₦airaland Forum

tillaman:
I know am not supposed to do this but there you go

Very interesting. My dictionary has three variations of the word but doesn't include assagai. Thanks for sharing.

tillaman:
A perfect case of You can run but you can’t hide!!!

I hope they chain Him like a dog and then run through him with an assagai!!
Bastardio

Assegai or assagaie is the right spelling. Kindly check your dico.

Anyways, thanks for teaching me a new word.

EliteDude:
God.....make us job creators

This is the koko

bigiyaro:
this is one of the reasons why I said "baby factories" should be legalized and regulated. no doubt this girl will gladly sell her baby, she's happy, the person adopting (buying) is also happy, life goes on.

Actually, adoption is legal. Baby factories mostly sell to ritualists and other shady people.

Judithjovial:
Who the Bleep put that fucking rule on Muslim threads that allows such nonsensical disclaimer before comments. My family are all doomed with such religion left in this world

Corrected

mamaafrik:
he is rite,can you tell me from history how many of the bandit attack were carried out in the Northern Kaduna compared to the South,pls tell me,let's learn

Firstly, I don't live in Kaduna and don't know about Kaduna.


Secondly, face the topic and stop jumping around like a mountain goat.

Agboriotejoye:
Modernization is based on western ideology. The Middle east today is the home of oil. Is oil exploration not a western innovation?

Building airports would have been declared un-islamic if those who decided against music are around to see that it, especially being a western idea don't you agree??

"Poetry with a sonorous voice". Nice try. You can call it "singing" it won't burn your pad. Music is singing and singing is music. The voice is described as a primary musical instrument. It's from it all the major and minor notes, progressions and other music elements are derived.

Firstly, modernization is a collective human effort. It isn't exclusive to the any region of the world. Are they the only ones that make research and innovation? And if you've been reading you would have learnt how algebra was invented by a Muslim mathematician; al-Khawaarizmi. Your jehova witness book; awake even documented it. Please read and save yourself sone shame.

Secondly, call it misic or whatever name you like, as long as there isn't instruments and it doesn't contain prohibited lyrics there's nothing bad in it. Otherwise, it's un-Islamic.

Agboriotejoye:
Mountain sheep. the topic is religious freedom. Why are you hailing the whites for practicing religious freedom but keep quiet when it is undermined under your nose here.
Recently, Kano governor banned the sharing of keke napep by opposite sexes. Where were you then? I guess news from faraway is sweeter to react to than the one in your backyard
Should you not be ashamed of yourself?

Actually, you should be ashamed of yourself. Are the people of Kano complaining? Why are you taking panadol for another man's headache? Obviously it's because you don't want Muslims to have any oppurtunity to practice their religion even when it's in their region.

Secondly, is it in accordance with your religiin for you to be free-mixing? Last time I checked, it wasn't. Rather women of your bible were modest and even covered their heads, bossoms to their ankles. But you, see how your women dress to church on sunday - and that includes your mummy G.O.

Your religion has gone to the dogs but instead of you to revive it you're busy trying to drag other people into the mud with you.

Agboriotejoye:
And El-Rufai wanted to ban Christians from open worship in Kaduna. Where were you guys then to condemn him and call him children of hate

FIirstly, I don't know of this and I don't comment on what I don't know.

Secondly, face the topic and stop jumping around like a mountain goat.

Agboriotejoye:
What is bigotry in understanding that the modern world of which you're a part of does not accommodate most of what your religion teaches? As it is now, even Saudi is beginning to shift to modernize a lot. Either you start a jihad to return Saudi to how it used to be in the time of the prophet or you accept that things are changing and Islam is changing along.

An example, in the days of the prophet, people go on pilgrimage to Mecca with donkeys and carmels. Now we have one of the largest airports in Saudi. Shall we then say Saudi has abandoned the right way of pilgrimage?

Besides, this passage that was quoted by the OP seems to show the immoral behaviours musicians are notorious for makes their music unacceptable. Thus, if we have an upright Islamic musician as we have so much of them in Yorubaland, should they not be acceptable?

My thoughts though are that the calls to prayers themselves are musical in nature. They are not bland or atonal but have a rising and falling rhythm that is synonymous to music. I hope you understand now.

