budaatum:

I looked. It's still flat, and round, exactly like a plate. In fact, if your telescope is strong enough you'd see the swiss cheese on the plate!

I took a picture of it with my telescopecamera. You can clearly see what they lied were craters.

You ehn

SKhanmi:
Hmmm,I see the freethinkers & those who quote from facts stated by fallible humans like them.

Spectacular opening statement.

Well, I don't think the earth is flat, a part of it might be due to a glancing blow from a meteorite eons ago.

Wait, what

What does this even mean?

There are strong claims to that on the net but until I see am with my own eyes,I'll take it with a Congo of salt. I guess that's where the flat earth theories come from.

Ookay

As for NASA,believe them at your own peril.

It is almost like you guys think USA is the only country with a functional space agency. Nasa this, Nasa that.

If we could put man on the moon then,why be sending satellites now when we have more superior tech? Think of that.

Oh, it is a matter of priority, there are humans in orbit even now.

Another manned mission by 2024.

By now,colonies should be on the moon,exploiting its resources, vacations to the moon should be possible but they are sending probes? Doesn't add up.

Untrue. By now there shouldn't be any vacation spots on the moon or space.

Space voyages are still the most dangerous known to man.

Astronauts on the ISS live no more comfortable than an animal on the wild.

That's not the stuff vacations are made of.

And, Government agencies have no business with building resorts.

That's a private sector business.

Elon Musk is in fact considering it.

Judging from the money, resources and hundreds of space launches it will take to have a small habitat on the moon, I say it is still a long time away.

By the way,always consider the fact that whoever controls what you see,read or hear can pull facts out of their ass & it would become law because they are acclaimed credible institutions.

I agree that any institution with mass trust can be a great tool for mass control and science can't be an exception since it can be controlled by people and people often have agendas.

Most humans will never get on a rocket to see for themselves anyway , so always maintain an openmind for possibilities

True.

1. It is unnecessary for most humans to
2. It will be insanely expensive if it is commercialized. Most humans can't even rent an apartment in New York or Beverly Hills.

Ola17:


Do you know what a telescope is?
Look into the heavens on a clear night with the aid of a telescope. A lot of your questions will be answered.

have you used a telescope before? Have you seen Saturn, venus, mars with a telescope just the way you see them on TV?, it is obvious you don't know what p900 camera is because of know you will not give the answer you just gave.

johnydon22:
And there is no such a thing as a ball heavy enough on earth to have its own significant gravitational field.

Even the moon's gravitational field is much smaller than the earth's.

Do you even understand the things we are talking about here?



Hilarious

Lol. Due to density in a gravitatisnal field.

Throw something up in microgravity and it keeps going up no matter how heavy it is.

Thank you for bringing this up, I think this should put you in check finally.

When a nail and a feather are thrown down from the same height, the nail falls first.

The question is why?

Because of other external factors such as Air resistance on the less denser object.

Remove air resistance, throw them down from the same height in a chamber with every air pumped out and they both fall at the same speed and time, because there isn't any air to resist gravitational effect on the less denser object hence the effect is precisely the same.

Exhibit B:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E43-CfukEgs

You can check such experiments on Youtube if you are really concerned about learning and not arguing from a naive perspective

Nope. It is density as acted upon by a gravitational field.

Remove the gravity, you keep going up until an opposing force is applied.

Exactly. Density is affected by gravitational field.

I'd be surprised really if you thought the contrary considering how little you have checked this subject.

I'm saying an object dense enough should have a gravitational field.

We have seen it happen everywhere. The earth and you, Earth and the moon, objects inside earth and earth, earth and the sun, the moons of Mara and Mars.

You have not been paying attention.

Up and down as a perspective is relative to the gravitational focal point. In this case, earth's gravitational point is the core of the earth, hence, down is always pointing at the core.

I'm pretty sure, at the point, you have no flying flamingo idea what 8inches and 1mile is in comparison to one another.

