₦airaland Forum

I studied computer science at different levels and if I have to go back to school, I will still study same computer science

rudestmcblaze:
It is, though it sometimes backfires when u come up against relegation threatened teams that have no particular style of play

Yeah. You're right about the relegation threatened teams. They play a style I like to term "anywhere belle face".

rudestmcblaze:
I'm good though bin real occupied, seems you're getting me wrong. I said "he is the manager and he is knows best" because that's the only reason or excuse I could give for his always fielding Fellaini despite Fellaini's style of play, Fellaini is nt a man utd first team player but a back-up plan

Lol@back up plan. So funny. Okay. I getyou perfectly now.

rudestmcblaze:
I never said he wanted to win, I only said he stood a better chance of winning fielding the players I mentioned cos Fellaini was making us play aerial football instead of counter-attack. By the way, Mou never wanted a draw against Chelsea cos it was obvious (he even affirmed it after the match) that it was the same idea he had when he came up against them in the F.A. cup match. More importantly, every manager wants to win

Which manager wouldn't mind a win. Read my analysis again. That is Mou sttyle. The fact that the play was more defend minded does not mean that he would not mind a win and that was the same reason they did not set out in your preferred mode.
Ps:Do you really take this long to reply to mentions? I guess you were busy. How are you?

CACAWA:
hahahhaha

So if I say

X + 6 = 19, find x

According to you guys, an advanced way of thinking is to say, let's try 1+6, 2+6, 3+6,..............7+6, ....10+6,........

Let's be honest..

That is what was tagged pure undiluted intellect by those herein

masperano:
Nah very similar. .

Okay. I will try if there is another way of solving it. Do you have another 6th grade maths question from China? . If you do, paste it.

MathsChic:
Thanks naturalwaves. I know it's late. Sorry about that. Just not been around.

I thought as much. That time you were so free, I guess you were on leave or something because it was so evident you had time. I doubt if it lasted past 2 weeks. Your absence was felt. Trust you are doing good.

masperano:
The mistake is so obvious... dividing 5.365 by 2.... he assumed the area beneath the triangle can be gotten by dividing the area in the corner by two...

I see.

masperano:
lolz well deserved i knew u will eventually solve it (to be honest)

You trust me gan o . It is tough. Was your method easier? Thanks for the meme

inschool:
area of red portion is = 18.778 unit square.....

welcome! I think you missed out something in your solution though.

masperano:
Ok this man has spared me the pain of typing the solution.... Yea Natural waves ur solution is correct... thank you!!

Wow! You need to give me a clapping meme. That question looks easy merely looking at it but I won't lie, it is tough on the inside. That's the toughest, brain racking sh.it I have solved in recent times

ps: You can still paste your solution. I would like to see how you solved yours.

masperano:
Nice try! but the problem is that you have assumed that the diagonal line divides the corner into two equal parts (which is not true). I will post the solution unfailingly 2moro, been busy of late... Cheers!.

go and check my solution now. I have solved it. Check the previous page. I cc'd you.

inschool:
exactly I didn't find that thread interesting at all

By the title, it was not meant to be found interesting and wasn't meant for competition. It's a maths clinic where issues are resolved and I only invited you guys to stop by once in a while to contribute your quota. That's all!

YungMillionaire:
Bros. this your thread is filled with teenagers trying to score chicks. We are talking a real math club on Nairaland.

Did you peruse the thread from page 1 to page 256 to make such conclusion? Fine, the starter of the thread made a bit of chest beating and all. Subsequently, it was refined and made better.On this forum, I have met close to 10 mathematicians and each one of them can stand their own anywhere. Alot of them came to the thread and assisted people. The thread is one of the longest threads if not the longest in the Education section. I only asked you to get in there and contribute your quota if you have any whenever you are free to. You seem on a very high horse and you need to calm down. Moreover, you do not seem to ooze any iota of intelligence aside doing side talks and igniting infernos and you are a very bad listener as well. You only hear whatever you want to hear or whatever tickles your fancy.

