₦airaland Forum

chronique:
Let's be factual here. We are criticizing Trump out of emotions and sentiments. The way Africans see Somalia as a useless country not worthy of living in,that's how the average white sees Africa. Africa has a lot of good brains who have excelled in the US and other countries,and are still moving forward. But when you comapare them with the ones who are useless and constitute a nuisance wherever they are, it becomes a sad thing. If I were a foreigner, and I keep hearing about the kind of things that comes out of Africa (Nigeria to be precise), I would almost certainly think same way. Truth is that we are living abnormally in Nigeria and Africa bit we do not know it because we are already used to this kind of life. When African leaders and their citizens decide to sit up and do the right thing, they'd begin to earn respect for themselves. Nigeria is a perfect example or what a nation should never be.

You write well and you made a whole lot of sense, but, use paragraphs next time, it is easier to read.

cahrlifa:
U need JESUS

You only follow females, I wonder why. Do not overindulge, eat responsibly.

SmellingAnus:

Lol ... , not you my friend, you are not welcome here.

Otule Ngozi dị ụtọ

imagine some young stripper coming over here to reproach me, when I am doing you all a service.

my2d:
wat are you saying...what is wrong with my dp

What is wrong with my post, is it not thoughtful and educational?

my2d:
Is This How you want to start 2018

Sanctimonious bitches I hate the most, look at ur DP. Just look at u.

DeadRat:
3rd Of January 2018...


Look At What A Human Being Posted

, you narrow minded t.w.a.t, watch me land front-page. I am trying to inform your illiterate butt, stop hating.

I try hard to distribute useful info, and what do I get in return... a bunch of hate. I will not be deterred, I will serve humanity as best as I can. I promise.

LessNoise:
First week of the new year

Lessnoise hu? You don't have to open the thread you know if it is not up your street, that's why we have a heading.

[quote author=Kings1930 post=63854154][/quote]I see you, looking for cheap likes abi?

Rimming is having a moment. Long thought of as a more “advanced” sexual activity, it’s being added to the repertoires of people who would describe themselves as being fairly vanilla. Here’s everything you need to know if you’re curious about giving rimming a try.

What It Is

Rimming (otherwise known as analingus) is defined as kissing and licking your partner’s anus and rectum. (The anus is the exterior portion, the rectum is the interior portion)

Why You Should Try It

The simple answer—because it feels good! The anus has nerve endings and enjoys being stimulated. Because rimming is still seen as pretty taboo, there’s also an illicit thrill to giving and receiving a rimjob. And for the record, people of any gender or sexual orientation can enjoy rimming.


Of course, as with any other sexual activity, you need to get your partner’s enthusiastic consent before proceeding. Rimming is not a good activity to spring on someone by surprise.

Prepare to Rim

The receiver of a rimjob should make sure to bathe first. You can incorporate this into your pre-intimacy, by hopping into the shower together and soaping each other down. If a shower isn’t logistically possible, at the very least, do a thorough cleaning with a wet wipe. If you’re really anxious about cleanliness, you can use an enema to clean yourself out beforehand. But this is a pretty intense step that really isn’t necessary. Only do it if it will help you relax enough to enjoy the rimming.

If the giver is a male, he may want to consider shaving his facial scruff. Scruff is pretty polarizing. Some people like the added stimulation of a little scruff, while others find it uncomfortable. You may want to err on the side of caution and get rid of your five o’clock shadow. Longer facial hair is typically fine, since it’s a lot softer.

Get the Receiver Excited

If it’s your partner’s very first time receiving a rimjob, they’re bound to be a little nervous. It’s best to get them relaxed and excited with plenty of pre-intimacy. Plus, rimming doesn’t feel that great if you go straight for it.

Do whatever activities you typically like to do for pre-intimacy. Then start to caress their ass. Cup their cheeks in your hands and squeeze. Trace a fingertip along the area where their butt cheeks meet their thighs. You can also kiss and lick along their cheeks. Tease your partner along their butt crack, starting to venture towards the anus but not quite hitting it.

Get into Position

When your partner is ready to go, get them into position. The best position for rimming is to have the receiving partner on all fours on the bed. Depending on the height of your bed, you can stand or kneel behind them on the floor or on the bed. Continue licking and caressing all over their body, to get them even more excited.

Use Protection

It’s possible to transmit STIs through analingus. You can also transmit Hepatitis A, B, and C, along with other conditions. Unless you’re fluid bonded with your partner, you need to use protection to rim them. A dental dam works well with rimming. Or you can cut open a non-lubricated condom (condoms with lubricant or spermicide will taste gross) and spread it out over their anus.

