₦airaland Forum

BEENUEL:
[/i]The motherinlaw is definitely[i] [/b]Iyalagbo[b]


Modified.

Somebody should teach me on how to use this italics, bolds and all. Am humbly seeking

wrap (put) the text you want to format between the opening and closing italic or bold tags like this [i] italic [/i] and this [b] bold [/b]. Duplicate tags wouldn't work well cos the first italic opening tag is always closed by the last italic closing tag, so any other italic tag between would display like regular text. Same with boldface.

I won't even let anyone lick my feet. It's all shades of weird

Hehehehe... Is this for real?

Why did she not reach out to him while he was still tormenting himself with thoughts of his own inadequacy? Because she did not care. She loved the power she had over him, the idea that he could be in anguish that she doesn't love him anymore. She must have felt powerful whenever he expressed his need for her body and enjoyed turning him down. She wasn't expecting him to get over it, to get over her.

Thing is, she still doesn't care about him. She cares about his being happy with another lady. She cares about the power she has lost. She cares about her own desirability or lack of it, and is shocked that she isn't irreplaceable. Serves her right a thousand times.

I hope he never returns to her, and I wish other men in similar situations with frigid/lukewarm/contentious wives would man up and call that woman's bluff.

Hmmm... Even within a tribe we still have this nonsense 'my-side-is-better-than-yours' mentality. The human race can never be truly united in this world as we know it.

That first one... Na until you see pics of your fake HIV result everywhere for internet and read the gist for Nairaland FP with your pics included, you go know say na very foolish idea.

The second idea is very cowardly, but it's better than the first.

If the lady is very much attached to you, she'd get hurt no matter how you break up. Why not save yourself the stress and do it the mature way?

Doesn't take a genius jare, it's easy. The guys above got it, but here are my workings.

There are 4 unknowns and 4 equations. Let the unknowns a, b, c, and d. So the equations become:
a + b = 8 .................. (1)
b + d = 8 .................. (2)
a + c = 13 .................. (3)
c - d = 6 .................. (4)

Comparing (1) and (2), we notice that
a = d

And comparing (1) and (3), we also notice that
c = b + 5

Armed with this new info, let's play with (4). Substitute a with d and c with b + 5. We'd have:
b + 5 - a = 6

Subtract 5 from both sides to eliminate 5 from the left hand side. It becomes:
b - a = 1
-a + b = 1 .................. (5)
Recall
a + b = 8 .................. (1)
Now we see that (5) has the same variables as (1) so eliminate one variable. If you add both equations, you'd eliminate a, but if you subtract, b goes. Let's add.
-a + a + b + b = 1 + 8
0 + 2b = 9
b = 4.5

but a + b = 8
Therefore
a = 8 - b = 8 - 4.5 = 3.5

d = a = 3.5
Then
c - d = 6
c - 3.5 = 6
c = 6 + 3.5 = 9.5

So the original equations are
3.5 + 4.5 = 8 .................. (1)
4.5 + 3.5 = 8 .................. (2)
3.5 + 9.5 = 13 .................. (3)
9.5 - 3.5 = 6 .................. (4)


Don't mind me, there are shorter routes. To type long story dey hungry me.

She's only pissed that she isn't as special as she thought, and that he has moved on.

The way some ladies reason sef... You see a popular guy, go gaga over him, throw yourself at him, spread legs wide open and expect magical enchantment. Like yours is the first pair of legs to part enthusiastically for him.

Nice! My next device would rock Android O. O for Oahray

Peacetemi:
I love it when I read a very long but sensible post. Thumbs up Op
Mr Oahray you can also add your own definition I'm sure Op would appreciate it

The friend zone is a situation in which one of two friends wishes to enter into a romantic or sexual relationship, while the other does not. It is generally considered to be an undesirable or dreaded situation by the lovelorn person.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Friend_zone

Friend zone is just a fancy term for unrequited love in a friendship. One wants romance, the other wants just friendship.

