₦airaland Forum

coded01: Wenger actually is breaking the banks...

Surprising..

coded01: I hail 2 oh! --- How your side?

My Bro, Messi loss, e dey pain oh...

Anyway, life continues...

Success in 2014/2015 season awaits us...

Yes.. Athletico decimated

back to the duopoly.. some good keepers.. nothing on the defens front.. does not bode well

Wenger showing some uncharacteristic willingness to spend

RoyalRoy: The EPL will take a new shape with the tactical Louis Van Gaal joining the fray. So many purchases by the top clubs and definitely it won't be a regular season this time around. I see intrigues twist and turns for all the top clubs. Can't wait.

Yes.. very sweet

coded01: Wicked...

Bros i hail ooo

I like your scriptural outlook on issues

MizMyColi: Waow! Eleyi Gidi Gáàn

Hey Nubia, first off, I am not married, but please read on

While you've done your best to elucidate on certain points as it pertains issues you're currently having with your fiancee, I don't think it's enough for well meaning RomanceLanders to aid you in your decision making.

That is not to say that I expect you to say more. From your post, I could sense your fears. Besides you seem to have always known this part of Him, but have always tolerated. There are two things involved Sweeree "He'll either get worse or get better". You know him better than anyone on this thread, now answer honestly to yourself, the statement above in quotes.

Lastly, I'll leave you with my all time favorite quote "There is a spirit in man and the inspiration of the almighty gives him understanding" of what is right and wrong - of what to do and what not to do.

Nubia, the answers you seek lie within. You might need some alone time to figure it out. When you do, either positive or negative, please don't look back.

kulyie: nothing on my mind for now. Just bored sick of sports

You nominate since it's boys thread

Dem give you opportunity.. u no nominate
no ves ooo


TOPIC

With LvG showing tactical acumen, Wenger showing an atypical propensity to spend, Mourinho going all out to spend and City doing business quietly, Rodgers losing the Biting Suarez
Who will win the EPL

kulyie: ehen it shouldn't be only sports every time. You people should change subject for once

. Must it always be about sports. Why not telemundos, cooking, trendy clothes etc


Infact I will pay the tv stations not to show football again

Oya nominate topic

Football shall never die

That religion is more powerful than any

kulyie:

I hate you

Football shall never die...
You will all join us

Next year: Africa Nations Cup

kulyie:

but women too are welcome na


abi we no dey welcome ni

u r welcome to comments... not dictate agendas
Anyhow.. welcome back

kulyie: yes o I loathe football.


Thank God its over

Thats your kettle of fish
In exactly four weeks.. Premiership resumes
La Liga

Euro Qualifying... Its a circle of life

are u aware this is the boys room.. kulyie

Low mileage punny is far different from high mileage ones

If the prostitutes are marrying good men in their droves, why do we still have so many single women



Some get married to reasonable guys but There is a point at which mileage is key
Lets not sensationalise issues
A couple of flings in school does not equate to hard core prostitution

Well written...

Its all about brainwashing

TV01: SSA is a disorder. Clearly dysfunctional as evidenced by the outworkings - or lack - of the unions of the SSA. The obvious and only really binary amongst human beings is male/female. It’s the outcome of their unions – procreation leading to offspring – that forms the whole raison d’etre of marriage.

SSU cannot procreate in principle or in practice. They are not infertile, they are sterile - always. If you claim “nature” made them that way, why contrary to natures dictates, do they want children? Why did nature give SSA persons the exact same reproductive capacity of normally functioning human beings?

SS couples “ape” what obtains in a normal human pair-bond, why is that? They can only copulate via an unnatural use of bodily parts or using prosthesis. Lesbians typically follow the butch/femme binary. One adopting pseudo-male behaviour. Likewise gay men, with their “tops & bottoms” binary.

It takes real enlightenment and a super-duper intelligence to persuade oneself that what is clearly physically and morally wrong is a human right. And that one man rectally penetrating another is the basis for a marriage.

Incest is also morally wrong, but by degrees and for good reason. If the human genome was devoid of flaws (as many believe it once was), what reason would there be too disallow incestuous relationships within limits?

Why would it be morally wrong, especially given the basis used to argue SSM - consensual, no one being harmed, privacy and human “rights”, etc? Moreso if these incestuous couples were happy not to breed or do so using 3rd party gemetic material as SSC do. Even today, cousin marriage – although not a great long-term idea – still obtains in many societies. SSC is both morally and structurally disordered.

To argue for SSA/SSM being good and moral, is to be a hypocrite if you don’t argue for Polygamy Polyamoury or other paraphilia being likewise moral & good.

A deceitfully sordid use of words such as “gay”, which we know means happy and “orientation” which was always about direction doesn’t fool anyone The bogus heterosexual/homosexual binary is plain idiotic. Normally functioning human beings couple heterosexually – if you insist on using that word. Everything else is deviant, as in the sense of being faulty. Heterosexuality is not one state in a "spectrum of normal", it is the only normal.

