Darkprime: Someone rank Daredevil, Jessica Jones, Agents of Shield, Flash, Green Arrow, Legends of Tomorrow, Doom Patrol & Titans.
I would think I'd love to watch Titans but that initial trailer never sit right with me. Nor did I ever hear this was a must watch.
I’ve seen every episode of all these shows, and for me it goes:
1.) Daredevil 2.) Jessica Jones 3.) Doom Patrol 4.) The Flash (well, the first couple seasons, anyway) 5.) Agents of Shield 6.) Legends of Tomorrow 7.) Arrow 8.) Titans
Titans is legitimately trash TV, imo. A terrible interpretation of most of the lead characters AND terrible storytelling at the same time. The only things in that show I’ve found to be worthwhile have been Deathstoke and Superboy/Krypto. You can just watch their scenes on YT and you’ve seen the best of the show, imo.
I"m kind of curious to see on what would happen around here IF (this is a big if) Natalie ended up not only getting top billing in this film and replaced Chris as the new Thor of the MCU like how she did in the comics (for awhile at least). Would fans be accepting of that idea like how they have been with the notion of Supergirl replacing Superman?
Cottonmouth: I don't actually see anything wrong with the game . It's perfectly alright to me
The only thing this game is missing is the ability to character swap while the entire the team is available . I'm fine with individual missions but they should allow for a character wheel give you the option to toggle options.
I'm pretty sure that was confirmed to be in long ago. The A Day gameplay seems to hint at that unless it was exclusively a training thing.
Yeah I don't know about this. At this point I've developed a certain level of apathy for this game. I don't like how the levels are basically just these big arenas with enemies that you select. I would've preferred an open world, something like Spider-Man PS4 or the Arkham games.
I also thought the gameplay looked a bit boring. It just didn't seem fun to play to me. You could see Thor doing that same combo over and over.
And I don't know why you would take out Captain America in your first Avengers game . Save something like that for the sequel. People want to play as Cap. I'm sure he'll be back, but the character will probably be missing most of the game.
F0REVERB0SS: I have no great excitement for any of the future announced Marvel movies at the moment. There a couple I am interested in seeing....but the thrill is gone for me. While I liked INFINITY WAR and ENDGAME.....I saw no reason to kill off characters because some actor's contracts were up. I have watched multiple actors play James Bond, Tarzan, Superman, Batman, etc......I could have watched a new actor play Iron Man or Captain America. ENDGAME was an ending. My set of MCU films from IRON MAN to ENDGAME make a grand set and series that I will continue to re-watch when ever I can. Yes, I know that SPIDER-MAN FAR FROM HOME came after ENDGAME....but it seems (to me) to be the start of the new stuff and doesn't fit in with the other movies. I will watch future MCU films as they are released....but I will not be waiting on the edge of my seat for them like I did all the others.
I would be in the same boat if the only things we're getting were sequels to Captain Marvel, Black Panther, Doctor Strange, Thor, Spider-man "Home" films, prequels to Black Widow, new sets of films from Shang-Chi, Eternals and TV shows for Hawkeye, Loki, and Falcon & The Winter Soldier, She-Hulk, Moonknight and Ms. Marvel.
However, what's really got my attention is the X-men. It won't be for a few years yet, so that's got my excitement way, way tempered down. When that time comes and all the casting news is released and the set pictures? Yea you'll see me in cloud 9.
But for now I'm just sitting back and hoping the slate of films that comes out in the next few years doesn't ruin the MCU
Says the man who doesn't trust god to post what he wrote on NL but instead implicitly trusts his device, his ISP, the routers and other internet paraphernalia used to deliver his message which are all products of technology.
LordReed come, on a serious note, when these christians open their mouths, what are they actually thinking? Sometimes when I hear these people talk, it's hard to believe I once had their kind of reasoning. They apply zero logic. They don't care to make sense. Making sense is the least of their worries. Infact when it comes to religion, they detest people who are too brilliant for their tastes and view people who intelligently criticize their beliefs as villains no matter how much you point out the absurdity of their position.