You may as well observe a house fly on a house 5 blocks away from you with such spectacular sense of perception.

what is this dungeon of hocus pocus, you do not even understand what you are sayong. A gravitational force strong enough to keep large body of ocean water on a ball should be strong enough to keep every object on the earth and would not and never let anything up at all. Even tiny mosquitoes float in the air and this so called gravity does not hold it down. There no proof whatsoever ever that a force is pulling everything to the earths core.

Moon have gravitational field? Have you been to the moon? Even NASA admitted they must solve the problem of passing through the van Allen belt before going into so called space. And your here talking about moon gravity. Or maybe you don't know that moon rocks given to some countries by buzz aldrin was a petrified wood.

And this saying that object with mass attracts gravity os false and is just an excuse to escape the explanation of gravity. That is I said get a heavy ball bit you said there is no such thing, what do you mean there no such thing.

Tell me how is density affected by gravitational field? What we see and know is that object fall down when thrown up because of there density. Not because we think an invisible force called gravity pulls them down. Am talking about what we experience for ourselves not theory because that is what you been stating.



The videos you posted was from BBC so I knew exactly what to expect
Pls every one who is following this thread should watch thatvideo and see the dishonesty in it.

At first they played the video normally, but when it came the time to prove zero gravity they played the video in slow motion. Why slow motion why not play it as the first. That has actually shot you on foot it a pity you think you could shut me up with.

If gravity was true the nail and feather should fall at the same speed because an invisible force is PULLING them down. But this experiment is the perfect proof there is nothing like gravity.

SKhanmi:
Hmmm,I see the freethinkers & those who quote from facts stated by fallible humans like them. Well, I don't think the earth is flat, a part of it might be due to a glancing blow from a meteorite eons ago.
There are strong claims to that on the net but until I see am with my own eyes,I'll take it with a Congo of salt. I guess that's where the flat earth theories come from. As for NASA,believe them at your own peril. If we could put man on the moon then,why be sending satellites now when we have more superior tech? Think of that.
By now,colonies should be on the moon,exploiting its resources, vacations to the moon should be possible but they are sending probes? Doesn't add up.
By the way,always consider the fact that whoever controls what you see,read or hear can pull facts out of their ass & it would become law because they are acclaimed credible institutions. Most humans will never get on a rocket to see for themselves anyway , so always maintain an openmind for possibilities

NASA claims to have destroyed the technology they used to go to the moon. Tell why will they do that? Is it not an obvious lie?, and all the telemetry data? The videos of moon landing have all been destroyed by NASA, is this not a clear covering of there dirty tracks?.

johnydon22:
And there is no such a thing as a ball heavy enough on earth to have its own significant gravitational field.

Even the moon's gravitational field is much smaller than the earth's.

Do you even understand the things we are talking about here?



Hilarious

Lol. Due to density in a gravitational field.

Throw something up in microgravity and it keeps going up no matter how heavy it is.

Thank you for bringing this up, I think this should put you in check finally.

When a nail and a feather are thrown down from the same height, the nail falls first.

The question is why?

Because of other external factors such as Air resistance on the less denser object.

Remove air resistance, throw them down from the same height in a chamber with every air pumped out and they both fall at the same speed and time, because there isn't any air to resist gravitational effect on the less denser object hence the effect is precisely the same.

Exhibit B:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E43-CfukEgs

You can check such experiments on Youtube if you are really concerned about learning and not arguing from a naive perspective

Nope. It is density as acted upon by a gravitational field.

Remove the gravity, you keep going up until an opposing force is applied.

Exactly. Density is affected by gravitational field.

I'd be surprised really if you thought the contrary considering how little you have checked this subject.

I'm saying an object dense enough should have a gravitational field.

We have seen it happen everywhere. The earth and you, Earth and the moon, objects inside earth and earth, earth and the sun, the moons of Mara and Mars.

You have not been paying attention.

