Naturalwaves's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Naturalwaves's Profile › Naturalwaves's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 (of 126 pages)
SINZ: You know America is the headquatres of Sodom and most por.n flicks from there feature alot of these black American dudes and some cross over migrants. It is now built in their subconscious mind that, black guys are synonymous with that and could bang their brains out. You see how trivial they could get? I am not usually like this here, I just feel like addressing some issues. lol. Someone came out with a worrisome issue and the best most of them could do is to salivate, get freaky and send pms |
SINZ:Have you ever wonder why they usually say they want black guys Take a guess ![]() |
KennyID17:You came late. I think the OP has pulled down the initial pictures(they were not nudes but painted the picture of what he was talking about). He even said they have started sending him Pms ![]() |
SINZ: This was not about making verifications o. They were so freaky. |
[quote author=SINZ post=55839666][/quote]The "f" thing was just splashed allover the "viewing this thread" section. Imagine, one of them was even so lost she was asking for a nude picture forgetting that she is on a public forum. Smh |
Going by the number of ladies viewing the thread, I can see that size indeed matters and a lot of them are so freaky. |
About 14 years ago, I had an appendectomy surgery for an inflamed appendix. My mum was with me prior to the surgery and waited outside the operating room while it lasted. It was successful and I was wheeled into a recovery room. My mum was told to go home and come back in few hours time since I was still unconscious due to the anaesthetic admitted on me during the procedure. She left the hospital and was on her way home when (according to her) something told her to go back ( That was about 10 to 15 minutes after leaving....The hospital was a trekkable distance from home). According to her, she asked herself the purpose of going home and why she cannot stay with me and just stare at me while I am still unconscious? She turned back and headed to the hospital. She went in straight to the room I was put. Lo and behold, I was gasping seriously for breathe and was jacking up and down. She ran out and called the Doctor and nurses, everyone ran like it was a race. The doctor then discovered that the nurse that set the drip did not set it well. Rather than the drip going into my body, my blood was going into the drip and the drip was completely red and filled with blood. Imagine someone that just lost blood through surgery losing the remaining blood in that manner. I am so grateful to my mum for her intuition and for turning back to stay with me in the hospital rather than go home. If not, there would not have been a "naturalwaves". I consider this a miracle Lessons Learnt 1. Always be close to loved ones when they are in the hospital 2. Don't trust Doctors and nurses completely...they could be so careless 3. Hospitals should have people to monitor patients that are recovering or set a close range camera. 4.Moreover, there should be an emergency bell on the bedside of any patient. Many have died because they could not talk nor reach for help on time. Thank you mummy! CC: swissheart |
. |
masperano:Okay bro. I think I will need some angle formulas to resolve that o if I wanted to and I have lost touch with most of them. I will try again sha maybe after work but I doubt if this is for 6th grade o. |
masperano:Area of tringle ACD = 1/2b * h =1/2 * 20 * 10 = 100 If the 2 different parts of the circle in the down region containing the red areas are joined together, we will get a complete circle. Therefore, we need to subtract the area of the circle from the area of the triangle to get the part that remains. The radius of the circle is 5 (i.e half way through the side of the rectangle. Hence, area = pie * radius square = 22/7 * 25 78.57 The remaining portion of the area = 100- 78.57 =21.43 But 21.43 is not the area of the remaining red region. In order to get the area of the red region, we still need to subtract that small part down there around the place I tagged “ A ” and this is where the problem lies. The final solution will be gotten by subtracting the area of the small region close to where I tagged "A" from 21. 