₦airaland Forum

You are a foooooooooooooooooool OP. Their qualification statues is not yet known. We will know by the end of today. There are 4 spots. 2 have been taken already remaining 2. If Chile should beat Thailand by at least 4 goals margin, Chile will take a spot. If someone wins in the match between New Zealand and Cameroun by a 2 goal margin, the team will take another spot. So, we need to pray that Cameroon New Zealand should play a draw because once any wins, our chances are slim. If someone wins between Cameroon and New Zealand, we need to now further pray that Thailand will not be too white-washed by Chile. Anything above 3 goals margin in that match and a win between New Zealand, Cameroon, we are out.

Chiomaella:
Nigeria will now be watching the rest of the 2019 Women’s World Cup nervously.

The Super Falcons saw their chances of making the Round of 16 reduce, as Brazil took the second slot after Tuesday matches.

The South Americans beat Italy 1-0, thanks to Marta’s late penalty, to claim third spot in Group C.

Three of the teams in the group including Australia finished with six points, while Jamaica had zero.

There are now two slots left for the best third-placed teams.

For the African champions to qualify now, Scotland need to beat Argentina on Wednesday. Or at least hold the South Americans to a draw.

New Zealand must also hold Cameroon or if either side wins on Thursday, it must not be by more than three goals.

Thailand, who have conceded 18 times already, should not lose by more than three goals to Chile.



See more here https://thickmatch.com/world-cup-super-falcons-chances-qualifying-reduce-brazil-take-second-slot/

This explanation is so complex. Can it not be explained in simple terms?

The penalty rule is not even the issue. The referee was so terrible. The French babe should have gotten a card for diving. You see the yeye reverse angle they quickly gave to the referee to keep on rewinding and rewinding. These people are great cheats. Such a shame for football. Very cheap penalty to award. If such had taken place on the midfield, even if a free kick was awarded, is that a yellow card offence? She still gave a yellow card again knowing fully well that the player was already on a yellow card. This was the same way Mali was booted out of the under 20 world cup through meaningless calls. When Kalu tried to pass the French player, the French player kept on kicking her legs and she fell yet no cards. When France attacked again, a French babe handled the ball with her hands when it was cleared but the referee turned blind eyes to it and allowed play to continue. Such a shame!
Anyway, I do not see this French team going anyway. I have seen teams like Netherlands play and at least 4 teams play better than them. They will be booted out soon.

dollytino4real:
all this indomie children can abuse their elders

I am very sure that I am not your mate. If your self acclaimed maturity is true, you would have reasoned that the mumu girls should be the ones to be blamed. They are the ones that need their heads examined.

TSRC:
Wrong.
Nnadozie was responsible for saving a lot of korean assault.

Go and check the stats again. The koreans played better, had more shots on target, had more possession and pressured our goal endlessly.
I can't count how many times our keeper was put under pressure which she along with the defence dealt with very well.
If oshoala was as effective as our goal keeper yesterday, Nigeria would have scored five.

No be only 5
How many balls came to her throughout the match?
Korea had just 7 shots on goal in the entire 90 minutes. Of the seven shots, the only threatening one was the one she fumbled. She tried no doub tbut comparing her with Osoala's performance makes no sense. Even the midfielders did not cover as much distance as Osoala and she scored a television goal that can be up for one of the best goals of the tournament. Osoala also broke a lot of attacks fromthe Koreans and disrupted their plays severally.

dollytino4real:
n.a. wah dis guy needs brain checker

Is it the guy that needs a brain check or your mumu gender wey pose bare chested with am? You guys are always quick to blame guys for your stewpidity. If nude ladies appear in videos, you blame the guy rather than talking sense into ur fellow mumu females.
Moreover, the pic looks like it was a festival or something. The babes look like those from South Africa.