It's a pity that a lot of people will end up living miserable lives and end up dying for nothing. Instead of making significant impact on their lives and the lives of people around them, they devote their short time on Earth constantly trying to please an abusive parent that they've never seen. Imagine!
I almost can't stand to hear them talk, but at the same time, I truly pity their situation.
Uncountable reality-warping, Galaxy busting, solar system eviscerating characters in Marvel's universe.
If it were strictly Marvel's street levellers or metahumans, or barely planetary threats, obviously Goku and Vegeta won't have a problem
Unfortunately, Marvel has more than that. Goku and Vegeta will face bastards like Thor (depending on the version), Silver Surfer, Adult Franklin Richards, The Marquise of Death, Immortal Hulk, Cosmic Ghost Riders, The Annihilators, The Squadron Sinister, The Squadron Supreme
Even if somehow they survive, they have Eternity & Death waiting for them.
Don't lowball Marvel bro, especially if you're talking of the entire f****** universe.
•Yes, the end has come sooner than we expected. The world has seen its first broadcasted proof that all religious god's are nothing but the figment of imagination of some people suffering mass delusion.
•Yes, The world has witnessed it's first actual change of world order. The global pandemic has given the government's total control over religion. Yes, the end has come sooner than we expected.
•All religious deities have been put in their place as non-existent and unhelpful when the biggest of calamities hit. Yes, the end has come sooner than expected.
•Every children born from today will look back to this year and know that yahweh, allah and the rest are nothing but empty words used to brainwash people. Yes, the end has come sooner than expected.
•The shamans whose trade has been cut short by the global pandemic ravaging the world have been constantly showing themselves, proving facts that are already known to the non-sheeple. Yes, the end has come sooner than expected.
•No country on earth counted religion as a necessity when the Sars-Cov virus hit the world, but mandated that all religious activities should cease like the non-essential commodity it is. Yes, the end has come sooner than expected.
•All religious shamans and cowards went to hide and looked up to scientists and doctors to save them from an invisible god more powerful than all their religious god's, showing how powerless the deities they hype is in front of actual danger. Yes, the end just came sooner than we expected.
Have bible readers tagged Covid-19 to be a plague yet? Like trying to say it’s in the Revelation Yet? Just curious if Christians have brought that up?
What’s happening now in life, outside of fiction. We keep doing bad things to mother earth, she’s going to kick our asses more if things proceed as they are. But has nothing to do with a deity.
Oh, and these predictions have been happening 100s of times over the years already! None have actually happened! Like Y2K. LOL. Then 2012.
@Chukwunweikemi, Having considerately taken the time to read all of the very dated bit of frippery you posted, its easy to see why Van Til is regarded the Father of modern presuppositional apologetics. He is the inspiration for all the disputative Hams, Comforts and Hovinds.
Van Til affably welcomes others to believe what they want but simply doesn’t allow for anything other than what comes from the application of dubious Christian ‘logic’ on unevidenced presuppositions of faith, to be possibly true. Everything else can be discounted out of hand. Honestly, you just cant argue with that. Brilliant. But still, I am honestly not happy having wasted my time reading it.
Now i want to hear about you. Care to share what you personally believe and why? Van Til passed in 1987 and is no longer available to contest his ideas. Do you have anything to offer? A nifty little defence of Van Til’s arrogance perhaps?
Martinez39s: I stopped reading halfway because that crap is an eyesore. It's a pathetic and sad, yet amusing, attempt at self-deception.
At first…before I saw he basically “copy and pasted” someone else’s reasonings or argument (unless HE wrote that) …I was preparing to discuss - THEN I scrolled.
