NegroNtns's Posts
Nairaland Forum › NegroNtns's Profile › NegroNtns's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 (of 242 pages)
PhysicsQED: Why do people keep throwing around Egharevba's name when they haven't bothered to read him?When I discussed the Yoruba-Kanuri topic, you saw it, you read it. . .why did it take this long for you to enquire about information. Take a look at the topic on this thread. . . do you see Yoruba-Kanuri? We are talking about Osahon and your Omo N'oba. Fill in the gap across the desert between Egypt and Bini. |
Beaf: There are no intellectual minds here to discuss with. Its just going to turn into one of those silly boko harem threads where things are plucked out of thin air and putrid anuses without the least understanding, while id!otic assertions are made with no backing. So I'm out.people are discussing empires and great civilizations that live above sea level, leeches that live in mud buried in the coastal reef is talking. |
We should ask this Oba to tell us what he knows about the blood ties and hierarchy between Ife and Bini. He has both the Ife and Bini blood in him and he is schooled in his ancestral roots.
|
Please don't get them started! Their history will be filled with "first this", "best that", "most this". . . . they are second to none! |
PhysicsQED:. . You should be interested in Osahon's myth since you fervently oppose Egarhevba's. They are the two sides of the Bini coin. Afrocentric accounts told by Negro distresses you, I want you to enjoy this topic about Edo, as told by Osahon. |
bokohalal: If that is how and what you feel to make you a man then there is no need talking with, or to, you even in real life.I do not think any human individual or group is sub anything to another.dude, detach your emotion from my response and assist Osahon. . . . fill in the gap between Egypt and Bini. We know where you started and we know where you settled, but did you stop in between, and where are those stop points and tell if there are artifacts or traces of your presence there. |
PhysicsQED: This again?I knew you would soon pop in to single out Negro_Ntns for attack. Do me a favor, share your tale of the beginnings of Bini and its journey from Egypt. Feel free to quote all the Eurocentrists you can find in your archive to back up Osahon and your Oba claim. |
Naptu, Great collections you got here, loving it, thanks!! That last picture was taken from the top of a church on the corner of Dosumu and Obun Eko streets. Carter Bridge runs North to South and so does Dosumu street. Obun Eko runs East-West. The ancestral home of my fathers is right next door to the church and on Obun Eko street. There are two landmarks, a North-South street in front that takes you to Oju Olobun and Idito. Adimu must stop at Idito and pay respect, after which he turns around and meets the family head at the door step and they exchange greetings. In the picture of Idumota with the unknown soldier and the clock tower, I passed by that clock on my way to and back from primary school. Facing East from that clock, there were shops left and right. You pass Onikoyi street immediately to your left (about 6 steps from the tower) and about 15 or twenty yards down and to left is Idunshagbe street. Midway between these two streets and if you are still heading east, if you turn your head to right you will be staring straight at Eleganza. It was from that location that Razak Okoya built his empire and expanded out. |
CyberG: None of those is Acceptable!! Every NON-NAATIVE must compulsorily leave! No need to create another problem that will come full circle in another 100 years! Give them an inch and before long, they will take the whole ph.ocking village.. . you know what? You guys are correct! These are Ibos we are talking about. You rent land to them and they think they own it. Their only option will be to return to Osu Nation. |
bokohalal: No Yoruba history has been able to fill that gap.They can tell tales of migration from Inner Mongolia(for all I care) but cannot explain Oduduwa reasonably.The Binis can!People can write whatever history they want for themselves but to get at the truth you corroborate their version against that of their neighbors and score the version for validity. Yoruba is sorrounded by Nupe, Hausa, Kanuri, Fulani, Ashanti, Songhay, Bini. Everyone of them has uniformly related the same historical account explaining the root of Yoruba people. Oba of Bini, led by Osahon and his cohorts backed out of the account passed down to him from his ancestors and presented controversy about Yoruba origin. Why should anyone take Osahon or Oba of Bini serious when 5 or 6 other ethnic groups and great empires that pre-dated Bini dynasty all agreed Yoruba was the father of Bini and they were of Afro Asia origin? Oba is making a mockjery of his throne. I have said repeatedly to people like you to line up behind your Oba and go to Ife to exhume the heads of his ancestors buried there and take back home to Bini for reburial in his courtyard. That's the only way you can get out of your subordination to Yoruba race. |
Osahon, discovering a gap to explain the ancestry and root of the Bini Oba lept over to Egypt. Inbetween Bini and Egypt can he find traces of Bini or Ogiso in existing cultures, whether Hausa, Kanuri, Fulani to explain presence and foothold? Ile Ife and Yoruba has presence and tracks left behind in Gobir, Kanuri, Sudan. . . . dotted line start-and-stop points that form an integral link between Ife and AfroAsia. Tell Osahon to reconstruct his story and resubmit. |
