₦airaland Forum

dayokanu: You can choose for yourself or ask the coach who called certain players Untouchable what his criteria was to call them untouchables

BTW Whats your point, Can you clearly define what you are arguing about?

Mine is: Every club has untouchable players these players start most of the team vital games as long as they are not injured.

Can you state yours clearly?

Bros I did not talk for you. It was my club JM coached, so you cannot tell me about the untouchables.
I want you to verify your claim that ALL 9 untouchables played "WEEK IN WEEK OUT"

dayokanu: Look Nateevs, I dont have magical powers to turn a bicylcle into a Ferrari, I cant turn a dullard like you to a football afficionado You have to learn the ropes by reading wide

Hehehe. How long did it take you to get this? I am sure you were hoping you find this somewhere.
So let's go on an educational ride.

Let's start by asking Dayo, how many appearances per season would a player need to have to qualify as a player that plays "WEEK IN WEEK OUT"? You can choose a percentage if you please.

dayokanu: So you know every team has a core of players who start almost every games

Not so quick. Come back and tell us the 9 untouchables you refer to that play WEEK IN WEEK OUT!

dayokanu: Were we not alive when Mourinho had 9 untouchables in his line up week in week out? even for Carling cup FA cup etc?

How did I miss this?
Dayo has stumbled on some secret stat that's eluded Chelsea fans for years.

Mourinho's untouchables were not 20 and 21. That's were it becomes a valid argument to state over-playing.
We are rebuilding and we have chosen to do so with kids. Why are we doing so? Not for me to explain.

What is relevant is that, with rebuilding around a bunch of kids comes consequences. Like the case of overplaying.
And while opinions opinions may differ over where exactly to draw the line of overplaying, the premise of the argument remains very valid.

The Chelsea of yore did not play every single game at 21.

dayokanu: Retardd how many starts does Hazard have since August

Answer nitori Olorun. This is a simple question

Hehehe. You are still arguing.

Dude, you lost the right to ask me that question again. In fact, it is borderline insanity to keep asking.
As a better man, I admitted that in wording my point, I got the month wrong.
It was July and not August. For club and country, 29 starts, 6 subs.



You in turn, even after I admitted that I got the month wrong, still managed to do this.

dayokanu:
Nateevs told us that since August, Hazard has 29 starts for Chelsea and 6 sub appearances

So I ask again, exactly when did I say this? You have to answer this.


This is after you phoolishly added up all the starts and called them games and still playing intelligent after you've been found out.
It's reaching embarrassing levels now that you can't admit you goofed but you are hell bent on on pushing a lost agenda.

dayokanu: Oponu how many starts does Hazard have for Chelsea since August ?

Uber dumb mode. Simple question requires a simple answer.
When did I say Hazard has 29 starts for 'CHELSEA'?

Answer abeg.

dayokanu:

Quit being a mor00n.

Nateevs told us that since August, Hazard has 29 starts for Chelsea and 6 sub appearances

.



Afofun . . When did I say this?

Tell us how you knew the figures you posted for us were wrong? The post was here for over 24hours you didnt correct them until I called you out on your umpteenth lie.

So it was my post that made you realize you have been lying all along? I am getting somewhere with you then

And I will remind you again. The figures were not wrong. Only the month was erroneous.
I gave you the link from where I got the stats. It was July and not August.
I am hoping your brain can decipher the difference between a lie and an error. What do I mean? It clearly can't

You challenged the figures and I backed it up. What you are doing now is clutching at straws even as you can see that it's all in balance. Calling an error a lie.
I admitted straight away that the month was wrong. Looking at the link, you can just about get that.




On the contrary you are failing to address your own moment of brain malfunction.
Adding up starts and calling them games. Suddenly you want us to excuse your madness because it corrected an error?
You are a class act dimwit.


"15+1+3+3+1 blah blah blah equals 35 games abi?" Even when I clearly said starts. Opnu jati jati. Now you are hiding.
I will ask you again. . At what point did I say this?

dayokanu:

Quit being a mor00n.