YungMillionaire:
Common be honest. You can't place naturewaves anywhere near any of those those two guys. Be honest. Stop the sentiments. Anyone who is really following this thread can easily see that.

The aim of the discuss was never to place anyone above any except if I missed the purpose. It was meant to be a regular intellectual discussion. It is not a competition. If you feel they are better than me, that is your opinion. Perception is something that cannot be debated. That is your perception and you are entitled to it and like I said earlier on, I have nothing to prove to you or anyone.

GodIsBiafran:
naturalwaves genius?! Please don't finish my Wednesday with laughter.Naturalwaves that does not know that assumptions are part of mathematics . I follow this thread better than you. Read again

If this was what you were able to deduce from the argument I had with Akinphysicist, then I am sorry for you. Please, go back and read again.

FisifunKododada:
What are you smoking? naturalwaves is not even on Cacawa's level let alone Akin's. Did you not see the xchange be naturawaves and Akin? See how your genius (who does not know the role of assumptions in mathematics) was schooled like a child. Go to page 6 and see how your 'genius' was publicly decimated. Please stop joking here.

Permit me to laugh at bolded . You are a clown! Even akinphysicist cannot utter such condescending words. I won't have a "roforofo" with you.

worldmoney:
Exactly, I have been following this thread while Akin and Cacawa are very Intelligent no doubt but the genius here is naturalwaves. Would love to learn more however from everyone and Thanks for your contributions

Thanks. Hope you had some fun as the thread was turned into a " bolekaja ambiance" (apologies to Obianhangbon)

Johncrown80:
please recommend a nice perfume not more than 4k

A white bottled CASABLANCA perfume for fragrance and a blue bottled ENGLISH BLAZER spray for freshness. A combination of these two should not exceed 4k. The casablanca perfume is not oil based but it should last throughout a whole day. Although, I do not know what your style is and the kind of statement you want to make when you get close to people but those two up there are subtle, soft and just cool. Nothing hard or nose choking, more like a natural smell in terms of softness. A week won't go by without someone asking you the name of the perfume you are wearing except if they are shy to ask or just want to deliberately let go.

AkinPhysicist:
Nothing do you boss. We are all here to share ideas and learn from each other. Lets agree to agree where we can. And agree to disagree on the rest.

No wahala. You can always go to this thread to contribute your quota whenever you are free
https://www.nairaland.com/1147658/nairaland-mathematics-clinic

mancheeutd:
you forced me out of my shell... you are so intelligent with your comment akin is only being smart here cos he's enjoying the attention and cacawa is so carried away not to notice it all in bid to share the glory with akin....be that as it may akin's creativity does not apply to the rules of mathematics.

Exactly! Good to see you share the same thoughts and thanks for the compliments.

YungMillionaire:
I will like to set up a Nairaland Math/Science club. I see more than a few talents on this thread. Even the textbook warriors have their own little place in my heart Lets bring all these talents together and share ideas, solve problems and have math fun on this forum.

Lol@ textbook warriors. You ehn. Well, you may be wrong. I don't believe in lacram lapour. I like application based stuffs.
Nice idea you have bro. A similar thread already exist on this forum. You can go in there to contribute your quota or paste your questions there. This is the thread
https://www.nairaland.com/1147658/nairaland-mathematics-clinic

CACAWA:
Excellent.

This is what maths should look like.

God bless you

Abi now. God bless you too.

yorex2011:

Weldone bro. I guess this is the kind of intelligence akinaphysicist, Godisbiafran and yungmillionaire meant

AkinPhysicist:
Clap 4 yourself. Using my 'wuru wuru' method: No pen and paper needed. And it took me less than a minute. Try it. Its good for your brain.


By the way - we already hashed this out yesterday. Keep up. See this:

The ideal thing is to first of all use the wuru wuru method now before setting out to solve so that one will have an idea of what the answer should look like. It is a smart way of reasoning. However, you are failing to get my points. Sometimes, the answer set may span a larger loop and because of that we need to set out standard ways of resolving such questions for the sake of other people watching( same thing cacawa was trying to communicate to you). You be chairman now. Who would doubt your ability of being able to solve such question.