Odua, Onlytruth has three options to choose from when his vision of Biafra actualizes: 1. remain a Biafran and relocate out of Yorubaland, then apply for documentation to re-enter as an immigrant. 2. disown Biafra and become Yoruba, with no need to relocate 3. become an illegal immigrant, i.e., an undocumented Biafran in Yorubaland. |
Host Maimuna:Kilode, Maimuna was feeling you! Buhari, this is end of translation. |
Guest: . . . then we launched what was called Legal Aid Clinic. Legal Aid Clinic was launched as part of Ministry of Women Affairs for women to take their grievances, disputes and complaints and generally in all areas of litigation or legal burdens and they help them with representation as well mediation and conflict resolution . Host Lami to Host Maimuna: Okay, Maimuna, you have more penetrating questions you want to ask. Host Maimuna: Yes. Okay, in the information you shared you indicated that there were certain tasks and work slated for women empowerment which is altogether now under one umbrella of network called WODESA. Overall, you accomplished many goals tailored towards family and the society in general and then once you left power these empowerment groups were all disbanded. At the time and your focus on the domestic programs were there any plans to create and institutionalize these strategies in ways that they outlast the regime, did you not think of a lasting continuity into the future? Guest: Yes, we did, we strategized along that line. If you recall in the opening of this session I mentioned obtaining authority and statutory power from the Federal Government to create programs and that’s what led to blueprint for family support, basic education, NTI, they were all submitted to Government for sponsorship and they responded backing them with decrees. . . Host Maimuna: . . . that is to institutionalize them. . Guest: . . .which is constitutional, in political jingo! So they were given that backbone support and in a UN summit held in America, we entered them into register so that their in their implementation the commitment to them will be long term. For instance in our regime we continued with programs laid down before us like NAPEP which became SIP. So the plans we left in place were not continued because when we talk about long term vision and planning there is plenty selfishness that go against public interest and sacrifice. NTI has continued and it retained its name and for basic education the only thing changed is the addition of “Universal” to its name. I remember in the time of Awolowo he launched Universal Primary Education as one of his campaign promises. So I think our successors borrowed from his idea to add universal to basic education program but I cannot. . I don’t see anything universal about it. Universal is a concept encompassing global application or availability, right? Or even, national widespread. For me, we just called it basic education, it’s a knowledge which is from. . . Host Maimuna: . . . . fundamental knowledge! Guest: Fundamental knowledge, exactly! Well, they are all there and nowadays Governors wives run their own different flavors and packages which in essence is family support even though it’s not called as such. You don’t need to call it family support to implement successfully. So I can conclude that a number of the programs are still around and in their continuity. I remember back when they were cutting back on excesses and Government overheads, there was talk about cancelling the National Hospital program but I heard that America intervened and requested a stay on that program and not to scrap it, so it was preserved. It is there but not in the way desired or in an optimal position to serve the public. I hope the new President will give it an uplift because access to it is very beneficial to the public. Host Maimuna: Well, we should now address my sidebar question earlier in which I hinted about the transition of power from military to civilian and back to military, and in your experience what would you say is the difference? Guest: Difference. . .well, history has shown that in the world, even the Europeans that are persistent in bringing a new democratic social order had their beginnings in military power. Leaders like Napoleon and his contemporaries were heroic soldiers that brought glory to their lands and people and established sovereign power. They laid the foundation for organizing national patriotism and democratic process that are now evolved. The soldier is a citizen as well a statesman for consolidating sovereign power and dominion to his land. This is the sole objective of a soldier. So a soldier in the ruling seat is in capacity to best fulfill this role of bringing eminence to the land, it is not a crime to rule. Perhaps a soldier will have his flaws or rub people the wrong way and when departing he hands over power and instruct on continuity. The soldier by virtue of his career is always learning. Go and look in the whole history of this nation and compare military regimes side-by-side with civilian regimes and you will come out finding that military