₦airaland Forum

LandlordHopeful:
If you don't tithe to church things would be tight for you. My GO even said you would end up in hell

AAA593:
see jealousy o. chai

teelaw4life:
Okay bro. For the sake of argument, I'll agree and say what you've written up there has got some merit. How about this verdict from former premier league referee, Peter Walton?

The thing is you haven't explained why Mane was offside or at what point he was offside. (Not that all of these matters but you're claiming only officials know the letter of the law and as such are the only ones able to interprete the offside rule. This statement alone compromises the merit of any argument you might have. It's not a first, we know how bad English officials are, Andre Marinner sending off the wrong player, Mike Dean not giving clear penalties, Deliberate handballs ignored and what not. They're all humans, that's why VAR is being introduced to help pick out these errors as events happen super fast in real-time that officials aren't able to pick certain actions up.

Now, I'll explain why Mane wasn't offside:

When the initial ball from Salah came in, Mane was in an offside position but he never made a move toward the ball or interfere with play. Instead, it was Firmino, who was onside, who went for it, got the ball under control and attempted a shot on target which hit the bar. At this point, Mane had already moved behind Firmino, before the latter even played the shot -and by the letter of the law, there was no way he could be offside. The Linesman perhaps, had the first phase of play in mind, when Mane was offside, forgetting that he was not interferring with play and Firmino's touch and control had nullified that. I could go on bro...but a simple google search of what the experts are saying on this matter will point you in the right direction.

https://www.express.co.uk/sport/football/1040475/Liverpool-news-Did-you-see-Sadio-Mane-s-goal-WRONGLY-ruled-out-for-offside-at-Arsenal

Shalom.

AAA593:
see this guy pain Wetin? u goofed
I just one correct u. e mean anything

AAA593:
Wetin this one dey talk. so because them draw Liverpool don mean say dem no dey matches with the possession before?
arsenal Will come up again

Spy360:
True, but possession is an indicator of dominance. If I dominated you, you can't come out and say I escaped with a draw. You talked about having more clear cut chances, forgetting that other stats. MOTM was Torriera not VVD.

immaculate1234:
that was how they had more possession than Man United last season and they ended up loosing 1-3 them too easy to play joor

immaculate1234:
Them think say emirate na fortress.......come to Anfield and u will see what they call fortress....Arsenal tried

ndidibabe:
Arsenal won?

vic17:
if I nod you?

brightalo17:
you saying apart from lacasera is below belt to intelligent football watchers, haba what type of talk is that? How on earth Will you say a thing like that? Is that how to say kudos to players?

If at all you know what odds is I don't think you'll still be here arguing on an obvious fact. The odd on any betting website on this planet earth was against arsenal to lose to Liverpool.

You can't say apart from a player this or this would've happen in a football game, because that is the reason the player is getting weekly pay. Nawa oooo.

KuzBoi29:
don't mind him bro haters be talking trash about Liverpool, I hope we will surprise them all this season! And by the way you are a true Liverpool fan #YNWA

TabletMan:
I wonder how people like you watch football or are you getting your own update with radio station. Arsenal made more attempt than Liverpool. What if lacazette score that his first attempt 2mins when the match started ?
Liverpool play more defensive because Arsenal is the better team today, Liverpool wouldn't have play defensive game if there are playing teams like Newcastle or Cardiff.

brightalo17:
Listen do not start saying trash here , even the odds was against Arsenal in terms of betting and predictions. 95% people bet against Arsenal, So what are you talking about?

Meanwhile no normal football fan will be dumb enough to ask apart from a certain player blah blah blah, my question is why did the club buy and pays the certain player?

Liverpool player scored same as Arsenal player did,So why the apart from lacasera? Is he a not paid to score goals? Smh.

Spy360:
Not as true as you mentioned. Arsenal dominated the second half. You could read their pattern of play from their passing and movements. I'd rather say Liverpool escaped with a draw.

keryj:
There unbeaten run is not my business, I never said anything about Liverpool unbeaten run

osamagbesmart:
noise everywhere in my house because of arsenal fans,plz did they win premiership,champions league and super cup combine

brightalo17:
And if not for Milner?

babsbolad:
And lacasera is a Liverpool employee?

germaphobe:
"if not 4 lacasare" before nko he be liverpool player abi na own goal, abeg go sitdown una don learn parking the box trade from mourinho. Just thank una gods say una defence strong shaa

keryj:
Who cares about unbeaten run, if not for lacazette as if the spirits came to score for liverpool

khalids:
Is Lacazette a borrowed player.....is he not a member of the Arsenal team......He scored and evened out the match....

Just like me saying if not for millner...Arsenal would have won the match

End of the day, both teams understood the potential of one another and played well with much respect....

Well done to both teams......

observanc1:
were liverpool players on d sickbed?

observanc1:
we have many players that would have equalised. Should i name them for u?

keryj:
Livers clueless till the end.

Xisnin:
It doesn't matter. Sai Baba