Firstly, modernization is one thing and western ideologies is another. Don't mix them up.

Secondly, building airports isn't anti-Islamic. No law says you must go to hajj on donkeys. There's no special reward attached to your mode of transport. So your point is flawed. Rather it exposes your ignorance.

Finally, islam isn't against reciting poetry with a sonorous voice. However it places two conditions to it; no musical instruments should accompany it and it must not contain idolatry, promiscuity, insults and all other forms of anti-Islamic lyrics.

Chamber2000:
What do you want kids to wear for sports? I pity all these zealots

Secondary school girls with developed bodies are kids?! No wonder your choir members grow to become oloshos!

madridguy:
How could a Muslim school allowed the removal of hijab from her female students all in the name of culture? How could there be intermingling, dancing and drinking of palm wine ? What is cultural in gourd filled with palm wine for under age pupils and students? What is cultural in dancing to Naira Marley's lyrics and beats?

May Allah help and guide us to His path, Ameen.

My brother, many of these muslim schools are something else.

Just this morning, the 'muslim' school beside my house is taking their female pupils out for sports competition. Guess what? They're in jerseys and skimpier hijabs.

For most of them, it's more about money than Islam.

May Allaah grant us steadfastness.

Agboriotejoye:
Really? But we have singers in Saudi. Some of them even sing rap.

What about the alasalatu among the Yorubas?
Does that mean they are not true Muslims?

When Saudi does something Islamic, they call them backward.

But when a saudi citizen acts according to their whims, they make them a reference.

Bigots, by their double-standard you shall know them.

zeeprince:
Evidence of prohibition of music in the Qur’aan and Sunnah:

Allaah says in Soorat Luqmaan (interpretation of the meaning):

“And of mankind is he who purchases idle talks (i.e. music, singing) to mislead (men) from the path of Allaah…” [Luqmaan 31:6]

The scholar of the ummah, Ibn ‘Abbaas (may Allaah be pleased with him) said: this means singing. Mujaahid (may Allaah have mercy on him) said: this means playing the drum (tabl). (Tafseer al-Tabari, 21/40).

Al-Hasan al-Basri (may Allaah have mercy on him) said: this aayah was revealed concerning singing and musical instruments (lit. woodwind instruments). (Tafseer Ibn Katheer, 3/451).

Al-Sa’di (may Allaah have mercy on him) said: this includes all manner of haraam speech, all idle talk and falsehood, and all nonsense that encourages kufr and disobedience; the words of those who say things to refute the truth and argue in support of falsehood to defeat the truth; and backbiting, slander, lies, insults and curses; the singing and musical instruments of the Shaytaan; and musical instruments which are of no spiritual or worldly benefit. (Tafseer al-Sa’di, 6/150)

Ibn al-Qayyim (may Allaah have mercy on him) said: The interpretation of the Sahaabah and Taabi’in, that ‘idle talk’ refers to singing, is sufficient. This was reported with saheeh isnaads from Ibn ‘Abbaas and Ibn Mas’ood. Abu’l-Sahbaa’ said: I asked Ibn Mas’ood about the aayah (interpretation of the meaning), ‘“And of mankind is he who purchases idle talks’ [Luqmaan 31:6]. He said: By Allaah, besides Whom there is no other god, this means singing – and he repeated it three times. It was also reported with a saheeh isnaad from Ibn ‘Umar (may Allaah be pleased with them both) that this means singing. There is no contradiction between the interpretation of “idle talk” as meaning singing and the interpretation of it as meaning stories of the Persians and their kings, and the kings of the Romans, and so on, such as al-Nadr ibn al-Haarith used to tell to the people of Makkah to distract them from the Qur’aan. Both of them are idle talk. Hence Ibn ‘Abbaas said: “Idle talk” is falsehood and singing. Some of the Sahaabah said one and some said the other, and some said both. Singing is worse and more harmful than stories of kings, because it leads to zinaa and makes hypocrisy grow (in the heart); it is the trap of the Shaytaan, and it clouds the mind. The way in which it blocks people from the Qur’aan is worse than the way in which other kinds of false talk block them, because people are naturally inclined towards it and tend to want to listen to it. The aayaat condemn replacing the Qur’aan with idle talk in order to mislead (men) from the path of Allaah without knowledge and taking it as a joke, because when an aayah of the Qur’aan is recited to such a person, he turns his back as if he heard them not, as if there were deafness in his ear. If he hears anything of it, he makes fun of it. All of this happens only in the case of the people who are most stubbornly kaafirs and if some of it happens to singers and those who listen to them, they both have a share of this blame. (Ighaathat al-Lahfaan, 1/258-259).

Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning):

“[Allaah said to Iblees:] And befool them gradually those whom you can among them with your voice (i.e. songs, music, and any other call for Allaah’s disobedience)…” [al-Israa’ 17:64]

It was narrated that Mujaahid (may Allaah have mercy on him) said: “And befool them gradually those whom you can among them with your voice” – his voice [the voice of Iblees/Shaytaan] is singing and falsehood. Ibn al-Qayyim (may Allaah have mercy on him) said: This idaafah [possessive or genitive construction, i.e., your voice] serves to make the meaning specific, as with the phrases [translated as] “your cavalry” and “your infantry” [later in the same aayah]. Everyone who speaks in any way that is not obedient to Allaah, everyone who blows into a flute or other woodwind instrument, or who plays any haraam kind of drum, this is the voice of the Shaytaan. Everyone who walks to commit some act o

f disobedience towards Allaah is part of his [the Shaytaan’s] infantry, and anyone who rides to commit sin is part of his cavalry. This is the view of the Salaf, as Ibn ‘Abi Haatim narrated from Ibn ‘Abbaas: his infantry is everyone who walks to disobey Allaah. (Ighaathat al-Lahfaan).

Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning):

“Do you then wonder at this recitation (the Qur’aan)?

And you laugh at it and weep not,

Wasting your (precious) lifetime in pastime and amusements (singing)”

[al-Najm 53:59-61]

‘Ikrimah (may Allaah have mercy on him) said: it was narrated from Ibn ‘Abbaas that al-sumood [verbal noun from saamidoon, translated here as “Wasting your (precious) lifetime in pastime and amusements (singing)”] means “singing”, in the dialect of Himyar; it might be said “Ismidi lanaa” [‘sing for us’ – from the same root as saamidoon/sumood] meaning “ghaniy” [sing]. And he said (may Allaah have mercy on him): When they [the kuffaar] heard the Qur’aan, they would sing, then this aayah was revealed.

Ibn Katheer (may Allaah have mercy on him) said: Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning) “Wasting your (precious) lifetime in pastime and amusements (singing)” – Sufyaan al-Thawri said, narrating from his father from Ibn ‘Abbaas: (this means) singing. This is Yemeni (dialect): ismad lana means ghan lana [sing to us]. This was also the view of ‘Ikrimah. (Tafseer Ibn Katheer).

It was reported from Abu Umaamah (may Allaah be pleased with him) that the Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “Do not sell singing slave women, do not buy them and do not teach them. There is nothing good in this trade, and their price is haraam. Concerning such things as this the aayah was revealed (interpretation of the meaning): ‘And of mankind is he who purchases idle talks (i.e. music, singing) to mislead (men) from the path of Allaah…’ [Luqmaan 31:6].” (Hasan hadeeth)

The Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said:

“Among my ummah there will certainly be people who permit zinaa, silk, alcohol and musical instruments…” (Narrated by al-Bukhaari ta’leeqan, no. 5590; narrated as mawsool by al-Tabaraani and al-Bayhaqi. See al-Silsilah al-Saheehah by al-Albaani, 91).

Ibn al-Qayyim (may Allaah have mercy on him) said: This is a saheeh hadeeth narrated by al-Bukhaari in his Saheeh, where he quoted it as evidence and stated that it is mu’allaq and majzoom. He said: Chapter on what was narrated concerning those who permit alcohol and call it by another name.

