₦airaland Forum

Dimples129:
Miss.Write

What we 'reading on nl'

Point me to something worth reading, I'm in that mood today

Shaybe.baby, now would be a great time to recommend a "great thread"

What's good y'all?

greiboy:
I prefer to share in private, if possible





lot... That is not necessary, there are more males than females in the China which is the world most populous nation.

I believe in the next few years many Chinese may consider marrying Africans out of desperation self.

greiboy:
Just em some thoughts running through my mind, nothing much.

I am just observing your support for lesbianism.

greiboy:
hmmmm

AntiBrutus:
1. Naija man fcks foreign woman on the first day. She spreads her leg like dividers and gives him bj join.
He is like, "foreign women are mature, they are sexually expressive, not like our African sisters. #TeamForeignGirls"

2. Naija man fcks Naija woman on the first day.
He goes "Naija girls are cheap. 99% of them are oloshos [minus their mother and sisters ], with indomie and egg you can get them. They'll be forming with their fish smelling borehole pussy. Finally you'll fck them anyhow, after all...that's all they have to offer."

3. Naija man sleeps with 100 girls as a bachelor.
12yrs later he is ready for marriage: "I have to marry a virgin, it's the pride of a woman."

4. Naija girl and guy dates. They break up, his friends be like
> "Shebi you fck am? You no lose out last last. Make she dey go. Na her toto go tire"

In a nutshell, una fit unaselves. It's simple cause and effect. So much emphasis is placed on sex here, we are a conservative society ----albeit a hypocritical one. Sex is considered a depreciation to the lady, and special skills on the guy's CV. The females are now rationing it and employing all sorts of trickery in relationships. They also don't wanna lose out last last. Some are now using it as a bargaining tool, after all, she'll still be judged[b][/b]. It's gonna be like that for a long time, maybe we should start getting used to it.

donstan18:
Lol, I don't mind you getting encouraged so long as you keeping sounding smart with it, it's cool


Nice, you good....I'm cool, stronger and still pushing positively

donstan18:
Lol ....How do you do?

Missed your debating epistle

donstan18:
Type something, Miss.Write

Don't just view

XhosaNostra:
That's why you shouldn't make a purchase without testing it or making sure that it fits
Now look at the woman you married! Kikikiki.

donstan18:
Vex jare

You and epistle are like 5&6, you can easily confuse your opponent in a written debate if he/she isn't smart enough

New word: Misswrite- Epistle.

E.g, it took Mr Jude a long time to compose that wonderful "misswrite-

Sagamite:
If you had been concentrating you would have counted approximately 112 years, as the 1938 one was "female/woman's chivalry" which I said I discounted.

Secondly, my argument was not that it had NEVER been used for women (as I knew even women could be nights), the argument was that is was very rare to the point of negligible.

It could even fcking be used for wild animals.

The point is that most people's attribution and understanding is that it is a masculine thing, hence why the use of it for women is negligible.

If one put a search for "Chivalrous Women" in google, several questions that would pop-up would be related to the applicability to women.

Even one of google's related searches suggestion when you put that in a search would be "chivalry female equivalent", which tells you many English-speaking people don't think it is applicable to women and are searching for the alternative word that is equavalently applicable to women.

Sagamite:
I agree with you, you did provide it with the "chivalrous women".

What I am saying is that you provide some few usage 100s of years ago. But definitions, as I stated, is about usage.

Is there any reason why you can't provide modern/current usage? 100 years is fcking pretty long?

I note that in your source itself ('Feminism and the creation of a female aristocracy' by Peter Wright), it clearly states:

"Chivalry today continues to be undertood as STRICTLY male obligations towards female beneficiaries".

In your source, not mine.

So can you see why I noted the 100 years?

He even alluded to my argument that the behaviour of niceness/kindness by women to men is not called "chivalry".

Sagamite:
No, you missed the point, darling.

If you go back and read what I posted, I stated: "I would not even accept black people as academic based on two or ten of them winning Nobel Prizes...."

Nowhere did I state a black man cannot be said to lack academic aptitute.

Of course I know what we are debating about.

I am just telling you that it was nonsense and a waste of my time for you to intepret my insinuations as true for all case.

E.g. my insinuation that men are love sex more than women to mean I think every single man loves sex than every single woman.

My insinuation that men are more intelligent than women to mean I think every single man is more intelligent than every single woman.

You SHOULD have known it was "on average".

There is really no argument there, darling.

donstan18:
So, you can type as short as this?