Em... Op, you may have had good intentions but I don't think your message came across as you intended. In a nutshell, you simply assumed a definition for friendzone and then argued against the definition. That's what is called a strawman argument.

I think you missed it when you added "purposely" to your definition of friendzone.

Fourwinds:
I never said morality is solely the responsibility of ladies...why I blamed d lady was exactly what I told u I experienced...it wasn't hear say... if dat lady had told me she was in a relationship., it would have save d day....so y lying..is dat not greed on d part of d lady because benefits comes with relationships

oga, even your own sef... You didn't know because you were only interested in the sex. If you were interested in her as a person, you wouldn't miss clues that there's something amiss. You wanted sex, she wanted sex. She didn't deceive you, you just didn't care to find out.

Didn't say you 'said' so either. SAYING and IMPLYING aren't exactly the same thing. Check all your posts on this thread. Not even in one of them did you admit that he could have ended it when he discovered she was cheating on her bf with him. All you kept saying was how it could have been avoided if she didn't agree. As if she could have agreed if he didn't ask. He just wanted a sexual relationship that's why he didn't do his homework before sliding in. Everything he got was what he chose. The worst part is where he found out but kept sleeping with her then came here to announce it.

Keep on justifying his hypocrisy, you hear? I'm out of here and the floor is totally yours.

Fourwinds:
u go back and read ur last paragraph which make sense....exactly what I have been hitting at...in one of my statement I said d guy is not a saint...meaning I condemned his action but a deeper look...how did it get here.? d guy has already slept with d girl before he finds out...

do u know I had a similar case some years ago..I woow a girl and she agreed for a date., it was while we were dating I got a call. and d caller I asked me if I know dat d girl I'm dating is married. I asked him a question...dat i didnt see MARRIED written on her face.? I told him before I started a date with her I asked her if she was in a relationship., she said no...because while d guy was talking with me he became insiultive...I have to put him where he belong... he later apologied and dat was how I cut d relationship...now will u blame me for such act....

I wouldn't blame you for not being observant enough to detect that you were dating a married woman. Sexual urge makes some guys blind to many clues. However, I'd blame you 100% if after you found out you continued the affair and still condemned her while at it.

On this thread you have been on the side of the op who has been acting like the shocked victim. He's just as shameless as the girl and is in no position to call her names.

I only tackled you cos you were implying that morality is solely the responsibility of ladies. That's bullcrap double standards.

Fourwinds:
u are just being too over zealous here....I have never condole things of these form...

If dat girl didn't agree to lay with dat guy., I don't think d guy will come here and write this crap...after all they are both corps members...I didn't see where guy said he raped( forced sex) d girl....so what is ur problem. if dat girl repeatedly said no no no no no ...what d fucccck.. do u think dis guy will write this crap.


please reason well

if the guy didn't go chasing after her like a dog on heat, he wouldn't have written this either. It takes two to agree to have sėx, what happened to his own right to look away or to end things when he discovered what she was doing? So a girl has to be repeating 'no no no no', before you go use sense abi? Unless he is retårded, he's capable of making conscious choices just as she is.

He chose to chase the girl for a sexual relationship right from a so-called religious family house. When he had the slightest chance, he slept with her. The first time he discovered she has a bf, he did not stop, did he? What exactly are you arguing about?

The point is clear, if you believe it's wrong of a girl to cheat on her man, don't continue helping her do it. If you continue sleeping with her after you discover because you have no control over your weapon, you have no moral right to condemn her. Is that point not simple enough to grasp?

Please reason well.

Fourwinds:
do u know if dat girl's husband to be finds out., who will suffer d consequences most. so y pretend as if d guy in d act is d loser...

in d game of cheating girls suffers d most...so if I'm a girl., it will be better for me to shut my legs...

after all she keeps her respect and dignity

who is talking about losing? Don't even try to change your stance. Wrong is wrong even if it doesn't have immediate consequences. I'm talking about the shameless hypocrisy you and the op have exhibited here.