This hadeeth indicates in two ways that musical instruments and enjoyment of listening to music are haraam. The first is the fact that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “[they] permit” which clearly indicates that the things mentioned, including musical instruments, are haraam according to sharee’ah, but those people will permit them. The second is the fact that musical instruments are mentioned alongside things which are definitely known to be haraam, i.e., zinaa and alcohol: if they (musical instruments) were not haraam, why would they be mentioned alongside these things? (adapted from al-Silsilah al-Saheehah by al-Albaani, 1/140-141)

Shaykh al-Islam (Ibn Taymiyah) (may Allaah have mercy on him) said: This hadeeth indicates that ma’aazif are haraam, and ma’aazif means musical instruments according to the scholars of (Arabic) language. This word includes all such instruments. (al-Majmoo’, 11/535).

Ibn al-Qayyim (may Allaah have mercy on him) said: And concerning the same topic similar comments were narrated from Sahl ibn Sa’d al-Saa’idi, ‘Imraan ibn Husayn, ‘Abd-Allaah ibn ‘Amr, ‘Abd-Allaah ibn ‘Abbaas, Abu Hurayrah, Abu Umaamah al-Baahili, ‘Aa’ishah Umm al-Mu’mineen, ‘Ali ibn Abi Taalib, Anas ibn Maalik, ‘Abd al-Rahmaan ibn Saabit and al-Ghaazi ibn Rabee’ah. Then he mentioned it in Ighaathat al-Lahfaan, and it indicates that they (musical instruments) are haraam.

It was narrated that Naafi’ (may Allaah have mercy on him) said: Ibn ‘Umar heard a woodwind instrument, and he put his fingers in his

ears and kept away from that path. He said to me, O Naafi’, can you hear anything? I said, No. So he took his fingers away from his ears and said: I was with the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) and he heard something like this, and he did the same thing. (Saheeh Abi Dawood). Some insignificant person said that this hadeeth does not prove that musical instruments are haraam, because if that were so, the Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) would have instructed Ibn ‘Umar (may Allaah be pleased with them both) to put his fingers in his ears as well, and Ibn ‘Umar would have instructed Naafi’ to do likewise! The response to this is: He was not listening to it, but he could hear it. There is a difference between listening and hearing. Shaykh al-Islam (Ibn Taymiyah) (may Allaah have mercy on him) said: Concerning (music) which a person does not intend to listen to, there is no prohibition or blame, according to scholarly consensus. Hence blame or praise is connected to listening, not to hearing. The one who listens to the Qur’aan will be rewarded for it, whereas the one who hears it without intending or wanting to will not be rewarded for that, because actions are judged by intentions. The same applies to musical instruments which are forbidden: if a person hears them without intending to, that does not matter. (al-Majmoo’, 10/78).

Ibn Qudaamah al-Maqdisi (may Allaah have mercy on him) said: the listener is the one who intends to hear, which was not the case with Ibn ‘Umar (may Allaah be pleased with them both); what happened in his case was hearing. The Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) needed to know when the sound stopped because he had moved away from that path and blocked his ears. So he did not want to go back to that path or unblock his ears until the noise had stopped, so when he allowed Ibn ‘Umar to continue hearing it, this was because of necessity. (al-Mughni, 10/173)

(Even though the hearing referred to in the comments of the two imaams is makrooh, it was permitted because of necessity, as we will see below in the comments of Imaam Maalik (may Allaah have mercy on him). And Allaah knows best).

The views of the scholars (imaams) of Islam

Al-Qaasim (may Allaah have mercy on him) said: Singing is part of falsehood. Al-Hasan (may Allaah have mercy on him) said: if there is music involved in a dinner invitation (waleemah), do not accept the invitation (al-Jaami by al-Qayrawaani, p. 262-263).

Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyah (may Allaah have mercy on him) said: The view of the four Imaams is that all kinds of musical instruments are haraam. It was reported in Saheeh al-Bukhaari and elsewhere that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said that there would be among his ummah those who would allow zinaa, silk, alcohol and musical instruments, and he said that they would be transformed into monkeys and pigs… None of the followers of the imaams mentioned any dispute concerning the matter of music. (al-Majmoo’, 11/576).

Al-Albaani (may Allaah have mercy on him) said: The four madhhabs are agreed that all musical instruments are haraam. (al-Saheehah, 1/145).

