Ositadima1's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Ositadima1's Profile › Ositadima1's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 (of 180 pages)
KarlTom:We have an ongoing project at the MPN facility in QIT near Eket. They have started discontinuing their official email handles, and I heard that the handover of the plant will take place tomorrow, the 13th. |
Xidget:For the past two months or more, the stock has been steady, closing at 478.8, while the VWAP is around 431. This indicates that the daily average sales are at 431. Unless the numerous offers you mentioned only recently appeared, or you are not analyzing them correctly, the price should have dropped by now. Whatever the case, if the FA aligns, there’s no need to focus too much on the bid/ask data, as it is often misleading (I can tell you why). I see a dividend of 35 naira, and using the discount formula, a target price of 915 seems likely. Then, the exportation to Central America that was mentioned will, hopefully, begin next year or shortly thereafter.
|
Dangcem may reach 915 by next year or early 2026, particularly when they increase their dividend to about 35 naira. It is a strong contender for a 100% return. This projection is purely based on technical valuation; I will conduct the FA later to see if both align. Feel free to challenge me (shoot me down) if this prediction fails, but if it does come true, remember it was me—the "oversabi" guy—who first brought it to your attention. |
jonnysessy:I don’t even know you, yet I read word for word on this thread. It means you contribute nothing—you’re just a leech. But it’s okay. |
vacanci:Bro, do whatever you like, it is a free world. |
crownprince2017:You are exercising your right by making this statement, and so am I. There is no rule preventing me from questioning anything, nor is there one stopping me from criticizing a post. |
If I say B, you say o another man say v Omo na you sabi... ![]() |
Dey say na January, ok nah, make we dey watch. ![]() Watin dey happen with that man with f ? Why are you swearing? ![]() |
rmx:What gets me is the confidence they exude when making such statements. I don’t think I’ve ever used words that imply such certainty when making predictions. When you speak with too much confidence and make bold claims, someone will inevitably be there to remind you of your failure. In this instance, that person is me, and so far, the predictions are failing. |
Hahaha... ☝️ |
Streetinvestor2:Lol, nothing way person no go see for ichimoku. Oyibo will develop a pattern-scanning tool tailored to their own markets and timelines. Then, you’ll read about it somewhere and adopt it blindly, without considering that our market operates under entirely different conditions. Did the creator account for the 100,000-block moves? Did they factor in our market’s strict ±10% limits? Yet, you’ll lift a TA tool without making the necessary adjustments or building one from scratch, and still feel like a sage. As for him, he probably invested in the banking sector. That 100% target might take a while. ![]() |
Mcy56, even without using Ichimoku, does a better job. At least if you follow her strictly, you can make some money. But Mcy56, why do you underestimate yourself? You’re a guru. Don’t dilute your evident skills by aligning with these so-called “Ogas.” Just my two cents. ![]() |
Where is the bull, and where is the crash? You’d better stick to your adult jokes—that’s where you shine. |
BuchyD:When they were calculating WAPCO up and down, I told them to calm down. The thread was full of calculations yet offered no clear direction on where to go from there. Both the ones with undefined gender. Before then, the likes of Agba and Loco were here talking about how we would see a bull market followed by the mother of all crashes, I calmly told them to relax—that the market would continue its volatile movement and that there was never going to be any crash. I am surprised how the same people who have predicted incorrectly on countless occasions still have the audacity to talk about the market, with all their Ichimoku cloud and other technical analysis. It makes me believe that all they can offer is comic relief. |
essentialone:A yo-yo is a toy consisting of a string attached to a spool. When you hold one end of the string and let the toy drop, it unrolls to the end of the string and then rolls back up. It’s somewhat similar to our local spinning tops, but instead of spinning on the ground, a yo-yo operates using gravity and tension in the string. ![]() |
Streetinvestor2:There’s no way you could have predicted how well OKOMUOIL would perform 10 years ago, given the many stocks available at the time—any one of them could have been chosen. In your portfolio, some stocks underperformed while others did very well. If you could see the future, would you have invested in the underperforming stocks back then? Selecting OKOMUOIL for this comparison, rather than Nigerian Breweries, reflects the bias of using today’s information to judge yesterday’s decisions. As for the dollar, there are no alternative options—you either invest or you don’t. |
