? I don't need to google anything before I speak my own mind. There are many voices in the world and we can't all say the same thing, so I don't care what people are saying out there. My own voice will be heard by whoever wants to hear it. Best Regards. |
@na2day: LOL na2day? Your name is so apt in this case. I have never met you, so to speak, so how can I tell that? @SeanT21: |
Sorry for the derailing above, and Abuzola, many thanks for starting out this thread. ![]() Here is the thread on faith. https://www.nairaland.com/nigeria/topic-381608.0.html @Pastor AIO: I have weighed it and it is under a kilogram by a few milligrams, thanks to the flicker you caused by blowing some air into the fire No deal, sir! |
Pastor AIO:Pastor AIO, the Word of God is the Code of Conduct by which he carries out all that He does. |
Inherently, it takes the scripture to interpret the scripture. See Hebrews 11:1 below: Heb 11:1 Now faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen. (KJV)The Word has spoken and no one can come up and say that "this is my own understanding of faith" or "this is how my own faith works". Here is the singularity of faith's definition, knocking out all speculations: Faith IS the substance, . Faith is not hope (1 Cor 13:13), belief, faithfulness, stubbornness, mystery, fiction, facts, religion, fate or waiting. Faith is the substance of things. There is only one definition of faith (since Eph 4:5 and 2 Cor 4:13 affirm there is only one faith). Faith is NOT a substance, it is THE substance, a definite article showing that there is only one substance in the scheme of things. So, no matter what you are involved in, spiritual, secular, economical, even for desired things; faith is THE substance. And that's why it's impossible to please God without Faith. Without Faith, there is no substance of things, and when there is no substance of the very thing you are involved with, God is not pleased! Heb 11:6 But without faith it is impossible to please and be satisfactory to Him, FAITH IS HYPOSTASIS In metaphysics, hypostasis is the essential nature or underlying reality, the constituent and very make-up of things. That's faith! Faith is hypostasis because it is what articulates things; it is the blueprint of things. Faith is the substance of your life, the substance of your health, business, career, prayer and walk with God. Faith is the substance of things hoped for. Did you notice that hope is the only word in the past tense? For every hope you express to God: hope for a good business output, a superb marriage, the development of an enterprise on earth, you hope in God for something to happen to you or for you that would lead to the fulfilment of your aspirations. Hope alone can never bring your aspirations to pass, but hope will do these two (rather similar) things for you. 1. Hope helps you keep you head up Rom 5:5a And hope maketh not ashamed; Rom 5:5a In alert expectancy such as this, we're never left feeling shortchanged. . . Rom 5:5a Such hope never disappoints or deludes or shames us. . . 2. Hope is the steadfast anchor of your soul Heb 6:19a Which hope we have as an anchor of the soul, both sure and stedfast. . . Heb 6:19a [Now] we have this [hope] as a sure and steadfast anchor of the soul [it cannot slip and it cannot break down under whoever steps out upon it--a hope]. . . Heb 6:19 It's an unbreakable spiritual lifeline. . . Hope is good. These two verses mean that when you are hoping in God, you are not ashamed and you are stable. Your soul is anchored, so you are not wandering, you are not drifting from the assured promise. Hope helps keep your will, emotion and intellect together and at the same time it makes you have a right attitude (an attitude of not being ashamed while waiting for the fulfilment you desire). Summarily, I believe this verse sets it out this way: You start out hoping for a thing (maybe you are praying for it, fasting for it, or simply believing God for it). As you express that hope to God in prayer, fasting, worship or the study of the scriptures, a time comes when God in His sovereignty communicates to you the substance of that hope you had expressed to Him. It is this substance of the hope you expressed in God, communicated to you directly by God, that is called FAITH. Once this substance of the hope you expressed has been communicated to you, hope becomes the past. You are now in faith, you no longer hope for it. FAITH IS NOW THE SUBSTANCE OF THE THINGS YOU HOPED FOR. This is the story of everyone who worked or did anything by faith. FAITH simply means someone responded to God by practicing the substance of the hope that WAS in them. The substance of that hope is a revelation borne out of God's Word. Until you get a definite word concerning the hope in you, you are still in hope. The substance of the faith in you is