Ibn al-Qayyim (may Allaah have mercy on him) said: The madhhab of Abu Haneefah is the strictest in this regard, and his comments are among the harshest. His companions clearly stated that it is haraam to listen to all musical instruments such as the flute and the drum, even tapping a stick. They stated that it is a sin which implies that a person is a faasiq (rebellious evil doer) whose testimony should be rejected. They went further than that and said that listening to music is fisq (rebellion, evildoing) and enjoying it is kufr (disbelief). This is their words. They narrated in support of that a hadeeth which could not be attributed to the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him). They said: he should try not to hear it if he passes by it or it is in his vicinity. Abu Yoosuf said, concerning a house from which could be heard the sound of musical instruments: Go in without th

eir permission, because forbidding evil actions is obligatory, and if it were not allowed to enter without permission, people could not have fulfilled the obligatory duty (of enjoining what is good and forbidding what is evil). (Ighaathat al-Lahfaan, 1/425).

Imaam Maalik (may Allaah have mercy on him) was asked about playing the drum or flute, if a person happens to hear the sound and enjoy it whilst he is walking or sitting. He said: He should get up if he finds that he enjoys it, unless he is sitting down for a need or is unable to get up. If he is on the road, he should either go back or move on. (al-Jaami’ by al-Qayrawaani, 262). He (may Allaah have mercy on him) said: “The only people who do things like that, in our view, are faasiqs.” (Tafseer al-Qurtubi, 14/55).

Ibn ‘Abd al-Barr (may Allaah have mercy on him) said: Among the types of earnings which are haraam by scholarly consensus are ribaa, the fee of a prostitute, anything forbidden, bribes, payment for wailing over the dead and singing, payments to fortune-tellers and those who claim to know the unseen and astrologers, payments for playing flutes, and all kinds of gambling. (al-Kaafi).

Ibn al-Qayyim (may Allaah have mercy on him) said, explaining the view of Imaam al-Shaafa'i: His companions who know his madhhab (point of view) stated that it is haraam and denounced those who said that he permitted it. (Ighaathat al-Lahfaan, 1/425).

The author of Kifaayat al-Akhbaar, who was one of the Shaafa’is, counted musical instruments such as flutes and others, as being munkar (evil), and the one who is present (where they are being played) should denounce them. (He cannot be excused by the fact that there are bad scholars, because they are corrupting the sharee’ah, or evil faqeers – meaning the Sufis, because they call themselves fuqaraa’ or faqeers – because they are ignorant and follow anyone who makes noise; they are not guided by the light of knowledge; rather they are blown about by every wind. (Kifaayat al-Akhbaar, 2/128).

Ibn al-Qayyim (may Allaah have mercy on him) said: With regard to the view of Imaam Ahmad, his son ‘Abd-Allaah said: I asked my father about singing. He said: Singing makes hypocrisy grow in the heart; I do not like it. Then he mentioned the words of Maalik: the evildoers (faasiqs) among us do that. (Ighaathat al-Lahfaan).

Ibn Qudaamah, the researcher of the Hanbali madhhab – (may Allaah have mercy on him) said: Musical instruments are of three types which are haraam. These are the strings and all kinds of flute, and the lute, drum and rabaab (stringed instrument) and so on. Whoever persists in listening to them, his testimony should be rejected. (al-Mughni, 10/173). And he said (may Allaah have mercy on him); If a person is invited to a gathering in which there is something objectionable, such as wine and musical instruments, and he is able to denounce it, then he should attend and speak out against it, because then he will be combining two obligatory duties. If he is not able to do that, then he should not attend. (al-Kaafi, 3/118)

Al-Tabari (may Allaah have mercy on him) said: The scholars of all regions are agreed that singing is makrooh and should be prevented. Although Ibraaheem ibn Sa’d and ‘Ubayd-Allaah al-‘Anbari differed from the majority, (it should be noted that) the Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “Adhere to the majority.” And whoever dies differing from the majority, dies as a jaahili. (Tafseer al-Qurtubi, 14/56). In earlier generations, the word “makrooh” was used to mean haraam, then it took on the meaning of “disliked”. But this is to be understood as meaning that it is forbidden, because he [al-Tabari] said “it should be prevented”, and nothing is to be prevented except that which is haraam; and because in the two hadeeths quoted, music is denounced in the strongest terms. Al-Qurtubi (may Allaah have mercy on him) is the one who narrated this report, then he said: Abu’l-Faraj and al-Qaffaal among our companions said: the testimony of the singer and the dancer is not to be accepted.

