₦airaland Forum

Ihedinobi: Obviously you did not read what I wrote. That thread is many pages long and it would take a great deal of dishonesty to question which God was meant. But then, dishonesty is pretty much your common name, isn't it, ooman?

And what I described as ludicrous is the belief that God does not exist. It's actually a magnificent lie. But then lies appeal to liars, don't they?

A pathetic excuse for lack of reason.

It doesn't matter which god's fan was dominant on that thread, what matters is that the op mentioned no god in particular.

Dishonesty is typical of the religious.

Of course lies appeal to liars, just like a murderous gori god appeals to murderers in heart.

striktlymi: When Knotty opened that thread, he was a Christian...this fact alone shows the God he was referring to.

Anyways, this thing is rather a very small matter...

And is it written or engrossed on the noun Knotty that "am a xtian"? How am I to know he was a xtian? How am I to know which God he referred to?

I have been banned by that succubus times without number without feeling cheated, but this time, its an obvious cheat. What she practice here is nothing but a travesty of moderation. She causes more shambolics than the order she thinks she brings.

striktlymi: Congratulations! You have just been promoted to Olodo first class!!!

Nairaland is not just a general place without order...

still a thoughtless reply. do you realize that you are implying the name "God" means yahweh only?

striktlymi: Is knotty a member of the fraternity of flying pig lovers? The only member I know is you and the last I checked your religion was established on nairaland just last month...

It is definite that knotty was not referring to your flying pig...


...and what is this thrash about being done with nairaland? If I hear?

another thoughtless reply..... NL religious section is a general place, so if a clown opens a thread simply on "god" without strictly indicating which of the gods he refers to, then all gods are welcome.

and what you read is what you see, am so done here

striktlymi: Olodo!!!

Do you need someone to tell you that knotty was not referring to your flying pig?

Everyone can see clearly that you went there to look for trouble.




Did you go there to praise the God knotty spoke of or you went there to pick a fight?

Which "everyone" sees clearly exactly? The dumb xtians? Oh pls!

Knotty used the word that isn't possessive, he used a general word; he said God. God is the general term for any fat, high sitting skydaddy. God could be rocks, rivers, yahweh, alla or the Great Flying Pig.

I went there to pick no fights! With whom could I possibly pick a fight there? Am not a xtian, am not dumb.
I went there to praise the TRUE God, The Flying Pig and I got banned for that.

Am done on NL, am so done!

Ihedinobi: This was the op on that thread:



And the tone of the comments that followed suggested whom the God was that the op meant. Now, we all know that you, however ludicrous the fact, do not believe that there is a God at all and that Jesus and His Father are not worthy of any kind of thanks, so it's not that difficult to see your intent on that thread.

Like stricktymi said, go open your own thread and choke on your obnoxiousness there. I'm certain nobody will bother you and your Flying Pig. Besides, your mentor in the faith, ahem, non-faith, the Knight of all Moronicity does his best to respect threads of people like us. I don't know him at all for tryinf to spread atheistic nausea where he is obviously not invited. He usually has his hands too full concocting idiotic arguments, pardon my French. You're not fresh out, are you?

Still another irksome reply. God is a general name for any invisible skydaddy galivanting the spiritual world. God could mean Lucifer, The Great Flying Pig, Yahweh or Allah. I praised the Flying Pig on that thread, I broke no rules.

And you think its ludicrous to reject Yahweh, and his parthenogenetic son? Let me tell you whats ludicrous and rizible: 6 days creation, a talking snake and a still sun.

striktlymi: Guy sharrap there before I stretch my hand through your PC and give you one across your lips...



You are a thinking man...what you did was wrong and you got what you deserved....like Jesoul said, that thread is peaceful and there is absolutely no justification for your action.

You went to look for trouble and you were caught in the act.

Another unbearably dumb reply. Are you blind? I praised the Flying Pig on a thread titled "Have you praised HIM Yet, Today"? Can you interprete syntax at all? Or is syntagm too much for you too.

Do you not understand that "him" is a general term that refers to no one in particular but any male entity?

What then is this rubbish you are saying?

Am not angry that I got banned, she has always displayed such reprehensible turpitude, am angry that I got banned in a GENERAL thread.

striktlymi: Olodo!!!

Open your own thread and praise your flying pig...if you like you can somersault too in its honour...after all, it will be your thread.

Another dumb xtian, do you not come shouting in every atheist thread?

why are you all clothed in dishonesty?

JeSoul: What did it say on your profile? "banned for praising your flying pig"? or "banned for derailing a thread"? Praise your pig all you want as long as you don't derail any threads. You posted that on the christian/praise God thread that is clearly for christians and you did so to deliberately offend people who post there in peace all the time. Insults/abuses that stem from passionate discussions are much less egregious and easier to overlook/simply hide but deliberate offenses that you have to go out of your way to perform are the worst, shamless kinds. And per NL rules, it will not be tolerated.

I came with calm and reason, and asked many times nicely, but it seems a certain 0.000001% of you prefer you be treated with koboko.

Jesoul, did you say this with a functioning brain at all? Are you sure you are fully compos mentis? Well I dont think so!

If you are blind, am not; I praised the Flying Pig on a thread titled "Have You Praised Him Yet, Today?". Did you see that? Well read again.