Up and down as a perspective is relative to the gravitational focal point. In this case, earth's gravitational point is the core of the earth, hence, down is always pointing at the core.

I'm pretty sure, at the point, you have no flying flamingo idea what 8inches and 1mile is in comparison to one another.

You may as well observe a house fly on a house 5 blocks away from you with such spectacular sense of perception.

if I have no idea of what 8inch people sqaure mile is then why don't you who know explain it to me why are you wasting time.

Well let me give you an example

If the earth was spherical you would not see anything in distance because of the curvature of the eaeth. Things will be lower than your eyes.
If your take a 2ft tall red flag kept at a distance of 3miles. When view with powered binoculars every thing could still seen when there should have been at least 4ft of curvature covering the flag.

Example. 3^2miles=9×8inch=72÷12=6ft-2ft=4ft
So according to the 8inch per squared mile rule there should be 4ft of curvature. But there is none. You can try this on water and see for your self.
Again tough trying to explain away up and perspective is just too hilarious. Of your saying is true then air planes flying from Russia to australia would land upside down when it gets to its destination.


Also if the earth is curved why don't airplane flying across the world dip their nose like every five minutes to account for the curvature. Why do they fly on a straight line as of they are actually flying on a flat surface.

It's a pity we still have people stuck in the Stone Age in 2019 on Nairaland and in today's information age, where you can read just about anything online to cure yourself of ignorance.

Still waiting for works of researchers you've documented and mathematical justifications to back your bizarre claims.

Or all you've is the P900 camera? Lol

Does this guy even know the value of the radius of Earth, which is approximately 6.4 million meters (megameter, Mm), with a diamater of around 12.7 million meters?

Compare it with the average diamater of an airplane, 5–6 meters?

That must be a lie too.

Or even the mass of Earth, 5.98 x 10^24 kilograms.

Compare these Earth's radius and mass with those of the largest ocean and see your folly.

You can check out the mathematical formulations from which these values (Earth's mass and radius) are calculated.

Before you say they are lies, I expect that you would have formulated yours and publish it.

Not just shouting the P900 cam all about.

gensteejay:
Does this guy even know the value of the radius of Earth, which is approximately 6.4 million meters (megameter, Mm), with a diamater of around 12.7 million meters?

Compare it with the average diamater of an airplane, 5–6 meters?

That must be a lie too.

Or even the mass of Earth, 5.98 x 10^24 kilograms.

Compare these Earth's radius and mass with those of the largest ocean and see your folly.

You can check out the mathematical formulations from which these values (Earth's mass and radius) are calculated.

Before you say they are lies, I expect that you would have formulated yours and publish it.

Not just shouting the P900 cam al

this is pure nonsense. Pls tell me, how did you come about this this was calculation, do you mind explaining them to me?

What has earths megameter got to do with the planes diameter. Is that the reason why planes do not nose dive while flying accross a ball earth?
It takes a bare faced lie such as gravity and this nonsense which you cannot and can never prove to believe in a ball earth. How did you know the weight of the earth.?


Pls take time to explain as I am doing. Some of you just come here to throw tantrums and cheap attack with out proving anything. I have been the one proving my statements with facts people can see for themselves. Not the pseudo science you guys tout as fact.

gensteejay:

You're a joker.

Post quality journals from researchers showing the Earth is flat, and let's examine them.

Do you have any physical basis and mathematical basis for your claims?

Post them; let's see if the mathematical justifications for your assertions are consistent at least before critiquing their other aspects and the physical basis; that's if you can come up with one.

Hope you understand what mathematical and physical bases, formulated to test an hypothesis, are.

Not all these childish ideas you have been posting here.

thought I replied this earlier but let me go again.
What you call childish is fact you can see for your selves and not theories.