The UK is currently riven with angst over claims of serial and organised paedophilial acts amongst the elites. But in truth they only really have half a problem. Normalising homosex solved the first half. Now they only have to reduce the age of consent and voilà problem solved.

It takes real enlightenment, a super-duper intelligence and a sick, twisted and evil mind. Utterly disgusting.



TV

TerryCarr: it seems you have an inferiority complex
ttp://www.nairaland.com/1811912/why-ancient-wisdom-matters-modern

Typical....

kaguya really suks

For the ladies

BABE3: Underdogs because no one (not me) thought they'd play that well.

I'm sure you also think Messi deserves the Golden ball.

I expected them to top their group.. they were seeded

With the crappy way Uruguay played.. they had a chance..... with Suares out;.... it was a walkover

They met their waterloo against the hosts

It wa either robben or Messi... Messi did ok

BABE3: When this discussion started, one would think you knew what you were talking about; not knowing you were just blowing hot air.

Pickabeau1 the patriot.

for someone who called colombia underdogs

They were seeded no 4 inthe world at the draws...

funny woman


anyway.. as i said before d final... i wished the argies won.. but knew it was going to europe

Not on the evidence of play

anyway... colombia was not ready for the big stage...

Argentina will have slaughtered them

coogar: argentina(5th) played nigeria(44th), iran(43rd) and bosnia(21st)

columbia(8th) played greece(12th), ivory coast(23rd) and japan(46th)

who had it easier between columbia & argentina in your own view?

The teams were seeded using oct 2013 data

Nigeria are the african champions...

Ivorians flopped

BABE3: It's good you posted the table; i was about to. That's your achilles' heel.

Argentina(5th) in the world played against bosnia(21) , iran(43) and Nigeria (44).

Coumbia (8th) in the world payed against Greece(12), Ivory Coast (23), and Japan (46).

If you know your maths well, you'll already see that Argentina have it easier mere looking at the positions.

The average difficulty of Argentina is 36

The average difficulty of Argentina is 27.

Average is gotten by adding the ranks and dividing by 3.

ok.... yet colombia steamrolled their own group copping 9 points

Met a useless Uruguay

coogar: stop embarrassing yourself - did you even see the rankings you posted? compare the rankings of the teams argentina played to columbia & tell us who had the easier fixtures.

you have one more chance to redeem yourself before i undrëss you in public.

Use the rankings when the teams were seeded.

coogar: columbia had an easier group & argentina didn't have an easier group? who was the seeded team in our group - was it not argentina? iran + nigeria + bosnia - what's scary about those teams?

abeg - columbia were 100% better than this argentina squad in everything. a stüpid referee only allowed brazil to roll over them with agbero football as he failed to protect columbia.

Go and check the rankings dude..

http://www.fifa.com/worldranking/rankingtable/

Whats scary against Ivory Coast, Greece and Japan


Colombia wilted when it mattered

BABE3: Yes, you are. You went there coz I'm a female discussing football. Whereas, you were the one that "believed" Nigeria would beat France.
Please lets see your facts.

Errmm... i will leave it at that
on this topic..u have it wrong.. unfortunately the data loss affected the posts...

Nonso23: Same here o! Pity he didn't win it. But that doesn't overrule the fact that he remains one of the best players of all time.

yes... this team had not been in the final since 1990
It was an achievement just not enough...

Im not ...

Frankly its the way it is.. Colombia had an easier group... they were seeded

You are arguing against plainly available facts..

BABE3: No need getting salty; you're not a female. We can argue without exchanging snide/s.

HAHAHAHAH


You dont even know diddlysquat.. i dont like to do this ,,,...


Colombia were the seeded team in their group

They steamrolled the 3 teams in their group quite comfortably

They met an uruguay team withno suarez

Pity... underdogs.. when did u start watching football

BABE3: You need to start Football 001. You're being biased because it's Argentina.

They had the easiest group; considering their hype and their record.

Columbia were the underdogs yet they pulled through with fantastic performances. Argentina's group performances were very average, yet they made it through; that's to show you how easy they had it.

really wanted him to win ... he did his best

BABE3: How's argentina better than columbia?

Argentina had the easiest group and then went on to play Switzerland. They had it easy.

Colombia - Greece - Ivory Coast - japan

Arg - iran - Nig - Bosnia

And u say Argentina had the easier group?

Colombia played a Suarez-less Uruguay.... yet u say they are better than Argie....puhleeze

You need to start Football 101

coogar: columbia is better than the finalists, i am gutted for rodriguez but he still gets to keep the golden boot.

colombia were dark horses.. these two were better

it was settled by a super gol...


any team that won deserved it

coogar?


Germany wins on S American soil