Sagamite:
Nice collection.

I must say that the first half would have not passed the mustard because the use was "female chivalry" or "women's chivalry", which suggests that the authors really saw it as an oxymoron.

But the final half do qualify as the use was "chivalrous women".

That said, your most recent example was 100 years ago?

Sagamite:
You missed the core point there.

The point was not who Nobels are given to. The point was which races demonstrate academic prowess.

The black race would not be regarded as one.

I know knighthood and war-leadership are not exclusive to men in history. I am just saying the behaviour attributed to the title is definitively masculine.

When I say "women" or "men", I think you need to figure out that I meant "on average".

I am sure if I said men are taller than women, you would not come back here and say I meant all men are taller than all women.

No! Wrong.

Cooking and cleaning is not about nurture.

Women are naturally more interested in things that involve people, glamour, design and relationships than men.

Men are naturally more interested in things that involve manufacturing, systems, achievements and social power than women.

That is why men's TV channels/magazines would show you sex, sports, physical challenges, documentaries and politics, while women's TV channels/magazines would show you fashion, family, love and trash like reality TV.

Evolutionary engineering, not social engineering.

Claiming otherwise is the feminist crap I referred to.

I repeat: Nature is not politically correct!

Sagamite:
Can you show me where you have seen the term used for female behaviour?

Feel free to go ahead.

Sagamite:
No, darling, I am not limiting it to knights.

As I said earlier, the word chivalry has metamophise into two different premises based as demonstrated in all dictionaries:

a) Knights (in war situations)

b) Men (in their specific, considerate behaviour towards women)

Two or ten female "knights" out of over probably over 100,000 knights in history is not really a strong argument.

I would not even accept black people as academic based on two or ten of them winning Nobel Prizes out of the over 200 Laurettes in history. So that knight one is really extremely weak.

Again, the bigger emphasise is that the word is almost never used for women or attributed to women's behaviour towards men.

You have a better chance of convincing me "pretty" is used for men. And the chance for this in itself is virtually zero.

Chivalry is a word for, and expectation of, men.



Well, the leading voices in feminism would disagree with you.

In their warped mind, apart from physical strength, they argue that men and women are virtually the same naturally. No difference.

That:

- Women have equal intelligence as men.

- Women have same type of intelligence as men.

- Women love sex as much as men do.

- Women are as promiscuous as men.

- Women are as logical as men.

- Women are as good and interested in STEM subjects as men.

- Women have the same career aspirations and drive as men.

- Women want the same things in life as men.

etc.

They argue that the difference we see is only because of "patriarchical" society's nurturing. "It is all about nurture, not nature".

And if you disagree with them, you are a "sexist" or a "misorgynist" who just does not want women to be equal.

You see that they are mad?

Some of the other feminists might not agree with this leading voices except when they are engaging with a man in an argument and they see that taking this position can lead to some kind of beneficial advantage. ..................Well, trust a woman; as illogical as fck in an argument.

Martin0:
Na wa for una ooo.

Sagamite:
Chivalry originated from war situations and from Knights.

The former is from a period where women did not participate in wars, the latter was a position women could not attain.

So, sorry, Chivalry is gender-specific. A woman cannot be "chivalrous". They can have or demonstrate the behaviours but the tag is not attributable to them in general.

Feminism cannot be compatible with chivalry.

Apart from war situations where the definition of chivalry is about mercy, the other definition of chivalry is premised on acknowledging the weakness of the other sex, which modern feminism would not accept.

The latter definition is not demonstrated by men towards other men except they are poofs (homosexuals).

Tohzara:
MissWrite and Reina Farine, I agree with you guys 100%. Like you said, It shouldn't be gender-specific (as that would make it sexist), but I WAS gender-specific in my question because that's exactly what I wanted to talk about. I've edited the topic to make that clear. And I appreciate your responses.

I consider it hypocritical for a feminist to place emphasis on male chivalry and consider it a one-sided OBLIGATION. And I'm glad none of you tried making a case for it. There are "feminists" who consider this normal, and claim those of us who have problems with it are "petty". I think it's a normal thing to do, but it should be RECIPROCATED.

Jupxter:
Godbless your wisdom ma. Now, assuming 90% of the males and the females are an extension of the larger society, what do you think will help?

I was in a fellowship 2011 and i can remember vividly the ministration was intense and i learnt 90% of the marriages of this generation will end in dovorce, 7 years later from the comments i read here i can begin to say it's dawning on the generation