Rafidi's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Rafidi's Profile › Rafidi's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 (of 19 pages)
Please refer to the below for evidence (that self-flagellation is prohibited by Shia Muslim leaders) and also explanation into the practice: https://www.jafariyanews.com/2k8_news/jan/14tatbeer_khamenei.jpg LagosShia: Sister "uplawal", |
Ashura Mourning Procession in Kaduna, Nigeria Pictures of Ashura mourning procession in Kaduna, Nigeria on Sunday the 10th of Muharram 1434. Hundreds of thousands joined the rest of the world to mark the Ashura day . https://islamicmovement.org/images/stories/ashuraM12/DSCF6600.JPG More pictures: http://www.islamicmovement.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=544:ashura-mourning-procession-in-kaduna-nigeria&catid=41:frontpage |
Pictures of Ashura Procession in Kano, Nigeria These are the pictures of Ashura mourning procession in Kano on Sunday the 11th Muharram 1434, Nigeria attended by hundreds of thousands of Muslims. Pictures taken by Muhammad Isa https://islamicmovement.org/images/stories/ashurakn12/DSC07717.JPG More pictures: http://www.islamicmovement.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=547:pictures-of-ashura-procession-in-kano-nigeria&catid=41:frontpage |
Ashura procession in Potiskum, Nigeria Pictures of Ashura Mourning Procession in Potiskum, Nigeria on Sunday the 25th of Nov 2012 marking the annual Ashura commemoration. https://islamicmovement.org/images/stories/potash12/PB251437.JPG https://islamicmovement.org/images/stories/potash12/PB251502.JPG More pictures: http://www.islamicmovement.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=548:ashura-procession-in-potiskum-nigeria&catid=41:frontpage |
From this year's procession in Kano that took place yesterday https://islamicmovement.org/images/stories/ashurakn12/DSC07707.JPG |
vedaxcool: ^Did I try to vindicate the Kuffans? No! Don't we Shia Muslims curse them? Yes we do. Now you are trying to play with the word "shia".if being "shia" (partisans/followers/loyalists) is what the Kuffan hypocrites displayed then certainly we Shia Muslims today are not what the so called "kufi shia" of yours were.while I do not belie what Sayyida Zainab (as) said,I insist that the hypocrites of Kufa were not acting on their own.they were taken orders from above alongside Yazeed's army,governor and commanders in Kufa.their change of loyalty in betraying Imam Hussein (as) doesn't at all qualify them to be called "shia" of Imam Ali (as) or Imam Hussein (as) that we Shia Muslims are proud to be.in fact they were not Muslims.whether you call them "shia","shayateen","buddhists","sunni","animists",join me let us condemn them and also condemn whose plan/order they were executing in killing Imam Hussein (as),his household and true and loyal Shia who stood by him.we as Shia today do not look to the hypocrites of Kufa who betrayed the religion of Islam for inspiration.we Shia Muslims of today look up to the loyal and truthful Shia who stood defending Imam Hussein (as) to their last drop of blood.why don't you mention their names instead of spreading propaganda for sectarian hatred to deceive the unsuspecting.my disagreement with you is not whether Kufans (the hypocrites among them) were evil or not.I'm not defending the hypocrites at all.but you're here defending Yazeed.I'm telling you the kufans were behaving by the political command from Yazeed and his governor in Kufa.I can point a number of Kufans who were true companions of Imam Hussein (as) and didn't betray him,because they were the true Shia and defenders of Islam against Yazeed and his associates and supporters.I'm proud of those kufan Shia who stood by Imam Hussein (as) because I learn from their sacrifice and devotion and piety what being Shia and Muslim is all about.you're trying to exonerate Yazeed and his governor in Kufa and the army he sent under which influence of power and intimidationthe kufans were suppressed and they turned/changed their support.my contention is not on the role the hypocrites of kufa (may Allah curse them) played.my contention with you is on whose behalf were they acting.the sermon of Sayyida Zainab (as) and her pointing finger at kufans is 100% true;but that in no way exonerate Yazeed. Hani Ibn Urwa (ra) was a true Kufan Shia and he stood by Muslim Ibn Aqeel (as),and Hani (ra) is considered among the martyrs of Karbala.on what grounds can a true Shia like Hani (ra) be called "shia",and the hypocrite Kufans that betrayed Imam Hussein (as) also be referred to (by you) as "shia" without distinction? Is this a just labeling? If those Kufan hypocrites you call "shia" were "shia" to you then they were muslims.would you accept if a non-muslim accuse muslims of killing Imam Hussein (as)? I wouldn't because I don't believe anyone who raises a finger against the Household of Prophet Muhammad (saw) is a muslim of any sort. We go back to my questions which you don't want to answer.but you must answer for you to know the truth that the kufan hypocrites were "shia of yazeed" and not "shia of Hussein" that I am proud to be and every Shia Muslim is proud to be.you call yourself "Sunni" but you defend Yazeed (la).its weird! and I'm asking you to join me to be a follower of Imam Hussein (as),master of youth of paradise,and stop your wahhabi propaganda against the Shia aimed at defending the tyrant,Yazeed (la). Answer me my friend: Who killed Muslim Ibn Aqeel (as)? Where (in kufa) was he killed? How was he killed? If you answer these 3 questions in a simple and direct manner,believe me I'm done with you.you can be ranting all you want about shia this or that;and Imam Hussein (as) will always be my master and grandson of my master (saw),and we will always remember him well,and Yazeed (la) will always be remembered for tyranny and oppression which Imam Hussein (as) stood against and refused to compromise on.answer my questions! |
vedaxcool: The one in bondage here, are those who fail to acknowledge the very fact that Zaynab speaks the truth that Kufee shais are killed Husayn r.a!Where did She say it was Kufans who killed the Imam (as).show me! Now you clearly stated that who Muslim, which offcourse is not the bone of contention and which if you read the thread I posted , clearly states how it happened, that is 18 men entered Kufa and the Kufee shias even after pledging their allegiance and were the cause of their muslim being still refused to provide protection from the 18 men, in Kufa alone 18000 men had pledge their allegiance (there were more than that amount of men in the whole of Kufa) and this men stood and did nothing ro save Muslim even when Muslim tried to hide an woman exposed his hiding place! But the real issue remains Kufee shias killed Husayn r.a and they were not even part of Yazeed army rather they killed Husayn r.a to cover their tracks, no amount of accrobatics would change this fact, Husayn only reason for being in Kufa was because Kufee shias invited him there and the same shias will not only fail to up hold their words but will also deliberately kill him to save their necks! And the very man who killed him, Shimr would be the same man who fought on the side of Ali r.a against Muawiyah! Clearly the shias have all evidence pointing at them, go have fear of Allah if you are really interested in holding Islam!You're ranting to confuse yourself.I simply asked who,how and where Muslim Ibn Aqeel (as) was killed.I need simple and straight answers.your fantasies for sectarian propaganda,I'm not interested in.save that for wahhabis and those it pleases to deceive themselves. Let me know: Who killed Muslim Ibn Aqeel (as)? Where (in Kufa) he was killed? How he was killed? When you answer these questions,we will know the following: 1.Who killed Imam Hussain (as) and is directly and chiefly responsible for the Tragedy of Karbala. 