GeeKudi:I got tired of this, since Sunday evening. Some people have been busy calculating without providing any clear direction. I’m sure I’m not the only one feeling this way—it’s been more than two days. Haba!!! |
GeeKudi:Instead of posting the actual details and freeing the thread from endless back-and-forth, you’ve been busy calculating imaginary numbers all day. You've been stuck on this elementary calculation since the day before yesterday. Una no dey tire, shuu. Yet we no know if na buy, sell or hold una talk. |
emmaodet:Your analysis is inaccurate because it relies on hindsight bias. While there is only one popular way to invest in foreign currency, there are multiple options when it comes to stocks. Selecting OKOMUOIL after the fact is biased. Instead, you should use something like the NSE index for a more balanced comparison. |
yMcy56:My sweet sister, me tire for all this plenty analysis with incomplete info. ![]() |
Sunrisepebble:The Swiss building materials company Holcim has agreed to sell its 83% stake in Lafarge Africa to Huaxin Cement, a Chinese firm, for $1 billion. This deal is expected to close in 2025, subject to regulatory approval. If the above is correct, why are you using the funds proposed for just 83% to compute the entire 100%? I understand your assumption that the same buyout amount can be projected for the minority, but when dividing, your OS denominator should reflect only 83%, not the full 100% OS. |
Sunrisepebble:Okay, so the person of unknown gender is correct. Now what? What is the end goal—buy, hold, or sell? |
If 1 billion is assumed then 127 naira per share. |
GeeKudi:Didn't you see the spreadsheet shared by the other guy? His argument is that the other person is wrong because, instead of dividing the total proposed buyout amount by the total shares, they first calculated 17% of the proposed buyout and then divided it by 17% of the total shares. These two calculations are essentially the same, as far as the rules of math are concerned. The funny thing is, the buyout only covers 83%, so both are actually wrong. If x represents the amount covering 83%, then dividing 100% by 83% of x will give the total amount for 100% OS. If you calculate this at an exchange rate of 1700, you should get roughly 203 naira per share (assuming 1.6 billion naira buyout of 83%). That's all there is to it. |
bovali:Lol, you remind me of those noisy teenagers who try to estimate which questions they got right and what their score might be immediately after an exam. What’s the point, when the exam is already over? Back then, I always felt like slapping their dumb heads. ![]() |
bovali:I think the issue with his calculation is quite different from what you explained. Assuming x dollars represents 100% buyout of the shares and y is the total number of shares, the result will be the same whether you divide x by y or calculate 17% of x divided by 17% of y, as the 17% cancels out. One of you must be making a mistake since both approaches should lead to the same number. This discrepancy between 180 and 400 is absurd. Why don’t you all give it a rest and let things play out naturally?" |
Sunrisepebble:Ok, thanks. |
Sunrisepebble:Honestly, I haven’t read the documents and don’t have the time to go through them at the moment. I was just browsing through the posts here. Someone claimed that the major shareholder is leaving because of the difficulties in Nigeria, while someone else countered by stating that the transaction isn’t limited to Nigeria but also includes other African countries. This made me wonder if the alleged offer price of $1.1 billion is for all the stakes held by the exiting investor across these countries, rather than just Nigeria. |
Sunrisepebble:I haven’t reviewed all your back-and-forth valuations in detail, but I have a question. If someone claimed that Nigeria isn’t the only subsidiary of Lafarge involved in this acquisition, why does it seem like you’re using the alleged offer price of $1.1 billion to estimate only the majority stakeholders in Nigeria? Shouldn’t you be considering the majority stakes in the other subsidiaries as well? Or does the Nigerian group encompass all those subsidiaries? Like I said, I haven’t looked at it closely, but it feels like there might be a flaw in your valuation approach. |
crownprince2017:What about cement? Check the cost in 2015 and compare it to today's prices. |
Streetinvestor2:If him dey carry am go radisson blu anchorage for VI before, now na one unknown hotel for Obalende him fit dey carry dey go do the do. Na the levels now. |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 (of 180 pages)