Look I don't even need to post journals from any body to prove this. Let me ask you does it look like your standing side ways on a huge ball spinning at over a thousand miles per hour? Incase you don't know we were told in school that the earth is spinning around its axis and also around the sun, and the sun is also moving at an incredible speed on the galaxy while the galaxy is also shooting away from the big bang at almost the speed of light.
Tell me why do we not feel any of the movement. What does your common sense tell you now? Does it seem like you are moving at all. It take delusion to believe in such hocus pocus. If the sun is 93million miles away why do we see the clouds around it and behind it?

Now to the mathematical bases.

Curvature of the earth is given as 8inchea × distance squared.

I. E, 1mile^2=8inches
2miles^2=32inches
5miles^2=16.6feet
10miles^2=66.6feet
And so on

an experiment was conducted on the isle of weight light house 180ft tall. From 42miles away to detect the curvature of the earth.

Given the spherical trigonometry the curve in the

earth is 8inch ^2miles.

Therefore 42^2miles=1764× 8inches =14,112÷12=1176-180=996// answer.

In other words according to this calculation the light house should be 996 ft below view due to the curvature of the earth when viewed from 42miles away.
But this was not the case as the light house can still be seen 42miles away from it.


Now I await your own physical and mathematical bases to test the curvature of the earth

EMILO2STAY:
I have been the one proving my statements with facts people can see for themselves. Not the pseudo science you guys tout as fact.

Don't mind those ignoramuses. Simple read, they can not do but want to claim the earth is not flat, as if they have never waka long distances before!

Simple experiment for all you olodos. If you travel from Lagos to Kano, is the land traversed not flat? Or did you spherical round earthers find Kano on the other side of of a ball? Next they'd be telling us the moon has a dark side!

gensteejay:
It's a pity we still have people stuck in the Stone Age in 2019 on Nairaland and in today's information age, where you can read just about anything online to cure yourself of ignorance.

Still waiting for works of researchers you've documented and mathematical justifications to back your bizarre claims.

Or all you've is the P900 camera? Lol

you are indoctrinated and miss informed. People believed the earth was flat and motionless before these freemasons came with their devilish doctrine of a ball spinning in empty vacuum created by a big bang, the aim is to remove the possibility of a creator.

Chidorx60:
Basic geography destroys the flat earth theory...

If the earth was flat...the night and day would technically be impossible... And if u don't really understand what this it saying..

The revolution of the earth about it axis clearly illustrates how the circulation of the earth gradually darts a portion of the earth from a lighted to an unlighted region...we can't feel this evident movement because of the earth's massive size and the gradual period involved..

Flat earthers pls shut up....if u knew at least basic physics u will know that the earth can never be flat.....


Infact the overall topography of earth can never be supported by a flat earth....the oceans should surely have Burt's open around the surrounding neighborhood the flat earth...during periods of glacier meltdowns..... The flats describes the earth as a huge cube of earth standing in existence.....
Seasonal differences should never be in existence if the earth is flat....because the same wind coming from the Antarctic should sweep across ur flat earth and hence lead to a global raining season...same with the desert winds.

Bro try to climb a mountain or hill self...and I'm sure you'll notice the curvature.....

By the way the earth has casted its circular shadow on the moon many times...just go and get a telescope...

Its seems joblessness is what is motivating flat earths conspirators... Its an absurd theory by the way.

oga basic geography supports the flat earth model. The is the reason the national geographic society use the flat earth map


The sun and the moon. Are in opposite direction and they revolve around the earth. When the sun leaves it goes with it light to another location that is why one side is always lite by the sun and the other by the moon. There os no evidence whatsoever that we are rotating if the earth is rotating at over 1000m/h. It will fling of everything on it. This is common sense.

It is funny how you believe the oceans will burst open on flat and scatter on a flat earth but do not believe water will fall off a ball earth.
Have you seen the curvature of the earth from a mountain? I thought we are too small to see that. Why contradict your self.

EMILO2STAY:
you are indoctrinated and miss informed. People believed the earth was flat and motionless before these freemasons came with their devilish doctrine of a ball spinning in empty vacuum created by a big bang, the aim is to remove the possibility of a creator.