2. Why the Kufans pledged support and all of a sudden changed their mind. 3. And who was in charge of Kufa. So please who,where (in kufa) and how was Muslim Ibn Aqeel (as) killed.I'm not interested in your stories.just answer those questions because I'm exercising full patience and humility with you.this is a discussion I shouldn't even hold because someone making your claims (making a cocktail of unfounded imaginations) is not worth talking to.but in order not to call you names or offend you,I'm assuming you're simply an honest person who has been misled.so before I make my conclusions and answer my questions with facts and references,please assist me and assist yourself to answer these questions.they are meant for you to answer because you need to open your eyes. I need to know (for the third time): Who,where (in Kufa) and how was Muslim Ibn Aqeel (as) killed.then we can progress to who really or what the kufans were including the accursed Shimr you're using for Ummayyad/Wahhabi propaganda.if you're honest to yourself,it won't take you a week before you cry profusely for deceiving yourself,and you will become a Shia Muslim.just give me the plain and honest answers;please if you're not wasting our time. |
vedaxcool: Now do you why this is becoming a case of shia double speak? The very fact that rather than acknowledge what Zaynab said to be true you are simply dribbling your own self left and right! Zaynab said clearly the Kufee shias killed Husayn r.a what is there to argue? You still refuse to acknowledge they killed him! Husayn himself again said the Kufee shias were responsible for his death! So what are you really arguing for? The link I placed clearly chronicled the event from start to finish! Now you can either read the link or continue going in circles, something I am not interested in doing, everything I wrote in my previous response were in direct response to your question! My has been left unanswered which simply is was Zaynab lying whens she said Kufee shias where the ones who kill Husayn, now a simple Yes or No would suffice! Trying to play semantics won't just work here! And I do not represent Yazeed only the truth, which Zaynab spoke of and of which you want to dispute, I did not post the text Zhul Fiqah did. Since no shia here can answer the simple question on whether Zaynab was speaking truthfully or falsely when she said Kufee Shias murdered Husayn r.a remains a huge indictment on the very dishonest myth you guys perpetuate to deceive novices on who is responsible for Husayn death! I remeber lagosshia even denied that fact! I only posted to show him his inability to remember his lies and his shia trait of posting whatever suit his case!The text you presented from Tarikh al-khulafa,quote Imam Hussein (as) as blaming the kufans for treachery.Sayyida Zainab (as) likewise blamed them for treachery.they would pledge allegiance and support,and then break their vows.the true Shia among the Kufans were a minority like Hani Ibn Urwa (ra) who was arrested by Yazeed's governor,Ubaydullah Ibn Ziyad,because Hani (ra) sheltered Muslim Ibn Aqeel (as),Imam Hussain's (as) emissary to Kufa.Yazeed ordered in a letter to Ibn Ziyad to imprison or kill Muslim Ibn Aqeel (as),as Ibn Ziyad deem fit. To cut things short,you are running away from facing the facts.the names of these historical personalities alone would reveal what happened and who did what.the Kufans betrayed Imam Hussein (as).they betrayed, abandoned,and joined Yazeed's army in the person of Ibn Ziyad. I asked you earlier on whose order were the Kufans acting,you gave me a long story and off issues.earlier,I asked some questions which you refused to answer. The Kufans after pledging allegiance to and asked Imam Hussein (as) to come,changed their position.tell us why? What was the conflict between the Kufans and Imam Hussein (as)? You said the Kufans wanted to cover their tracks.now I'm asking "cover their tracks" from who? Finally who killed Muslim Ibn Aqeel (as),where and how? I'm sure you could find no lie to attribute the killing of Muslim Ibn Aqeel (as) and Hani Ibn Urwa (ra) to the kuffans.how can kuffans even be acting and killing directly as you're lying when there was a governor of Yazeed in kufa? Please,I'm not here fighting with you.I'm here to help you.if you see the truth and can change your views from the bondage you've put yourself because you're prejudiced against the Shia,I'd be happy for you.you just go out there looking for anything just to reply.I want us to think together. You can forget in fact all I have said.just tell me who killed Muslim Ibn Aqeel (as). |
vedaxcool: You are joking right? Kufan's are shia because even Husayn r.a referred to them as such, so any grouse you have with that should be directed at Husayn r.a and shia scholars who termed them such!You're seriously confusing yourself.you've pulled too many false notions and wrong accusations.but those are not discussion for this thread.I want to reach the conclusion with you that Yazeed killed Imam Hussein (as) and is chiefly responsible for the Tragedy of Karbala.now this is common knowledge.but you're obviously trying to make your own history up to convince yourself in funny ways why you shouldn't be a Shia.I'm not going to explain what being a Shia means or how a Shia should behave in his responsibilities to Imam Hussein (as) and the Ahlul-Bayt (as).I never denied that the hypocrites of Kufa are partly to blame and I'm not either going to prove what beliefs Kufans held at that time and why they are hypocrites.I'm only concern in proving to you and making you to accept willingly that Yazeed is chiefly responsible for the tragedy of Karbala,even though wahhabis try to shift blame from him while the crimes of Yazeed from Karbala to Medina (battle of al-harrah) and to Mecca,speak for themselves. You mentioned Muslim Ibn Aqeel.he was Imam Hussein's (as) cousin and ambassador to garner support from the Kufans. Can you give us insight into who killed him,where and how? From here we should make progress.you're representing Yazeed (defendant). |