Nateevs told us that since August, Hazard has 29 starts for Chelsea and 6 sub appearances.

Ah! Let's not worry about another moment of extreme stoopidity, he was trying to correct an error.

dayokanu: Dumbass how many starts and sub appearances does Hazard have for club and country since August?

I never believed the numbers were right yet I was the one who gave a detailed breakdown when you are whining like a diseased pig and couldnt piece together the numbers

You need to tattoo dumbass to your forehead to warn pedestrians to stay away

You are an id10t. I do my research mate. I posted the link right there for you
When the figures didn't tally. I knew exactly what was wrong.
I gave you the exact matches that didn't add up in an instant - as soon as I read your post. Cos I knew what I was doing.


So what you are expecting me to believe that you knew what you were doing by adding up all the starts and calling them games?
No one can be this dumb. .. You are breaking records here. Unless you are acting it.

I don't bloody care what you were getting at. You did your elementary maths. . 15+1+3+3+1 etc but they were starts, not games. That's all that matters and that stoopdity deserves an award.

dayokanu:

Quit being a mor00n.

Nateevs told us that since August, Hazard has 29 starts for Chelsea and 6 sub appearances.

Did I at any point say this? Or were you taking your mental drugs when you said this as well?
Another brain fart moment right? How can I blame a man whose brain resides under the sole of his shoes?
Afofun.

dayokanu: You made a mistake of July for August, How the two became similar we might never find out. We wonder what other mistake you have been feeding little minds like Debo with.

You typed, you posted pic to back it up not knowing you are exposing your folly to the whole world

I posted a pic to back it up because that's the exact site I visited to put the figures together. I got the figures right just the period.
A normal reasoning person marries the premise of my argument with the figures I quoted and immediately guesses that the Month was just an error. However because you revel in beer-parlour activities, you are determined to clutch at straws.

You started out by attacking the numbers because u never believed they could be right. I have shown you they are right and you are still embarrassing yourself by asking me if July and August are similar.
Are you being deliberately thick?


Instead, you add up all the starts and call them games. Getting the month wrong is an error. Your addition and inference was just plain dumb.

Now you've come back to say he had all the apps for Chelsea which I clearly didn't say. Infact, you've quoted what I said 3 times, how could you not get it right?

You phuck asss dumb joker.

dayokanu: And by the way go to bed before you exhaust whats left of your online cred. The bolded is the kind of stuff that destroyed Nagasaki

I told you that once I am on this thread you should watch what you type cos peddling falsehood on this forum would not go unchallenged.

Now the shameless boy is now saying it doesnt matter if he was wrong? So what matters? It doesnt matter you are wrong? Have you no shame dude?

Shame? You are kidding me right?
I made a mistake of the month. It was supposed to be July and not August. Clearly that can be overlooked. A wording error.
The stats were not wrong, neither was the case I was making. Debo had every right to quote it.

You in turn added up all the starts and came up with a mysterious 35 games and I am suppose to absolve you of shame?
You must have your head in your assss. Have re-read what you did?
Now you are blaming the picture I posted.

Plus you've turned around and said again that I said Hazard had 29 starts and 6 subs for Chelsea when what I said is clear for everyone to read.
Shame?

dayokanu: Quit being a mor00n.

Nateevs told us that since August, Hazard has 29 starts for Chelsea and 6 sub appearances.

Sorry mate. Another brain fart.
This is what I said.

nateevs: Playing stats for our current midfield for club and country since August.

coogar: dayo, stop being a tool!
i am saying your counter-argument was also wrong......that nateevs was wrong is irrelevant, you were adding the number of starts to correct the number nateevs provided as the number of appearances. are you so daft you cannot see your mistake?

Don't mind the ninjah. He added up all the starts and tried to make them games. He's cursing someone for getting something wrong yet he can't even use his brain well in his response.
It didn't matter if I was wrong, I didn't posted 35 starts.

dayokanu: Chelsea vs Man City is also called the Community shield Mumu





Chelsea vs Seattle Sounders [size=18pt]JULY 12 2012[/size]
Chelsea vs PSG [size=18pt]JULY 22 2012[/size]
Chelsea vs Milan [size=18pt]JULY 28 2012[/size]
Chelsea vs MLS all Stars JULY 25 2012

How much do i charge the UK govt for the education of Lateef?