43. I do not know how to get the area of that small region but if I extend the image to make a square and try and see or guess what size of the square that portion will take, I will say around 1/8 of the portion. Area of square is 25 and 1/8 of it will give 3.125 ( this is just an estimate by eyes o. lol) THerefore, estimated area of the red region is 21.43- 3.125 = 18.305 metre or centimeter square since you did not give the unit of the dimensions. Note: The real answer should flabitate between plus or minus 2 from this estimated answer ![]() Edited Calculating the area of the small piece on the left corner Area of small piece= area of the smaller triangle formed - the right piece - the semi circular part = 1/2 *10*5 -right piece - semi circular part = 25 - right piece- semi circular part Finding the area of the right piece To get this, we need to extend a square shape to the diagram and subtract a quatre of a circle from it Area of extended square is 5 square = 25 Area of quatre of circle is (22/7 * 25)/ 4 = 19.64 Area occupied by the right piece = 25- 19.64 = 5.36 So now, we are left with finding just the area of the semi circular part. NOTE: The semi circle formed by this area was not formed from the bigger triangle, so we cannot use the big triangle to resolve this. How to solve the area of the semi circular part The only way to do this is to draw up a triangle on the semi circle such that part of the triangle will serve as the radius of the bigger circle. The reason for doing this is to obtain a sector which we can easily subtract a triangle from in order to get the area of that small part. The triangle formed will be an isosceles triangle. This will give 17.68 after solving. 17.68 is the area of the semi circular part Recall that area of the small piece formed = Area of new triangle drawn - area of right piece - area of semi circular part = 25-5.36-17.68 = 1.96 Therefore, the area of our red region = our initial 21.43- 1.96 = 19.47 metre or centimetre square Note: I attached the image of how the cut was made and how the area of the semi circular part was resolved. Check image below and please, do not tell me I am wrong because this question kept me on my sit for 2 hours+ after work Cc: masperano, thankyoujesus, emmitex77,inschool
|
masperano:I think I will like to give this a try once I am settled. |
vibeskartel101:That is true. Familiar terrain. |
vibeskartel101:Hahahaha. You know this is not true. Moreover, there are no small teams in football. No under dogs anymore. |
willjoe:Yeah, sure I did. They almost won it few years ago before Ramos equalised. Honestly, they deserve it but they will need to be more mature and calm in front of goal to achieve that. |
willjoe:Well, I doubt this. They were held by Leicester. If Bayern or Real Madrid had met that same Leicester, they may be walloped as high as 5:0 or even more. They still lack a bit of quality and maturity for big matches. The only thing that can work for them is determination, high work rate etc. Unfortunately, it takes more than that to win a match of such magnitude. The quality of the Madrid team is so high and on their day, they can massacre any opposition. Look at Leicester for example. they tried their best but lack UCL exposure. The strikers were not calm in front of goal, all they wanted to do was to play a fast shot and it affected them a bit. |
Maxcollins042:The penalty awarded o Bayern in the first leg was not even a penalty to start with as the ball never touched anyone's hands. The one awarded to them yesterday was a 50/50. Some refs will not even give it. Moreover, Robben dived so bad. Don't even let us go there at all but the referee awarded it all the same. Do you think a referee that has been instructed to be partial will award such penalty? Maxcollins042:He was not dismissed fir his challenge. He was yellow carded for it. He was dismissed because the said yellow card was the second for the night= red card. Moreover, the yellow card was for obstruction and not for the first challenge. In case you do not know, Vidal did two things; 1.Challenging for the ball by making a slide which he won and did perfectly before a Real guy got there. 2.Raising up his left foot and getting into the way of play of the Real guy which later resulted in the tripping. If you must know, the card was for number 2 above. Maxcollins042:This your point is so hilarious. A real madrid player got in the way of Robben ( he made partial contact, Robben brushed the top of his left boot on his boots and then dived like a clown) and the referee awarded a penalty for it. Now, a real madrid player dived and no penalty. Is that not fair enough? You are still asking why he was not yellow carded. If the referee wanted to favour real madrid like you said, would he not have given a penalty for that? Maxcollins042:Yeah, I support this too. It would have stopped the fraudulent penalty awarded to Bayern in the first leg and all other types of inconsistencies. |
willjoe:Maybe he is yet to recover fully. Talking about football rules, the golden goal rule was cancelled so, do not give up yet as it can still be cancelled. Rumour has it that the golden goal rules was cancelled because Africans benefited from it most and it seems to work more for Africans . Nigeria used the rule to knack Brazil akpako at the semi final of the Olympics before beating Argentina at the finals ( Funny enough, the Argentines played the offside trap in that game.....we had a free kick and they all ran out leaving our striker one on one with the keeper). Cameroun used the golden goal rule to win the Olympics 4 years after Nigeria did as well. |
