₦airaland Forum

AvantGarde and Chamokazzie Gaylords play the two top teams in both the H2H and the main league. . .

Whoever qualifies it's going to be hard-earned!

I wonder how many epic comebacks were staged tonight thanks to Hangeland/Dempsey

It would be simply be classic if Borokiri Boyz fail to make the play-offs

That was never a red card. . . However Marcelo should have been sent off for the stamp on Pedro.

^^ As usual, you can't refute anything i've ACTUALLY said, so you just make up rubbish i HAVEN'T said, argue with yourself, then declare yourself victorious. . . You are basically alluding to your own idiocy.

On the other hand, i quote the rubbish you spew and blow it to smithereens. . . Now watch me do it again

You are trying to tell me why you think Chelsea is finished and why a Billionaire will not put money in like Roman.
I proved why you are wrong.

I never said Chelsea IS finished, nor did i say a new owner WILL not put money in. For the umpteenth time, you are trying to put your moronic words in my mouth. You have only proven your insanity.

However, you are sadly mistaken if you think a new owner is guaranteed to put money in.

I gave you the perspective of a billionaire and I finished the argument as a fan.

The perspective of a billionaire was completely irrelevant to the matter. Why were you giving it to me? It's like saying "it'll be better if all humans die". . . FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF THE ANIMALS WE FEED ON! Is stupidity your religion?

I am sorry if you can't think like that on your own and that's why I called you a small mind.

You are a smelly liar. Your "small mind" reference was made to illustrate how a "big mind"(owner) would take 200m revenue + loss over 50m revenue + profit, which i have already proved to be idiotic since i do not own Chelsea.

If you weren't an ignoramus you'd know "small minds like you" in that context actually meant fans in general. But since you are, you foolishly tried to put a negative spin on it. SMH

Call it a beautiful dark fantasy, but if a mind can conceive it, it can achieve it.

I can categorically state Nateevs will die wretched!

Never mind, I will give you a job when it all happens. . .

Hehehe, have you paid A-40 his 100 quid before you consider giving me a job?

Now let me shed more light on your stupidity:

To small minds like you, tiny revenue and £5m profit is better. Billionaires look at the big picture.

We are assuming the (hypothetical) finances don't affect performances on the field correct? Moving on.

Of course as a FAN, tiny revenue and tiny profit is better than big revenue and big loss. For one, it gets UEFA off your back(financial fair play). And more importantly, you are not incurring any loss/debt, and are profitable/self-sustainable.

Perhaps a BUSINESSMAN would prefer big revenue + big loss IF it enables him to sell at a higher price. Pray tell, are YOU getting a percentage of the fee it would cost to buy Chelsea?

Or maybe in your beautiful dark twisted fantasy, you are a mogul on the brink of selling your club for 10 times what you paid to acquire it. . .

Well i'm sorry to break it to you, but you are a bloody chav, and therefore 5m profit is better than 70m loss.

A fan thinks it's "better" for his club to operate at a (massive) loss, as long as it helps the owner sell the club at a higher price!?

"small minds" hehehehe, if Nateevs isn't the dumbest man on earth, he's runner up, surely!

Nateevs blowing hot air again. 99% of what you type is senseless but let me try to indulge you.

This was my original comment which got you throwing your toys out of the pram:

But if i were you i'd be worried Roman has spent hundreds of millions of pounds on your squad and (for arguments sake lets assume United have already won the title) you've only won the league once in the last 5 years, and haven't won the UCL. Sure you've won the FA/Milk Cup but i think we all agree those are "consolation prizes".

If with unprecedented investment you have only one major title in 5 years, what will happen if Roman burns his checkbook? Relegation?

Instead of telling me why you're not bothered about Chelsea winning one major title in 5 years despite spending more than all your rivals, you started ranting about new owners and increased revenue

Then you went on another senseless rant:

Why do you think even companies with monumental debt get bought by other rich men? Because the next owner keeps thinking they can run it effectively you dim-wit. To small minds like you, tiny revenue and £5m profit is better. Billionaires look at the big picture.

There are several factors that cannot be stripped to detail now. Men who put their money into such franchises don't expect instant gratification. If not, all billionaires will be selling pure water.

While one person's strategy may be to bare all the expenditure, others think of strengthening the franchise and increasing value, so they can sell at a higher price. Strengthening the franchise may be finding a perfect balance between paying high wages and buying even more expensive players with a goal to increasing global fan base and interests, that could generate even more revenue from merchandise, advertising, TV rights and tickets.

Others may think of building a stadium to increase match-day gate returns. Dim-Wit, how many owners do you know that buy clubs for the sheer annual profit they generate? How many sports franchises actually make a profit? Why are people still buying them? Dunce!

You based all this rubbish on the premise that if Roman gets bored of Chelsea, there's going to be some other billionaire willing to buy? Chelsea are no Arsenal, if Roman decides to sell, there aren't going to be billionaires falling over each other to buy. What makes you so sure there's actually someone on earth willing to buy Chelsea?

