Ortarico's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Ortarico's Profile › Ortarico's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 (of 27 pages)
Odunhana: Abeg, don't tell me all these ones hard ooo.1. A 2. B 3. B 4. D 5. A |
Edis4christ: No bro........i dnt tink soWell, I think i've stressed that enough. |
Adex097: 1)a group of photograph of a family of six(for children and their parents) is to be taken . If the parentst must occupy the two middle seats, then the number of different arrangements is.1. C 2. C 3. A you haven't showed the correction I requested for |
Edis4christ: 1) d ans is BNo bro, the fraction of meat can't be 5x/24. Now this is according to the way of your working: Budget=x provision=x-x/4=3x/4. . .the fraction left Now half of the fraction that is left is for staples: 1/2*3x/4=3x/8. . .fraction of staples therefore the fraction left after deducting the fraction of staples is 3x/4-3x/8= 3x/8. Now the fraction allocated for meat is 1/3 of the remaining fraction: 1/3*3x/8= 3x/24. Therefore the amount-total fraction is: x - (x/4+3x/8+3x/24) = x - (6x+9x+3x/24) = x - 18x/24 =24x-18x/24 = 6x/24 6x/24=350 6x=8400 x=1400. . . .Actually! |
Teezman: prove that elasticity of demand(Ed) = (average revenue(AR) / ( Average revenue + marginal revenue )what do you mean, AR can't be divided by itself? |
Odunhana: where are my Economics guru... Am bak with loads of question... Who is herewe still dey here. . . .welcum nd kari cum |
Adex097: Solve the following partial fractions1. C 2. A-but not sure of this can you post its correction plz? 3. B |
Adex097: right correection to number(3)Yeah, i've got it now |
Adex097: 1)Calculate 2034+4213-31121. 2034+4213 in base five=11302 base five :11302-3112 in base 5=3140 in base. C is the best option. 2. Let the amount be x. . . .Provisions: x-1/4x=3/4x. .3/4x fraction left Staples: 1/2 of 3/4x= 3/8x. . .3/8x fraction left after deducting the fraction of staples. Meat: 1/3 of 3/8x= 3/24x. . . .fraction of the remainder is 6/24x. Therefore: 6/24x=350. 6x=8,400 x=1,400. C is the best option. 3. 9^x=27*3^1-x 9^x=81^1-x; bcoms 3^2(x)=3^4(1-x) 3^2x=3^4-4x; cancel the bases which are 3 and bring out the indices; 2x=4-4x 2x+4x=4 6/4x x=4/6 x=2/3. D is the best option. |
Adex097: you can show it.......gonna post ur score lataok bro. |
Fynestboi: y re u disturbng urself simple tn u nid to do is reprint ur photocard to verify.. Dats allThe re-printing of photocards for the new dates has been intended to be on the 18th. So, print your card as from the 18th of this month! |
Adex097: 1)Calculate 2034+4213-31121. C 2. C 3. D Is the showing of working necessary? |
Adex097: Thread for mathematics https://www.nairaland.com/1255112/mathematics-tutorial-utme-post-utme-other#1520405710ks 4 diz bro, goin dia nw. Tobexin: Predicted. Question in the forth coming jamb...so all jambitoes amd jambala should solve dis and get emancipatedUhmm. . . . 1. A 2. D 3. C |
kunlex445: Hello fellow Jambite? Am here 2 give you guys some questions to answer1. C 2. A 3. A 4. D 5. D plz nid thread 4 maths |
browncool: Jesus Christ is not God, but he is the son of God and to answer your question, God was in charge if it doesn't make sense to you, then you should as well ask yourself when Jesus Christ was in the womb of Mary his earthly mother for the period of 9months, then who was in charge? hardbody: Jesus is not the Almighty God, he is the Son of God. In the Bible, Jesus prayed to his father. When he was coming of the water after baptism, his father called him my son in whom I am well pleased. When he was about to die after his earthly ministry, he kept praying to his father and requested that the cup should pass over him. Your question, religiously speaking is a no brainer.And who told you both that Jesus isn't God? You had better study your Bible wella. Jesus is God but of a humble personality who doesn't equal himself with God the Father (Philippian 2 vs 6-7) & (John 14 vs 28) He was also at Creation (Genesis 1 vs 26) or who did you think created him and the Holy Spirit? Now on the issue of the "Trinity" though the Bible didn't clearly state that but was given as a literal word meaning; "Three In Unity- Trinity" (1st John 5 vs 7-8; main verse that supports the doctrine of "Trinity" or are all terms used were taken from the Bible? Even the word Bible wasn't taken from the Bible.Agnostics or Athiests or whatever you call yourselves, the demons in you that make you believe that there are no demons. For you just wanna be free from religious warning and doctrine. Where you the one that created yourself? Even the science of the universe itself points to a designer. . . . "For now we see through a glass, darkly; but then face to face: now I know in part; but then shall I know even as also I am known". |