willjoe:Lol. If you read my initial write up, I even castigated the referee for Ronaldo's offside goal. At least you don gree So, I am only trying to be objective. I blame the mumu tactics called OFFSIDE TRAP implored by Ancelloti. If you watch that goal, the player in front of Ronaldo wanted to move in opposite direction to the ball as it was coming, he was running out rather than defend. Then , the one behind Ronaldo was running in. That tactic is usually confusing to defenders at times and if a defending team keeps on using it, there is a probability that the referee will fall for at least 1 in every 10 attempts and not blow for offside. That is the tactic I detest most in football THE OFFSIDE TRAP. It is usually exhibited by teams that are fearful of a potent striker while defending rather than take the bull by the horn.Moreover, why would a player like Ronaldo be given such free space to roam alone in the first place. Do you remember how Gattusso tight marked him in those days in these kind of matches? It is a shame honestly. Bayen fall my hands wella. |
willjoe:Already did severally and I wrote why it was justified but you did not read it. You just tagged my write up an epistle without reading through it thoroughly. Well, let me restate it here if you cannot go back; 1. Vidal made a clean slide / tackle on the ball. 2. Vidal got to the ball first before the oncoming Real player. 3. Vidal was not booked for that challenge/ slide. 4. After the slide, Vidal cunningly raised up his left foot to trip the Real player and stop him from moving. 5.Vidal was booked for this act in (4) above and not the initial challenge. 6. Vidal actually suspected that the pass he made while sliding may put his team under pressure hence he decided to raise his leg to stop him and that leg was nasty. Hence, he got carded for it and only few people noticed this. You can rewatch again. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=atAAmchKemY Vidal's action is tagged "obstruction" in the game of football and referees are free to give yellow cards for such offences. |
willjoe:It was a yellow card and became an outright red due to an earlier card. It is a pity that this is the best you could come up with from what was written. I doubt if you know what analysis means. I don't want sentimental cries without a solid reason. Sop mentioning me if you have nothing meaningful to say. If you feel it was not a card offence, say it and explain the reasons. You need to learn how to discuss. No one is fighting with you. |
willjoe:Did you read what I typed or you did not just comprehend it? If not, go and re read it okay? Particularly the second paragraph. I love intelligent discussions/ analysis and if you are not going to follow in that line, do not quote me again. |
uk10:Calm down and be sincere. This was not a case of robbery like the way it was so glaring during Barca days against Chelsea etc. This was just a bad call by the referee. If he wanted to outrightly favour Real, he would have awarded that penalty in which the Real guy dived. Robben dived for his penalty too but he still awarded it. Moreover, Vidal's second yellow card was well deserved. After sliding for the ball, he knowingly raised his left foot to obstruct the on coming Real player, go and re watch the highlights online. The referee did not book him for the slide but for the leg obstruction which was after he got the ball. So, all the talks about him going for the ball and getting the ball is trash ( I was even suprised Ancelloti said same at the press conference) and that was not what he was booked for. The wrong call about the referee was Ronaldo's offside goal which was close but it was offside and that is an error which I feel should not happen in a game of such magnitude but not to say that Bayern was robbed. Again, the build up that led to Bayern's second goal was even offside. If the referee had blown for offside for the Bayern player before intersection and then own goal by Ramos, the goal would not have counted ( no one is talking about that one o) Furthermore, in the first leg match, Bayern Munich was awarded a penalty which was a very bad call. The ball did not hit the hand of any Real Madrid player and the referee blew for a hand ball. How come you guys did not make all the videos or pictures to show it never touched the guys hands? No one said that Real Madrid was robbed cos Vidal missed the resulting penalty and Real also won. Therefore, let us learn to be objective in all analysis of the game. |
The first penalty itself was a big dive from Robben. Some referees won't even award that penalty. The referee made some errors which were only human but saying the match was favoured for Real Madrid is not true. |
yorex2011:Goal is one of the most useless sports blog in the world particularly the writers they have from Nigeria. You can refer to Guardian, Telegraph etc but never to Goal. #just saying |