My god!!! Like I can always google JW.org if I want to be preached at.
chukwunweikeemi: To the individual who does not believe in God please read carefully. PLEASE FOR SPACE CONSTRAINTS I HAVE HAD TO SPLIT MY POST IN THREE.HERE IS THIRD(FINAL) PART OF MY POST:
Now before I drill into the nerve of the matter, I must again make apologies. The fact that so many people are placed before a full exposition of the evidence for God's existence and yet do not believe in Him has greatly discouraged us. We have therefore adopted measures of despair. Anxious to win your good will, we have again compromised our God. Noting the fact that men do not see, we have conceded that what they ought to see is hard to see. In our great concern to win men we have allowed that the evidence for God's existence is only probably compelling. And from that fatal confession we have gone one step further down to the point where we have admitted or virtually admitted that it is not really compelling at all. And so we fall back upon testimony instead of argument. After all, we say, God is not found at the end of an argument; He is found in our hearts. So we simply testify to men that once we were dead, and now we are alive, that once we were blind and that now we see, and give up all intellectual argument.
Do you suppose that our God approves of this attitude of His followers? I do not think so. The God who claims to have made all facts and to have placed His stamp upon them will not grant that there is really some excuse for those who refuse to see. Besides, such a procedure is self-defeating. If someone in your home town of Washington denied that there was any such thing as a United States Government would you take him some distance down the Potomac and testify to him that there is? So your experience and testimony of regeneration would be meaningless except for the objective truth of the objective facts that are presupposed by it. A testimony that is not an argument is not a testimony either, just as an argument that is not a testimony is not even an argument.
Waiving all this for the moment, let us see what the modern psychologist of religion, who stands on the same foundation with the philosopher, will do to our testimony. He makes a distinction between the raw datum and its cause, giving me the raw datum and keeping for himself the explanation of the cause. Professor James H. Leuba, a great psychologist of Bryn Mawr, has a procedure that is typical. He says, "The reality of any given datum — of an immediate experience in the sense in which the term is used here, may not be impugned: When I feel cold or warm, sad or mirthful, discouraged or confident, I am cold, sad, discouraged, etc., and every argument which might be advanced to prove to me that I am not cold is, in the nature of the case, preposterous; an immediate experience may not be controverted; it cannot be wrong." All this seems on the surface to be very encouraging. The immigrant is hopeful of a ready and speedy admittance. However, Ellis Island must still be passed. "But if the raw data of experience are not subject to criticism, the causes ascribed to them are. If I say that my feeling of cold is due to an open window, or my state of exultation to a drug, or my renewed courage to God, my affirmation goes beyond my immediate experience; I have ascribed a cause to it, and that cause may be the right or the wrong one." (God or Man, New York, 1933, p. 243.) And thus the immigrant must wait at Ellis Island a million years. That is to say, I as a believer in God through Christ, assert that I am born again through the Holy Spirit. The Psychologist says that is a raw datum of experience and as such incontrovertible. We do not, he says, deny it. But it means nothing to us. If you want it to mean something to us you must ascribe a cause to your experience. We shall then examine the cause. Was your experience caused by opium or God? You say by God. Well, that is impossible since as philosophers we have shown that it is logically contradictory to believe in God. You may come back at any time when you have changed your mind about the cause of your regeneration. We shall be glad to have you and welcome you as a citizen of our realm, if only you take out your naturalization papers!
We seem now to have come to a pretty pass. We agreed at the outset to tell each other the whole truth. If I have offended you it has been because I dare not, even in the interest of winning you, offend my God. And if I have not offended you I have not spoken of my God. For what you have really done in your handling of the evidence for belief in God, is to set yourself up as God. You have made the reach of your intellect, the standard of what is possible or not possible. You have thereby virtually determined that you intend never to meet a fact that points to God. Facts, to be facts at all — facts, that is, with decent scientific and philosophic standing — must have your stamp instead of that of God upon them as their virtual creator.
Of course I realize full well that you do not pretend to create redwood trees and elephants. But you do virtually assert that redwood trees and elephants cannot be created by God. You have heard of the man who never wanted to see or be a purple cow. Well, you have virtually determined that you never will see or be a created fact. With Sir Arthur Eddington you say as it were, "What my net can't catch isn't fish."