Dbrain22: It gud n also bad bcus jamb helps 2 reduce candidates datz 4 dose wit low score.so if d institution set entrance exam 4 abt let say 90,000 candidates,hw many wil dey admit? It beta dey continue writin utme.I second your opinion bro. . . |
nk2bob: for uniport 1st choice is 42135 while 2nd Chioce is 34272.Thank you bro, God bless you. |
@macmos plz help me with Uniport. Thanks! |
Plz help me with Uniport. Thanks! |
In fact I feel very lucky to have found this thread on the issue of intimate filial relationship. Truly the Bible prohibits such and there were instances where this thrived even in the Bible: Abraham married Sarah his sister (Genesis 20:12). Othniel wifed his cousin Achsah (Joshua 15:16,17). And all these were seen as no abomination. Plz, I want you to comment on this view. |
greatgod2012: @op, i dont think there is a law in our country that forbid it but, the Law of God forbids it, its in the bible, as well as the quoran, that, such act is an abominable one, and i think the law of God should be above any other laws, so, dont do it, there are so many other ladies out there that you can marry, i take God beg you, the repercussion may not be immediate, but definately, something unpalatable will come out of it in the future, which may not be easily bearable to you, redirect that love to the right type of love that is suppose to be btwn both of you and set each other free from the bondage you both are. At first, it may be hard, but, if you sincerely wish, you can both brake the yoke, the first step to take is to move and live far away from each other for a very long time.In fact I feel very lucky to have found this thread on the issue of intimate filial relationship. You said the Bible prohibits such and there were instances where this thrived even in the Bible: Abraham married Sarah his sister (Genesis 20:12). Othniel wifed his cousin Achsah (Joshua 15:16,17). And all these were seen as no abomination. Plz, I want you to comment on this view. |
Tolexander: Also some newspapers like punch have a column where they publish what the social media says mostly nairaland.This guy is very right. I was also surprised to see and read some comments made by some nairalanders on the issue of "how one can get off the hook of Cultism". It's on "the Punch" of Friday, March 8 2013, page 14. |
kj_hova: Ok, if you indeed want to have the atheist's view on this, it'll be twofold; conservative atheists will it's bad while liberal atheists will say it's not a problem. Before you go into shock, please note that liberal christians also feel it's not a problem.A gay/lesbian? Oh my God, what are humans turning into even for this 9ja! That means you also support bestiality!! #schocked# |
All i know be sey God dey, even Heaven and Hell REAL! The testimonies of people wey die but come back don do for a proof. |
all4naija: What a fanatic excuse!Thanks! Pls what book(s) does your contemporary western sense uses? Or is it Queen premier? |
all4naija: Are you talking about Science or Atheism? You are a confused dude, indeed!Maybe I don't know, what is the basis of atheism? |
kj_hova: @Ortarico, let me let you know that the books referred to as apocrypha even vary from bible to bible and from denomination to denomination. Many of the books accepted in the Roman Catholic canon were deliberately removed from the King James' authorized Anglican bible in 1611. The Coptic church, East Orthodox & the Ethiopian traditional church all have varying unrelated books in their different canons.Bro, I sincerely appreciate your efforts/enlightenment on these things! The Bible remains yet complete. I'll also appreciate more if you let me know by your concept on how the universe and creatures came into existence. |
kj_hova: @Ortarico, let me let you know that the books referred to as apocrypha even vary from bible to bible and from denomination to denomination. Many of the books accepted in the Roman Catholic canon were deliberately removed from the King James' authorized Anglican bible in 1611. The Coptic church, East Orthodox & the Ethiopian traditional church all have varying unrelated books in their different canons. |