Another note of caution: if your partner is female-bodied, don’t lick from anus to vagina. The vagina is sensitive to outside bacteria, and can get irritated or infected.

Lubricate

Since the rectum doesn’t self-lubricate, you’ll need to keep the area nice and wet. Make sure to use plenty of saliva. If you like, you can also use a flavored lube designed for MouthAction. If you’re using protection, make sure to get it wet under and on top of your barrier. This will help transmit the sensation better, making the barrier feel less barrier-like.

The Basics

The act of rimming itself isn’t that complicated—simply work your tongue around the anus. Going in circles is the easiest technique. You can adjust the diameter of your circles, moving farther apart and then closer together. Or try doing figure-eights, crossing over the anus itself.

If you and your partner are enjoying your rimming adventure, try squeezing their cheeks and pulling them wider apart. This will expose even more area for you to work with, and feels great for your partner.

Take It to the Next Level

If you’re performing analingus on a man, you have more latitude to explore other areas of his body, then come back to the anus (with women, you have to be careful not to lick the vagina after licking the anus). Try playing with his perineum and testicles.

Rimming pairs really well with other sexual activities. Try fingering your partner’s asshole as you rim it. Or stimulate your partner’s breasts, clitoris, vagina, or penis as you play with their anus.

feelamong:
Happy New year to everyone in this Great Forum!

As we plan our Investment Portfolios for the year...... I encourage everyone to work harder, invest more than you ever did in the past year, read more and seek out better Investment opportunities for your hard earned funds.

Take a little more risk...try out new frontiers but always make sure its a calculated risk you are taking.

Those of us that tried the Cryptos arena know very well what I am talking about! Averaging over 12,000% Return is no Joke!

Once again Do have a rewarding and fun filled year!

12,000% ROI? Una dey print money ni? if I had invested that 500k I for hold 60 mils for hand now ��

Philippines? I will rather be in Nija o, i dont see the point in leaving one third world country for another in search of greener pasture, does not make sense to me.

dovelike:
Where did you spend yours? I'm at work myself

Picture or it never happened.

.

Introduction

I just wanted to write a brief note on my perspective on the transaction between resources and sex. The connection between resources and sex has become ingrained in the human brain, and exists in every culture ever studied. Men with lots of resources is attractive to women, and women exchange resources for sex. In the purest form, we call this prostitution. This term has a very negative connotation in Western culture, and I do not necessarily agree with this stigma. After all, the exchange of resources for sex exists it countless other forms even today. If we consider the amount of resources that are spent in the hope of sex, the examples increase even further.

Evolutionary Psychology

Women have a biological need to be the gatekeepers of sex. They can only have a maximum of 8-12 children in their reproductive years. Men can theoretically have infinite numbers of children. This is the ultimate reason why men have a 'spread their seed' strategy, while women have a dual mating strategy of both short term, and long term, mates. The short term strategy involves having sexual encounters with men that bear strong genes, evidenced by features that suggest high testosterone, athleticism, and physical attractiveness. The long term strategy involves having the greatest resources for their offspring, and ideally involves cuckoldry by having a provider male as their long term partner.

Now these biological urges result in men generally having more of a desire to accrue excess resources (rich as Bleep), which combines with the spreading the seed instinct, to create endless situations where resources are traded for sex. To most people, this is merely prostitution, which is the contractual exchange of resources for sex. However, this exchange occurs much more frequently in all aspects of life.

Prostitutes, Sugar Babies, and Trophy Wives

We have already discussed the most straightforward example, prostitution. However, 'sugar-babies' and 'sugar daddies' are becoming much more common. This is a similar contract to an escort, but on less clearly defined terms. In a sugar daddy contract, the male offers money in return for companionship over a continual period of time, in the form of an allowance. This typically involves an older less attractive male, with a younger more attractive female. Sex is not specifically included in the contract, but if sex was not provided at a satisfactory level, then the male would likely pull away from the contract, and not provide any more allowances. I believe this is for men who want to 'kid themselves' into thinking they are not paying for sex, however, I also think it attracts men that want more than just the physical relationship with a women. The cost per period of sex I would imagine would be much higher than the prostitute, but not several times higher. The investment for the female is greater than the prostitute, but still not very significant, and guaranteed immediately upon performance.

