₦airaland Forum

[quote author=$ammy link=topic=342914.msg4852727#msg4852727 date=1257251308]Akata, you are behaving just like my girlfriend when she saw a text i sent to a girl on my sent list from my phone and then she started acting like the world has crumbled and has never trusted me again. The truth is that you women need to understand that cheating is a mans nature.I advice you to try as much as possible to forget about the incident and enjoy your marriage.[/quote]'

HEHEHEHEHEHEHE!!!!

@ poster

Americans and closure

Too much sentimentality will kill you

You go wound o!

Move on!!

@ poster

Do not take advice from women who are vindictive.

level headed people give more concise responses

posakosa:
Someone who has signed on to tell me that I have a low thinking faculty----says that he does not respond to insults-----<hehehehehhe> keep trying. U're probably 12 years old.

lorebobo:
loud and clear!!! e don do. haba! ok. it is a legally sham marriage but that doesn't change the fact that it is legal and she has to go through the divorce process.

@ poster. I don't think you should be taking advice from someone who keeps using the word Sham marriage and green card in every post they respond to without you actually mentioning it. They really seem to be very uneducated about legal procedures or processess.

I would strongly advice to visit the Us travel advisory website which should have a section on marriages conducted abroad and their legal standing in the US or a lawyer in the US regarding recognition of marriages abroad.

This posakosa is not a very bright person from her statements.

My two cents.

[quote author=1,2 link=topic=332394.msg4849851#msg4849851 date=1257204233]morpheus24, there is no a single coloured there or mixed people. Those chicks are all ZULUs from Durban. Being light skinned does not mean you are not Black. Otherwise Majority of people would not be considered Blacks in SA if that was the case since most of the people here are light skin. You would even say they are Coloured when they are not. Those chicks are 100% ZULUs and they still practice their culture.

WHen you see some one as light skin, you just rush to conclusion that they are MIXED. Then if you come south of the equator you will be suprised. People in LESOTHO, 95% of them are light skin, then do you want to tell me that they are not BLACKS. If you go to LESOTHO you will see that every one is light skin. If you go there if you are dark skin, they see immediatley that you are not from there, then they will ask you where you are from, not violently. My cousin was in LESOTHO 3 months ago, he is dark skin and he tells me that people where always asking him where he was from. It depends where you are situated. The sun some times is a factor. The more warmer the more people skin pigment becomes darker. If you leave in a place where its not that hot, you skin is lighter than people who leave in the hotter area.[/quote]My friend will you stop lying to yourself. 100% Zulu my ass. Go back and look at the pics you posted again. I can agree some of the girls there are representative of Zulu girls but not all of of them.

The reason people in Lesotho are 95% light skin is because of the Indigenous Khoi who assimulated into this particular group of people and other surrounding ethnic groups much less the Zulu who were the last late comers into the region. The region also is less sun intensive which would hinder darkening of the skin as well.

I have been to Durban, capetown, pretoria and johanesburg and know the colored groups in each region look a little bit distinctive from each other and know zulu groups do have certain shades of light but please as far as the pics go you know there are some colored chicks so stop bambozzling some people here.

100% zulu my ass!!!!

[quote author=becomrich, link=topic=342715.msg4851085#msg4851085 date=1257235102]morpheus24 , only God determine part of your gene that comes up. obama could have been white too. Look below is the picture of obama if his black gene was Recessive gene. And the first picture is of my son. compare his skin to obama mother to the right, that little child he is carying is obama. and see how africa children look like. and compare to mine. Recessive gene can show up when they like.

first picture is my son, dress up in africa cloth. i told you i did a DNA test.[/quote]Damn! I didn't see the pic

Can you post it again. Since you say you took a DNA test can I have the results. I probably have an explanation for your sons phenotype based on it

Don't be afriad of these other mofo's

ababda:
morpheus24:

i totally agree with you reeducation is definitely needed. especially among my people in northern sudan.

its because they are afraid of accepting the term black or believe the term applies to West and southern Africans who are termed "negroid" and obvously because the Western world has attached alot of hideous connotations to it so they adopt the nonsensical term " Dark skinned" African. To me both terms are stupid and describe only certain hues of African skin variations but don't worry as more Africans understand their history we are slowly being freed from this mind set which a lot of people are not happy about.

[quote author=1,2 link=topic=332394.msg4849531#msg4849531 date=1257198314]No, not Angola. They are from Durban South Africa.[/quote]And most of them are cape colored, malay and cape indian hybrids extracted from recent European, malay and indian groups witha stint of indigenous groups.

You have to be in Africa much longer than that to be considered an African beauty by my standards,

[quote author=tpia. link=topic=332394.msg4847564#msg4847564 date=1257177840]Nubian boatman in Egypt

https://img509.imageshack.us/img509/8769/aproudnubianboatman.jpg


http://www.trekearth.com/gallery/photo535125.htm[/quote]@tpia
if you read the posts by the person who posted the pic notice how they say their skin is black "like Africans"

instead of saying their skin tone is as a result of being African.

RE-education is seriously needed

ababda:
Morpheus24, i don't know where to begin. firstly, i am not somali, but i am a nubian from northern sudan, but raised in egypt. secordly, somalis like their cousins the oromos in ethiopia, the beja in eritea, eastern sudan, and part of upper egypt are all catogorize as cushites, since the kingdom of Cush was situated in northern sudan, so by extension the somalis are  part of us, so they are racially speaking cushites. ! Thirdly, northern sudan and part of upper  egypt was called the land of cush or sometimes ta seti. which means the land of the bow. fourthy, northern sudan at the secord cataracts was part of pharanic egypt. actually, the pharaoh amenhopet and queen tiye his nubian wife erected temples in  northern sudan honoring them as gods, and  these monuments are standing there till this day, but in ruin form. here is the temple of soleb in northern sudan.

http://lh3.ggpht.com/_cVQn7t5rUAY/SfL8zcITL5I/AAAAAAAADgc/_AE2pfC34xI/IGB_9804.JPG

This still does not invalidate what I said. Ancient Nubians cluster with Somalian/Ethiopian types and ancient egyptians, Therefore modern day nubians, somalians , eriterians and somalians look like their ancestors.