kj_hova: I like your conclusion i.e. it is wrong for anyone to try to convert another person to his own belief. Christians are most guilty of this crime of proselyting.As long as God liveth such a decree shall never be promulgated. Do you think we're serving a God that can't speak up for himself? By the way, did you know what happened in the Buhari/Idiagbon era (1983-1993) when such a law was decreed? Now why must the gospel be publicly proclaimed? I propose nine reasons why the public strategies of preaching should be considered as a valid way to present the gospel of Jesus Christ. 1. It presents the gospel to people who may not otherwise step foot into a church. 2. It allows the preacher to obey the most frequent command regarding the manner in which the gospel is preached. 3. It follows historical pattern of pastors open air preaching e.g in the days of Noah. 4. It plainly understands the command of our Lord to "go into the highways and the country roads" and compel sinners to come. 5. It trusts wholly that God's word will never return void. 6. It encourage believers to go out together as a team and it mutually stirs others to more fervent and urgent evangelism. 7. It convicts christian passers-by who are not sharing their faith to consider evangelizing with greater zeal. 8. It always glorifies God because His word is being proclaimed. 9. It depends wholly on the sovereign work of the Holy Spirit to quicken dead hearts to new life as sinners hear the word preached. |
all4naija: You should ask the church. Did you say antagonist book? Are you assuming something about me? What an easy excuse to demoralize the argument to something else by attacking another book to prove your book right.Why are you repeating already answered questions? Why haven't you just for once sat down and consider/put some thought about how this world began actually? Why has science not been precise about these? Or don't you know that science has got a lot of tales as well? Science has no explanation about these things than to give us unreasonable assumptions and that's why theories codemn theories in the world of science! Or is it true that this world and man only evolved to give us what we have today? Science hasn't given us to know on the knowledge or mystery behind unlike other religious books that has done in clarity! Or do you fully embrace Darwin's theory on evolution? Do you belief that your primitive ancestors were monkeys who made the "kho kho" noise?. . . .Haba! For it's just like when we were children and sang the hilarious song that salamanders would eventually turn to snakes. Talking about the Bible being outdated shall never happen! For we've seen how some great men tried it but was a futile effort for them even here in Nigeria. The funniest of them all was the one whose house eventually turned to a Bible printing press! |
all4naija: That means you don't know the actual origin of your religion book. It is clear you want to remain in a state of denial and blind to reality like fanatics do. Yes, you are brainwashed in the sense not to question what's been fed to you as regarding your religion and its false doctrines.I don't and won't believe there were books of "Apochryphals" in the Bible as it is literally termed as a story well known, but probably not true (folk-tale). Forget about what you read in antagonistic books, or were you there when all these things were done? It also seems that you don't even know that there are books outside there which also antagonise "Atheism". So, everyone & everything can't escape the issue of criticism but what makes it to still have it stand is what matters. You yourself is open to criticism/critics even of your best friend! In spite of the hostility towards the Bible it has not been and would never be outdated, do you know why? Forcing or not, I'm not against you being an atheist, but you guyz should just stop polluting or deter the minds of heaven pilgrims from the belief in the existence of God. Let everyone just hold to his or her belief and LET IT BE! |
rhymz: Are you trying to be clever for your god or what? Abeg go discuss with your fellow below average i.q, you have obviously run out of reasonable argument and intelligence. Your assumptions and personal anecdote don't impress me, they seem like some redundant petty arguments from a child trying to look smarter than he realy is. Being uneccessarily verbose does not mean you are smart dear. Anyway, thanks for wasting my time.Congrats Mr ~25% IQ! I see that dealing with persons like you is worthless. Feel free to compare me with what you will, as I doubt I'll come back to this page, despite the possibility of a fun and healthy debate! |
?
or are all terms used were taken from the Bible? Even the word Bible wasn't taken from the Bible.