Post your own model of the Earth, along with its relative position to the Sun and the moon.

Let's see.

About your other claims, I don't even know where to start.

Your problem is religion; it makes the brain extremely dull.

It's good to question things but don't ask dumb questions and make silly claims like a 5-year old.

Mayzie:
The earth is a globe.
Proof: theory of relativity. OR dummies can check out the principles of gravity i.e how gravity works if the former is too advance for your microscopic brain.

The Earth is flat by any self observation. Travel by boat, car, train, plane, or even on the back of a jackass and wherever you step down it will be flat. The horizon being curved is just an optical illusion. The Earth being round from high altitude is a fish bowl lense another optical illusion. The reason the ancients all over the world saw the Earth as flat is because of observation I just gave you. No where they traveled did it appear round. Science is theory rather educated opinion put under rigid tests of observation with conclusions reached based upon recorded data. There are many things beyond our observation or awareness so we can't assume they are false because we can't observe. There are alot of ancient wisdom still unproven by modern science such as pyramid construction. Watch what you teach your children because indocrination is very difficult to undo.


Wake up out your your slumber

gensteejay:


It's good to question things but don't ask dumb questions and make silly claims like a 5-year old.

Please read and be educated on the truthful flat earth facts of the earth, and universe! He is not questioning anything. In fact, pay him school fees for your education!

@johnydon22
Judging from the money, resources and hundreds of space launches it will take to have a small habitat on the moon, I say it is still a long time away.

Nah,Like I'll always say, any recent hyped tech released to the public is an obsolete one in the real technological world. They are like 30-40years ahead. DARPA comes to mind.
Go over your reply to me & see if isn't what I would ordinarily hear from a space-X/Nasa official on social media schooling the normal ignorant audience with herd mentality.
Nothing I won't find on mainstream official accounts already. See your position?

The tech:
To clone humans,
For instantaneous transportation of humans/objects from one point to the other on this planet & within our solar system,
To create artificial earthquakes & use weather as a weapon,
To travel back & forward in time,
To even mimick the second coming of Christ to fool the Christians (there's even a warning in the Bible) et.c
All Exist

And yet we can only send men to the moon BY 2024? So ironic.

Case study: The existence of supersoldiers,was denied & rubbished,even with video proofs& abundant evidence around as far back as 2003,who remembers the twins that got hit & ran over by a speeding truck? No head/tail of the case in the end, until the MKULTRA program was declassified.

My own opinion on all of these is, smoke doesn't exist without fire, You evaluate both sides, that means trying at least to investigate on your own the so called spurious claims(ignoring the obviously impossible ones)before reacting from your programmed subconscious.

Do you know the moon is not even native to our solar system & is deliberately stopped from rotating? An anomaly. And yes budatuum, there's a dark side.

This quote sums up NL religious section,especially with some popular monickers here. Reason I Hardly engage most.

"Swinging to one extreme & demanding,hard material proof for everything will limit your perspective,as will swinging to the other extreme by believing any fairy tale that comes along."

The middle ground is your intuition. Use it. There's always a chance what you know is false

budaatum:

Please read and be educated on the truthful flat earth facts of the earth, and universe! He is not questioning anything. In fact, pay him school fees for your education!

What about this animal DNA mixed in with the original race?

SKhanmi:
@johnydon22
Judging from the money, resources and hundreds of space launches it will take to have a small habitat on the moon, I say it is still a long time away.

Nah,Like I'll always say, any recent hyped tech released to the public is an obsolete one in the real technological world. They are like 30-40years ahead. DARPA comes to mind.
Go over your reply to me & see if isn't what I would ordinarily hear from a space-X/Nasa official on social media schooling the normal ignorant audience with herd mentality.
Nothing I won't find on mainstream official accounts already. See your position?