Nor do I pretend, of course, that once you have been brought face to face with this condition, you can change your attitude. No more than the Ethiopian can change his skin or the leopard his spots can you change your attitude. You have cemented your colored glasses to your face so firmly that you cannot even take them off when you sleep. Freud has not even had a glimpse of the sinfulness of sin as it controls the human heart. Only the great Physician through His blood atonement on the Cross and by the gift of His Spirit can take those colored glasses off and make you see facts as they are, facts as evidence, as inherently compelling evidence, for the existence of God.
It ought to be pretty plain now what sort of God I believe in. It is God, the All-Conditioner. It is the God who created all things, Who by His providence conditioned my youth, making me believe in Him, and who in my later life by His grace still makes me want to believe in Him. It is the God who also controlled your youth and so far has apparently not given you His grace that you might believe in Him.
You may reply to this: "Then what's the use of arguing and reasoning with me?" Well, there is a great deal of use in it. You see, if you are really a creature of God, you are always accessible to Him. When Lazarus was in the tomb he was still accessible to Christ who called him back to life. It is this on which true preachers depend. The prodigal [son] thought he had clean escaped from the father's influence. In reality the father controlled the "far country" to which the prodigal had gone. So it is in reasoning. True reasoning about God is such as stands upon God as upon the emplacement that alone gives meaning to any sort of human argument. And such reasoning, we have a right to expect, will be used of God to break down the one-horse carriage of human autonomy.
But now I see you want to go home. And I do not blame you; the last bus leaves at twelve. I should like to talk again another time. I invite you to come to dinner next Sunday. But I have pricked your bubble, so perhaps you will not come back. And yet perhaps you will. That depends upon the Father's pleasure. Deep down in your heart you know very well that what I have said about you is true. You know there is no unity in your life. You want no God who by His counsel provides for the unity you need. Such a God, you say, would allow for nothing new. So you provide your own unity. But this unity must, by your own definition, not kill that which is wholly new. Therefore it must stand over against the wholly new and never touch it at all. Thus by your logic you talk about possibles and impossibles, but all this talk is in the air. By your own standards it can never have anything to do with reality. Your logic claims to deal with eternal and changeless matters; and your facts are wholly changing things; and "never the twain shall meet." So you have made nonsense of your own experience. With the prodigal you are at the swine-trough, but it may be that, unlike the prodigal, you will refuse to return to the father's house.
On the other hand by my belief in God I do have unity in my experience. Not of course the sort of unity that you want. Not a unity that is the result of my own autonomous determination of what is possible. But a unity that is higher than mine and prior to mine. On the basis of God's counsel I can look for facts and find them without destroying them in advance. On the basis of God's counsel I can be a good physicist, a good biologist, a good psychologist, or a good philosopher. In all these fields I use my powers of logical arrangement in order to see as much order in God's universe as it may be given a creature to see. The unities, or systems that I make are true because [they are] genuine pointers toward the basic or original unity that is found in the counsel of God.
Looking about me I see both order and disorder in every dimension of life. But I look at both of them in the light of the Great Orderer Who is back of them. I need not deny either of them in the interest of optimism or in the interest of pessimism. I see the strong men of biology searching diligently through hill and dale to prove that the creation doctrine is not true with respect to the human body, only to return and admit that the missing link is missing still. I see the strong men of psychology search deep and far into the sub-consciousness, child and animal consciousness, in order to prove that the creation and providence doctrines are not true with respect to the human soul, only to return and admit that the gulf between human and animal intelligence is as great as ever. I see the strong men of logic and scientific methodology search deep into the transcendental for a validity that will not be swept away by the ever-changing tide of the wholly new, only to return and say that they can find no bridge from logic to reality, or from reality to logic. And yet I find all these, though standing on their heads, reporting much that is true. I need only to turn their reports right side up, making God instead of man the center of it all, and I have a marvelous display of the facts as God has intended me to see them.