regimes have covered a lot of miles of work and I will be modest and not say they are better than civilians so as not to appear self-serving. *This remark drew laughter from studio hosts* Guest continuing: . . .but they worked and accomplished a lot and it resulted in some progress for this country. All the social decays, backwardness, are common . Today, I saw in a newspaper article, can’t recall it might have been Vanguard, in which the commentary said to the effect that “Abacha would have been better. . . for something. Well, I didn’t finish reading because I was hoping to remain free of bias when I get here for interview. So, the soldier is a citizen, the police is a citizen, the navy is a citizen, well, everyone is a citizen and everyone has the right and we all aspire with conscience and anyone that finds himself in the ruling chair is with goodwill to bring honor and glory to the land, to serve the land and to move it forward in what is beneficial for its advancement. So the military did their part and put forward a best attempt during their regimes and even now without them government will be stagnant. Even now in the panicky moment of the unknown everyone respect what they stood for. For that reason, they are all under one umbrella, in the military you have men, women, the young, the elderly, I don’t see any big difference between military and civilian regimes. The only thing is military is not cut for social administration but that is not to say he is incapable of running it responsibly as a duty. So I don’t see anything wrong in it. In the democracy of this age the military officers are the ones now embracing democratic leadership, look at Obasanjo, he served as both military and civilian President, that means he understands his right as a citizen. Look at the Senate President, former military and you have other Senators and Members that once wore uniforms. You had old military men that became civilian Governors, I mean look at Osun State. My husband appointed him Lagos State Governor back then and now he is Governor again in civilian regime. For the second time as a Governor, apparently there was something good he did in his military career. I am pleading to the public to please stop the divisive agenda of comparing between civilian and military, their functions are interwoven and the civilian depend on the military. The military also need to support the civilian in a way that progress are realized. May GOD advance us all, Amen. |
shymmex: Bruv, Ijebus have always been Yorubas - and we'll always be proud Yoruba.. Don't forget most of the Yoruba leaders of the past, and some of the present are Ijebus (Chief Awolowo, Pa Adesanya, Prof. Wole Soyinka etc.). We're Yoruba people and we're proud of our Yoruba heritage.Oh yes I know Ijebus are my people but there are some misguided ones who drank from same water the Oba of Bini drank from. . . .they say they are not Yorubas. I dont understand it. Anyway, you did not derail the thread because there is validity in what you said. Ijebus are co-owners of Lagos State and even in Eko proper itself, Ijebu is recognised as one of the Akarigbere. Its a long history but I keep it short. There are three Eletu Chiefs that serve the Oba and they belong in the Akarigbere class of Chiefs.. . . the sword chiefs, meaning from Bini. They are Eletu Edibo, Eletu Iwase and Eletu Ijebu. The Eletu Ijebu was a later addition and honorary recognition for the contribution and immense sacrifices of the Ijebus to Eko. One of the Obas also was from an Ijebu mother, just as Akinsemoyin was born of an Egun mother. In fact, Akinsemoyin likewise upgraded some titles from Apa, his mother's hometown into the Abagbon class of chiefs. So, the contribution and sacrifice of Ijebu in Eko is not lost to the sons and daughters of the land and you have presence in the Oba's court. |
Good point Mynd. |
Seriously, there should be no jump to conclude this is BokoHaram. There are worse enemies within with secret plots to cause problems in face of the free-for-all security breaches. If this is Boko, OPC must followup, if Ibos or SS people are behind this act then OPC must also act. |
hmmmm, an attack on Yorubaland. . . .the secret wishes and whispers of the ndigbo soul. |
[quote author=Kilode?!]What is Maryam saying here? When did this opposition happen? Any other evidence to corroborate her story? There are Women only schools in the South and in many parts of the North too, they've been there before Nigeria got independence, even before Maryam was born, many are still flourishing till today. I don't buy this tale. By the way, many of her tales point to the problem we had with leadership in Nigeria, we still have those problems. These people build institutions and ideas around themselves without creating the strong framework that will enable those institutions outlast them. All these "We built this, we built that" cannot last if you don't systemize them with strong policies, robust laws without personally profiting from them. Negro_Nations, Well done my brother.[/quote]Kilode, hammer to the nail head. . . ."BANNNGG"!! Buhari, you dont understand. . . I wish to finish off the interpretation as quick as possible so I can knock it off my task list but I am neck deep in more demanding priorities. The sound quality on the recording is poor that I have to listen hard, there was a section earlier in the translation where I had to play three four times over to capture what she said. I will try and finish the rest of the first part today, I think I have maybe three minutes left in it. Im working at moment, will translate later. Please have patience. |