Linguistically the Somalis, oromos of Ethiopia and so on are categorized as Cushitic speakers under The Afroasiatic grouping of languages which includes you if you are nilotic speaking. I doubt you are semitic speaking since most of its speakers trace their origins outside of Africa or even a Berber speaker since being a Nubian you are a little too far off from them.

In order words you all share the same ancestry. They are not an extension of you but a sub group of your original ancestors which included mostly ancient upper egyptian populations.

ababda:
who do the somalis, northern sudan,upper egyptians, ethiopian, eriteans, djibouti look like?

we look like our ancestors behold
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/09/Tomb_of_Nakht.jpg
http://www.corbisimages.com/images/CJ003133.jpg?size=67&uid=B9502678-84F6-4154-9F41-D2384064E0BB
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/5d/Tomb_of_Nakht_(1).jpg

northern sudanese bishop back in the 9th or tenth century when nubia was christian
http://web.history.ufl.edu/new/images/euh/nubian.jpg

You need to rephrase that ancestor part and stop posting pics of ancient egyptians.

Your ancestors are actually of the same stock as the  the proto egyptian /proto somali- ethiopian stock. In other words, You all came from the same stock of ancestral east African groups not the ancient Egyptians you posted. You group with ancient egyptians but do nt not come from them ancestrally.

PS the pics posted by Keelshim are actually accurate to a point. The somali pics posted by him are the faces of the typical somalian though the other ones are picture spams of Somalis with less typical somali features not necessarily as a result of ad mixtures from the Arabian peninsula


Know your own history,

Najapwinez:
My man is Somalian and he looks better than most Naja men (fact) since you are rubbin it in that we arent the prettiest you should know a few truths too.
I like somalians wavy hair and facial features i always play with my mans hair it feels so funny!.
Also i dnt want my kids to have nappy hair, im not sayin this bcuz of self hatred im sayin this because i dnt want my
kids to have[b] that hassle and go thru what i have gone thru with their hair when they grow up[/b]

Self delusio is a mental illness sister

You are practicing what they call selective breeding.

A shame to your somalian boyfriend's and your ancestors who were black sub saharan Africans

@ poster

More scenes for the BNP to be laughing about.!

Tha begging was too disgusting to finish watching.

THE AMAKA:
not tryna sound like a hater but 80% of the pics he posted were of average looking girls.
the only thing that stood out were their bodies.
or maybe even their light skin that some africans love to drool over.

jealousy no good oh !

Wayo na sabotage!

If you dey hate picture

na your shame be that!

[quote author=Negro_Ntns link=topic=343571.msg4819476#msg4819476 date=1256768129]There is nothing in what you say to keep up with. I suggest you share your knowledge on race and intelligence, instead of earning credibility through attacks on others.[/quote]I didn't attack you. I merely challenged your ascertions but you do not respond each time I counter so,

PS, I AM sharing my knowledge on "RACE"

Ergo Intelligence!!!

The east is rotten now.

Uche2nna:
I am not saying that your statement is incorrect,  I am only giving my own point of view , which is what it is, just a point of view.

The changes in phenotype of the explanted pygmies U  attributed to mutation,no?  I am just saying that it is likely that it has nothing to do with with making new set of genes or alleles to adapt to the new environment but environmental pressure resulted in a selection of alleles of genes (that were already present) and this will manifest itself in some mild phenotypic differences.

Another explanantion, which again has nothing to do with mutation , is that of genetic drift which u actually raised in one of your posts.

And from the posts between U and Beaf, I think I understand now what U are trying to say, so I will just shut the Bleep up, lol,  .

I learn more from such interactions so feel free anytime to interject your opinion.

I am still an understudy of the human genome and don't proclaim I know everything.

Uche2nna:
Thats a classic example right there and I am glad U brought that up.

However, this always reminds me of the case of the chicken and the egg which came first? The difference between the sickle cell gene mutation and what is known as the normal gene is in just one amino acid (glutamic acid replaced by valine). That to me is a[b] highly specific change and not compatible with the random nature of spontaneous mutations[/b]. Is there any evidence against these two alleles co-existing side by side instead of the prevalent notion that the sickle cell gene came as a result of mutation of the "normal gene"? How do we even know which one is the normal gene and which one arose as a result of mutation?

The resistance factor is a clue to which one came first but as you say there is no evidence that refutes or confirms the co-existence so what we have now we accept.

Uche2nna:
Again like I said, very easy to misconstrue the two,

Let me try and put it this way,

Mutations do not occur within selective pressure (mutation can and will always happen with or without selective pressure). U probably would be better off saying that selective pressure occurs within mutation and even that will depend on what U believe is the origin of allelic variations in nature.

I think I infered that earlier.

I think the point i was trying to make tht you responded to was on the differencies that would occur within an isolated pygmy population who miraculouslly were sbuplanted in the icelands compared to a pygmy population that remained in the interior of African in reference to Genotype and phenotype expressions 50, 000 years down the line.

If you feel my statement is incorrect please correct and explain.

Beaf:
We seem to be saying the same thing, but with different intepretations of mutation. There are hardly any (many would argue zero) beneficial mutations.

http://www.nature.com/nrg/journal/v8/n8/abs/nrg2146.html

okay! I 'll stop calling this changes MUTATIONS.

As long as you get the point I am making semantics is irrelevant.