"Him" could be just anybody, him could be a man, Zeus, Allah, Yahweh or the Great Flying Pig.

So once again, are you sure your English language comprehensive skills are still functional?

Powers are in your hands so you use them preposterously arbitrarily.

What more can I say, you are a Christian, such behaviors can be excused for you, but that doesn't mean that if you have an iota of reasoning ability within you, you shouldn't use it.

You go about, roistering in every thread, galumphing as if you've gone bonkers. When you come across threads that abuse atheists, satanists or Lucifer, you leave peacefully as if those thread didn't break the unbelievable, unavailing NL rules. No kerfufle runs through you then, your megalonaniac egocentric brain does not get melodramatic. But when anything is said concerning your already dead lord, your heart starts palpitating, you become sociopathic, banning all involved. Such is a mental condition that can be healed by a little bit of reasoning.

Next time you feel the rush to ban, ban me forever. Am done debating anyway and am fulfilled.

complete and absolute rubbish

the child needs to wake up, she lives in a world where 95% of its humans are dumb believers in a god who make them murderers and iddiots.

only what is accessible in 3D and by maths.

only what is practical

Deep Sight: Don't be daf.t. YOU stated clearly that HUMANS ARE ANIMALS.

HOW AND WHY THEN do you proceed to contradict yourself by saying that whats right for one animal is wrong for another? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?

again OLODO

where did I say it is right for animals? I in fact implied its wrong!!

Deep Sight: Dont be silly. Of course the strong trump the weak in nature, and this is certainly a part of the concept. Only the strongest and best genes get to perpetuate. How is that not survival of the fittest. Please, its obvious the questions have you in a corner and you have nothing of moment or consequence to say. If you cannot deconstruct the VERY SIMPLE premises and conclusion set forth, please go siddon.

yea say that to calm yourself.

your postulations are erroneous.

morality only becomes objective when there is a conscious mind involved.

why dont you also whine that animals dont have courts or schools?

am disappointed!

Deep Sight: This is contradictory. If humans are animals, why is it wrong for them to kill amongst themselves, for territory, and scavenge. Animals do this.

in the language of Striky : Olodo

because animals do this, does that mean its right?

animals also kill humans, is that therefore right simply because they are animals and we are animals.

why you dey fall my hand na?

and Deepsight, how many times will I tell you that survival of the fittest does not necessarily mean kill? survival of the fittest is always at work in the human community, only the well read pass, at times only those who have godfathers get a job, only the fittest survive does not mean only the assassins survive. you and your kind have an incomplete knowledge of evolution, I couldn't be moved by your fallacies.

if you want to be a thief, just say it, rob a bank and see if material atheists wont lock you up when caught.

Jesoul, exactly what did you ban me for the last time? for praising the Flying Pig?

am really disappointed, your pride will knock you down soon enough and you will gnash your teeth at the horror.

a word is enough for the wise.

Deep Sight: Please answer these questions with simple and direct sincerity -

1. Are humans animals?

2. Is it immoral or evil for animals to kill or scavenge?

Thanks.

humans are animals, some are dumber than some animals, some are dumber than slot for eg

it depends on your definition of immorality.

you are immoral only when you harm a member of your species.

to live is to kill

^^^ iranu meaning nonsense, none sense

striktlymi: Hallo ooman,

It depends on what you mean by 'complete'...

we all know the bible is a hogwash. omniscience and freewill, talking snake, still sun, resurrected zombie; all are stories for the deranged.

where did Cain get him wify from for eg?

striktlymi: That's your ish man!

that's my religion

the undead zombie who will come and eat your brain

striktlymi: Olodo!!!

ni e

striktlymi: Olodo!

Every Leader knows what is TRUE...

Goodluck Jonathan knelt before a pastor and acknowledged God's supremacy...

Goodluck Jonathan is ooman's leader...

Hence ooman should acknowledge the supremacy of God because it is TRUE...

a spiritual leader is different from a political one, isn't that what you say? so why equate them now.

and Jonathan is not my leader, i'd rather have a dog as a leader.

dumb nut xtians

pastors are your leaders so if they think God is a hocus pocus hogwash, then that is TRUE.

atheism is the way.

striktlymi: Morning Seek,



I do not agree that the book of Genesis blamed only the serpent and the woman for the 'fall'...everyone was held responsible by God and that's why they all had their fair share of God's 'wrath'...



Everything you have up there is based on speculations...you do not have complete information to draw an informed conclusion on any of the above.

1) Who told you God did not inform Adam about the battle in heaven?

2) How did you know that God did not tell Adam about the serpent's cunning?

3) How did you know that God did not inform Eve about the tree? Anyways, the following passage proves that you haven't really studied the story as you claim:

Genesis 3:1-3
King James Version (KJV)
1 Now the serpent was more subtil than any beast of the field which the Lord God had made. And he said unto the woman, Yea, hath God said, Ye shall not eat of every tree of the garden? 2 And the woman said unto the serpent, We may eat of the fruit of the trees of the garden: 3 But of the fruit of the tree which is in the midst of the garden, God hath said, Ye shall not eat of it, neither shall ye touch it, lest ye die.

The bold shows clearly that the woman was aware of the instruction not to eat of the 'forbidden tree'...

the bible isn't complete then.