The tech:
To clone humans,
For instantaneous transportation of humans/objects from one point to the other on this planet & within our solar system,
To create artificial earthquakes & use weather as a weapon,
To travel back & forward in time,
To even mimick the second coming of Christ to fool the Christians (there's even a warning in the Bible) et.c
All Exist

And yet we can only send men to the moon BY 2024? So ironic.

Case study: The existence of supersoldiers,was denied & rubbished,even with video proofs& abundant evidence around as far back as 2003,who remembers the twins that got hit & ran over by a speeding truck? No head/tail of the case in the end, until the MKULTRA program was declassified.

If one follows scientific research, especially as regards space science, and studies religions, it becomes clear that NASA and world governments hide a lot of things from the public.

But flat-earth isn't one of such.

For instance, I personally feel they have much more info on extraterrestrials than they release to the public.

But I don't think anyone will believe in Bible, Qur'an, and other holy books if the public gets to know about some information or technology.

The world is far deeper than science or even religion paints it.

And only a tiny part of humans control the majority of humanity via science, religion, politics, economics, etc.

Life is an extremely complex game.

Don't believe all you see. It's good to question everything with reason and wisdom.

EMILO2STAY:
thought I replied this earlier but let me go again.
What you call childish is fact you can see for your selves and not theories.

Look I don't even need to post journals from any body to prove this. Let me ask you does it look like your standing side ways on a huge ball spinning at over a thousand miles per hour? Incase you don't know we were told in school that the earth is spinning around its axis and also around the sun, and the sun is also moving at an incredible speed on the galaxy while the galaxy is also shooting away from the big bang at almost the speed of light.
Tell me why do we not feel any of the movement. What does your common sense tell you now? Does it seem like you are moving at all. It take delusion to believe in such hocus pocus. If the sun is 93million miles away why do we see the clouds around it and behind it?

Now to the mathematical bases.

Curvature of the earth is given as 8inchea × distance squared.

I. E, 1mile^2=8inches
2miles^2=32inches
5miles^2=16.6feet
10miles^2=66.6feet
And so on

an experiment was conducted on the isle of weight light house 180ft tall. From 42miles away to detect the curvature of the earth.

Given the spherical trigonometry the curve in the

earth is 8inch ^2miles.

Therefore 42^2mi1176-1804 × 8inches =14,112÷12=1176-180=996// answer.

In other words according to this calculation the light house should be 996 ft below view due to the curvature of the earth when viewed from 42miles away.
But this was not the case as the light house can still be seen 42miles away from it.


Now I await your own physical and mathematical bases to test the curvature of the earth

Have you wondered why when you are in a speeding car with all the glasses wound up and you throw up a piece of paper, that the paper does not go hurtling towards the back of the car but lands safely on your hands?

Perhaps, this 21st century flat earth theory is a social experiment gone rogue.

Ola17:


Have you wondered why when you are in a speeding car with all the glasses wound up and you throw up a piece of paper, that the paper does go hurtling towards the back of the car but lands safely on your hands?

Perhaps, this 21st century flat earth theory is a social experiment gone rogue.

How can a Yoruba say such? Yorubas are one of the most advanced races on Earth, yall know a lot secrets and hide them too. Does it not say Almighty Obatala spread the Earth which is Ile out by using chickens? And if Obatala used a chain to climb down to Earth then what was the chain supported on? And doesn't the Orishas fit the description of the Bachwezi and Annunaki? Yorubas keep too many secrets at a time knowledge is advancing.


Wake up out your your slumber

Grandium:



How can a Yoruba say such? Yorubas are one of the most advanced races on Earth, yall know a lot secrets and hide them too. Does it not say Almighty Obatala spread the Earth which is Ile out by using chickens? And if Obatala used a chain to climb down to Earth then what was the chain supported on? And doesn't the Orishas fit the description of the Bachwezi and Annunaki? Yorubas keep too many secrets at a time knowledge is advancing.


Wake up out your your slumber

Though I don't doubt Obatala's existence in ancient times, I have my own reservations about the highlighted statement as a Yoruba guy.