And if my unity is comprehensive enough to include the efforts of those who reject it, it is large enough even to include that which those who have been set upright by regeneration cannot see. My unity is that of a child who walks with its father through the woods. The child is not afraid because its father knows it all and is capable of handling every situation. So I readily grant that there are some "difficulties" with respect to belief in God and His revelation in nature and Scripture that I cannot solve. In fact there is mystery in every relationship with respect to every fact that faces me, for the reason that all facts have their final explanation in God Whose thoughts are higher than my thoughts, and Whose ways are higher than my ways. And it is exactly that sort of God that I need. Without such a God, without the God of the Bible, the God of authority, the God who is self-contained and therefore incomprehensible to men, there would be no reason in anything. No human being can explain in the sense of seeing through all things, but only he who believes in God has the right to hold that there is an explanation at all.
So you see when I was young I was conditioned on every side; I could not help believing in God. Now that I am older I still cannot help believing in God. I believe in God now because unless I have Him as the All-Conditioner, life is Chaos.
I shall not convert you at the end of my argument. I think the argument is sound. I hold that belief in God is not merely as reasonable as other belief, or even a little or infinitely more probably true than other belief; I hold rather that unless you believe in God you can logically believe in nothing else. But since I believe in such a God, a God who has conditioned you as well as me, I know that you can to your own satisfaction, by the help of the biologists, the psychologists, the logicians, and the Bible critics reduce everything I have said this afternoon and evening to the circular meanderings of a hopeless authoritarian. Well, my meanderings have, to be sure, been circular; they have made everything turn on God. So now I shall leave you with Him, and with His mercy.
Martinez39s, LordReed, Vic2Ree
Did any of you actually read this
This man said
... I hold rather that unless you believe in God you can logically believe in nothing else ...
Yet in the same (over long over-verbose article) mentions "miracles" and invisible beings and "logic" in the same post.
You see that word "False", up there, it will Never make you properly own a piece of land here, with authentic title.
Fallacy, your favourite Weapon, do you really and Truly know what it means? Of course you do not know, if not you would not be able to use it with me.
Why?
Because You do not know the True Power of Fallacy is but the False Powerless One, thought by your false Logic Texts.(it's powerful only against those who do not know that it False and a Mirage, and a Deceit).
And Everything False, I Repeat, Everything False does not have a place to Sit, Firmly, in This world of Truth, Founded in Truth and Soaked in Truth Everything Truth.
Not your fake and false truth which you wish to bring here, But the True Truth which is as True as The Rock called Zuma Rock is the area known and commonly described as Abuja, or as No man can flap his hands or any part of his body, to Fly like a bird, or if you slit the throat of a man, his flesh and blood and body, that uses his throat, must die.
These Are Natural Truths verified and verifiable by all or are you going to say that this is not True? Scratch that, is this not True?
Let me stop here, so that I will know what Ground are we contending about, for I Perceive, that you have a different 'Truth other than Known Established Natural Truths, so what is it?
Ow, Sisi, you do not want another beating, I respect that, I respect that, no one uses Keke Marwa to fight a Caterpillar and it would not be right and good (I Love good) to encourage one.
That's Just Mean!
So I Respectfully and Honourably back out and I leave you be!
Dtruthspeaker: Same as making Contradictory statements, it is Useless to everyone, except of course Liars!
Contradictory statements? Wow. Let us examine this grave accusation, shall we?
You are either inside the office or outside it. So I choose for you and knock you to one side, which is it is Your clear stand that there is no God and I am not going to allow you to change it.
This is a false dichotomy fallacy. You're creating a false black and white scenario. Any honest individual would look up what a false dichotomy fallacy means but it's not like you care anyway, because your understanding of logic is so incredibly skewed. You're perfectly satisfied demonstrating how uninformed and dishonest you are. Basically, you've proved her point. You don't care what she believes. She's told you her stance but you feel satisfied misrepresenting her due to cognitive dissonance. To you it is impossible for someone to take the middle ground. Let me ask you: do you KNOW god exists or do you BELIEVE god exists.
Anyways, lack of belief =/= belief. No, she did NOT contradict herself.