The point I made was in reference to how many starts and subs apps all those players had since they joined Chelsea.
If I wrote August, it was clearly a mistake. The stats I intended to put forward were not wrong, neither was the case I was making.

What next?

I am glad you know that posting my name on a public forum is going way too far.
Thanks for taking it off.

I am very curious to know how you got that.

dayokanu: I was here assuming you can think for yourself

Chelsea plays in the League, league cup, CL , FA cup, Super cup and community shield

League 15 starts in 15 games,
League cup 0 starts in 2 games,
Supercup 1 start in 1 games
Community Shield 1 start in 1 game
Champions league 3 starts in 5 games

World cup qualifiers for Belgium 3 starts in 4 games
Friendly vs Holland 1 start


So didinrin dadandindin Tell us how this summed up to 35 games Ademumu

15+0+1+1+3+3+1 = ? Oya Nateevs answer and you are allowed to use counters Oponu Omugo agbalagba

I have told you that on this forum you lack the ability to reason properly thats why you ftentimes wait for other posters to buttress you point. I am waiting on how you would wiggle out of this.

And Dobo too who couldn think but just copy your words as Gospel

Chelsea v Seattle
Chelsea v PSG
Chelsea v MLS All star
Chelsea v Milan
Chelsea v ManCity


Oya add am.

dayokanu: Instead of Dobolawin to ask you where Hazard has played a total of 35 games he is spewing the same line like he doesnt know you spew falsehood regularly

Hehehe. I suppose you have verified it's falsehood you 1d10t. LINK
Olopolo jijo. Instead of you to get off your lazy @ss and do some research, you are here embarrassing yourself.

dayokanu: So whats the basis for calling them overplayed? Just because Nateevs moronically mentioned it, you too have to repeat it, Cant you use the saw dust in your head for once?

Mentioned what?

Ibime: Original argument. . .



Benitez has failed to exonerate Emenalo.

Calculator has now stepped in to exonerate him. End of discussion.

Even though it's clearly a question, trust the twist master to milk it to the end and argue that Nateevs said Benitez will find a formula to end the rot. What am I saying? He already started it. I just realised he's been going through my posts, trying to find dirt. He can't find one, he's trying to make a question an argument.


You have no case. You are a giant big load of bollocks mate.

Emenalo is supposed to leave 3 strikers in a squad. Lukaku is one of the three. Moses is one of 8 players who can play his position yet Moses addition makes more sense than Lukaku?
Are you not one of the eediots who argued when I said Lukaku is better than Torres now you're acting like Lukaku is a new revelation.
How was Emenalo supposed to know Lukaku can score goals? Are not dumb asking such question since Emenalo was the one who paid 13 million pounds for him?

13m paid on Lukaku ain't sh1t mate. You should know better. Chelsea paid 20m for Oscar and he was supposed to go on loan.
I do not care how much was paid for Lukaku, the bottom line is at the time you are claiming he deserved a right to a shirt, he didn't.
With hindsight, you are now making a case and trying to make us believe you are right.

Emenalo did the sensible thing. Moses in for Lukaku based on pure common sense. Moses is more experienced and Moses can play as a striker. He played as one for Wigan. Na me say make RDM no play am as Striker? Where did you get the notion that Moses is a midfielder?


You wanted 3 strikers, Torres, Sturridge and Moses.

Now you are justifying Moses unnecessary acquisition at the expense of a threadbare midfield and strikeforce by asking what happens if Mata and hazard get injured. What kinda silly question. What happens when Silva or nasri get injured? Sinclair steps in. For us Oscar Marin ramires Sturridge and Bertrand steps in and are not different from Moses. how does growing up in crystal palace affect the squad.

In one argument, you said Moses should have been out for Lukaku. Now you are saying I am backing Moses over a threadbare midfield. It can't be the two. You see how you jump from post to pillar just to blame Emenalo?