vedaxcool: You haven't answer the question, the kufee shias (the same people were partisans of Ali r.a) were solely responsible for the death of Husayn r.a. And that is what Zaynab said, they killed Husayn not just betrayal but deliberately in covering their tracks, all the long semantics did not even acknowledge the words of Zaynab r.a I did a thread which answered all your questions, www.nairaland.com/826513/o-allah-judge-between-us let me give you a quote from itMay Allah's curse and wrath be upon the Kufan hypocrites who betrayed,abandoned and fought Imam Hussein (as).may Allah curse Yazeed and punish him severely. I hope you're satisfied? Now the problem with you is deep down inside you,you do know being a Muslim and follower of Muhammad (saw) cannot escape you standing against his grandson.you also don't want to acknowledge the Shia are right.so you easily fall for Wahhabi propaganda and shift the blame on the Kufan hypocrites,and brand them "shia".not forgeting that the Wahhabi are the only people claiming to be muslims who defend Yazeed,even though the Wahhabis themselves acknowledge the conflict was between Yazeed and Imam Hussein (as).all the drama about Kufans is just to shift blame from Yazeed.that's not even a significant argument in my view.the Shia honor Imam Hussein (as) annually and revive his memory as part of the sunnah of Prophet Muhammad (saw).now regardless of who you or I believe is "solely" or partly responsible for the tragedy of Karbala,the question is why don't you commemorate Imam Hussein's (as) martyrdom as a sad event in Islam and in a bid to revive a prophetic sunnah? Why are wahhabis seriously opposed to reviving this sunnah? Isn't it obvious because they follow the legacy of Banu Ummayyah,Yazeed's dynasty? Now back to your explanation.you claim the kufans are "solely" responsible for the tragedy of Imam Hussein (as).if so,what was the conflict between Imam Hussein (as) and the kufans? What was their motive? Please explain the reason they "killed" him. |
vedaxcool: Lol!The hypocrite kufans are partly responsible for what happened,no doubt about that.we Shia do not forget to send their share of curses when we curse Yazeed.you want to simply make it look Yazeed had no hand in what happened and the kufans were acting independently on their own.it wasn't like that.the kuffans were themselves sick of ummayyad rule.that is why they invited Imam Hussein (as) to come to Kufa,after Imam Hussein (as) refused to pay allegiance to Yazeed,and Yazeed gave order to kill Imam Hussein (as),right when he was still in Mecca.when Imam Hussein (as) finally got to Iraq,the thousands who invited the Imam in Kufa who should rally behind Imam Hussein (as),were no where to be found.Imam Hussein (as) from the thousands in Kufa only ended up with 72 supporters!!! In the meantime,Yazeed already heard of the turbulence in Kufa before Imam Hussein (as) had arrived.fearing a revolt to his rule,he replaced the lenient governor of Kufa,and made Ubaydullah Ibn Ziyad (who was harsher),the governor and he sent an army from Syria as reinforcement.Ibn Ziyad succeeded in bribing those of the Kufans who wanted material reward,while he threatened or killed others.that is how support for the Imam (as) slowly disappeared by the time Imam Hussein (as) had arrived.the Kufans are guilty of betraying the Imam,abandoning him and also joining his enemy. Before Imam Hussein (as) reached Kufa,he was besieged in Karbala.Imam Hussein (as) was not even allowed to reach Kufa.Umar Ibn Saad (la) and al-Hur (ra) laid siege to Imam Hussein (as).in the last minute al-Hur (ra) switched side after listening to the Imam (as).al-Hur (ra) became the first to be martyred fighting to Imam Hussein (as) against the army of Yazeed,which he was part of.the army of Yazeed insisted that Imam Hussein (as) must pay allegiance to and recognize the immoral and tyrannical unbeliever (Yazeed) as caliph or else be killed.Imam Hussein (as) refused because Yazeed posed a threat to the very foundation of Islam.even the 6 month old son of Imam Hussein (as) was killed in Karbala.it wasn't a case of "murder".it was a tragedy and a very sad event of massacre. Please stop calling the hypocrites of Kufa "shia".you cannot consider a people of break their vows to a cause/person,believers/followers of that cause/person.the Shia were the loyal 72 companions of Imam Hussein (as),not hypocrites who betrayed him.I am a Shia and I hate both the hypocrites of kufa and Yazeed,on whose order they acted.a Shia (partisan) of Imam Hussein (as) cannot betray Imam Hussein (as) and still be considered a "shia".its contradictory and makes no sense! Sometimes I wonder how you have the conscience and claiming to be muslim,to play with these issues. Please its now your turn to answer my questions. |
vedaxcool: Word games won't help you here was zaynab lying or not when she said you shias (Kuffans) murdered Husayn r.a, being that the same Kuffans actually invited him to come and be their Iman only to murder him! Keep lying Yazid when it is clear who killed him!It seems referring to the hypocrites of Kufa as "shia" allow you to sleep at night ![]() Anyways,I pray you stop this nonsense and face reality and facts. Please answer the following: 1. Why did the Kufans "murder" Imam Hussein (as)? 2. Who was the governor of Kufa and who made him governor? 3. Who led the army that besieged Imam Hussein (as) ? 4. Who later killed that commander who laid siege on Imam Hussein (as) and his companions? 5. Why were the surviving family members of Imam Hussein (as),alongside the severed heads of Imam Hussein (as) and his companions,taken to Damascus for Yazeed? Please answer,or mind your business and stop trolling. |
In addition to Imam Zainul-Abideen's (as) sermon (posted in the post above) in the court of Yazeed (la),Sayyida Zainab (as),sister of Imam Hussein (as), also made a sermon addressing the tyrant and exposing his crimes in his court in front of a large audience. Sermon of Sayyida Zainab Bint Ali (as),Granddaughter of Prophet Muhammad (saw), in the Court of Yazeed (la) : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bM_bNxjkzxg |
After the massacre in Karbala of the Prophet Muhammad's (saw) Household members,Ibn Ziyad (Yazeed's governor in Kufa) arrested the surviving women,children and Imam Ali Ibn al-Hussein,Zainul-Abideen (as)-the only surviving son of Imam Hussein (as) after the Tragedy of Karbala-and sent them in chains (as prisoners) to the court of Yazeed in Syria.the severed head of Imam Hussein (as) was also transported to Yazeed (la).Imam Zainul-Abideen (as),the fourth holy Imam, survived Karbala due to his poor health condition he was in and his inability to defend his father (as) against the army of Yazeed,sent from Syria. The Sermon of Imam Zainul-Abideen-aka al-Sajjad (as),in the Court of Yazeed in Damascus, Which Exposed Yazeed: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0uDhY1UQiFk |
vedaxcool: Lol!It wasn't Hitler that killed the Jews in world war 2.it was the germany army.hitler was an "innocent" man just like Yazid,right? |