Onlytruth: |
Naptu, I do not have the ruling on this dispute. Thank God for the wisdom of the Idejo chiefs refusing to support the British treaty without first getting an outlined clarity on the rightful owners of the land. If it hadn't been for their resolve, Federal Government through the various regimes would have kicked Aworis off their land and indeed declared it a "No man's land. Property owners should be made to pay property tax to the State Government since the land is leased. The deed to the land gives authority to develop or occupy but the right to use ought to be levied. |
Kobo, We dont need to regress backward, what we need is an advancement forward and that can only be achieved by reversing all these borrowed Eurocentric practices, theories and policies and retooling our African practices and philosophies to work for us in the modern social order. |
Again, to those vowing on the authority of the Nigerian Constitution to shield their interest on claims to land ownership in Lagos, I ask you. . . .how much of the promises penned into the constitution to guarantee and safeguard your life and property in the North has so far been delivered free of any breach? Where such guarantees are disregarded and you were sacked from the Northern territory, how much of the UN guarantees of freedom and rights have been invoked on your behalf by ICC? How many of the survivors of your killed brethrens have so far been compensanted for loss and damages to the lives and properties of their loved ones? When in Rome, do as Romans do! When in Croatia and Serbia, do as they do over there. . . .but this is Nigeria and Yugoslav practices of justice and equity will not hold here when it comes to contention over territorial ownership. The Yoruba race almost wiped one another out for just that one reason. . . political boundaries and territorial domain! We will not hesitate to give praise to Ogun with your blood if you push us to that point. There is only two ways for you when Nigeria collapse, get out or become Yoruba! |
Shymmex, I don't understaqnd what you meant by credit and recognition for Ijebus and Egbas for growth and development in Eko? When we talk about Yoruba Nation the Ijebus are fond of standing out and claiming they are not Yorubas, they are Ijebus. This thread is about defining whether Yorubas own the land in Eko or not? The list of contributors to growth of Eko is a very diverse and long one but when we discuss land endowment in Eko there is only one ownership and that is the Aworis, a Yoruba people taking their political authority from the Alaafin of Oyo, as denoted by their insignia of rulership, the Irukere. Generally, land in Lagos State is owned by a coalition of Egun, Awori & Ijebu, but in Eko proper, only Awori has claim to that land. |
continuing with discussion of who the Idejo Chiefs are. . . . Yoruba can be defined here as a commonwealth of cultures and peoples under the dominion and sovereignty of Oyo Empire, the last standing Yoruba Political Sovereignty when the British forces landed in Eko. In Eko, the elite ruling class is an aggregate of influences from Oyo Empire, Bini Empire and Nupe Kingdom. Out of the Oyo Empire we have the Aworis and the Eguns; out of the Bini Empire we have the Binis; out of the Nupe Kingdom we have the Tapas. The Aworis, the original land owners of Eko (Awunrin) were people of Olofin, settlers from Ile-Ife. The children of Olofin and the original rulers in Eko needed military protection against incursion from Dahomey and made invitations to Oyo. Oyo military operates cavalry formations but the dense forest of the Awori riverine land were highly risky and unsuited for their horses and so protected them from the northern flank. Dahomey soon found new channells to invade by attacking through coastal waters at Whydah (Ouida or Allada). Dahomey then controlled the Eko coast and its outlets into the Sea and Portuguese trade. Invitations were then sent to Bini for protection against Dahomey and Oba of Bini dispatched warriors to Eko. These warriors of Bini Kingdom consisted of Edos, Itsekiris and Ilajes. This protection resulted in a treaty between the Idejo Chiefs (Aworis) and the Bini Oba to stay a permanent base in Eko. Asipa (Asikpa) thus became the first Bini to represent the Oba in Eko. The Idejo Chiefs gave land in what is now Iga Idunganran from where the Binis could enforce their administration and protection of the lagoon and coastal waters. This was how Bini monarcy started in Eko. Chiefs were dispatched from Bini to Eko to advise and assist Asipa in the administration of his duties and the exercise of the treaty. These Bini chiefs are the Akarigbere group. The Idejo chiefs' insignia of office is the IruKere (Horsetail) which is the symbol of throne for the Alaafin of Oyo. This denotes their ancestry. The Akarigbere chiefs' insignia of office is the Abere (Sword) or Scepter) which is the symbol of throne for the Oba of Bini. The sword denotes ancestry from Bini and can be seen in this picture of Oba of Lagos.