If one studies various religious books and esoteric literature, it becomes clear that ancient people (by "ancient", I mean hundred thousands and millions of years in the past, before the homo sapien era) were far, far scientifically and technologically advanced than us.

I feel those orishas are our ancestors (giants) that people now worship in modern times as gods in world religions.

They had spacecraft, so if that creation story of Obatala is true; he could have used spacecraft.

Talking about such spacecraft, it's no coincidence that most world religions point to the sky to pray to their god.

Those orishas (gods) tampered (tinkered) a lot with our DNA and bodily makeup.

I wish one could get authentic history books on past human races (homo erectus, neanderthals, and much older races of Earth).

A lot of this info is hidden in different secret cults and inner circles, such as Illuminati, Freemasonry, and the likes.

EMILO2STAY:
NASA claims to have destroyed the technology they used to go to the moon. Tell why will they do that? Is it not an obvious lie?, and all the telemetry data? The videos of moon landing have all been destroyed by NASA, is this not a clear covering of there dirty tracks?.

That's one part of the popular narrative, the other states they went & met extraterrestrialsextraterrestrials who warned them off, If we follow both narratives down to recent history, you can easily pinpoint the outcome in mainstream beliefs. Misinformation also has its uses. The truth might be totally different. You might want to be objective on issues like this.

gensteejay:

If one follows scientific research, especially as regards space science, and studies religions, it becomes clear that NASA and world governments hide a lot of things from the public.

But flat-earth isn't one of such.

For instance, I personally feel they have much more info on extraterrestrials than they release to the public.

But I don't think anyone will believe in Bible, Qur'an, and other holy books if the public gets to know about some information or technology.

Well said, Most on this section just break into two rigid opposing sides thinking they are right,We might all be wrong or right for all we know. After all,we're nowhere near the apex in the pyramid of life in the universe.

SKhanmi:


Well said, Most on this section just break into two rigid opposing sides thinking they are right,We might all be wrong or right for all we know. After all,we're nowhere near the apex in the pyramid of life in the universe.

Yea.

EMILO2STAY:
oga basic geography supports the flat earth model. The is the reason the national geographic society use the flat earth map


The sun and the moon. Are in opposite direction and they revolve around the earth. When the sun leaves it goes with it light to another location that is why one side is always lite by the sun and the other by the moon. There os no evidence whatsoever that we are rotating if the earth is rotating at over 1000m/h. It will fling of everything on it. This is common sense.

It is funny how you believe the oceans will burst open on flat and scatter on a flat earth but do not believe water will fall off a ball earth.
Have you seen the curvature of the earth from a mountain? I thought we are too small to see that. Why contradict your self.

your post is clearly unscientific and way too random.
First of all...the other side you claim to be lit by the moon doesn't happen all the time...infact we only experience a full moon every 27days and I believe u should know that.
This alone completely tarnishes ur flat earth theory..why? Because the moon should be displayed in the night sky averagely every night...if the earth was flat..

The curvature of the earth and its rotation is what causes a moonless night...crescent moon and then the full moon.


Bro by the way...we can see the part of the earths curvature from a clifff..

I only said we can't feel its movements and rotation due to its size..selah

gensteejay:

Though I don't doubt Obatala's existence in ancient times, I have my own reservations about the highlighted statement as a Yoruba guy.

If one studies various religious books and esoteric literature, it becomes clear that ancient people (by "ancient", I mean hundred thousands and millions of years in the past, before the homo sapien era) were far, far scientifically and technologically advanced than us.

I feel those orishas are our ancestors (giants) that people now worship in modern times as gods in world religions.

They had spacecraft, so if that creation story of Obatala is true; he could have used spacecraft.

Talking about such spacecraft, it's no coincidence that most world religions point to the sky to pray to their god.

Those orishas (gods) tampered (tinkered) a lot with our DNA and bodily makeup.

I wish one could get authentic history books on past human races (homo erectus, neanderthals, and much older races of Earth).