JastSiryin:
This your likes go soon turn to dislikes very soon. Guardiola had long earned his stripes as an assistant coach, and also coached a Barcelona junior team(can't remember which one). I'm sure Zidane even had more experience when he took charge of Real than Lampard has now. Chelsea are just getting way in over their heads if I must say. It ain't gonna end well believe me

The dude is highly delusional and know no Jack about those he mentioned. They had a very large base of experience before picking up those jobs.

cheezy4real:
Chelsea's champions league was gotten by Di Mateo, an inexperienced coach. Let dem gamble

Did he not meet an already well structured team? Even without a coach, they would still hold their own. Coaches have ways of structuring their teams in a certain way and coaches like Mou, Pep etc have been known to do this. Coaching a team goes beyond merely planning how the formation will be or what formation would be used.

prodigyhenry:
Sarri was trophyless before he joined Chelsea. Zidane hadn't coached a top division team before a whole real Madrid made him head coach. Guardiola had no experience when he became Barca's most successful coach ever. So it's not about experience if you've got it, you've got it

Stop dishing out fake information. Even those you mentioned hadn't coached the top clubs before being appointed, they were part of a robust coaching crew of such clubs or had been so much around the club's overall coaching. Was Zidane not more of an assistant coach at Real Madrid before picking up the job? The truth is, Lampard is not yet ripe for the job. He still has a lot to learn as a coach. I watched a couple of his Derby games. They should have made him a coaching staff for some years to see the pressure from that side and be part of the team's analysis for a while. Giving him the role straight up is a bad decision in my opinion.

TSRC:
Wrong.
Nnadozie was responsible for saving a lot of korean assault.

Go and check the stats again. The koreans played better, had more shots on target, had more possession and pressured our goal endlessly.
I can't count how many times our keeper was put under pressure which she along with the defence dealt with very well.
If oshoala was as effective as our goal keeper yesterday, Nigeria would have scored five.

She got scrappy shots and nothing threatening.Having shots at goal does not necessarily imply that the shots were of good quality. I have been watching almost all the matches at this female world cup and Osoala is one of the very few players that cover the highest distance. How many of our players can cover the kind of distance she coveres. Her goal was the nerve settler and was so good. The manner she gave the slightest touch to the ball to go into the net is something that a lot of male strikers cannot even do at such a tight angle. She made a couple of heavy touches and you want to criticise her. The young lady on haircut that supplied her the pass is another fantastic player. She was the second best after Osoala. Did you not see how Kalu came in and got tired and could not even move much? For female football standard, Osoala is awesome with her runs and pressure. Do you even know how many moves she intercepted and used her physique to stop a lot things?Her man of the match award was well deserved.

TSRC:
Even the dstv southafrican crew gave it to nnadozie.

Bigot.

You mean those female analysts? What do those ones know?
NNadozie did not have much to do. Most of the balls she was handling were scrappy shots. She even fumbled when a very light cross that could be held was played. It is either you catch it or punch it well if you do not want to catch it. What did she do with it? She laid it on the path of a Korean player.

Mrshape:
I have been fetching them out lately with my post sir,
It gives me joy to see like minds sir.

Lolz.
They are much o. I do not know the names you have on your list already. Perhaps I could add more.

Mrshape:
Good one sir √√√√√√√√√√√(11/10)

I bet you did not realise that there are a lot of badazz mathematicians on Nairaland.

moniniola:
Jeez! do questions like this still exist?somebody like me will drive my children early to school so they can copy maths assignment lol...I hate that subject

Mrshape:
yes I observed that but I gave him credit for the first attempt on point.

Okay. Kudos to him.

Mrshape:
If the students have done technical drawing, the will be able to easily understood the concept sir.
If the haven't they can still understand with a good 3D diagram in the blackboard and explanation,
Were resources limit most is teaching Longitude and Latitude without a globe,

What percentage of science WASSCE candidates offer technical drawing? Less than 20%. Now, what percentage of WASSCE candidates offer technical drawing? Less than 4%.The technical drawing reference is therefore a no no.
Do you know the amount of time it will take to start sketching 3D diagrams on a blackboard before explanation out of the 40 minutes alloted to the class? Respect to teachers who try to use their limited resources to teach.My point is that, education requires funding. The world has gone beyond the methods most schools use in teaching. 21st century teaching and learning methods should be used. Should all these be provided, everything becomes smooth. This is why our own students pack A1 like beans in all these low standard WASSCE examinations.
Look at the public schools for example, some parents are satisfied because no money is being collected from them and it is free education but they fail to ask the question "What is the quality of the free education?" By the time they start demanding more, maybe government will be truthful enough to tell them that "A qualitative education cannot be free."

