Phantom233's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Phantom233's Profile › Phantom233's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 (of 57 pages)
Moh247:The white men destroyed this country before they left....any time I see this video, I know that we have no reason remaining as one. |
Racoon:Presidential elections will be cancelled or otherwise the stolen mandate will be given to the rightful owner after the original results might have been collated from the BVAs. Tinubu d extremely corrupt druggie is like Moses, he'll only see d promise land but shall never smell it. ![]() |
The so called INEC chairman is d game changer else if elections were without fraud, no sane Nigerian will vote for darkness when he can see d bright light. |
Don't get yourself confused. The Major area where this manipulations takes place is in the results elections sheets that were not upload on the iREV portal directly from PU's d law clearly States that where there's any discrepancies on the results uploaded from the pU and the ones collated manually, it's the results that was uploaded directly from Pu that will be used as a legit results. So it's obvious those results we saw on inec websites after a winner was announced is fabricated that's why Apc and Pdp are seeking court order to inspect those BVAS in order to collect the original results for verification. On the other hand INEC is seeking to reconfigure the BVAS in order to tamper with those results. |
Every one knows d elections was a scam. Tinubu will be thrown out even if they hurriedly swear him in. |
Tinubu's fraud will be exposed soon. He can't fooled d entire nation, obviously he's widely rejected ![]() |
The stolen mandate must be returned. Nigerians can't vote for Apc after 8years of the most useless, wicked and backward leadership in the history of Democracy. |
Direct e-transmission of election results is mandatory (2) Guardian NigeriaMar 7, 2023 12:00 AM It is respectfully submitted that the legal and practical implications of the provisions of Section 64(5) of the Electoral Act 2022, are: It is respectfully submitted that the legal and practical implications of the provisions of Section 64(5) of the Electoral Act 2022, are: 1. Electronic Transmission of election results direct from the polling units is MANDATORY; 2. Collation of results manually (the lower level of collation) is still allowed; 3. Where there is a conflict between results transmitted electronically direct from the polling units and results as collated manually, the results as transmitted electronically direct from the polling units shall prevail; 4. In order to determine whether such a conflict exists, there must have been direct electronic transmission from the polling units, before the manual transmission. Both must co-exist. 5. The results transmitted direct from the polling units (higher level collation) are the yardsticks for measuring the authenticity of the results collated manually (lower level collation); 6. The collation officer at the collation centre, must be afforded the opportunity of measuring the authenticity of the manually-collated results by matching them against the electronically transmitted results. This opportunity may only exist where there has been direct electronic Transmission from the polling units before the manual collation, so that both must be present to enable the collation officer to make an informed determination. 7. Failure to transmit the results electronically DIRECT from the polling units is a fatal violation of the law, because the collation officer is then denied the mandatory opportunity to verify the authenticity of the manually collated results by matching them against the electronically transmitted results. From all the aforesaid, it could reasonably be concluded that failure to transmit results DIRECT electronically from the polling units is more than a substantial non-compliance with extant law. From the law, it appears that the foundation of the authenticity of the entire electoral process in Nigeria, under the Electoral Act 2022, is hinged on electronic Transmission of the results direct from the polling units. Where this fails, the affected election fails because its credibility has been completely lost on account of absence or failure of direct electronic transmission from the polling units; direct electronic transmission being the surest safeguard provided by the extant electoral laws for determining the authenticity and credibility of the results of the elections. It’s therefore a flagrant desecration of the extant electoral law to refuse/fail to transmit the results electronically DIRECT from the polling units. It’s respectfully hereby restated that there can hardly be any talk of CREDIBLE and FAIR elections under the Electoral Act 2022 without direct electronic transmission of results from the polling units. The provisions on Direct electronic transmission of results are put in place to cure the mischief (rampant manipulation of results) which had persisted as a result of the lacuna in the previous/old law. Where electronic Transmission fails, the whole purpose of the Electoral Act 2022 is grossly defeated and the election fails for being illegal and invalid. The requirements of the Electoral Act 2022 and the Regulations and Guidelines on direct electronic transmission of election results from the polling units are a mandatory requirement which may NOT be flouted with impunity, it seems. It is truism in law, that breach of a MANDATORY statutory provision is fatal to the act done in breach thereof. Hence, in Amalgamated Trustees Ltd V. Associated Discount House LTD (2007) LPELR-454(SC), the Supreme Court said (Per OGBUAGU ,J.S.C ( Pp. 75-76, paras. F-A ), “It is settled that not every breach of a statutory provision, renders an act void, and that to be void, it must not be merely directory, but mandatory. See Odu’a Investment Co. Ltd. v. Talabi (1997) 10 NWLR (Pt. 523) 1; (1997) SCNJ 600 at 649 – per Ogundare, JSC (of blessed memory).” Further, where a statute prescribes that an act MUST be done in a particular way, that act can only be validly done in the prescribed manner. Also, in SANUSI V. AYOOLA & ORS (1992) LPELR-3009(SC), the Supreme Court said (Per KARIBI-WHYTE ,J.S.C pp. 19-20, paras. F-C) that: “It is well settled principle of our jurisprudence and an important requirement of our administration of justice that where the exercise of a power is statutory, such power can only be exercised within the limits prescribed by the statute. – See Bowaje v. Adediwura (1976) 6 S.C.143.” This being the case, it is most unfortunate, embarrassing and heart-rending, that INEC had collected over N350 billion from the coffers of the Federation of Nigeria (on the condition that it would comply with the law through mandatory direct electronic transmission of results from the polling units as prescribed by law with the aim of giving Nigerians credible elections in 2023) only to turn around to flagrantly flout the laws of the land by deliberately refusing or failing to electronically transmit directly from the polling units, more than 80 percent of the results. This is a national shame and embarassment, perpetrated in the full glare of the world. See: See: *2023: no going back on electronic transmission of results, inec reassures (Channelstv; 26 October 2022). Meanwhile, In a release titled “Electronic Transmission & Collation Of Results” which comes under the general heading “2023 General Election Updates” and published by INEC on its own website ( accessed on 28 February 2023 at 1.00pm), the INEC wrote as follows: “One of the most progressive provisions of the Electoral Act 2022 is the provision for result management from the Polling Units (PUs) to various levels of collation and declaration of winners. The process, as provided by the Act, is basically still manual involving the recording of results on forms (as determined by the Commission) and their delivery to various levels of collation until declaration and return are made. However, the law also provides for electronic transmission of results. In the event of dispute arising in the course of collation, the electronically-transmitted result shall be used to resolve it. These are clearly provided for in Sec. 60 of the Act which deals with the counting of votes, their entry into specific forms endorsed by INEC officials and candidates/polling agents and their transfer to collation centres. Furthermore, Sec. 64 (4), (5) and (6) of the Act provides for the recording and transmission of accreditation data and election results directly from the PUs using the Smart Card Reader or any other electronic device determined by the Commission”. To be continued tomorrow |
tuoyoojo:They even mention that pooling units will have backup BVAS incase of any malfunctioning so let them use thoae black up BVAS for d next election or better still cancel the first one and conduct a transparent re-run |
SHIVA001:61 with sound mind is better than 96 yrs old druggie's who lies about his age. |
No peace for the wicked...all those ethnic satanic elements sabotaging the Future of this great country for their evil interest will all end on a bottomless pit. Why can't they produce separate BVAS for the two elections knowing fully well that litigations will come up at tribunals after a fraudulent elections. |
cococandy:They're through with the elections that matters most to them that's why the want to use d iREV . That animal called INEC chairman should be sent to the abyss as Asap. |
Hausa people shouldn't be allowed to man that office again cos they're highly tribalistic and corrupt. Imagine this man is still alive and has d guts to be saying this nonsense.i thought each units had provisions for additional BVAs machine? What was d 300billion budget used for? |
At first he wanted to become presidential candidate of Apc while maintaining his office as CBN governor when that plan failed,he resorted to becoming an obstacle to perceived opponents by introducing a fraudulent naira redesign policy. |
wanimo:Yes, as they always do |
wanimo:There won't be anything like uploading directly else the legal battle against the manipulated results that brought this druggie will be won cos it will set a judicial precedence for the court to use in delivering judgement. |
Pooldrowning:Tinubu's a curse and so are his supporters. I said same when jega manipulated GEJ out just to bring in PMB, am sure you're enjoying his administration? This old druggie's case will be worse ![]() |
The notorious octogenarian corrupt druggie won't last beyond 2yrs. ![]() |
Then the so called INEC chairman should be sentence to life imprisonment for misleading Nigerians with lies and fake assurance that is not in the law, Apc is a curse party that had been rejected nationwide so they resorted to this calculated fraud just to maintain power but I see a tsunami. |
All my tooths are shaking and I can't chew, can this be helpful? |
You're a fool |
After manipulations have been completed right? We must ensure that INEC Chairman is not given to a northern again I'd we want credibility, secondly it must be stated clearly by the law that elections be results must be transmitted from pooling units. |
Let them divide this shithole before it's too late...these are warning signs, Very soon a wave of agitations Will emerge. |
Yoluba people are naturally abusive in nature, This old brain drained druggie will be worst than the late Buhari ![]() |
If so that criminal called INEC chairman should be arrested and sentence to life imprisonment for repeatedly lying to Nigerians that the results will be transmitted realtime directly from every pooling units just to create room for him to perfect his evil plans of manipulating the results in favor of a dead man's party. |
Wagwanbrethren:market my words even if they succeed in rigging this election to favor this satanic Apc regime that has brought famine to Nigeria, Tinubu will not be better off than the late yar'adua |
oyin44:You mean jubril of sudan?
|
Johnathan's a fool no wonder he was quick to congratulate Buhari even be when elections results was not announced in an elections that was obviously rigged. |
Do we have a legal system in Nigeria? Is it not the same people that riggs elections that also supervise the judiciary? When the laws demanded that the old and new naira notes be used together did the president obeyed the so call judiciary/law? |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 (of 57 pages)