Baarakallaahu feekum

[quote author=WeSayNoToRuga post=87183883][/quote]Ogbeni how market na.

I can see you're in sifia pain

Trump nyansh-lickers will not like this ooo

Muslims should stop accommodating unIslamic acts.

Dear Muslim scholars and entreprenuers, could you please quit the islamization of thrash?!

Today, there's barely no anti-islamic act that you won't find one 'scholar' or popular speaker promoting. From alcohol to fornication and even idolatory! Just pick the mic to speak against gambling and some so-called islamic scholars will jump up and start calling you names; he's not tolerant, he's too backward, he's too this and that. They'll even quote the Quran and hadith to backup what they know isn't islamic.

See, if you want to fornicate because the Nigerian law permits it and you can't control yourself, please go ahead without trying to justify your fornication with verses from the Quran. At least that way you will be commiting just one sin of disobedience. But trying to prove what is halal to haram or vice versa makes your sin two. Rather it is an act of disbelief.

And one of the reasons for the widespread of this is the widespread of ignorance and ignorant speakers.

A bigger reason is that many 'scholars' are willing to sell their hereafter and integrity for a crumb of this world. Imagine a 'cleric' whose sponsor works in a conventional bank, definitely he's never going to say interest and usury is anti-islamic.

The worst are those clerics that follow politicians. The only islam most of them have is their cap.

We ask Allaah for safety.

There are different types of Muslims' schools, we have Muslim proprietors' schools, the schools are owned by Muslims but they have no provision for Islaamic programmes and admits all and sundry.

Secondly, we have Islaamic schools, these are equally owned by Muslims that allow Islaamic ethics and etiquettes to have a place in their schools, but the Islaamic activities are used as dragnet to woo Muslim parents to their schools while the real motive of the proprietors are profit making, economic survival instincts and self actualisation. All the interests are purely personal.

The third category are ideological Islaamic schools, these are schools owned and established with the sole aim of Islaam advancement. The schools are daawah centres, ideological base, Masaajid for reorientation, reformation and nurturing of Muslim children's soul. It can be compared to welfare home where deviant and delinquent children could be remoulded, guided and reformed.

It is not in Islam for us to prostrate in greeting to anyone!

Apt and concise

Solatul istisqaa

Akpan107:
Body odour is likely not a problem!

For you having body odour, you can easily use perfumes and deodorants. It's as simple as that.

As for the Hadith, he (commendations and peace of Allaah be upon him) only did that to show that it isn't a sin, not that it's a recommended act.

There are numerous hadiths that urging the believer to perform ghusl (bath) before intercourse with another wife. In fact the wordings of the previous Hadith says: 'he did it's not 'he used to do it's and the reporters of Hadith are always careful in their choice of words.

Finally, as a popular saying goes: it isn't the food that has problem, it's the sick person's tongue. If you calm down and listen to explanation, there's nothing contradictory in Islam. Rather you'll see the beauty of Islam.

Rashduct4luv:
`

Lovely & Coincise, Shukran bro!

Aameen

paparazzi1987:
Are you saying we can abort pregnancy that is below 4 months ?

No I'm not. I'm only saying that once it's 120days there's no doubt that abortion is a murder case. But 120days is a big sin as is mentioned in earlier mentioned verse.

Allaah knows best.

JazaakumuLLaahu khayraa dear OP.

There are many other errors we make when building our mosques, I've wanted to write on them for a long time but hopefully I'll list them here;

First is making the Imam's place a cubicle such that many of congregation can't see him during the prayer.

Consider the picture below, you see how everyone on the first row can see the Imam unlike our mosques here where the Imam enters an enclave which hides him from the congregation. The implication is that the enclave makes it difficult for the congregation to take cue by the Imam as commanded in the Hadith: the Imam has there to be followed

Also, many mosques build their toilets facing the qiblah. While there's a difference of opinion on this matter, it's safer to avoid it (at least to respect those who believe it's not permissible).