Talking about Longitude and Latitude, that is the most poorly taught topic in most Nigerian schools. Most teachers do not even understand it. I was planning to do a video on it and then upload but I have not had the chance to.

Mrshape:
Yes you and abeos gave the correct 2D representation, while Razor017 gave the correct 3D in his last diagram.

Okay. Abeos made a mistake in his labelling though.

Rezos017:
At natural waves:
I was trying to correct a wrong idea u had: the tower is north of D, meaning directly in front of D. But its not the whole tower that is at an angle of elevation of 35degrees from D. Its just the top of the tower, ie point B. Its clearly detailed in the second diagram. You seem good at basic maths. You can see the difference

I did not look at your 35 degrees well before. I have seen it. The only problem we seem to have now is the 2D versus 3D approach. I wish you guys are close by.

Mrshape:
You call it straight forward because you already understood the ideal,
If I tell you the number of students and maths teachers around the word that have failed this particular question you will not believe, when I presented the solution, the only way the comprehend is when it was in 3d dimension,
Students will not be ask to draw 3D, but only does that understand 3D formation of it can translate it to what u did their.
Note my diagram is same as, @Razor017 diagram.

I see! Doing 3D imaging and teaching the concept is a bit advanced for that level considering the fact that 95%+ of secondary schools do not have the resources to teach such. It cannot be well illustrated on a white board for students. I may teach in a privileged school with all the necessary facilities like Interactive Flat Panels and necessary software to make an illustration. However, less than 5% of schools have this.
If I get you right, do you mean to say that I gave the correct 2D analysis and imaging while you guys gave the 3D solution?

Mrshape:
U did a great job, but a good 3D diagram will be better understood.

Were the students expected to draw a 3D diagram for the straightforward sketch? Let me see the diagram you have.

castro316:
So why were you so quick to say my drawing when your aptitude reasoning is high. This is the statement my teachers used to punish me that year which I found out was very bad thing to say In an academyof "learning"

Okay. Sorry about that if you are offended. Quickly check the previous page to see the images I attached. You are free to criticise it.

Rezos017:
It isn't merely one point that is due East of another(read the question again).

Yes, I know

Rezos017:
It is the tower that is due east of point C, ie on the right side of C.

Sure.

Rezos017:
The angle of elevation of the top of the tower B from point D is 35 degrees

This is not possible bro because the tower is due North of point D and as such cannot be 35 degrees. When one point is due north of another, it has ot be straight up and cannot make an angle of 35 degrees.

Rezos017:
I have pointed out that little mistake in d diagram. I"l post another one to show the correction. From the perspective of the diagram, points C and D as well as the tower itself are all on the same horizontal ground.

The only mistake you are making is that you did not think about the fact that the top of the tower was the initial reference point. I have attached some diagrams on the first page. Check them out

Rezos017:
Just a little rotation.

Bro, in your diagram, C,A,D are not on the same horizontal plane.

castro316:
The problem is understanding english language (statement problems) not the mathematics. The question says C and D are different observation points at the foot of a tower A Ie the same plane. From there start making your analysis. And before you start your insults, (which I will not indulge you) why did you come out to say my diagram is wrong without checking your facts? However draw yours. If you came to learn stop being a spectator. I am not C. Ronaldo or Messi. Biko. I am SS3 teacher and I know what I drew there

Were you not the one that started insults by asking for my maths grades? You just come online to talk anyhow without even knowing whom you are talking to. You produced a diagram that does not follow and I made a simple observation. Produce a simple diagram that has A,C and D on the same horizontal plane and satisfies the question. Should this be too much to do nwa teacher? You teach sss 3 maths, kudos! . I have produced countless students that have gone on to massacre exams in further mathematics and mathematics with 90%+ of them scoring A1 even though that is not my own subject. In my subject, I have never produced a B2 in an external examination. You can take that to the bank.