This is not right everyone is free to make and unmake their minds, so count me out.
Well, we now know how untrue this is for you....
Did you not hear that you can not believe what is on television this days not to talk about Recorded Theatre Art Performances called movies? Your mistake!
I think you had no point here. You just felt like saying something you thought will be smart. Well you FAILED.
I do not know much about atheist but one thing I know is that They can never stand on anything not to talk about Naturally Established Truth Seen in Nature.
Another own goal. Let me clue you in because it seems you're the only fellow who missed the point of the op: If you don't know much about someone, find out directly from them. You don't know what they know. Don't be an assumptive dickhead.
But they must run all over the world trying to escape their fall While Truth Only Chooses One House or Castle to Live and either stands with his castle or falls with it, Like a devoted Captain of a Ship!
Your faux sense of superiority plus your overwhelming ego will be death of you
If Atheist can stand on One Ground, they would have some respects whether they stand or they fall, like soldiers, rather than Running around Li like children playing "catcher"!
It's cognitive dissonance that's dealing with you sir! You want to redefine atheism to suit your selfish purpose because you have no legitimate rebuttals to their position.
Stop being such a wuss. Gosh!
Well I did not scroll down to comment, I commented while scrolling down
So what say you?
I say you are an unimportant douche with delusions of grandeur. You think you know everything and are not humble to learn. You want to bully people to buy your opinion but I'm sorry mate. It doesn't always work like that. I think meeting atheists online was like a culture shock to you, I understand. But sometimes you just have to let it go.
If you're going to sit there and point accusing fingers, what do you hope to achieve from this excuse of a response.
Hey Sab, Ready for Round 2, with the Rules of Fair Play and Good Reasons, No insults?
Ugh please save it.
If it were my XxSabrinaxX days, I'd have brought you to your knees . I was seldom active last year on NL, but you could ask around and the few who knew me would tell you.
You are hands down the most insufferable apologist I've had the displeasure of quoting. You're clearly not intelligent (honestly you're one of the dumbest Christians I've met on here), but you're also so full of yourself when you address atheists. You're not ready to learn. You make rash judgements often exposing how uninformed you really are. Look how quick you were to imply she was contracting herself without understanding the basics of taking philosophical stances. You went ahead to commit an outrageous fallacy that not even an undergraduate logic student would commit.
You're so trash really. I'm not ready to pass through untold pain spoon-feeding you. I only wanted to respond to your rebuttal just so viewers of the thread won't be deceived, thinking you're making sense. Well I expect your type to support you tho.
This is my last response to you. You're not qualified to have any logical discussion for now. Maybe if your reply to this impressed me, I'll indulge you
Cc. DaughterOfAllah, Martinez39s, Vic2Ree, LordReed
Dear OP, you forgot -- "AtHEiSm iS a ReLIgiON" -- Hands down the most retarded claim they love to make. They think the whole world revolves around their myopic views. In a way it ties in with your first point though.
Jokerman: How can you call yourself a Christian, and not go to church at all??
We need to check very well
Aww just stop
A christian who doesn't attend church for once in his life can very well still make heaven as opposed to your judgemental self-righteous ass.
All you need to make heaven is a strong relationship with Christ, not church attendance. It says so in your bible. Your bible recommends the gathering of christians, but only to foster the faith of believers. It's not a do or die affair.
It has been quite some time since i've been to church. So maybe things have changed but the churches i have gone to never seemed wholesome. At least not after a bit of thinking, observing and questioning.
They are mostly hateful sexist places filled with self serving self righteous greedy hypocritical people.
Rozz: i have earlier created a topic on that in religion section and your likes came in with annoyance and bombarded everything with insults.They are waiting to pounce
Religion / Re: Proof Of God! Proof Of God!! All Over The Place. by Sabr1na(f): 2:54pm On Dec 31, 2021 
. Save something like that for the sequel. People want to play as Cap. I'm sure he'll be back, but the character will probably be missing most of the game.
.