|
Onlytruth, Your people are emotionally and egotistically attached to these properties that they build in Lagos. Any time your ego is attached to a material object, you become enslaved to that object. Politically, your people are enslaving their ethnicity and identity to the Nigerian conscience to the effect that if every other ethnic group come out and say they want a dissolution of Nigeria the one single group that will be economically and socially impacted the most will be Ibos because of their vast investments in property and trade outside their homeland. This is not to suggest that other people do not invest outside their territory but by comparison of the top 50 billion naira investments for each ethnic group the Yorubas are at home, the Hausas are at home but the Ibos are not. . . .your top nairas are distributed into other economies and markets. While other people are agitating for a dissolution of this country, the Ibo voice, in interest of self-preservation, ought to do the opposite. . . .that is, agitate for a One Nigeria! This is an interesting turn of fate because if you look through Nigerian history the two Igbo rulers Azikiwe and Ironsi both went for central control using parliamentary and military strategies respectively to forge a one country from which the Igbo blood can dominate from center. Your newblood traders and businessmen will have to follow their steps and hope for a unity in order to remain egotistically attached to their installed properties in other people's land. A dissolution will work against your interest and amassed wealth outside your region. FACT! |
Amor4ce, I read the blog, you are baaad! lol, very good write up! If you did not read Amor4ce' blog, please do so. Link to it from his post on this thread. On the issue, there are two topics coupled into one. First, the controversy of encroachment and land ownership on Lagos Island and its adjoining metros as well the extension of that controversy into Lagos State generally. In defining who owns the state and who owns the land, there can be no dispute that it belongs to one ethnic group alone and that group is Yoruba. There are contentions that the state belongs to all Nigerians on the ground that it once served as a Federal Capital Territory. There is sufficient history and written records going as far back as 1800s in which the owners of the land stood up to the British invaders and asserted their rights, even in the face of monumental political obstacles stacked against them. One development, that should not escape us is the reaction of the ‘Idejo’ the original land owners of Lagos to the cession of Lagos to the British by Oba Dosumu. According to Takiu Folami a local historian of Lagos, there was violent reaction to the treaty of the Idejo. This opposition was based on the Idejo’s contention that Dosumu was not a land owner and as such could not give over their land to the British as he could only exercise such right over the Lnd given to him by the Idejo. The British had to concede by issuing a notice to the effect that the Idejo would not be deprived of the ownership of their land. It was only after this notice that the Idejo reluctantly agreed to the treaty.Lagos State is made up of several parts - Ikeja, Badagry, Isolo, Agege, Ikorodu, Epe, Eko. . . and so on. The primary area of land contention is Eko itself and so we should focus on that. Regardless of who you speak to, Yoruba, Bini, Hausa, Ibo, there is no disagreement that Aworis were the indigeneous owners of Eko. Over the centuries people of other ethnicities and nationalities have joined them on the land and become co-habiters and developers of the area. People such as Ijebu, Egba, Egun, Oyo, Bini, Ijesa, Igbomina, Tapa, Ilaje, Lebanese, Europeans, Saro, Aguda, Hausa, Ibo. . . and so on. These settlers are not necessarily named in order of their arrival but Ibo is the latest addition to the newcomers. Over centuries of settlement in Eko, never before has any group of settlers or migrants of people laid claim of ownership to the land nor contest the Awori's rights to the land. In the quoted case above, Dosumu did not contest the land ownership but he was challenged in making unitary decision to ceede it away to foreigners and in the outcomne, everybody, including the foreigners, were awakened to the reality on the ground. With the latest migrant of Ibo traders however, there is an incresing noise and clamor to convert rights of ownership. Land deeds or certificate of occupancy on a land is a license to build and use, not a conversion or endowment of native rights. Property ownership does not equate to proprietary rights. To acquire proprietary rights require a different set of dialogue and negotiation above and beyond the ordinary and simple transaction involved in property ownership. If I buy a bottle of cocacola I can do whatever I want with it but my purchase did not include the formula to the mixture. To buy the formula (proprietary rights) I would have to go into negotiation with owners of cocacola; they might sell and they might not sell but their refusal to sell should not give me liberty to denigrate their product and brand and what they stand for in the