Now we have the trophy wife. The trophy wife term was used because it is the more extreme example, however, we see softer forms of 'trophy' wives with less attractive women (e.g a '7' trophy wife with a 4 male). This is the most common example, and you have several people that would fit this criteria in your life. This requires the greatest investment by the female, many times with no payout at all. Rather than getting immediate control of a small amount of money, they choose to get partial control to a much, much larger amount of money. Although this requires the biggest investment, it has enormous payouts for the women involved, especially at the extremes. There is no need to rehash the insane billion dollar divorce settlements we've seen in the past, because there are endless smaller examples that you have probably witnessed yourself. The cost per sex in this example would be by far the highest, but it would have the most long term emotional support as a side benefit.

Society's Perspective

My point being is that society hates prostitutes. It also has a negative view on sugar daddies/babies. However, aside from perhaps the more extreme trophy wife examples (Anna Nicole Smith), society generally does not view trophy wives negatively. If we consider the endless soft examples of 'trophy' wives (guys with decent amounts of cash trading up), society largely accepts it, and even enables it with the family law system.

When you start to think about it, the prostitute is the most honest of the three examples. It is a clearly defined contract with consideration provided by both parties. The sugar daddy, is a less clearly defined contract. And the trophy wife offers no contract (with respect to sex) at all. Furthermore, the trophy wife is the most deceptive of the three, while the sugar baby falls in the middle.

I am writing this article to get people thinking about why society accepts the trophy wife lifestyle, but condemns the sugar baby, and rejects the prostitute. If you view the roles objectively, society's perspective is completely upside down. However, beta males and women make up the vast majority of society. This includes the people at the top of society, and the ones that do not agree with this philosophy would not dare speak out against it due to the concern of being perceived as politically incorrect, thus ruining their reputation. Women and provider males will always constitute the majority of people in the world, and the system will try and appease the majority. We have come to shame prostitution because it works DIRECTLY against the female dual sexual strategy, while benefiting the male's. If the majority of men participated in prostitution regularly, there would be less providers available. This would ultimately cause more women to turn to prostitution as a source of resources, when accruing a long term mate becomes a less viable strategy.

One could also look at prostitution and marriage as polar opposites, with one side benefiting the female sexual strategy, and the other benefiting the male. Now this is not to say that there are many reasons that prostitution has a seedy reputation in the West. The illegal nature of the trade, the association with drug use, and human trafficking, all are very real problems. However, societies that have accepted and regulated this have much less problems then societies with a black market.

Conclusion

I personally don't use prostitutes, but I just wanted to offer a different perspective. I have as much respect for a sex worker as I would for any other woman, however, I cannot say the same for a trophy wife. I just wanted to offer my view of how societies views on the three categories of women trading sex for resources can be viewed from an evolutionary psychology perspective.

TL;DR Society views prostitutes negatively, but not trophy wives, and this perspective strongly benefits the dual female sexual strategy.

It's a long essay, but very revealing, the woman specie are just about the same everywhere you may find them, be it in Nija or USA...

Introduction

I just wanted to write a brief note on my perspective on the transaction between resources and sex. The connection between resources and sex has become ingrained in the human brain, and exists in every culture ever studied. Men with lots of resources is attractive to women, and women exchange resources for sex. In the purest form, we call this prostitution. This term has a very negative connotation in Western culture, and I do not necessarily agree with this stigma. After all, the exchange of resources for sex exists it countless other forms even today. If we consider the amount of resources that are spent in the hope of sex, the examples increase even further.

Evolutionary Psychology

Women have a biological need to be the gatekeepers of sex. They can only have a maximum of 8-12 children in their reproductive years. Men can theoretically have infinite numbers of children. This is the ultimate reason why men have a 'spread their seed' strategy, while women have a dual mating strategy of both short term, and long term, mates. The short term strategy involves having sexual encounters with men that bear strong genes, evidenced by features that suggest high testosterone, athleticism, and physical attractiveness. The long term strategy involves having the greatest resources for their offspring, and ideally involves cuckoldry by having a provider male as their long term partner.

Now these biological urges result in men generally having more of a desire to accrue excess resources (rich as Bleep), which combines with the spreading the seed instinct, to create endless situations where resources are traded for sex. To most people, this is merely prostitution, which is the contractual exchange of resources for sex. However, this exchange occurs much more frequently in all aspects of life.

Prostitutes, Sugar Babies, and Trophy Wives

We have already discussed the most straightforward example, prostitution. However, 'sugar-babies' and 'sugar daddies' are becoming much more common. This is a similar contract to an escort, but on less clearly defined terms. In a sugar daddy contract, the male offers money in return for companionship over a continual period of time, in the form of an allowance. This typically involves an older less attractive male, with a younger more attractive female. Sex is not specifically included in the contract, but if sex was not provided at a satisfactory level, then the male would likely pull away from the contract, and not provide any more allowances. I believe this is for men who want to 'kid themselves' into thinking they are not paying for sex, however, I also think it attracts men that want more than just the physical relationship with a women. The cost per period of sex I would imagine would be much higher than the prostitute, but not several times higher. The investment for the female is greater than the prostitute, but still not very significant, and guaranteed immediately upon performance.