Yazeed's Attack on Mecca and Medina After Killing the Prophet's (saw) Family Members in Karbala (Iraq) Let me also add that in addition to the Tragedy of Karbala,Yazeed crimes and attrocities extend.he still showed no remorse when it come to killing and plundering.in the Battle of al-Harrah,Yazeed sent his army from Syria (the Umayyads made Damascus their capital) into Medina.the holy city of Medina was ransacked,its people killed and their wealth plundered.the Syrian army of Yazeed went on looting spree.thousands of the inhabitants of Medina were killed.you can further read about the. Battle of al-Harrah. what even make the crimes of Yazeed worse is the fact that it is forbidden for anyone to fight or shed blood in the holy cities of Medina and Mecca or to kill their inhabitants.in a hadith,the Prophet (saw) cursed anyone who oppress the inhabitants of Medina. After the Battle of al-Harrah and Yazeed's army capturing Medina,his army then headed south to the holy city of Mecca.they laid siege to the holiest city in Islam,and in the process the holy Ka'ba was damaged.it siege only ended when Yazeed all of a sudden died. And this is the same Yazeed that some people (as you can see in the below video) defend when the Shia Muslims send la'nat on him and consider him a kaffir,an immoral person and an illegitimate ruler: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=98bK3V7JNfY |
Deleted |
Let me also add that in addition to the Tragedy of Karbala,Yazeed crimes and attrocities extend.he still showed no remorse when it come to killing and plundering.in the Battle of al-Harrah,Yazeed sent his army from Syria (the Umayyads made Damascus their capital) into Medina.the holy city of Medina was ransacked,its people killed and their wealth plundered.the Syrian army of Yazeed went on looting spree.thousands of the inhabitants of Medina were killed.you can further read about the Battle of al-Harrah.[/b]what even make the crimes of Yazeed worse is the fact that it is forbidden for anyone to fight or shed blood in the holy cities of Medina and Mecca or to kill their inhabitants.in a hadith,the Prophet (saw) cursed anyone who oppresses the inhabitants of Medina. After the [b]Battle of al-Harrah and Yazeed's army capturing Medina,his army then headed south to the holy city of Mecca.they laid siege to the holiest city in Islam,and in the process the holy Ka'ba was damaged.it siege only ended when Yazeed all of a sudden died. And this is the same Yazeed that some people (as you can see in the below video) defend when the Shia Muslims send la'nat on him and consider him a kaffir,an immoral person and an illegitimate ruler: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=98bK3V7JNfY |
Let me also add that in addition to the Tragedy of Karbala,Yazeed crimes and attrocities extend.he still showed no remorse when it come to killing and plundering.in the Battle of al-Harrah,Yazeed sent his army from Syria (the Umayyads made Damascus their capital) into Medina.the holy city of Medina was ransacked,its people killed and their wealth plundered.the Syrian army of Yazeed went on looting spree.thousands of the inhabitants of Medina were killed.you can further read about the Battle of al-Harrah.[/b]what even make the crimes of Yazeed worse is the fact that it is forbidden for anyone to fight or shed blood in the holy cities of Medina and Mecca or to kill their inhabitants.in a hadith,the Prophet (saw) cursed anyone who oppresses the inhabitants of Medina. After the [b]Battle of al-Harrah and Yazeed's army capturing it,his army then headed south to the holy city of Mecca.they laid siege to the holiest city in Islam,and in the process the holy Ka'ba was damaged.it siege only ended when Yazeed all of a sudden died. And this is the same Yazeed that some people (as you can see in the below video) defend when the Shia Muslims send la'nat on him and consider him a kaffir,an immoral person and an illegitimate ruler: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=98bK3V7JNfY |
Let me also add that in addition to the Tragedy of Karbala,Yazeed crimes and attrocities extend.he still showed no remorse when it come to killing and plundering.in the Battle of al-Harrah,Yazeed sent his army from Syria (the Umayyads made Damascus their capital) into Medina.the holy city of Medina was ransacked,its people killed and their wealth plundered.the Syrian army of Yazeed went on looting spree.thousands of the inhabitants of Medina were killed.you can further read about the Battle of al-Harrah.[/b]what even make the crimes of Yazeed worse is the fact that it is forbidden for anyone to fight or shed blood in the holy cities of Medina and Mecca or to kill their inhabitants.in a hadith,the Prophet (saw) cursed anyone who oppresses the inhabitants of Medina. After the [b]Battle of al-Harrah and Yazeed's army capturing it,his army then headed south to the holy city of Mecca.they laid siege to the holiest city in Islam,and in the process the holy Ka'ba was damaged.it siege only ended when Yazeed all of a sudden died. And this is the same Yazeed that some people (as you can see in the below video) defend when the Shia Muslims send la'nat on him and consider him a kaffir,an immoral person and an illegitimate ruler: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=98bK3V7JNfY |
[size=14pt]"Revive our issue and mission; may Allah have mercy on whoever revives our issue and mission."[/size] -Imam Ja'far Ibn Muhammad,al-Sadeq (as),the sixth holy Imam from the Ahlul-Bayt (as) of our beloved Prophet Muhammad (sawaws). |
maclatunji: Actually, LagosShia's many posts don't show anything more than the fact that Aisha (RA) was a normal wife who had disagreements with her husband. Ultimately, the husband was happy enough to keep her as his wife until his death. No need to write long epistles on her status in Islam. It is obvious to anyone with a clear mind.I'm sure my brother LagosShia is very proud to read your post.he has succeed to make you see that aisha was just another "normal wife".she wasn't what sunnis say about her and definitely not "favorite wife" of the Prophet (sawaws).and was the Prophet a "normal" husband that aisha can disgree with,raise her voice at,deny his truthfulness and disobey? LagosShia in fact raised very valid points to answer your question why our Prophet (sawaws) didn't divorce her. I think your acceptance she was a normal wife (and not the invincible wife Sunnis express) should serve LagosShia as consolation for his ban. |
We Cry for Hussain...So Did the Prophet Written by Yasser Madani Every year, Muslims around the world commemorate the tragedy of Karbala. They attend mourning meetings and processions in which the story of Karbala is retold, lamentations are held and special poetic readers using dramatic techniques and symbolism recite eulogies to mark the events of the day of Ashura. All these commemorative meetings not only serve to convey the events and message of Karbala but also provide opportunities for us to learn about Islam in general. We commemorate Ashura to symbolise and express our grief and emotions towards the martyrdom of Imam al-Hussain (AS), to keep Imam al-Hussain’s (AS) cause alive in our hearts and to be committed to his cause. Also, we want to extract lessons from the tragedy of Karbala and apply them to our daily lives. We want to pay our condolences to the Holy Prophet (SAW) and the Ahlul Bayt. You might then ask why we don’t commemorate the death of the Holy Prophet (SAW) who has a much higher rank than Imam al-Hussain (AS). The answer to this is that although we do commemorate and mourn the death of the Holy Prophet (SAW), it is the way and circumstance in which Imam al-Hussain (AS) was martyred which makes all the difference, the fact that he was martyred for refusing a government headed by the wretched Yazid, who drank, gambled and indulged in many corrupt practices, the fact that