born when God communicates to you through His Word or Spirit. Rom 10:17 So then faith cometh by hearing, and hearing by the word of God. Until God speaks to you on a matter you cannot express faith for it. [b]Simply put, Faith is the substance of your hope, that comes by hearing what God has to say about the hope! Whatever God says is the substance of that hope. [/b]Faith signifies the expression or the practice of the word that was given to you as the substance of your hope. Before we consider Biblical examples, I want to buttress the points above: The Greek word used for "evidence" in Heb 11:1 is elegchos meaning "Title deed". When you purchase a land, a document is issued to certify that you are the owner of the said land. So it tells that faith is a title deed, signed, sealed and delivered to you. All you need to do is to go out there with the faith to possess the property allocated to you. The reason it can't be a fake paper is because God is the allotter. The land, wherever it is, is no more a reality than what appears on paper as a title deed. The Word of God communicates to your spirit the title deed or the occupancy of a property you have not seen. We know that every title deed for land shows ownership, size and location of the property. So faith at this level shows you the ownership, tells you the size and indicates the location of a property not yet seen. It is specific! Unlike the one that is seen, faith delivers to you the title deed on an unseen property. Once you have the title deed, the job is done. Heb 11:1 says "not yet seen", meaning it will be seen eventually. faith does not wait for it to be seen, it takes hold of unseen realities and uses it in the PRESENT time. |
Guyzmat, Renz and Selencious: Did you people read the "Edit" notes under the OP's initial post? ![]() JeSoul is one of the (few?) practicing Christians I have met here on Nairaland, and she did not really mean Ungodly or unholy. She meant it "in quote", so-to-speak. Some people see the SOS as unholy, and that was what she meant. If you really read through the consequent posts, you will see that people just DID NOT get her point. And neither did the three of you. I speak for her because I know that is not her mindset. |
The Word of Faith is the driving force of the universe. It is an economy and a determinant of God's Fiscal Policy. Heb 11:3 By faith we understand that the worlds [during the successive ages] were framed (fashioned, put in order, and equipped for their intended purpose) by the word of God, so that what we see was not made out of things which are visible. It is the operating system by which the will of God is done on the earth. Men of faith in the Bible interacted with the promises of God by faith and brought forth dimensions, dispensations, seasons, policies and events alien to their environment, culture, economy and status quo. The incontrovertible truth is that, through the substance called faith, events have taken place on the earth that have altered the course of nature, government, economy and human development. Inexhaustive Highlights of the Word of Faith among men: -A man walked with God -A ship built by a family to preserve mankind -The Red Sea opened -An insurmountable wall came down -A world power was defeated (Pharaoh and army) -Economic and political emancipation after 400 years of slavery -Global sustenance through corn for 14 years -Nonagenerian conceived -Incessant blood-flow due to haemorrhage dried up -Economic fortunes in a period of Global Economic Recession (Abraham, Isaac) -Kingdoms subdued by a small, relatively non-military nation, Israel -A persecutor became an apostle What is that something, the spark that ignited these events in the annals of human history? It is important to note that faith is not a biblical doctrine deployed occassionally when one is faced with a difficult situation. The Bible in Rom 1:17 and 3 other places declares that the Just lives by (his) faith. i.e. anyone justified lives by faith. The just is the new creation in Christ Jesus, he is created to live by faith, he has been programmed this way and for this to happen he has to learn faith, know faith, develop faith, talk faith and thus live by faith. There is a line joining people of equal faith, who hear the Word of Faith, receive it, meditate on it, increase in learning and grow thereby. So we want to study faith as it is seen in the Word of God, we want to understand it, conceptualize it and importantly, we want to apply it. |