I asked what if Mata and Hazard are out to justify the number of midfield players we have. 2 extra players. That's all. Is that too many? However, you are in a haste to reply and you never care to understand the opposing views.

You claim other clubs have 8 defenders. When has Chelsea ever had 8 defenders. Is Ferreira a better right-back than ramires if we have injury in that position?

I don't care what Ramires can do at RB. This is a discussion of right and wrong. You hang Emenalo out to dry as though he committed incest. 8 defenders in the UCL. When I point out that United, Arsenal and City all have done it, that infact, Arsenal have 9 defenders, you say Chelsea has never done it before. Is that all it takes for Emenalo to be wrong? The fact that Chelsea have never done it before? What are you on about? Must you argue?

Anyway my mistake for indulging you in stoopid calculator issue. You were having heart attack after the match exposed all your stoopidities this season till I indulged you in foolish calculator issue on how a director cant put 22 man squad together. Please carry on explaining to us how rdm is at fault and Benitez would exonerate your stupidity, emenalo and romans. Or do we need calculator to take the place of Benitez now?

Reminiscent of your repeat till it sticks method. You are slowly building a case of Nateevs supporting Benitez over RDM even when the event never took place. Cooking lies and repeating just like you blame Emenalo for everything and repeat it over and over. No one's listening to you mate.

-----------------------------------------

What other clubs have done over the years is invest in the academy and included a few players who take up club trained spots in the squad. Currently we have 3 spots that could be filled with club trained players and have them registered in the UCL. We don't have them because in the past, we have thrown money at every problem we have. Now money cannot buy us a club-trained player. If we had 3 decent club-trained we've brought through, we could have had 3 spots saved in the foreign spots and then we can bolster the squad with more defensive midfielders and strikers but we don't.

Is Emenalo to blame for not bringing youth players through?

Ibime: and we're just talking of 6 games in UCL where we can sit down likes of Romeu, Moses if we want. We still have 5 open spaces in EPL where two dms can fit.

Emenalos big mistake this summer has nothing to do with depth but the quality of his first choice. It wasn't the second choice midfield that was shyted on in Donetsk, Monaco, turin or Upton park. It's not his second choice that have conceded record no of goals. It's his chosen two. I can never send mikel to sit for MaZacar. what was he planning? Replace Mikel and Romeu with two solid dms, take out Moses, bring in Lukaku, and you still have Paulo Ferreira to play with. Everything would be balanced and no one would be counting calculator even with one spare player.

Hehehe. You added to the post. Let's entertain your rubbish and rewind to August. You expect Emenalo to leave out Moses who grew up at Crystal Palace, played in the Championship and then in the PL, is experienced, has scored goals and most importantly can play as a striker for Lukaku who just came in from Belgium, is very raw, has never scored a PL goal, has no experience of playing in the PL.

Emenalo must be a fool for thinking in this way. How unintelligent! This is what Ibime is telling us now because Lukaku managed to score a few goals four months later? Emenalo is supposed to know in August, that Lukaku WILL DEFINITELY score goals.

So once again Ibime is right and Emenalo is wrong

For the three positions at the top of the midfield Emenalo had Mata, Oscar, Marin, Hazard, Piazon, Ramires and even Lamps and Studge. Or Bertrand at a stretch

Here we go again. Piazon? Are you serious? Piazon is one of the players Emenalo bought this summer? You mean at the time Piazon was bought he was already in plans for this season? Or that Piazon was bought this season? I do not see how this fits into your argument. You might as well add McEachran and Ulises Davilla. I don't blame you. You have to invent things like you always do to lay credence to your already flawed opinions.



Also, you are adding the positions of AM, LW, RW and CMs and them calling them 3 positions. Sturridge was bought as a an attacker when he arrived.
AVB was the first to play him as a permanent Winger now are assuming Emenalo thinks of him as the same without knowing what he does think. The funny is because you think this, everyone has to agree. There's no knowing Emenalo's thought process but I can safely go by what Sturridge was bought to fulfill.