those who savagely slaughtered Imam al-Hussain (AS) called themselves Muslims is what makes us mourn and lament his martyrdom the way we do. Imagine this, it is afternoon on the day of Ashura. Imam al-Hussain (AS) is standing on the blood-drenched soil of Karbala in the heat of the scorching sun waiting to meet his beloved. His head is wounded and blood is streaming slowly down his holy face soaking his blessed beard. He looks around, searching for members of his family and his companions, only to find them brutally slaughtered and slain like sacrificial lambs, lying there on the ground soaked in blood. He hears the innocent crying and wailing of the children and the women. Tears flow down his holy face. He takes a piece of cloth to wipe the blood from his face, whereupon an archer from the army of Yazid (may Allah’s curse be upon him) shoots a triple-headed arrow, which lodges into Imam al-Hussain’s (AS) heart. He pulls out the arrow causing blood to gush out. The Holy Imam is thirsty, he cries: “O God, I am thirsty”, in the meantime another man approaches and shoots an arrow which thrusts into Imam al-Hussain’s (AS) throat quenching his thirst. Hilal bin Nafi’ was reported as saying: “By God I never saw a person getting killed with his own blood all over his body in a better state than al-Hussain. I was so overwhelmed by the radiance of his face that I refrained from contemplating killing him”. Even when the accursed Shimr approached Imam al-Hussain (AS) to severe his blessed head, he said: “When I approached Hussain ibn Ali and my eyes fell on him, the light of his face so gripped me that I forgot my intention to kill him”. It is reported that when Imam al-Hussain was killed, the sky rained down blood.[1] It has been recorded that Imam Ja’far as-Sadiq (AS) has said: “…For no one the heavens wept for forty days save Yahya and Hussain…” [2] Show me such a spectacle of human greatness in an event other than Karbala and I will commemorate its memory instead of Karbala! How can someone hear all this and not cry and mourn, even those who are not Muslims shed tears when they hear this tragedy. Even the heavens wept for Imam al-Hussain (AS).[3] Let me ask you a question, if a Muslim cries over the passing away of their own relatives, then how can they not cry over the grandson of the Messenger of Allah (SAW)? Furthermore, crying for Imam al-Hussain (AS) is considered seeking nearness to Allah (SWT) for the tragedy of Karbala is bound to the great sacrifice which Imam al-Hussain (AS) endured for the sake of Allah (SWT) and for Islam. It is only when your heart is soft and absorbable that you feel the sense of closeness to Allah (SWT). The Holy Qur’an praises crying and those who cry for a legitimate cause. The Holy Qur’an describes many of the Prophets and their followers when they cried, "When the verses of the Most Gracious were recited unto them, they fell down prostrating and weeping" [4] Furthermore we cry over the martyrdom of Imam al-Hussain (AS) for the Holy Prophet (SAW) wept for Imam al-Hussain (AS) as recorded in many traditions (ahadith): Ahmed and Ibn al-Dhahhak narrated from Ali (AS): “I entered on the prophet (SAW) and his eyes were flooded, I said: Oh! Prophet of Allah, anyone made you angry? Why are your eyes flooded? He said: Gabriel just left me telling me that al-Hussain will be killed by the river Euphrates. He (the Prophet) said: So he (Gabriel) said: Do you want me to let you smell his dirt (from his burial pot)? I said: Yes! He reached with his hand and grabbed and handful of dirt and gave it to me. So I could not help it and my eyes were flooded.” [5] Ummul Fadhl the daughter of al-Harith said that she entered on the Messenger of Allah (SAW) and she said: “Oh! Messenger of Allah, I saw a strange dream last night. He said: And what is it? She said: It was difficult. He said: And what is it? She said: I saw, as if, a piece of your body was severed and was put in my lap! The Messenger of Allah (SAW) said: You saw well - Fatima will give birth, God willing, a boy so he will be in your lap. Then Fatima gave birth to al-Hussain and he was in my lap - just as the Messenger of Allah (SAW) said. So I entered one day on the Messenger of Allah (SAW) and put him in his lap, but I noticed that the eyes of the Messenger of Allah (SAW) pouring tears! So I said: Oh! Prophet of Allah, my parents are your ransom, what is with you? He said: Gabriel (AS) came to me and informed me that my nation (ummah) will kill this son of mine.” [6] Umm Salamah has said: "al-Hussain entered on the Prophet (SAW), while I was sitting at the door, so I saw in the hand of the Prophet (SAW) something he turned over while (Hussain) sleeping on his stomach. I said: Oh messenger of Allah, I looked and saw you turning something over in your hand when the kid was sleeping on your stomach and your tears were pouring? He said: Gabriel came to me with the sand upon which he (Hussain) will be killed. And he informed me that my nation (umma) will kill him." [7] Ibn Saad, Ali bin Muhammad, Yahya bin Zakariya, a man heard it from 'Amir al-Sha'bi say: "When Ali (as) passed by Karbalaa in his march to Siffien and lined up with Nainawa - a village on the Euphrates - he stopped and called one of them men: Tell aba 'Abdullah (al-Hussain ) what this land is called? He said: Karbala. Then he cried until the earth was wet from his tears. He then said: I entered on the messenger of Allah (s) and he was crying. So I said: What makes you cry? He said: Gabriel was with me, just now, and informed me: that my son al-Hussain will be killed at the banks of Furat in a location called Karbala. Then Gabriel grabbed a handful of dirt and let me smell it. So I could not help it, my eyes overflowed." [8] From this tradition (hadith) we can see that Imam al-Ali (AS) also wept for Imam al-Hussain (AS). There are more traditions showing that the Holy Prophet (SAW) wept for Imam al-Hussain (AS). [9] Umm Salamah, the wife of the Holy Prophet (SAW) also wept for Imam al-Hussain (AS).[10] Even the Jinns mourned Imam al-Hussain (AS)'s death, it has been reported that after Imam al-Hussain (AS)'s martyrdom, Umm Salamah said: "I heard the Jinns mourning for al-Hussain.” [11] Yet unfortunately there are some Muslims who have claimed that mourning and lamenting the death of Imam al-Hussain (AS) is impermissible and a wrong practice. Ask yourselves this question - if this is so, then why did the Holy Prophet (SAW) mourn the death of Imam al-Hussain (AS)? Some Muslims have even gone to the extent of criticizing the Muslims who commemorate Ashura [12] whilst others have even claimed that this practice is polytheism (shirk) and an innovation (bid'ah). Maybe there are some Muslims who hate to see the remembrance of the Ahlul Bayt. Notes: 1. Nadra al-Azdiya, a woman who was contemporary with Imam al –Hussain (AS), is said to have reported: “When al-Hussain b. 'Ali was killed, the sky rained down blood, so that next morning we found our wells and water jugs filled with it.” This hadith is narrated by Ibn Hajar. 