I guess IMHO in imhotep means In My Honest Opinion? Hehe, jokes. I know its Egyptian origins.imhotep:I will do just that, but you need to pay me. I will accept nothing less than a kilogram of fire. ![]() imhotep:Yes, the words are pointers to the necessary experience, and can never actually define the experience in totality. For instance, I can tell you what I had for breakfast, and you can conceptualize it, imagine tasting it, but you can't grasp it in totality, which in itself is a limitation of mankind. imhotep:You are getting my point now, Imhotep. The Master's TEACHING should be understood if the disciple is to make progress, or as I said, have a journey unto enlightenment. This teaching will, in part, constitute of words which I believe must also be understood; as well as the master's actions will be understood, and also the master's inactions. I think the main problem here is in the phrasing of the words (you see, another limitation with words). I think you seem to mean that "the master's intents and purposes are not to be understood" and not "the master's words are not to be understood". What do you think? Edit: This came in while I was posting the above: imhotep:And that exactly is my point. What is left is the intents and purposes of the master, which cannot be "rationalized". It will all go through the solvent called "understanding", and so THIS won't dissolve. The words of the Master will fail, they will dissolve. But the Truth they embody will stand. That reminds me, I am meant to be starting out a thread on faith. Please you are welcome there. |
Thanks sir. Unputdownable? I like that word, I will use it someday ![]() |
LOL thanks Ilosiwaju! Though we don't agree about many things, it seems you've always got my back. Thanks again, bro! |
Very brilliant reasoning, Imhotep. For the record, Pastor AIO, I agree with you and understand you to the end of the line. Maybe I'm just a nitpicker but something in Imhotep's statement doesn't fit. Imhotep, the ONE point I have been addressing is still THIS one: Mavenb0x:Can you please tie this in with the numerous "conversations" with the disciples? Are they not instructions that are meant to be fathomed, if not grasped in entirety, at least understood? For instance, in your last stated one, if the disciples never understood that the spiritual exercises are meant to guide one on the way to Enlightenment, how will they proceed except by chance? I never indicated that the Master ought to spoon-feed the Disciple, or that the Disciple ought to think himself/herself ever competent enough to handle things by himself; I perfectly understand your stance that the Master's words are only a guide, but my question is that how can you say the Master is NOT to be understood? Where is the rationality in that? If the Master is not to be understood, will there ever be a journey? |
LOL Thank you people! ![]() Hafees, well the problem is that Im often too busy to develop my novels (I have a number of them). But I have your email now, and who knows? I may just contact you! Never say never, they say ![]() |
imhotep:@imhotep: Seeing that the overcoming of obstacles entails various techniques, do you not agree that instruction is a more secure route than a painstaking awakening that may or may not occur if it isn't managed or at least supervised in part? What then is the task of a disciple? [color=#990000]Edit: And on the other hand, even if the process must need be painstaking, instruction will ensure that the necessary awakening is achieved when the painstaking process occurs. The instruction will ensure the master-to-be recognizes the presented opportunity for an enlightenment, the same way one may appreciate the song of a bird because he/she knows the beauty of music. |
TrueSeeker:I think this is the most useful post on this entire thread. Thanks for sharing this, The Seeker. P.S. JeSoul I made a mistake in my post when I said the young virgin girl was espoused to King Solomon ![]() |
Backup / Replay: AMPLIFIED: THE MESSAGE:The AMPLIFIED clearly states that the death is an extinguishing of life, and The MESSAGE shows also that the death is fatal -- thus causing eternal death (as I explained earlier, when fatality is encountered, there will not be any chance to repent, making eternal death automatic. If fatality is not yet encountered, then one may repent and avoid eternal death). Let me repeat v17 in the MESSAGE [size=18pt]1Jn 5:17 Everything we do wrong is sin, but not all sin is fatal.[/size] and I just read verse 18 again, I believe it is the key to it all: when one makes a HABIT of sinning, then it becomes an unconscious thing and if one dies at any instantaneous time, s/he will almost certainly die in sin: THAT is the fatality described. So if you see one who constantly commits a sin and it has become a part of them, it will almost certainly lead to fatality sooner or later. Death will ensue. You may ask Abacha ![]() |
Sorry to burst in on your enlightening conversation with ancel, but Imhotep, you say the words of the Master are not be understood? How did he become a master then? By a chance awakening in his/her heart? |
Thanks, viaro. ![]() |