That's 2 players out of your mystery lineup. So that leaves 6 players for four positions. LW, RW, and 2 CMs if we play a 4-3-3. So Emenalo is wrong in thinking that if 4 positions are filled at any point in time, having 2 more players on the bench is a good thing? How do you justify these lies? Add Moses to that and you are complaining about having 3 more players for 3 positions?

What about a long term injury to Mata and suspension to Hazard? There'll be only one more player left on the bench who can change things.

Later the same guys come to complain how come Marin isn't playing.

What's this got to do with anything? Did RDM have to play with MaZaCar for 90 mins every single game? That's why I asked why MArin isn't playing. Not even in the Carling Cup. It's poor squad management.

Extremely poor from Emenalo.

Your opinion.

Ferreira excuse? Pure nonsense! 7 defenders is what Chelsea have taken to UCL for the past ten seasons. Alex, Terry and Luiz, Ivan, Bosingwa, Ferreira and Cole was what we took last year. Even if looking for 8th man, Ramires plays RB better than Ferreira.

United have Vidic, Ferdinand, Smalling, Evans, Evra, DaSilva, Phil Jones, Butner. . . 8 defenders.

Manchester City have Micah Richards, Maicon, Vincent Kompany, Pablo Zabaleta, Joleon Lescott, Gael Clichy, Matija Nastasic, Aleksandar Kolarov . . . 8 defenders.

Arsenal have Sagna, Mertasacker, Vermaleen, Koscielny, Santos, Squilacci, Djorou, Gibbs, Jenkinson. . . . 9 defenders.



Emenalo thinks okay we'll go with 8 but Ibime in all his wisdom thinks Emenalo is trying to destroy Chelsea even when he does things other clubs have done. But hey! Ibime is right and we are chatting nonsense.


Can you imagine all the lies? Emenalo this Emenalo that? All the allegations are unfounded.

Ibime: Ok I admit, I don't know Bertrand status.

So why are you thinking of possible constraints - after finding out the midfield and strikeforce is hogwash which you argued against last week?

A weak argument to cover a disgraceful argument last week.

Did Bertrand affect the calculators brain when he was chasing Moses late August despite already having surplus of wingers yet no midfield or strikeforce.

Did Bertrand affect the calculators brain when he chose Ferreira for squad with no strong midfield or strikeforce.

Did Bertrand affect the calculators brain when he purchased 4 attacking midfielders in summer and no strikeforce or DM

I hope Bertrand won't be sold to make space when he purchases a new player in January.

Nigga writing bullshyte yet worrying about fullstop and comma. Cancer patient worrying about Ibimes baldness. You have just encapsulated your stoopidity with your line of argument. Continue.

Abeg, please tell me where I can buy this calculator jor!

Ah! Back from the dead.
Welcome back. It takes a real man to admit his errors.

I have stated and will reiterate, I have no issues with the quality of the 1st team. The issue we have is the quality of the depth. As such, it is wrong to suggest that my argument was born out of what I saw with Diame today. I am struggling to understand what point in time you managed to create this fusion. My argument is not weak. You harp on about Emenalo's inadequacies with no backup, I tell you it is wrong. How is that weak?


So now you have a problem with 4 attacking midfielders. Who of the attacking midfielders do you now think is surplus to options? If we play with Mata, Oscar and Hazard, we have only Marin and Lamps on the bench as any players that could come in and play in the attacking midfield sense. You consider this unnecessary? Over the top? So Emenalo has done wrong with having only 2 midfielders on the bench? How do you sleep at night?


Paulo Ferreira, I already explained how he fits in the squad and his purpose. Imagine a situation as today's where Luiz is suspended, JT is out injured and Azpilicueta cops a red card, who plays RB? You guessed right. . . Paulo Ferriera? So Emenalo is wrong for thinking like this? What if this situation arises and there is no Paulo? You will be the first ranting here about how he should have for-seen that.


I even gave an analogy that in other clubs, the reserve RB or LB will be a club-trained player or it could be the first choice just like Rafael DaSilva, Gibson. That way, you free up one spot for a foreign player who could then be an extra deep lying midfielder. So Chelsea failed to develop a player over the years who can deputise and that's Emenalo's fault?