2. The Holy Qur'an, Aqa Mirza Mahdi Puya, p. 681, pub. Peermohammed Trust (Pakistan). This hadith is recorded under the tafsir of the verse (19:12-15). Aqa Mahdi Puya says that what is meant by “the heavens wept” (in the hadith of Imam as-Sadiq) is that the sun became extraordinarily red. 3. al-Suyuti reports in his commentary on the verse (19:13) describing Allah's compassion towards the ancient martyr John son of Zachariah that “The heavens did not weep for the death of anyone except John son of Zachariah and al-Hussain b. Ali. Its redness [at sunset] is the sign of its weeping”. 4. The Holy Qur'an, (19:58); also refer to (17:109). 5. Thakhaer al-Uqba, Muhibbuldeen al-Tabari, p. 148. 6. al-Mustadrak al-Sahih, al-Hafidh al-Hakim al-Nisapouri, v. 3, p. 176, (al-Hakim said: “This is an authentic hadith (Sahih) on the conditions of Bukhari and Muslim but they did not print it”); Dalael al-Nubouwa, al-Hafidh al-Bayhaqi under the subject of al-Hussain (AS); Cf. Ibn al-A'tham IV, (Hyderabad, 1971), p. 211-2, the author narrates this hadith using a different chain of narration. 7. al-Musannaf, al-Hafidh abu Bakr bin abi Shaibah, v. 12. 8. al-Tabaqat al-Kubra, Ibn Saad; al-Musannaf, Ibn Abi Shaibeh, v. 12 (with "Patience aba 'Abdullah, patience aba 'Abdullah" ) ; al-Moejam al-Kabeer, al-Tabarani, v. 1; Tareekh al-Shamm, Ibn 'Asakir. 9. al-Musnad, Ahmad bin Hanbal, v. 2, p. 60-61; al-Taba'qat al-Kubra, Ibn Saad; al-Moejam al-Kabeer, al-Hafidh al-Tabarani (on subject of al-Hussain); A'lam al-Nubuwwah, al-Mawardi al-Shafi 'I; Kanz al-Ummal, al-Muttaqi al-Hindi. 10. al-Khasa'is, al-Suyuti al-Shafi'I, 2:125; al-Manaqib, al-Magazili, p. 313; al-Musnad, Ahmad bin Hanbal, 6:294; Tarikh al-Islam, al-Dimishqi, 3:11; al-Bidayah wal-Nihayah, 6:230; al-'Aqd al-Farid, ibn 'Abd Rabbah, 2:219; Kanz al-Ummal, al-Muttaqi al-Hindi; Cf. Ibn al-A'tham IV, 212-4; Sahih al- Tirmidhi; Mishkat al-Masabih, an-Nawawi, English Version, Tradition # 6157. 11. Tarikh al-Kabir, al-Bukhari (author of the famous Sahih), v. 4, Part 1, p. 26; Fadha'il al-Sahaba, Amhmad Ibn Hanbal, v. 2, p. 776, tradition # 1373; Tabarani, v. 3, p.130-1; Tahdhib, v. 7, p.404. 12. Kitab al-Lata'if, Ibn Rajab. http://www.sibtayn.com/en/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=48&Itemid=123 |
Fasting on Ashura By MELJ Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) entered Medina in the first year of Hijra and noticed the Jews fasting. He asked one of his companions: “Why are the Jews fasting?”. His companion replied: “The Jews are remembering when Prophet Moses (pbuh) and the children of Israel were saved from the Pharaoh”. The prophet said: “I have a greater right on Moses than what they do. Therefore, my people will fast on Ashura in the same way they are fasting on Ashura”. One of the companions exclaimed: “O Messenger of Allah, but we are going to be copying the Jews” and the prophet then replied: “You are right, from now on we will fast on the 9th and 10th”. The above narration and the fast of Ashura is one of the most controversial acts of worship in Islam. It is an act of worship that requires thorough dissection and analyses in order to examine it from a variety of angles. When examining the hadith above; we must carefully consider the following: When is the hadith mentioned and in which books is it narrated? Who narrated the hadith and what is their personal history? What is the meaning of the word ‘Ashura’ and does it possess more than one meaning? According to the Jewish calendar, did the Jews fast on the day of savior of the children of Israel? Did this day correspond to the 10th of Muharram? When did the Arabic calendar begin and how does this coincide with the above hadith? Why would the prophet copy the practice of the Jews? Are there other areas of the Sunnah which have been neglected? The fast of Ashura upholds both historical and contemporary significance. In terms of its contemporary significance, people from all over the globe engage in a fast on the day of Ashura. According to some scholars, the fast of Ashura ‘Is one of the most beloved fasts to the holy prophet, after the fast of Ramadan’. Due to its contemporary significance, it is important to understand the basis of the fast on Ashura, where this particular act of worship originated from and whether this act is recognized by all schools of Islam. Have you ever wondered why the fast of Ashura is the only Sunnah of the holy prophet Muhammad (pbuh) which is provided with such a vast propaganda? As the 10th of Muharram approaches, all the Imams are preparing lectures that highlight the significance of the fast of Ashura. Millions of pamphlets, books, posters and many more media machinery operate to encourage the population to fast on Ashura. It seems that on the 10th of Muharram, the fast of Ashura is the only momentous incident in the history of Islam. Yet, the savior of Prophet Ibrahim (pbuh) from the king Namrud and the fire, the savior of Prophet Noah (pbuh) and his people, the curing of Prophet Ayyub’s (pbuh) illness and the returning of Prophet Yaqub’s eyesight all occurred on Ashura. Yet, why are such significantly notable events NEGLECTED? Why is everything devoted to the fast of Ashura? Subsequently, the act of fasting on Ashura originated from the day of savior of Prophet Moses (pbuh) and the children of Israel. The comprehensive analysis of this act of worship requires delving into the worlds of history and ahadith as well as studying the Jewish and Islamic calendars. The hadith relating to the fast of Ashura is narrated in Imam Bukhari’s Sahih; Imam Muslim’s Sahih and Imam Tarmizi’s Sahih. Thus, it is narrated in three of the six available Sahih’s. When we look at any narration which tells us about an act of worship such as fasting, we must analyze the chain of narrators in order to confirm its reliability. Ibn Abas, Abu Hurraira, Abu Musa al ashari and Muawiya are the narrators who claim that the prophet recommended the fast of Ashura. The above hadith is meant to have been mentioned when the prophet arrived in Medina in the 1st year of Hijra. Hence, we will examine the activities of the narrators at that period of time: Ibn Abas was four years old when the prophet arrived in Medina and the hadith was mentioned. Ibn Abas was born three years before Hijra. If we assume that he was with the prophet at Hijra and Ibn Abas heard every single bit of the narration, he would have been four years at that time. According to many scholars of hadith, a four year old child is not exactly the most reliable resource. Abu Musa al Ashari came from the tribe of Ashar in Yemen. He converted to Islam before Hijra and since that day till Khabar, he was no where to be seen. This is because the prophet sent him back to Yemen to spread the religion of Islam and consequently he could not have been with the prophet in the 1st year of Hijra since he was in Yemen. The first glimpse anyone had of Abu Musa was after Khaibar. Abu Hurraira converted to Islam in his early years and was only seen in Medina after Khaibar which occurred in the 7th year of Hijra. Now, if you weren’t even at the event, then how can you narrate what happened? Muawiya converted to Islam in the 8th year of Hijra which is seven years after the mentioning of the hadith relating to the fast of Ashura. Thus, can you label Muawiya as being a reliable source? Further examination of the narrators broadens our understanding of the