Now we have the trophy wife. The trophy wife term was used because it is the more extreme example, however, we see softer forms of 'trophy' wives with less attractive women (e.g a '7' trophy wife with a 4 male). This is the most common example, and you have several people that would fit this criteria in your life. This requires the greatest investment by the female, many times with no payout at all. Rather than getting immediate control of a small amount of money, they choose to get partial control to a much, much larger amount of money. Although this requires the biggest investment, it has enormous payouts for the women involved, especially at the extremes. There is no need to rehash the insane billion dollar divorce settlements we've seen in the past, because there are endless smaller examples that you have probably witnessed yourself. The cost per sex in this example would be by far the highest, but it would have the most long term emotional support as a side benefit.

Society's Perspective

My point being is that society hates prostitutes. It also has a negative view on sugar daddies/babies. However, aside from perhaps the more extreme trophy wife examples (Anna Nicole Smith), society generally does not view trophy wives negatively. If we consider the endless soft examples of 'trophy' wives (guys with decent amounts of cash trading up), society largely accepts it, and even enables it with the family law system.

When you start to think about it, the prostitute is the most honest of the three examples. It is a clearly defined contract with consideration provided by both parties. The sugar daddy, is a less clearly defined contract. And the trophy wife offers no contract (with respect to sex) at all. Furthermore, the trophy wife is the most deceptive of the three, while the sugar baby falls in the middle.

I am writing this article to get people thinking about why society accepts the trophy wife lifestyle, but condemns the sugar baby, and rejects the prostitute. If you view the roles objectively, society's perspective is completely upside down. However, beta males and women make up the vast majority of society. This includes the people at the top of society, and the ones that do not agree with this philosophy would not dare speak out against it due to the concern of being perceived as politically incorrect, thus ruining their reputation. Women and provider males will always constitute the majority of people in the world, and the system will try and appease the majority. We have come to shame prostitution because it works DIRECTLY against the female dual sexual strategy, while benefiting the male's. If the majority of men participated in prostitution regularly, there would be less providers available. This would ultimately cause more women to turn to prostitution as a source of resources, when accruing a long term mate becomes a less viable strategy.

One could also look at prostitution and marriage as polar opposites, with one side benefiting the female sexual strategy, and the other benefiting the male. Now this is not to say that there are many reasons that prostitution has a seedy reputation in the West. The illegal nature of the trade, the association with drug use, and human trafficking, all are very real problems. However, societies that have accepted and regulated this have much less problems then societies with a black market.

Conclusion

I personally don't use prostitutes, but I just wanted to offer a different perspective. I have as much respect for a sex worker as I would for any other woman, however, I cannot say the same for a trophy wife. I just wanted to offer my view of how societies views on the three categories of women trading sex for resources can be viewed from an evolutionary psychology perspective.

TL;DR Society views prostitutes negatively, but not trophy wives, and this perspective strongly benefits the dual female sexual strategy.

Beware of Male Feminists !!!

LordKO:
@OP

The importance of euphemism on matters like this shouldn't be underestimated. Men have no superiority (aren't higher in quality) over women, but they sure have natural right to claim superior (higher in rank) over women. The earlier you understand that there's a tiny but big difference between the words "superior (higher in rank)" and "superiority (higher in quality)" the better for you.. . . As nouns the difference between superiority and superior is that superiority is the state of being superior while superior is a person of higher rank or quality.

Hey, your first paragraph makes no sense.

If you feel the woman in your life is more matured than you are, and as result take your position in a relationship then my friend, you are doomed.

Drama-free pussy is what we're all after, my friends.

Where are the feminists of Nairaland, no shots fired my way? In addition to the above , they (feminist bandwagon) lack mental grit to read an averagely long essay or the intalectual ability to process

I came across this long essay on Reddit.

Men are superior to women and therefore have more responsibilities than women. Women are superior to children, and therefore have more responsibilities than children. Superiority means "leadership over" due to increased maturity and reason, it does not come with a connotation of hate.

Women do not hate children because they're superior to them in the same way that men do not hate women because they're superior to them. Although plenty of men have their hang-ups with women (just as the reverse is true.) Men are more mature than women, who are more mature than children. This is about a hierarchy of maturity, of which men are at the top. The less mature you are, the less reasonable you are. You wouldn't want an immature person in charge of you, and assuming you found someone competent, you wouldn't say you were equal to the person in charge of you.