To buttress my point, if faith had been kept in one of Bertrand and Van Aanholt over the years instead of sending them on incessant loans, Bertrand today will be registered as club-trained instead of foreign. Is that Emenalo's fault as well?


This is why I think your attack on Emenalo is unfounded. There is no basis.

----------------------------------------

If we sign a new player and we are lucky to progress to the next round of the CL then yes, one player will have to not play in the CL or we will have to send a player on loan. However, we wouldn't as we need the player in the league. That said, this new player can play in the league without de-registering any player.

How is all this hogwash?

Ibime: Wetin concern me with Bertrand. That's like a man with cancer worrying about baldness. The premise of your whole argument is hogwash in the first place. The first technical director in history whose excuse for failure is calculator. Mancini could do with such excuse afterall na only Micah Richards him get. Please just tell me where I can buy this calculator cos this exam hard no be small

You are a phucking disgrace. You cannot admit it and you have the audacity to call my argument hogwash. You flipping sl0wp0ke.
What do you think TDs do?

It's been utterly exposed today that you know nothing about what TDs do to come up with squad composition.
You didn't know that 3 of our players are registered as foreign players which includes Ryan Bertrand who until today, you thought was club-trained and yet you are on a mission to convince everyone with your never ending rants of how Emenalo has destroyed Chelsea when you don't have solid knowledge of the constraints.

You repeat it many times that the gullible can almost believe you. Now someone finds you out and calls you wrong, exposing your rubbish and you cannot deal with it. .


My argument is hogwash?. . Joker. My argument highlights possible constraints while yours is totally oblivious of any constraints and you expect us to take you seriously?

Ibime: I'm very surprised at this calculator that buys and sells players. The calculator who decided at start of summer to sign x amount of wingers but no strikers or central midfielders. Can anyone tell me where to buy this calculator? I have serious exam next week.

No Bertrand come-back right? So you wish you hadn't exposed your stupidity for all to see.
Is he club-trained or not? Then we can show you where to buy a calculator.

coogar: @ this rate, if ibime dies in the next 3 months, you should be held responsible!!!

did you watch our game? madness @ the madjeski stadium!

I watched every minute while I tackled the fat bloke.
It was intense.

Total madness. I thought Utd could lose 2 pts in the last few minutes.
Kudos to you guys for holding on.

coogar: ibime is a soccer illiterate -
the fat fool does not understand uefa squad rules - that boy na really buffoon!

Don't mind the obese centipede.
Obviously, it's the first time he has heard about this.
He thinks the guys upstairs have nothing they do but wielding a wand and making decisions happen.
1di0t does not even know that 3 of our playes are registered as foreign players.

He came back to argue instead of taking a moment to research that.
Now he is arguing about Bertrand being club-trained and attempting to sound intelligent instead of putting his hands up and owning up.

Intellectual dishonesty.


So he's mad at Emenalo because of Paulo Ferriera? Joker has no job.

Ibime: Your school fees must have been a waste. Ryan Bertrand who signed for Chelsea in 2005/2006 was not at Chelsea three years before his 21st birthday in 2010. So the reason Diame powered through Chelsea midfield is because Paulo Ferreira is in UCL squad? Which of the home based slot was he taking in the squad.

Hehehehe. Ryan Betrand signed for Chelsea in 2005.

06 Loan to Bournemouth
07 Loan to Oldham Athletic
08 Norwich City
09 Reading
10 Nottingham Forest . .




That's 5 seasons Bertrand spent on loan after joining Chelsea. Bertrand is 23 already. So you say Bertrand was at Chelsea for 3 consecutive years?


Evidently you don't know and do not understand squad rules. You have no clue and you think you do.
The annoying thing is you keep arguing. This must be the only Chelsea fan in the world who believe Ryan Bertrand qualifies as club-trained.