market. So what do the Ibos want, do you want property ownership or are you looking for land ownership? Anyone in the global human society can buy land and put their property on the land in Eko. . . .however, the ownership of the land is very restricted. Even the Oba of Lagos does not own land, except what is given to him by the Awori owners. The Governor does not own land except what is given to him by the Awori owners. Some of you are taking the Nigerian constitution and its interpretation too far in comparing its implementation and rule of law with that of USA and countries in Europe. How much of the security and unity promised by the constitution has so far protected you from the abuses and hatred in the North? Yes, the governor is empowered by the constitution to allocate land but I take it that you are interpreting the constitution and that proxy power wrongly. In the USA, the same country where you rest your hope for justice and equity, the government is a proxy. . . . an administrator installed by the aristocratic land owners through the powers of democracy and capitalism to administer society, land included! In Eko, the owners of the land are the Idejo Chiefs of Lagos. The Governor does not own land, the Oba does not own land, both the governor and the oba are administrators of land and serve the interest of the land owners (The aristocratic Idejo Chiefs). So who are the Idejo Chiefs? busy at moment, more to come. . . |
CEFOLASS - CENTER FOR LAGOS STUDIEShttp://www.cefolassaocoed.net/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=19&Itemid=29 So who are the owners of the land we today call LAGOS? Is it the Yorubas or the non-Yorubas? |
Physics, "Asanjo" is a Bini term, it is a title. What does it mean? |
Thank you naptu. What was their connection to 15 Pedro street? There are many places in Isale Eko they could have gathered for their deliberation, why in Oko Awo? |
Babasessy, I hope you did not write the article. This article again depicts our ignorance when it comes to understanding and respecting local customs. Mr Yekini was buried in accordance with Islamic rites, which calls for timely burial and low profile. This article is inferring that because "celebrities" were not present and the casket was "wood" and not "brass" or "gold" made it a less befitting burial for Mr Yekini. Mr Yekini needs prayer, his family and children needs prayer and support. . . . the call for bells and whistles and pomposity is a dis-service to his memory. If the family had to wait for all the expected guests to assemble for a "firecracker" burial then his religious doctrine for timely burial will be breached. If you did not write the article, Babasessy, you equally did not exercise good discretion by bringing this article to share in NL. |
Wow! I arrived late on this one. Anyway, I siddon dey watch. . . . Naptu2, thank you for the angle on history. I saw the following caption on the Eshugbayi controversy and wonder if you know who the nineteen pro-government Princes were and also I would like to correct that Ibikunle Akitoye did become King and was succeeded by Olusi.. . .and by the way, Yesufu Omo Oba was in fact Yesufu Kosoko and the immediate grandson of King Kosoko. Eleko also fell out with the colonial government when he accepted the invitation from the Central Mosque to approve the appointment of Bashorun Balogun and others. The government believed that this was a purely muslim affair that should have been done in the Central Mosque with its blessings rather than with Eleko’s approval. The government held on to this and used the opportunity to avenge itself for Eleko’s defiance over the water rate levy. It thus withdrew recognition and suspended the Eleko’s stipend. Instead of making life more difficult for Eleko as the colonial government had believed, so as to make him change his mind, the suspension made Eleko more popular. Market women flooded Eleko’s palace with foodstuff, while Chief Oluwa (an Idejo chief) and other members of the Ilu committee made sure that the Oba was financially and materially self sufficient. This was a slap on the face of the colonial government. Seeing this, Yesufu Omo Oba led a pro-government group to the government asking for Eleko to be deposed, while the lawyer Egerton Shyngle led another faction which defended Eleko’s action in approving the Central Mosque appointment. As a result, Eleko was reinstated by Sir Hugh Clifford in 1919.On a different post you also shared a picture with the banner of well wishes to the visiting Queen Elizabeth in 1956. What an irony, that just 100yrs earlier in 1850, her grandmother, Queen Victoria had approved grant and authority for the then British Officer in Lagos to erect a befitting abode for the resetling King Kosoko. If you notice in the picture, it says "Iga Ereko" on the entranceway into the compound. I will not be surprised that there was a political undertone to the presence of the banner on that building and as well that it was recorded in pictures. Kosoko welcomed foreign trade partnership but fervently opposed the presence of foreign authority or dictates on the land. |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 (of 242 pages)