validity of the above hadith: Abu Hurraira was made the governor of Bahrian by Omar al khatab in the 21st year of Hijra. In the 23rd year of Hijra, Omar discovers that Abu Hurraira was gaining an income through the narration of ahadith. Omar said to him: “When I let you go to Bahrain, you didn’t even have shoes on your feet and now in Bahrian, you are buying horses for 1600 dinars each and I hear that you are narrating ahadith and making an income from it”. This incident emphasizes that the narration of Ahadith became a profession after the death of the holy prophet Muhammad (pbuh). Can we possibly accept a narration from a person like Abu Hurraira? How can we accept the hadith as being valid if the narrators weren’t even present at the incidence? Furthermore, it is important to consider the meaning of the word “Ashura” in order to analyze the hadith above from a different angle. Ibn Ather who was one of the greatest scholars of the Arabic language highlights that the word ‘Ashura’ possesses an old and a new meaning. Taking the old meaning into perspective, “Ashura” refers to the 10th of any month. Moreover, the new meaning of the word Ashura was established after the martyrdom of Imam Hussain (pbuh) and it refers to the 10th of Muharram in particular as it was on this holy day that the prophet’s grandson was murdered in the land of Kerbala. Upon Ibn Ather’s examination of the hadith relating to the fast of Ashura, he raises the question: “When was the hadith mentioned?” The narrators of the hadith claim that the prophet mentioned the hadith in the 1st year of Hijra. Thus, the old usage of the word “Ashura” applies and when the hadith is put into context, the prophet’s statement “My people will fast on Ashura in the same way they are fasting on Ashura” means that the Muslims will fast on the 10th of the month in which the prophet was in, when he was at Medina. As a result we must be fasting on the 9th and 10th of the month in which the prophet met the Jews at Medina. Why are the Muslims fasting on 10th of Muharram? Why is the propaganda always behind the 10th of Muharram? The prophet never mentioned Muharram! The propaganda and media machinery indoctrinate the population by emphasizing that the prophet entered Medina in the month of Muharram and thus he met the Jews on the 10th of Muharram. Let’s assume that this is valid as we analyze the Jewish and Islamic calendar. Hence, for an assumption: Ashura= 10th of Muharram in 1st year of Hijra. The Hadith relating to the fast of Ashura claims that the Jews fast on the day of the savior of prophet Moses and the children of Israel on the 10th of Tishri (Jewish calendar) and this corresponds to the 10th of Muharram (Islamic calendar). The hadith also claims that when the prophet (pbuh) acknowledged that the Jews were fasting on Ashura, he commanded the Muslims to fast on the 9th and 10th of Muharram. Consequently, the existence of Judaism today further assists the recovery of truth. Ask the Jews whether they fast on the day that prophet Moses (pbuh) and the children of Israel were saved by the Almighty Allah. Ask them whether the day in which they fast corresponds to the 10th of Muharram. The answer is simply NO. The Jews have no such fast and it NEVER corresponded to the 10th of Muharram in the first year of Hijra. The only time the 10th of Tishri corresponded to the 10th of Muharram was in the 29th year after Hijra. Yet, the hadith claims that the prophet met the Jews in the first year of Hijra! Moreover, the 10th of Tishri is not related to the savior of Moses and the children of Israel but rather the 10th of Tishri is the day the children of Israel paid atonement for worshipping the calf when Prophet Moses and some companions went to Mount Sinai. As a result of this incident, the Jews fast on the 10t of Tishri. However, the hadith relating to the fast of Ashura claims that the Jews were fasting on the 10th of Tishri due to the savior of Moses and the children of Israel! Rather, the savior of the children of Israel occurred on the 15th of Nissan in the Jewish calendar and the 15th of Nissan in the 1st year of Hijra corresponded to the 23rd of Ramadan. Hence, if there should be a fast which is recommended then it should have nothing to do with the 10th of Muharram but rather the 23rd of Ramadan. When narrating the hadith relating to the fast of Ashura, were did this massive mistakes come from? The mistake was as a result of the naivety of the hadith writer. Since the Islamic calendar begins with Muharram, the hadith writer wrote the hadith on the basis that the prophet entered Medina in Muharram. It is well known that the prophet reached Medina in Rabi al awal. This big mistake is due to a hadith writer that didn’t understand how the Islamic, Jewish and Arabic calendars work. The prophet entered Medina in Rabi al awal but the Islamic calendar began with Muharram due to the suggestion of Ali Ibn Abi Taleb (pbuh): “The Islamic calendar will start just like the lunar calendar begins. It will start from the year of Hijra but the month of Muharram.” When the prophet entered Medina, the hadith claims that he exclaimed: “I have a greater right on Moses than what they do. Therefore, my people will fast on Ashura in the same way they are fasting on Ashura”. But we now ask, O messenger of Allah! You entered Medina in Rabi Al Awal and not in Muharram. So, how were the Jews fasting? It is unbelievable how many people were paid to write ahadith. Plan and plot as much as you want, for “Allah is the best of those who plot” (Holy Quran. Chapter 3, Verse 54). Write as many fake Ahadith and narrations as you will. Allah will expose them all. Also, when a law is given in Islam, the law may then be changed depending on the circumstances. For example: A law which makes the consumption of alcoholic drinks unlawful has been put into perspective. However, if you were dehydrating in the middle of the desert and possessed nothing but alcohol, then you are permitted to consume it. The consumption of alcohol becomes lawful for you. This is a secondary law. Similarly, there may have been a recommended fast on the 10th of every month (Ashura) and this may have been a Sunnah of the prophet. However, Imam Muhammad al Baqar narrates that as the fast of Ramadan became compulsory, the fast of Ashura was made void and then completely stopped. Ironically, some people claim that the fast of Ashura is such an important Sunnah to be practiced while there are so many Sunnah of the holy prophet which they neglect. If you are so concerned about the Sunnah of the prophet then why didn’t you speak out when the Sunnah of the prophet was changed! Wasn’t it a Sunnah of the prophet that the phrase “Haya ala khair al amaal” is included in the Azan? When the second Islamic ruler (Khalifa) came in, he simply altered the Sunnah of the prophet and removed the phrase above from the daily Azan. This is because he wanted Jihad to be known as the ‘good task’ (khair al amaal) and not prayer. Why weren’t you concerned when the Sunnah’s of the prophet were changed? Is the fast of Ashura the Sunnah of the prophet or the Sunnah of someone ELSE? The fast of Ashura is receiving the most propaganda because it has an agenda behind it and this agenda