MyJoe, thanks but I guess its not necessary. SeanT21, who I was talking to, knows me in reality outside Nairaland and so does JeSoul. So i could have made such a sideline post only in reply to either of them. I dont joke about such things & I was not advertising so I had to curb the gist before it goes out of hand. I know some other people will as well attempt to ressurect the gist anyway. |
JeSoul my dear, thanks. I was in self-defense mode already cos im used to this, and u never know. Why oh why dont people let others be? I have never criticized or picked on others for their [dis]virginity status so whenever it happens to me, THIS happens, and it was just starting. ![]() |
Deep sight, I have said it before and I will say it again, I dont care what the world does by nature of sex, which, last time I checked, was private. If your neighbour is sleeping with hogs and dogs, its none of my concern. You keep speaking as if my post was made out in response to the OP, but no it was not. So thats why you have gone on and on about the natural tendency to indulge in sex, be it sparingly or otherwise. I dont give a damn what you do with your sexual urges or how often, cos im not your keeper or your god. When i mention excess, its with reference to the person's decision. If someone decides to stop eating Chinese food, the delicacies become an excess to him. I thought I made my self clear that it has nothing to do with frequency? ![]() Near the end of your post, you come round to the only one point I have been addressing all along. You claim that the examples were too harsh. Is that so? Social ills, Moral ills, ills in Personal ethics, and then religio-spiritual ills [if that is the reason for a 2nd attempt at chastity] all encompass the same human soul who is trying to become better [to conform to either observed social or perceived divine standards of good]. So who EXACTLY are you, Deep Sight, to say someone who makes an honest attempt at bettering [as far as he/she believes] themselves is demonic? Who made you the final authority in deciding what is best for people to believe? So you say everything against the natural call is demonic? Thats rich, coming from you, who also believes in repressing natural instincts in the understanding of the divine! You must indulge in every low-level primal whim, then. I get it now Bawomolo, how does my virginity status or its attendant requisites put food on your table? Please, I will like you to mind your business, thats what will keep hunger at bay for you. Oyb, if you knew who you were talking to, you would swallow your foot. Please keep such ideas to yourself, i was talking to SeanT21, who knows why I said what I said the way I said it. |
For the sake of your blasphemy, I now understand that you are not in search of the truth, and my discussion will be a waste of my precious time. But for posterity, I will reply the post above. When one reads the KJV without a concordance, one can almost give any meaning to any word. If you are too lazy to use one, read the Amplified version i posted and see v16 where the death is described as the extinguishing of life. The life that God will give when you pray for the sinning brother, is a merciful extension of his lifespan to give him an opportunity to come back to himself. Without such an extension he would die in his sin and then he would be damned. So you think its spiritual life? Thats heavy ignorance between your ears, because Salvation is each man's personal decision. When Huxley sins, Olaadegbu can at best pray for mercy and more time for Huxley to come back to God. Thats the secondary dimension of forgiveness. The primary dimension, you must use your own mouth and heart. Olaadegbu cannot confess Huxley's sins and obtain eternal life on his behalf. As for when you will die, Im not God's Voltron, running to defend him. Neither am I His timekeeper. Your surmise only irritates me. But just like i know a man forcibly held underwater may only survive for so long without oxygen and death is sure unless he can rise for air, I know death is inevitably at your window already, forcing its way in. God's mercies are endless, who knows, a miracle may yet save you. |
Huxley, the verses (see my last post above) clearly show that John meant "there are sins that INVOLVE death in the process of carrying out the sin". It speaks here of a physical death, because when one dies physically while sinning it will be impossible to repent. Since the time Christ rose from the dead and preached to the dead, giving them a final chance, forgiveness has become a luxury only available to those with the license of physical life. After Christ rose, anyone who dies in his sin will not have another chance. All sin lead to spiritual death. A classical sin which leads to physical death is suicide. Or maybe cursing the Holy Spirit, thus severing your possible connection to God and escaping the arms of mercy; physical death will occur quickly. Like it did with Herod in Acts. If you are in a tree & you saw off the branch you are sitting on, wont gravity break your bones? |