Also included is no separating male and female entrances and passages. This leads to freemixing and many sick-minded youths take advantage of this to turn the mosque to a hookup zone.

We ask Allaah for safety.

Also is that many mosques do not conceal their toilets from the public. It's a well-known principle in the books of fiqh that one should distance or conceal himself while answering the call of nature so as not to disturb others with obnoxious sounds, smell or sights.

Lastly, many mosques do not place sufficient barricades between urinals therefore making it possible for two people easing themselves to see each other's privacy. This needs to be corrected. The privacy of a man is from his navel to his knees and only his wife is allowed to see it.

We ask Allaah for tawfeeq.

Ola260:
So whats d meaning of minbar if imam and congregation are to be on same level

Mimbar is where Imam climbs to address the congregation not where he climbs to lead them in prayer. This is one thing and that is another.

Very true.

In Islam, a child born out of wedlock cannot has no right to claim anything from his biological father. He/she can't inherit and can't use his surname.

Unfortunately, most firstborns of today are bastards. We ask Allaah for safety.

The OP didn't address an issue, and that's the dislike or prohibition of preventing pregnancy just for the fear of poverty.

The people who invented the term family planning use it in two ways;

Birth spacing

Birth restriction.

Birth spacing is done to ensure that the mother has sound physical and mental health to cater for each child before conceiving another. This is in accordance with Islam. Allaah -Sublime and Exalted is He- commanded mothers to breastfeed their children for 21 months (that's if gestation was for 9 months).

However, restricting birth such as saying I want to have only two children or only four children isn't in accordance with Islam. Unfortunately, this is the more common usage of the term 'family planning'. In fact when family planning is mentioned, this is the default meaning.

The only time when birth restriction is allowed is when a professional, experienced and Muslim doctor advices the couple to avoid pregnancy because of the wife's health. But restricting birth because for fear of poverty is anti-islamic.

And kill not your children for fear of poverty. We provide for them and for you. Surely, the killing of them is a great sin.

Islamicaly, anyone who kills a child after 120days in the womb is guilty of murder. Let alone those who throw babies into drainage systems.

We ask Allaah for safety.

ContractKiller:
So failure to purify the p*nis will condemned you to hell, while having sex with 9 year old girls is okay?

Now you're jumping to another topic. Your question has been fully answered.

ItooWorWor:
Actually learnt something from a friend, why muslims don't eat dogs, he said one of their Anabi and is almajiris went to the mountain to pray the way Jesus did with his desciples, he said their Anabi told his almajiris to wait for him at the bottom of the mountain, while he climbed up the mountain wearing a white cloth to pray, while he was praying rising his ass up some mad dogs came and saw him thinking he was a white rabbit and attacked him, when his almajiris waited for him and didn't see him they climbed the mountain to look for him, my the time they get there to their suprise their Anabi has been torn to pieces by dogs.
Since then they vow never to eat dog again.

You're almost funny

ContractKiller:
How does shaking your p*nis 3 times after urinating, tie you to your creator?

It ensures that no urine is left so that some drops don't trickle in your pants.

That is purification and purification is half of faith.

OoniOfIfe:
e dey pain u. Ode simple sarcasm
.

No, Netflix wasn't being sarcastic, your Jesus was really gay and he had 12 wives husbands

ContractKiller:
What an ex-muslim from Egypt posted on YouTube:

"The Muslim is the only one who needs a fatwa for what side of the bed he wakes up from. He must pray before putting on his shoes and he must always wear his right shoe first. He must pray a special prayer before entering his toilet and another special prayer while sitting on his toilet otherwise the Jinn and Sheitan will disturb him. He must make sure his buttocks are not pointed in the direction of the Quibla (Mecca) when he is in the toilet. He must wash his p*nis and shake it 3 times after urinating and he must try to urinate while stopping like a woman."

Actually, we should thank that man/woman for the compliments.

Islam ties us to our Creator and Lord because worship is the primary reason why we're in this world. Every other thing we're doing are distractions (or at best means to worship).

OoniOfIfe:
e dey Pain

Sorry for hurting you