involves diverting attention from what happened to the grandson of the holy prophet Muhammad (pbuh) at Kerbala. The aim of the fast of Ashura is to divert people’s attention from the incident which resulted in the remorseless slaughter of the prophet’s own grandson. There is no greater event in the history of Islam than the martyrdom of the master of the youth of paradise; the murder of the Grandson of the greatest messenger and the grandson of the greatest message. Imam Hussain (AS) said: "Don't you see that the truth is not followed and the falsehood is not discouraged? (The situation is so severe) that a Believer wishes to meet Allah. And today I don't see death but prosperity, and living with tyrants is nothing but disgust and disgrace." What a shame it is that we honor people whom the prophet himself forbade them his intercession in the Day of Judgment. What a disgrace it is that we praise people whom the prophet declared war against. In a famous Hadith, the Holy prophet (pbuh) said: “Hussain is from me and I am from Hussain”. (This manifests that Imam Hussain’s pathway and message is similar to that of the prophet. It is as if he is a replica of the prophet (pbuh)). The face of the Messenger of Allah (pbuh) lit up upon seeing his newborn grandson. He took him in his arms and then recited the Azaan in his right ears and Aqama in the left one. The prophet then placed the baby in his lap and wept. "May my father and mother be your sacrifice," Asma asked him: "why are you crying?" "Because of my son," the prophet (pbuh) replied. "He is a newborn baby," she said. "O Asma…..After me, the transgressing party will kill him. May Allah never grant them my intercession." The Messenger of Allah also said: "Al-Hassan and al-Hussain are the chiefs of the youth of Paradise and Fatimah is the chief of their women." It has been narrated that the Prophet (pbuh) looked at Ali (as), Hassan (as), Hussain (as) and Fatimah (as) and then said: "I am in war with those who will fight you, and in peace with those who are peaceful to you." The Messenger of Allah said: "He who loves al-Hassan and al-Hussain, has loved me, and he who makes them angry has made me angry." Regarding Imam Hassan and Hussain, it has been narrated that the prophet said: "These are my sons and my daughter's sons. O Allah, I love them, so I beseech Thee to love them and those who love them.” Moreover, it has been narrated that as the Prophet was passing the house of Fatima (SA), he heard young Hussain crying. The Prophet stopped, went into the house and said: ‘Fatima, don’t you know it hurts me to hear Hussain cry.’ We know ask you, O messenger of Allah! If you couldn’t even bear to see your son’s tears, then how did you cope while witnessing your son’s brutal murder? How did you endure the very sight- your son dying of thirst in Kerbala–Your son gazing at the dead corpses of his friends and family—Your son comforting the women—your son all alone—Your beloved son being attacked from every direction …. Arrows, spears and swords piercing his pure body— ten horsemen stepping on the body of your son…breaking his ribs and whatever remained of him into pieces. O messenger of Allah, how did you withstand seeing the daughters of Fatima Al Zahra running from one burnt tent to the other? The daughters of the chief of the woman of paradise being taken as prisoners of war… being dragged like sheep from one country to the other…. Being harassed by the naïve and ignorant… O messenger of Allah! How did you endure the sight of Karbala and the very incident of Ashura- the day the skies wept tears. http://www.muharram.shiasisters.net/articles/fasting_on_ashura.html |
code: 365378 Date: 2012/11/17 - 11:01 Photo: Muharram of Imam Hussain mourning ceremonies begins in Zaria, Nigeria http://www.abna.ir/data.asp?lang=3&Id=365378 (Ahlul Bayt News Agency) - The Annual Mourning gathering kicked off at Husainiyyah Baqiyyatullah on Tuesday the 1st of Muharram 1434 (15/11/12). As Usual the Leader of the Shia Islamic Movement in Nigeria delivered a short speech after sunset prayers. He also read the supplications of Kumail and dua' on the advance of New Islamic Year. Mourning was also performed. [img]http://abna.co/a/uploads//252%5C5%5C252590.jpg[/img] [img]http://abna.co/a/uploads//252%5C5%5C252598.jpg[/img] [img]http://abna.co/a/uploads//252%5C5%5C252599.jpg[/img] [img]http://abna.co/a/uploads//252%5C6%5C252601.jpg[/img] [img]http://abna.co/a/uploads//252%5C6%5C252603.jpg[/img] |
Eid al-Ghadeer Mubarak to all Mu'mineen in Islam! |
Is Maclatunji blowing all covers and openly demonstrating he is an "e-agbero"? Why would you delete an entire thread in honor of Prophet Muhammed's (saw) grandson,Imam Hussein (a),just because you're annoyed with LagosShia? And the thread is very old and 4 pages.why would a moderator display such unstable attitude based on emotions? If the moderator cannot control himself,what role/right can he exercise to control others? Smh! |
On the 8th day of Zhul-Hijjah,61 AH/680 CE,Imam Hussein (as) left Makkah for Kufah forgoing the Hajj and instead performing Umra to preserve the sanctity of Makkah and the holy Ka'ba.Yazeed (la) had ordered for the assasination of the Imam (as) even if found clinging to the walls of the holy Ka'ba.the news reached Imam Hussain (as) and he decided to left Makkah to both preserve the sanctity of Makkah and to continue his march to stage his revolution in his bid to oppose tyranny and injustice and save Islam from the clutches of the tyrant. Sermon in Mina: http://www.al-islam.org/masoom/writings/sermonofmina.html |
A good article to be proud of,regardless who wrote it. If I may add a tenth point there to be proud as a muslim,it is Imam Hussain (as),Prophet Muhammad's (sa) grandson.great men in history like India's Mahatma Ghandi who is popular for his non-violent struggle were inspired by Imam Hussain (as),his sacrifice and revolution in Karbala.Imam Hussain (as) revealed true prophetic character he could only have inherited from his grandfather,Prophet Muhammad (sa).every year Imam Hussain (as) has being remembered and Ashura commemorated. "I learnt from Hussain how to achieve victory while being oppressed"-Mahatma Ghandi |
LagosShia: this is really a good article and nicely written as well.thanks brother.this is very inspiring and i find it more useful than the article in the OP for understanding issues better. |
gent paris: Religion of peace indeed. You can spew your hate all you want against them. God is with israel.https://www.nairaland.com/786941/israel-warning-pictures-horrific LagosShia: Pictures of Christian brothers in Kaduna joining the Al-Quds Day Procession Organized by the Islamic Movement of Nigeria under the leadership of Sheikh Ibrahim Zakzaky (ha): |
the picture below (attached) shows Bahrain peaceful anti-government protesters burning the Israeli Zionist occupation flag on the commemoration of Al-Quds Day.
|
just avoid answering the simple question was Zaynab lying when she said kufee shias murdered Husayn r.a u invented a leeway to escape? Oh dear you really deserve pity! Kufee shias are solely responsible for the death of Husayn r.a, you can either refer to the thread posted earlier or keep deceiving yourself on that very matter!