willjoe:OP, yu are being economical with the truth. After that Vidal slide to get the ball, he raised up hios leg to fall off the rushing Madrid guy. It was a technical foul. He did that because he suspects that that he may catch up with the ball. Watch the video again. He was not yellow carded for the slide but for intentionally falling off the opposition. When you watch the video closely, you will notice how he raised his left foot to fall off tyhe Madrid guy. |
SpicyMimi:Try joor |
seyema:You're right. Vidal suspected that the sweeping pass/ intersection pass he made to a supposed team mate in front of him was not powerful enough and an opponent will most likey catch up. So, he did that which you described. Most people will actually claim he didn't see the opponent coming cos the opponent was behind him but that is a big lie. He would sense it and he quickly adjusted which led to that second yellow but I felt it was a bit harsh thoughm A free kick would have just been okay considering the nature of the game that was being played. |
Rapahel1116:I get your points. The referre made a bad decision with that goal, it was close though. Bayern actually wanted to play the offside trap but the strategy was made worse when the dude behind Ronaldo ran in early and I guess the referee did not see that well and that is why I feel the most foolish tactic in football is the OFFSIDE TRAP. The refs usually miss at least 1 in 10 calls whenever a defending team is adopting such strategy. It is even so foolish of the Bayern players to leave a player like Ronaldo stand alone at any given time. Why didn't the defenders make sure that they are in front of all forwards at all time? Why was he not even man marked? I see a couple of bad tactics in this game from Bayern. That being said, Ronaldo has nothing to prove to anyone again and people should learn to just give him the respect he deserves and let him be. You can even download the first leg and see the manner he scored the tap in goal....bending his body forward to almost 45 degrees, making the ball come a bit further and taking it through the back of his left leg to beat defender and keeper. These skills are not child's play. The problem most people have is tha, due to constant practice, Ronaldo makes a lot of incredible skills look so simple. Sorry about the loss but it will be ridiculous for anyone to claim that the match was fixed or the referree was deliberately partial cos he made a huma error. He even awarded a penalty to Bayern. If the decision waas to be partial, he wouldn't have done that. Did you even see the way Robben dived? He did that same bullshit at the last minutes of a world cup match when they couldn't score a goal and the Ref fell for it. |
Oreoo:Seems you have a bit of memory loss. Just log on to youtube and check out his videos. You can start with this appetizer; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vSL-gPMPVXI |
Rapahel1116:Sharrap! What do you mean by tap ins and headers? Do you know what it means to be at the right place at the right time? Do you know what it means to have such kind of body cordination like Ronaldo. Go and rewatch the highlight and see how he first requested for the header through his hands, how he was following up with his eyes, how he positioned his body to take the nodder, how he slammed the header on the floor just in front of the line etc. How about his sublime ball control for the controversial offside goal which was a tough call? The way he chested the ball down in between two defenders is top notch. He chested and shielded the ball well such that it could be safe while descending to his foot level before striking it with his left foot( He is even dual footed). You think say all these things na beans? He put 5 goals past one of the best keepers in the world in 2 successive meetings and this is the best you have to say. You guys should cut Ronaldo some slack and give him the honour he deserves. Na ur type no fit last 1 minute on a field. If you play or know football, you won't type this rubbish you just did. |
dealslip:I see. That stuff could be so unsettling and hectic. |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 (of 126 pages)

Take a guess
This was not about making verifications o. They were so freaky.
because this question kept me on my sit for 2 hours+ after work
So, I am only trying to be objective. I blame the mumu tactics called OFFSIDE TRAP implored by Ancelloti. If you watch that goal, the player in front of Ronaldo wanted to move in opposite direction to the ball as it was coming, he was running out rather than defend. Then , the one behind Ronaldo was running in. That tactic is usually confusing to defenders at times and if a defending team keeps on using it, there is a probability that the referee will fall for at least 1 in every 10 attempts and not blow for offside. That is the tactic I detest most in football THE OFFSIDE TRAP. It is usually exhibited by teams that are fearful of a potent striker while defending rather than take the bull by the horn.