Deep Sight, i knew you would roll in the direction of sex outside marriage because you already know my stance. But that is totally off my point on this thread. You said trying to resume a life of celibacy after sexual experience is demonic, and i countered that the same methods are used to deal with other ethical, social, medical and personal issues. Then you said it does not apply because this is a natural instinct like eating (which begins the off-point journey, because people can break their fast , eat and resume fasting. Your hero, Gandhi, did it often). I replied meaning that eating will not be a thing we are trying to "correct", so maybe gula (gluttony) or alcoholism may be a more appropriate view. I said this because, objectively, why some people will choose to re-maintain a state of celibacy is constituted from their own personal ethics, like the reason why one will choose to stop smoking or doing drugs or eating in excess or something. So they all compare in light of the fact that the person sees it as an excess in view of their personal ethics. Otherwise why would they want to re-maintain, as you put it? My point is not whether human beings are sleeping with hogs or dogs or they are having indiscriminate sex. Its none of my business. My point is, how can you say it is "demonic" (evil, wrong, misguided, improper) to decide to re-maintain? Thats what I was on about and not the excess sexual escapades of others, or the lack thereof. |
DeepSight, if you will be honest to yourself you will see how my analogy applies. You have mentioned eating and drinking as natural impulses, but you have eschewed gula. You can't tell me that excesses are a natural order, it tends to successive entropy. Gluttony is the analogous equivalent of many of the "unmaintained" practices, and not hunger because those sexua.l actions are not intended to procreate. Se.x, as discussed here, is more akin to those (often tending to excess) fun-and-excitement seeking practices I mentioned, or in some cases they were lured into it unsuspectingly, or otherwise where the people who stopped "maintaining" were. maybe, rap.ed, then you can liken it to the psychotherapy I mentioned. Lets be honest in our analysis, please. |
JeSoul, in case you are alarmed at some responses, don't be. Get set for more: SOS is delicate & controversial enough and your thread title is to be "blamed" & will wreak more. . . ![]() Okay, my opinion. SOS is pure romantic poetry, and as was common before the repressive Victorian age, is highly eroti.c (or at least it was, in its hey day) in nature. God designed us that way, and it pleased him to wire us up to also be able to control ourselves when necessary. Se.x is a great thing! But as with all other things in nature, like gravity, it must be kept in check, properly moderated, or you fly into the sun. I never force the topic down people's throats but I believe God never intended us to indulge in carefree, temporary-commitment &irresponsible se.x like some animals. He wanted us to enjoy it in a sweet & controlled, defined atmosphere of a marital union. If any, there are few lines pointing to a spiritual relationship with God. That was not the author's intent, IMO, so if any its a coincidence. I think the book is there to show the virtues of chastit.y in the Shunammite woman, who was espoused to King Solomon. The romanti.c praise of the Wise King for the distinguished wise virgin is the theme in SOS and there are volumes to learn there if you dont have a "heart attack" at every eroti.c word! |
@Deepsight: Can I take your opinion that "re-maintenance is demonic since maintenance is dreadful enough" to mean you do not believe, for instance, in 1. Drug & Alcoholism rehab programs 2. Prisons & other Legal correctional institutions like the "juve". 3. Psychotherapy as a medical aid in resolving soul trauma? Because IMO they employ similar procedures in getting one back to a path he/she deliberately or mistakenly left or was lured into abandoning for the sake of excitement and adventure. What say ye? |
Okay, JeSoul ![]() |
What mistruths are you now engendering? What complications did I foster on your question? Didn't I answer? ![]() And now you are talking about shackles, as if you don't understand the 9ja slang. Do you see what I was saying about splitting hairs? Im certain everyone on this thread (except for some troublemakers that will soon show up, I guess) understands all I have said perfectly. Am I even having this conversation? ![]() |

Hehe, jokes. I know its Egyptian origins.
Unputdownable? I like that word, I will use it someday 