If you truly believe something is wrong, steer clear. Don't indulge in it and go on to paint your partner in crime a devil.

So it's ok for a guy to sleep around because you believe a girl "suffers d most?" Is that your point?

That's one of the reasons why the world is as messed up as it is. You people know what is right and wrong, and you celebrate the wrong just because you are not on the receiving end of it.

Na 2 and 3 I dislike pass, cos even an ordinary girl I'm just friends with can be too talkative or overly dramatic. If you be parrot or drama queen, no even near me.

The others... Well, we'd have to be dating for it to bother me, even remotely.

This is not a statue jare. No one has made a nudė statue of Hilary yet. It's the same photoshop pics released sometime ago. Was just superimposed on the street pic.

Nairalanders gullible sha.

Hmmm... Na dem sabi. The groom knew his lady has a volatile temper but chose to marry her.

I avoid people who are helpless puppets of their own temper. Say whatever and do whatever just because they are upset. Later they would act like they don't know how it happened.

Fourwinds:
did u hear me calling d guys saints... for corruption to take place., there must be giver and a receiver.....if d giver does not stretch out his or her hands., d receiver cannt collect..

reason y I said d girls have a duty to close their legs

this your nonsense logic sef. Some 'receivers' collect by force, so you are wrong.

What is wrong with some of you people I share the same gender with sef? You are the man, stop talking like a child without a sense of responsibility. So you have no choice over where you dip your rod? If a mad woman opens her legs for you, you'd go in? Why try to make it seem its only the lady that can and should say no?

A guy knows a girl is cheating on her man and is helping her do so shamelessly, and you are here doing selective bashing. Something dey worry your head, and the head of every guy or lady who defend the wrong person because they are of the same gender.

Op your hypocrisy is nauseating. So you know she's in a serious relationship and you are still sleeping with her? You kiss her with one side of your mouth and condemn her with the other side. What makes you better than her? Mumu.

Chai. Seriously? You get work sha.

Mehn... This is nice. I hope more persons get to read this. I tried explaining the theory of mind (it's related to the "comparing to others" part of the "Reality testing" point) to someone and e just be like say na greek I dey yarn. Wish she could read this.

SIRTee15:
Photoshop image of Hilary surfaced online early this year....
heaven didn't fall......
Hillary campaign didn't even bother to comment......

it wasn't just one image, but then a photoshop pic pales into insignificance next to nakedd statues ridiculing a person's sex organ and by extension masculinity. BTW, for every photoshop pic of Hilary, there's probably 10 of Trump.

It's wrong to do this to anyone.

BekeeBuAgbara:
Now nobody is whinning, the biased liberal media is quiet but I wonder how some people would have reacted if it were Hilary Clinton nak3d statues.

that time all the feminist 'snakes' would bare their fangs and dogs would bark objectification and discrimination against women. But it's a man now, no problem at all

Definitely Obama. It's obvious he knows how to play with babies.

First make sure you untick that 'enter is send' option under chat settings in your whatsapp settings. If problem persists, it might just be your keyboard settings.

No quora?

Lol. Funny. Beht where I dey when my mates dey learn photoshop?

hahn:
Hypocrisy

as in eh... I can imagine Obj and Atiku condemning PDP 16 years of misrule

I still don't understand the PDP 16 years of misrule they keep talking about sha. 8 years in it had Obasanjo and Atiku at the helm of affairs, and they are now in APC. Why do they act like a political party is a separate being that embodies good or bad regardless of the people in it?

miremoses:
you guys keep tslking as if Im a kid or what,i dont know the game i have? Well to your question,his name is carl,his a little bit fat,dark skin.

that's not GTA V. It's a GTA San Andreas mod.

I disagree that children are no more intelligent. On the contrary, children learn faster now despite the fact that there are now far more things to learn than there ever was.

Give a 9-year old access to a smartphone and he/she would likely learn to operate it faster than the parents can. The past generations had no technology to distract them from their studies; just boring farm work or house chores. Misplaced priorities do not equate lower intellect.

Joke Silva