Ositadima1's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Ositadima1's Profile › Ositadima1's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 (of 180 pages)
Raider76:My argument is that banks are investors. Anyone who lends money to a business is an investor because their return isn’t guaranteed. If Oando was able to raise 1.3 billion dollars, it’s clear that lenders have confidence in recovering their principal. This is basic finance. |
Raider76:Alright. |
Banks are not investors—is this the kind of objective analysis Raider76 is referring to? Ok nah. |
emmanuelewumi:It seems like you bend things to suit your view when it’s convenient. Banks are investors. A company obtains funding in two ways: debt and equity, and both are forms of invested capital. |
Raider76:That’s the point—analyzing the results objectively, without bringing in biases from past failures. I analyze results here too, and I presented Oando objectively, clearly showing that the negative trends from its past may have shifted with new evidence. If you didn’t notice that, then you may be biased as well. |
emmanuelewumi:Your arguments seem to be going in circles. First, you claimed Oando is like Enron, suggesting it’s presenting misleading numbers and heading for a crash. Now, you’ve acknowledged that they’re generating returns for investors. So, which is it?" |
emmanuelewumi:Remember, before the NAOC acquisition news, there was little interest in Oando. It was only after the acquisition that the hype kicked into full throttle. Yet, according to you, the NAOC acquisition has no impact. Why is that? Please enlighten me. |
emmanuelewumi:I’ve already pointed out the loans Oando secured in 2024. With all the negativity you’re presenting, how do you explain Oando’s ability to secure over 1.3 billion USD in 2024 alone? Are you suggesting there’s some kind of conspiracy, or that the NAOC assets are merely audio? |
emmanuelewumi:Why are you silent about Dangote Sugar, which you also praised and promoted here, while Oando seems to be such a big issue for you? Both companies currently have negative equity. Of course, you’re entitled to your opinion. Some people have already made more profit on Oando, with its price moving from 10 to 80, than you have with Aradel at its current price, no be juju be that? |
emmanuelewumi:I understand your point about the way they split the annual statement of comprehensive income across two pages—showing a profit of 60 billion on the first page, then a 69 billion loss on the following page. This layout could indeed confuse some readers, like Mcy56. It also emphasizes a significant improvement from the previous year. If not for the exchange losses that affected many companies in 2023, the results would have been much stronger. Below are the key highlights presented objectively, as your analysis comes across as emotionally charged, almost as if you have a personal vendetta against Oando. Reported profit after tax: N60.28 billion Total comprehensive loss: -N69.97 billion The difference is primarily due to "Other comprehensive loss" of -N130.25 billion Opening equity: -N197,205,768,000 FX translation loss: -N132,694,274,000 Closing equity: -N267,178,721,000 |
bovali:These are the points Oga Emma is highlighting, especially regarding the equity raising(right issue). I don’t think it will happen anytime soon; remember, this was before the NAOC acquisitions, and a lot has changed since then. Also, with all the loans taken in 2024, do you still think they need to raise more? Afreximbank Reserve Based Lending (RBL) Facility: Oando PLC secured a $500 million RBL facility for financing the NAOC acquisition, with Oando Energy Resources (OER) acting as the guarantor. This loan was obtained on August 22, 2024, the same day the acquisition was completed. The facility is likely secured by the oil reserves of the acquired NAOC assets. Afreximbank Junior Facility: Alongside the RBL facility, Oando PLC also obtained a $150 million Junior Facility for the NAOC acquisition, again with OER as the guarantor. This facility likely serves as a secondary source of financing and might have different terms and conditions compared to the RBL facility. BB Energy Loan: Calabar Power Limited (CPL), a subsidiary of Oando PLC, secured a $40 million loan facility from BB Energy (Gulf) DMCC on June 28, 2024. Oando PLC acted as the guarantor for this loan. The purpose of this loan was explicitly stated as the acquisition of a 20% working interest in the NAOC Joint Venture Assets and related fees and costs. Indorama Capital Holdings Pte. Ltd. and African Export-Import Bank Loan: Oando Petroleum and Natural Gas Company Limited (OPNGL), another subsidiary of Oando PLC, obtained a $500 million loan facility from Indorama Capital Holdings Pte. Ltd. ($150 million) and the African Export-Import Bank ($350 million) on July 25, 2024*. The purpose of this loan was to purchase a 20% participating interest in the NAOC/OOL/NEPL Joint Venture. Mercuria Asia Resources Pte Ltd. Loan: OPNGL also entered into a $150 million loan facility agreement with Mercuria Asia Resources Pte Ltd. on July 23, 2024. This loan was intended for transaction costs and expenses related to purchasing a participating interest in the NAOC/OOL/NEPL JV and acquiring 100% equity interest in NAOC. Total Loan Amount: $1.34 billion. |