GodIsBiafran:
akinphysicist - yes but am not sure of the naturalwaves guy. He has not been fully vetted yet. Right now he is just making noise up and down.

. You guys are so hilarious. It is not a competition now and I have nothing to prove to you. I come here anytime I can. I contribute my own quota if I can and learn from people as well. You guys should learn how to make good intelligent convos online. Again, my dear, I have nothing to prove to you o.

AkinPhysicist:
Because its a fun out of the box kind of way of doing it


Good. Children can teach you are lot about imagination and creativity. Be a child once in a while and you will see things differently.

So? - as long as the child knows the answer has to be positive definite so he starts from zero instead of negative infinity. This child has learn far more mathematics than the people subtracting 2 from both sides to see what happens. Whatever its worth the child probably knows the subtraction method too.


It would be trial and error if I didn't know where to start and were to stop. See my post above about the creative child who knows where to start counting from. That is the key. There are quite a few advanced mathematics techniques that employ spanning a limited space to find element or elements that fulfill a particular restraint. This is what I did here. If you are wise you will learn.



If you truly believe I cannot solve this problem in the normal (school textbook way) then why are you engaging me in this conversation?

You are very funny. You just have a way of evading things even though you know what I was talking about. Your evasive techniques shows how intelligent you are. Moreover, why would I think that you won't be able to solve the question? Like I said, it is for the benefit of others watching as well. No hard feelings and stop dribbling up and down joor.

skillful01:
akinphysicist and naturalwaves,you guy 've got pure intellect.

Thank you bro. Since Akinphysicist has decided to dance in circles and not provide a suitable solution to the question nor provide an alternative method that is more acceptable, let me solve it through a way that is devoid of wuruwuru and trial by error like he did for the benefits of secondary school students and others viewing the thread. See solution attached below.
cc:cacawa

StarBukola:
ohh for me?? I don't knw what to say

Yeah, sure!

AkinPhysicist:
Uggh! Not again. These people and their wahala Assumptions are part of mathematics. Look it up. If an integer solution exists you will find it. If you don't find it then you will KNOW that an integer solution does not exist. This itself is KNOWLEDGE you did not have prior to the count test. In the absence of an integer solution, then a more general approach can then be used to solve the problem.

Why would you make an assumption when there is a legitimate way to go about it without assumption? What you did is not different from a child being asked to solve for X in 2+X=6 and then you start testing 1,2,3 etc to see which one will give 6. That is trial method and it is demeaning for someone of your calibre. Provide a suitable solution that is devoid of trial and error.

AkinPhysicist:
If you don't understand then ask questions. Here is my response to someone who was wise enough to seek clarification:

Kelvinreality - after giving Cacawe all night to answer the question above, I have concluded he is incapable of basic logic. Here is the explanation:

x^1/2 + (x+15)^1/2 = 15. If an integer solution exist, then you can obtain it by counting. Here is how it works.

Let a = x^1/2 and b= (x+15)^1/2 so the eq. becomes a + b =15. So choose a pair of integer a and b whose sum gives you 15. However, NOT all pairs qualify because a^2 has to be equal to b^2 - 15 (since both have to be equal to x). So all you have to do is count from 0 to 15 to see which pair qualifies. Clearly any pair with a from 0 to 5 fails because in this case a^2 is clearly less than b^2 -15. You don't even need to do any calculation - all you need to know is if b^2 -15 is greater (or smaller) than or equal to a^2. If its equal then you have your solution. No calculator required. Nothing. Just basic logic of counting.

You are so funny bro. How will you start up a mathematical solution with " If an integer solution exists". That's not right at all. Okay, what if an integer solution does not exist? What universally accepted principle are you going to use for it? Show it! You can't be substituting unknowns with integers based on logic except incase of objectives or something that requires a fast answer and thaat is not the case here.

StarBukola:
when we could have split the the money,70 for me 30/for u

Hahahaha. Very funny. Don't worry, will give you 90.