The problem with people today is women have been told it's bad to let a man be in charge of them, and men have been told to treat women as equal partners rather than subordinate dependants they care for.

You are superior, and you have to be in order to be eligible. That's reality. For the sake of ego preservation on her part, she will want to think of herself as your "first mate" or "partner", but you're not the captain, you're the ship. Without you there is nothing, no base nor foundation. She relies on you VASTLY more than you rely on her, and any functional relationship between a man and a woman is always based on this model.

It doesn't mean she's not important, it means you're depended upon more than you depend on her. It means the distribution of burden is disproportionate in order to reflect your difference in maturity, your burden is greater because her need is greater, her need is greater because she is more immature, and by extension of being less mature, less competent.

In fact, it's dangerous for you to depend on her emotionally, but the reverse is perfectly acceptable and fine. This is the burden that comes with being at the top of the maturity hierarchy. Emotional loneliness. Accepting you cannot confide all your deepest secrets and fears, not unless you're a schmuck who wants to see your relationship fall to shit. Women are so upset they're not really equals that they're completely ignorant to the fact that not being the final person everybody depends on is a privileged position. That when push comes to shove, women want someone to lean on and someone to blame, that true equality to men is something they could never handle. Like a child who wants to stay up late and eat unlimited amounts of candy, they only see the privileges of being a man, not the burdens.

Notice how women always go on about maturity in a way men don't seem to give a Bleep about? They're like the damn maturity police. This reminds me of little kids who insist they're grown-ups out of insecurity. "Women are equal to men!" touted by women is the same infantile narcissism as a child claiming "I'm not a little kid anymore!". It stems from the desire to be taken seriously by people you're less mature and capable than. This is all ego, remember you will find the truth in action rather than words, for in words they claim equality to man, but in action they demand superiority from him.

In relation to the statement "women are children", this is hyperbole, what /u/redpillschool concretely means is "women are childlike" - if they weren't, you wouldn't want them. Feminine charm comes from a certain present-orientation, feminine beauty comes from a lack of ageing.

Women play up innocence and play down their cunning because this is what makes them attractive to men. Innocence is an inherently childlike quality. Men don't try to seem innocent because it's not masculine, things that are childlike are inherently unmasculine, but they aren't unfeminine. Why? Because women are closer to children than men. Stop thinking this is some way of talking women down or some sad attempt at dehumanisation. It isn't. It's a truism regardless of whether it suits your sensibilities.

Shrewd women constantly leverage the appearance of innocence to get people to help them. Women pout, men don't. Women have strops, men don't. Women cry more than men. Women are less rational than men. In summary: women are more mature than children, but less mature than men.

You can teach a woman to behave well, but she is still a woman and so requires discipline in the same way a child does. She craves it. She will not "be good" because "she's a good woman" she will only "be good" because you convey authority, and in order to convey authority, you must be superior, superior meaning more mature and more competent. This is the natural order of things. Egalitarianism is an indoctrinated ideal, it is normal to you because you grew up brainwashed by feminist garbage, but it is not normal in nature, and it is not indicative of reality.

Women's childlike qualities are not just physical (smaller, less hair etc), but their neonatality is likewise echoed mentally. The hottest women have greater neonatal traits than uglier ones. She's not your psychological equal. You can love her, care for her, even depend on her for small things, but she's not your equal and never will be.

As Schopenhauer said, she is somewhere between a child and an adult, an adolescent perhaps. If you can't accept that, if you need to believe in the feminine ego porn that she's your equal in every which way, fine. But that doesn't mean TRP is wrong, it means you're unable to accept an aspect of reality that discomforts you.

justiniyke29:
na lap u go they Bleep na,it no go enter promise land

lol, wasted energy, semen, too much waste if u ask me.

KingLennon:
Is this real or surgical? To doggystyle this kind ass go make sense o

Only if you are 8 inch or more, the nyatch go push you go back nah. I suggest missionary, sir.

Dimples129:
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder

Na lie, that's not you.

dotcomnamename:
You mean having like 10 Million Naira on Mutual Funds like ( Money Market Fund ) ?

Yes sir, would it be a good idea

Hi, can some one live off dividends from stocks? On average what is the dividend yield as a percentage of investment? I guess if I had 10 millions in a good stock, yearly return may not be enough to live on.

Freciprocal:
You should be young enuff to understand sarcasm!!!

Never be in a hurry to post Lies. Take corrections and move along...

Really, why would this dude lie, for what nah, is it now so hard to download common series, he said he made a mistake. All this fake perfectionist sef.