I really don't know how i am even talking about change of ownership when i never said anything about it to begin with. . . Oh wait, i'm talking to a 5-star m0r0n!

babaearly:
really? why do you say that? You must have an explanation right?

Evil: morally wrong or bad; immoral;

When you consider the fact that "morals" are a load of hogwash, then you have to put "evil" in the same bracket.

^^ As usual you are tying to put your moronic words in my mouth. . . I said nothing about Roman leaving but it seems you like arguing with urself.

Your revenue has risen from 50-200m but you are operating at higher losses than you were pre-Roman. If you weren't a complete doofus you'd know your increased revenue counts for fuckall if your expenditure is much higher. It is better to have 50m turnover and 45m expenditure than to have 200m turnover and 300m expenditure, dunce!

If he decides to sell, how much do you think Chelsea is value at? Who do you think will be able to buy Chelsea from Roman? A millionaire?

More reetarded logic. . . Because a billionaire buys Chelsea from Roman doesn't mean he'd spend anywhere near as much as Roman(if anything at all). Glazers ring a bell?

Maybe you think all owners put their personal fortunes into their clubs like Roman? My red blood cells are laughing at you!

Chelsea F.C. are not self-sustainable. If Roman(or a new owner) stops putting his money into Chelsea today, you are FINISHED!

Would you stop talking rubbish and address the crap you typed earlier?

But he scores and that's what matters. The skill is being there at the right time to stand a chance. What would Arsenal not do now for such a player?

You think Arsenal would give an arm and a leg for Hernandez for his goalscoring? RVP's goal-ratio shytes on Hernandez + every other player in the league.

if e easy why have you not won a trophy in 6 years?

You obviously know nowt about football if you think Arsenal's problem is goalscoring.

I'm going to give you the benefit of the doubt and assume you are drunk.

But he scores and that's what matters. The skill is being there at the right time to stand a chance. What would Arsenal not do now for such a player?

Hehehe, Nateevs is taking the piss. . . I doubt Sturridge would make Arsenal's reserves bench

if e easy why have you not won a trophy in 6 years?

Yes, Arsenal will start winning trophies once they sign STURRIDGE!

How are you not embarrassed right now?

There is no such thing as "evil".

Sturridge v Welbeck?

Shitt v Crap?

^^ Worst joke ever. . . Your sense of humor must have committed suicide.

nateevs:

Let's say you beat Utd which I am believing you will, Chelsea have a genuine chance of winning the title by winning all our remaning matches convincingly. You on the other hand will need Utd to lose 3ce and Chelsea lose 2ce for you to have a sniff at it.

This man again. . . When was the last time Arsenal beat United? Yet you somehow "believe" it would happen, how convenient?

Your remaining matches include Spurs, United away, Everton away, i seriously doubt you'd bet half a penny on Chelsea winning ALL their remaining games.

Even if you do, there's still a very good chance it'll amount to nothing.

And your calculation is flawed, Arsenal can finish above Chelsea if they lose once, not twice.

nateevs:
We are not in the same boat. We are looking down at you.

Of course we are not in the same boat. . .

But if i were you i'd be worried Roman has spent hundreds of millions of pounds on your squad and (for arguments sake lets assume United have already won the title) you've only won the league once in the last 5 years, and haven't won the UCL. Sure you've won the FA/Milk Cup but i think we all agree those are "consolation prizes".

If with unprecedented investment you have only one major title in 5 years, what will happen if Roman burns his checkbook? Relegation?

You see, things aren't quite as rosy in Chavland as you'd have us believe

One would think Bayern and Chelsea are actually going to win anything this year. . .

If you're upgrading ur HDD, you might as well go all out, i.e 750gb.

There are some good tutorials on Youtube on how to get it done.

What did i miss?

Anyway no need for long talk, resources dictate Arsenal should be third, and that's where they are.

You see, it's actually very simple!

^^ As long as you switch back to OFW 3.55 before you upgrade, there's no risk.

Just don't go from CFW 3.55 to OFW 3.56/3.60, or any future releases.

No exclusive character for the 360 version

^^ Putcha money where ya braces at niccuh!

It may interest you to know Nateevs is on the brink of breaking his piggy-bank to pay A-40!

If Arsenal & Chelsea manage to beat United, all three teams could be tied on points going into the final two games. . .

How brilliant would that be?

More idiotic officiating. . . RVP was clearly onside for the disallowed goal.

That said, a draw was probably a fair result on the balance of play.

If you don qualify for play-offs with two games to spare, putcha hands up!

Oh wait, i'm the only one!

^^ Teeeeeefffffffffffff!!!!!!!!!

^^ No, it really is!

Betting is illegal where i'm at

The person playing Gears Of War 3 needs to hook me up with the devs

GoW3

Arsenal 4-1 Spurs. You read it here first!

^^ Sexual frustration

^^ I was trying to tell Chamotex the other day that Baines is a good choice for captain cos he's on pens + all other set pieces, cops a shitload of assists, and bonus points too. Only four players have scored higher than Baines this season!

It would be a shame if AvantGarde lose to a 9-man team!

Church plenty pass filling station but offering cost pass one litre.

THIS!