mails4funshi:Food don done, Oga Street and Oga Emma over to you. |
designking:Did you analyze and arrive at a fundamental value, or are you just echoing what others have been saying here? Are you genuinely convinced in your heart, and do you have a fair value in mind? Why should it move up—is it simply because Seplat moved up? |
jonnysessy:The big question is, why is it falling? How can you be sure that whatever is causing it to fall will stop at 400? This is why investing or trading is never guesswork. Do you have charts to support your claims? Have you conducted valuations to estimate its fair value? What is your angle? Doing MH without even knowing that you are doing MH. |
Agbalowomeri:🤣 |
nosa2:Prediction is very much an art. Your valuation of GTCO, for instance, is also an art because you made assumptions to arrive at a specific number. You do have a number in mind that you believe reflects GTCO's value, right? How did you arrive at that number, and what assumptions did you make? Applying concepts logically is always better than ignoring them (in your case saying it is futile) . Someone who doesn’t calculate and simply assumes GTCO is undervalued is likely to get burned sooner or later if they don’t know where to stop buying. This is just an example to illustrate my point. |
nosa2:Because EPS fluctuates from year to year, certain years may show a very high EPS due to factors like reduced interest rates or unsustainable revenue jumps. In other years, unfavorable events can pull EPS down. The idea is that an average will smooth out these anomalies and outliers. You’re likely familiar with this concept from stock movements; the same approach applies to physical quantities like temperature, humidity, and more. |
nosa2:Yeah, there’s nowhere they can’t be used, as long as there is a time series of data points. |
nosa2:You may not have heard of moving averages, but they are widely used in the real world, from finance to engineering. I suggest you update your knowledge—lest the world leaves you behind. |
nosa2:Although averages can sometimes be misleading—just ask the guy who drowned after being told the average depth of a swimming pool was only 1.5 meters before he dived into its deepest part at 4.5 meters—in this case, averaging may be useful as a low-pass filter. Now, book value per share is essentially a fancier term for equity per share (kind of...). Therefore, EPS divided by book value per share gives us ROE. By averaging ROE over five years and re-substituting it for EPS (now an average), this method makes sense. This doesn’t mean his discount rate or current value calculation wasn’t incorrect (it is an he needs to admit that), but this approach helps smooth out unusual fluctuations in EPS. |
designking:So Seplat go dey do sitdon dey look? Or u think say Seplat don peak? |
emmanuelewumi:First one was 232.5, the other is 320. The 320 was bought after selling Buacemen near its peak. |
emmanuelewumi:Oga Emma, not like that o, u know say na u teach me work. Na you I follow enter Total in 2021, na u still make me sell my gamble in buacement after it did that 40%, na so I carry enter Total, that dividend Total pay last few months ago, sweet my bele wella. But u see Oando, him time go come, Oando go even do him own 1000 sef when matters set. |
Princkez:Total is making us proud. Another #1000 stock... |
Mpeace:How long will it take for increments to cover 573 billion, assuming they can maintain that momentum? Maybe, I'm missing something.
|
Mpeace: ![]() |
Zagee: ositadima1:Backward integration will take years and huge investment in land and produce, for now, importation of raw sugar is unavoidable. |
BullBearMkt:So, all the companies with negative equity due to currency devaluation, like MTNN, NESTLE and others, are now building refineries. The irony is that the refinery has nothing to do with it—they've been at a disadvantage since entering negative equity, compounded by poor efficiency. |
It's funny how people twist reality to make it bearable—suddenly, all the good results are dismissed as fables, and now DS’s results are considered the standard. What delusion can't do no dey, see how somebody is thinking because thier fingers are about to get burnt the more. 🤔 |
Raider76:I analyzed DS on several occasions, foreseeing challenges that others did not seem to take seriously. I demonstrated why backward integration would be difficult and time-consuming (long term strategy, and will take years and conciderable investments) , and I highlighted the significant issue of negative equity, especially in the context of high interest rates. I also compared DS with BUA Foods to underscore its inefficiencies. Additionally, I explained why owning businesses within the same group does not guarantee they can support each other effectively. Similarly, I pointed out MTNN's negative equity issue to mcy56, noting how problematic this is in the current economic climate. I presented facts, but some people preferred to ignore them, focusing on emotions rather than evidence. The posts are here, as are the criticisms of them. |
yMcy56: ![]() Ginalex ![]() |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 (of 180 pages)

?