Ibime: If you didn't get the message lemme spell it to you. If Emenalo can send Essien and Meireles away, he can likewise send anyone away to accomodate the defensive midfielders yet you claim his hands are tied. What is Paolo Ferreira doing in our UCL squad? Ode!

Emenalo this and that . . . I understand you're bored, but you're the eediot who came here to tell us today that Diame overpowered Chelsea midfield. Last week there was no problem with this midfield. It was all RDMs defensive failings which "Benitez would rectify "

Score dem MORE MORE!!!

On Paulo.

So you want to go to the UCL with 3 CBs right? Cahill, Terry and Luiz? Not in JM's years, not now.
We have 4 CBs because 2 could get injured easily. We have 2 to fill in.

That means, technically we have 2 RBs. Azpilicueta and Paulo. That's why he is in the squad.
In other clubs, the second RB will be a young, academy player who doesn't need to be registered as foreign.
Therefore that foreign spot can be used by another midfielder who can then provide this base you talk about. . Another glaring result of failing to produce academy players.

Is that Emenalo's fault? Hehehe. Joker.



On Diame.

I said he came in and made the difference. It's not an admittance of a shyte midfield.
It was a one off event. . This is akin to me questioning our defensive personnel on the back of Andy Carroll jumping higher than all of our defenders.
This is Emenalo's fault as well right?

Do you give up?

Ibime: Can you imagine the guys foolishness claiming that "UEFA says we cannot have more than 4 Association trained players meaning we have to register 4 of them as foreigners "

One would wonder how Barca manage to field 25 man squad with majority home based squad.

This guy's eediocy is unparalleled. Using his own stupid misinterpretation to defend Emenalo.

For clarity, the rules simply say teams must have at least 4 hometrained and 4 trained in the same country.

HAhahaha. Extreme idiocy on display.
UEFA says you cannot have more than 17 foreign players. The rest 8 of the 25-man squad can be made up of homegrown players.

However, this is where the restriction comes in. You can have NO MORE THAN 4 Association trained players. We have 8 homegrown players -7 association trained and 1 club-trained.


We have 7 AT players, we can only register 4 of them as AT but they are all in the squad. . What are they? Effectively FOREIGN PLAYERS you dumb @ass.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I love when you try to sound informed about matters you no nothing about.

Ibime: Terry and Bertrand have been with Chelsea from 18 so are clubtrained meaning we only have to keep 2 places open on our squad.

Do you even know the conditions of being homegrown? The player has to have been at the club for 3 consecutive years before his 21st birthday.
Was Bertrand at the club for 3 consecutive years before his 21st birthday ? How then can he be club trained?
Ibime stop embarrassing yourself.


Some things you know. This one, you have no clue about and I suggest you stop now.

Ibime: Shebi una see Mr Calculator. Last week Emenalo had done nothing wrong. The new defense this week is 25 man squad. When you say this man is foolish, him go think say na joke. Malouda and Ferreira presence in the squad (despite the fact they have been sent to youth team) is now the reason Emenalo could not purchase a quick strong defensive midfielder or two or even keep Lukaku around, yet he could send Meireles, Essien and such away. If this mumu even calculated well he would know Oscar, HAzard and Romeu don't need to be registered for Premierleague as they are under -21. Infact Chelsea only submitted 20 man list to the Premierleague leaving space for 5 players or 3. The same Emenalo also purchased players we don't need like Marin yet couldn't buy decent central. Lemme not indulge this guy's madness anymore and allow the madman continue to play with his calculator. Mumu excuse for incompetence whilst trying to sound intelligent. When we sign new player in January, he will come and explain the Taylor series that Emenalo used to fit the guy in the squad.

You are a S10wpoke. . .
The same you who admitted last week that Marin was bought because we hedged our hopes of not qualifying for the CL.
Now you blame Emenalo for the same thing again?


So Essien would have provided this base you talk about? Are you serious? And Meireles?
The same Meireles you cursed and cursed last year.

And you are wrong man, Malouda and Ferriera are registered on the Chelsea squad list.
I also see that you evade the CL squad analysis. . .

Emenalo this Emenalo that? . . Everyone's bored.