A lot of this info is hidden in different secret cults and inner circles, such as Illuminati, Freemasonry, and the likes.

Space craft is a modern invention as there is no outer space. What sense does it make for Allah to create so much empty space with nothing it for millions of light years? This sounds like pure fabrication.

The Yoruba legends says the Orishas live in the Earth meaning there are worlds beneath us and worlds we know beyond the Ice wall. This is consistent with ancient cosmology.

Yet the Yorubas keep secrets even though the time for such secret keeping has ended reason for the awakening. The hybrid is ruling the world and is the reason for the deception and for the elders need to preserve the truth. The Yorubas kept secrets to preserve the truth as they are keepers and bearers of the light. So I hold no grudge against them for such.

The legends say that Obatala created the first humans from clay. The Bible and Qur'an says from dirt or Black mud. This means that the original race evolved as plant based lifeforms and not animals. Hard to believe yet the DNA of the original race Africans is 100 percent man while other races including African Diaspora is mixed with animal. The animal is the cave beast aka Neanderthal which was a hominid. The ancient Gods during the time of Babylon mixed their God DNA with animals created the hybrid. Since this hybrid was a rhesus monkey chimp he came with certain beast like traits that have disrupted the planet. If the original man came from the body of the Black woman then the hybrid also came through the womb of a Black woman. Then the Black woman is Eve the mother of all living human beings. That makes for two bloodlines one the Black Kings of Africa and the cave beast. Alot of people have animal DNA in them and this is causing the dehumanization of the planet.

Wake up out your your slumber

This thread reminds me of talking oyinbo rats.

I know we have not paid school fees yet, but can you please post links so we can read up on the giants and human animals please.

Grandium:



Space craft is a modern invention as there is no outer space. What sense does it make for Allah to create so much empty space with nothing it for millions of light years? This sounds like pure fabrication.

The Yoruba legends says the Orishas live in the Earth meaning there are worlds beneath us and worlds we know beyond the Ice wall. This is consistent with ancient cosmology.

Yet the Yorubas keep secrets even though the time for such secret keeping has ended reason for the awakening. The hybrid is ruling the world and is the reason for the deception and for the elders need to preserve the truth. The Yorubas kept secrets to preserve the truth as they are keepers and bearers of the light. So I hold no grudge against them for such.

The legends say that Obatala created the first humans from clay. The Bible and Qur'an says from dirt or Black mud. This means that the original race evolved as plant based lifeforms and not animals. Hard to believe yet the DNA of the original race Africans is 100 percent man while other races including African Diaspora is mixed with animal. The animal is the cave beast aka Neanderthal which was a hominid. The ancient Gods during the time of Babylon mixed their God DNA with animals created the hybrid. Since this hybrid was a rhesus monkey chimp he came with certain beast like traits that have disrupted the planet. If the original man came from the body of the Black woman then the hybrid also came through the womb of a Black woman. Then the Black woman is Eve the mother of all living human beings. That makes for two bloodlines one the Black Kings of Africa and the cave beast. Alot of people have animal DNA in them and this is causing the dehumanization of the planet.

Wake up out your your slumber

You sound like a Muslim slave who sees the world through the myopic view of Muhammad and his bunch of war-mongers (Sahabah) as stated in Qur'an?

What's your model of Earth?

Allah is one of the thousands of gods (orishas) worshipped by humans.

I no get time for all these religious arguments; they are time-wasting.

gensteejay:

You sound like a Muslim slave who sees the world through the myopic view of Muhammad and his bunch of war-mongers (Sahabah) as stated in Qur'an?

What's your model of Earth?

Allah is one of the thousands of gods (orishas) worshipped by humans.

I no get time for all these religious arguments; they are time-wasting.

Allah means the prime causation just as Olodumare. I know how to say prime causation in Egyptian too it's Amen.

You are stooping to religious debate my response was based in science.

Wake up out your your slumber