₦airaland Forum

darefestus: I honestly believe Nateevs and Coogar have been Vindicated by the performance today..



If I may ask bro, what is a pure Goal?
The man scores and now he has to score pure goals. You should stop this double standard because you were creaming yourself last season when Gomez was scoring 'impure goals'

jackbauersballs: Perhaps Torres isn't getting the service he wants, but surely HE should adapt to fit the team and NOT the other way round:

jackbauersballs: Juan Mata says: "With Drogba we were conditioned to play in a certain way. .

Indeed if he doesn't score against Sunderland, then he is well and truly finished....

jackbauersballs: The upcoming game against Sunderland will provide a big opportunity for Torres to build on his confidence following his good showing earlier this week...

If Torres doesn't net against the black cats, then it's over for him...

dyabman: @Coogar

Isn't it so glaring to you that Torres has lost his confidence especially when facing stronger opposition? ,

BlueDiva: 50 million pounds isn't 5,000 pounds.Let him justify it!

OMO IBO: torres and his bloody obnoxious i-used-to-be-a-prolific-striker has seen off 3 managers. . . 3 bloody managers.

BlueDiva: Actually, Torres' goals are inconsequential.
We could have won 4-1 and it would still be a decent win.

Our point is that we would love to see him grab a winner.
We would have loved him to grab the late goals in the games we drew.

Only morons will believe that scoring 2 goals mean the dud is back.
Get us a man who knows where the goal is in Jan.

dayokanu: Ope ooooooooooooo

Torress scores off another keeper error in the CL after the ball hit Torres arm

How much Roman pay this ref sef?

coogar: mark hughes didn't play him too - same as hodgson

OMO IBO: Remember studge at Bolton?
remember studge last season Despite being played out of position all season?

remember studge is yet to get an extended playing time in his favourite position.

BlueDiva: CFC has a 90% chance of being kicked out today.
Winning the Europa cup doesn't sound so bad either.

dayokanu: Like i told you clutching onto "Week in Week out" Isn't football analysis. When it comes to the real thing you are always found wanting\

For now stick to your "week in week out" analysis or "Starts vs Games"

dayokanu: Every opinion you had are always baseless and always waiting for someone to come back it up.

Lack of conviction below

Last week we heard Only Torres can save torres, Few days later after coogar posted it became, the players are not working with torres hence his failure

Stick to the week in week out analysis and Stay out of football or better still ask coogar before you post anything

dayokanu: Thats the thing, Nateevs never has a conviction about anything. Ask him what he thinks about anything, He repeats what ever rubbish coogar says

[size=15pt]Now Nateevs : Is it possible to fit ballack, Essien Makeleleand Lampard in Jose Mourinhos 4-3-3?[/size]

dayokanu: I know when it comes to real football analysis you would be found wanting but when it comes to repeating Week in Week out thats where Nateevs analysis starts and end.

Now lets analyze the statement "it was impossible to fit Ballack, Essien, Makalele and Lampard all into JM's 4-3-3."

On 26th November 2006 a few days before mourinho made the "Untouchable comments" Chelsea played Man Utd their biggest title rival to a 1-1 draw. The link is shown above and the Chelsea Lineup was.

Chelsea: Cudicini, Geremi (Robben 46), Carvalho, Terry, Ashley Cole, Essien, Makelele, Ballack (Ferreira 90), Lampard, Shevchenko (Joe Cole 75), Drogba.

Now Nateevs : [size=14pt]Is it possible to fit ballack, Essien Makeleleand Lampard in Jose Mourinhos 4-3-3?[/size]

We are waiting for the spin on it and expectedly Coogar to come to your rescue once again when you fail

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/eng_prem/6161090.stm

Nateevs. Week in Week out is not football analysis. Just verbal gymnastics

dayokanu: Oh If this isnt the definition of stupidd I wonder what is.

Jose Mourinho said something, I quoted it Now Nateevs said what Jose said doesnt matter. isnt that insane?

Nateevs made A Mistake 3 days ago, i corrected him last night, Nateevs response "My mistake does not matter"

My guy does anything matter to you? These posts of yours are shallow. We cant start teaching you football if you cant understand simple logic and common sense

Lemme spell it out: Drogba's touch is not up to league 2 level!
Drogba is finished! That is why I have been advocating to sell Drogba before he reaches thirty. This is simple analysis!

It is harmful to keep players on past glory.

I have said it before and Ill say it again, Drogba without stamina is as useless as John Carew.
Class (Anelka: 1997-2009) is permanent, whilst form (Drogba: 2006-2007) is temporary.

dayokanu: Is this not a moronic thing to say. I have asked what do you interprete Joses comment to be, you cant say it but claimed I falsified his comments and intentions? Is that not stupidd even looking at it from your moronic prism?

You cant tell us what it means yet you claim it was falsified, Can something be false when there is no true version?

Abi lets wait for coogar to explain what you mean cos he seems to have the ability to read the mind of retardds

Back which claims. I already gave you Joses own words where he said they were untouchables and you said you dont dispute that. So are you asking for the interpretation of untouchables?

dayokanu: Like Coogar has attempted to do, Can you interprete what Jose meant by the 9 untouchables. Assuming you can think for yourself or should we take coogars thoughts as yours?

dayokanu: Jose Mourinho said he has Untouchables in December 2006

So If you agree that Mourinho said he had invincibles then

What does untouchable in a club mean in the Mourinho context in 2006? And why did he say Sheva was not an untouchable



No vex. this exercise is to show who the charlatans are and I'm glad its becoming glaring right now that Nateevs doesn't know what he is saying most of the time. If you look at those long worded posts you would notice they are empty and full of half truths and outright lie.

He is now being found out for who he really is. A football novice

dayokanu:
Mourinho had 9 untouchables in his line up week in week out even for Carling cup FA cup etc?

dayokanu: Is it that Nateevs cant think for himself that you have to verbalize what he is thinking for him??

Jose Mourinho said he has Untouchables in December 2006

What does untouchable in a club mean in the Mourinho context in 2006? And why did he say Sheva was not an untouchable

dayokanu:
Mourinho had 9 untouchables in his line up week in week out even for Carling cup FA cup etc?

dayokanu: What kind of verification are you looking for? That Jose Mourinho called 9 players untouchables or what?

dayokanu:
Mourinho had 9 untouchables in his line up week in week out even for Carling cup FA cup etc?

dayokanu:
Mourinho had 9 untouchables in his line up even for Carling cup FA cup

dayokanu: Is it hard for you to state what your point is? Or are you telling us that you have no Point?

Dayokanus point: Every club has untouchable players. These players start most of the team vital games as long as they are not injured.

Nateevs whats your point?

dayokanu:
Were we not alive when Mourinho had 9 untouchables in his line up week in week out? even for Carling cup FA cup etc?