₦airaland Forum

ijebabe: Teacher was paid to do his job na. Now I can refuse to be taught

Well this is a registered charity with Sagamu Local Government authorities. It is like Oxfam, I do it for free and out of our love for people. Love which I express by intellectual pummelling and ridiculing.

Ranked 4th in Africa and 36th in the world for what?

Raape? Extrajudicial killings? Torture? Illiteracy? Abuse of human rights? War crimes?

Which one?

Trust me, if you are a local in most countries, you would have some regret if these wild barbarians came to your land.

ijebabe: WTF! Una no dey tire

If your teacher say im dey tired instead of teaching you back in the day, you go dey where you dey today?

This is free, high-quality education online, to educate the mind.

I am just watching the Andrew Marr Show now (A UK political show), and the presenter is interviewing the leader of UKIP, Nigel Farage. UKIP is the UK's fourth largest party, who are trying to take over from the LibDems. Here is the conversation I just fcking heard:

Presenter: Okay, is you party ready for the big time, people ask? People say, they look at the members who start populating your forum, there, some of them are racist, some of them are anti-gay and then when their views emerge you don't throw them out.

UKIP Leader: I don't think the racist slur works at all because we are the only party in British politics actually prohibits anybody even becoming a member if they have formerly been a member of the BNP Party or any racist organisation (i.e. the UK's version of KKK/Nazi party). As far as the homophobic claims are concerned, look we are a party that believes in free speech. I know on our members forum, sometimes people go ridiculously over the top, but I do think ... (interrupted)

Presenter: Somebody said on your forum, a member [of UKIP] apparently, schizophrenia amongst black people is caused by inbreeding in the Carribbeans. Now, do you throw them out, do you take any disciplinary actions?

UKIP Leader: Well it is difficult to know what to do Other than to say ... (interrupted)

Presenter: Labour say throw them out.

UKIP Leader: If people go beyond the pale, we do throw them out. And infact, over the last few years lots of people have been removed from UKIP. There is a balance here between free speech and debate and people to bring our party into disrepute.

Presenter: Senior UKIP member, Dr Julio Gaspar, branded gay rights a lunatics charter and says "Some homosexuals prefer sex with animals"? What are you going to do about that?

UKIP Leader: Well she is not a senior UKIP member, No 1. ... (interrupted)

Presenter: Well she is still at party though, isn't she?

UKIP Leader: She has resigned as an officer of our Oxford branch. I am very pleased to say.

Presenter: Right! But you don't throw people out for those kinds of things.

UKIP Leader: Listen, don't think this is just UKIP, this happens in the Tory party, it happens in the Labour party, all party leaders face this kinds of things.

You think the presenter would dare ask a political party leader to throw people out for making comments that are pro-gay?

You think that presenter would not be hounded until the BBC sacks him?

So much for free speech and balanced interviewing and news reporting.

You think the presenter would ever be that aggressive to parties who's members are all for gay rights?

You think the presenter would ever challenge pro-gay people about the illogical and outrageous claims they make in support of their cause?

You think the presenter would aggressively lie on a pro-gay camp, like he did with the Gaspar issue, and get away with it without being punished by the BBC for such gaff of not getting simple facts right?

This was EXACTLY how they hounded the Conservative party until those ones had to vote for someone like David Cameron before they ever had a chance winning the election. Now Cameron sings like a parrot for pro-gay views and would kiss the gay-lobby's arsse at every opportunity to remain in power. DRAGOONING! CALUMNY! That is the tactic! I have said it on NL several times!

When I tell people they are being brainwashed and it is all a systemic dragooning, they think I am joking? And lets not forget the piggybacking. Homosexuality cannot stand on its own so make it an affiliate of racism to make sure the white people quickly feel guilty. And note, take this as powerful observation of their tactics taught to you by Sagamite, it is usually applied in the order - racism and gay, rather than gay and racism even if talking about gay issues only or it is a gay person talking. This is because they want to disarm the target and mentioning racism (linked to slavery) first is more powerful in weakening them or putting them on the defensive and make them appear like if they are struggling to give an answer. Watch and observe that from now on and you will see what I am talking about. That is what the presenter did. Perfect Brainwash!

The argument for gay rights is not based on logical dialectics, it is all a systemic cunning propaganda, that is why I remain unconvinced as I am too imperiouly smart!

Jenams: Now I see our leaders are not really d problem wit dis country! We the citizens are! How come professional Journalists find it difficult to report a 30minutes event accurately? Each wit different version all to confuse and mislead her very own people! Oh nigerian citizens! Why arth thou thy very own enemy?

These are examples of the moronic person quacks you should be blaming:

http://www.punchng.com/news/punch-announces-new-appointments/

Incompetent fucktards!

TouchDown: C'mon...
Jonathan can't do all that. He is a typical Nigerian politician who benefits from the sleaze in public office. Anyone expecting actions like the one you listed above is on a long thing.

The more sad thing is that if there is a Nigerian politician willing to do this, you will still have some Nigerian fucktards attacking it saying:

- Oh, this is selective justice. Are these the only corrupt people in Nigeria? Or are they the most corrupt?

- President X is only doing this because they are from region. What about Y and Z from his region? This is just victimisation and marginalisation of my region.

Most Nigerians are fucktards!

J12: The following excerpts from the After the Ball will exemplify the manipulative tactics Marshall Kirk and Hunter Madsen enticed pro‐sodomy activists employ.
“The first order of business is desensitization of the American public concerning gays…To desensitize the public is to help it view homosexuality with indifference instead of with keen emotion. Ideally we would have the straight register differences in sexual preference the way they register different tastes for ice cream…”

79 “The masses should not be shocked and repelled by premature exposure to homosexual behavior itself…the imagery of sex should be downplayed…”

80 “…gays must be cast as victims in need of protection so that straights will be inclined by reflex to assume the role of protector...”

81 “…make use of symbols which reduce the mainstream’s sense of threat, which lower its guard…”

82 “…replace the mainstream’s self‐righteous pride about its homophobia with shame and guilt…”

83 “Talk about gays and gayness as loudly and as often as possible…” “The principal behind this advice is simple: almost all behavior begins to look normal if you are exposed to enough of it at close quarters and among your acquaintances."

84 “Constant talk builds the impression that public opinion is at least divided on the subject…”

85 Madsen and Pill (Kirk) explain their scheme in greater depth when they write:
“Where we talk is important. The visual media, film and television, are plainly the most powerful image‐makers in Western civilization. The average American household watches over seven hours of TV daily. Those hours open up a gateway into the private world of straights, through which a Trojan horse might be passed. As far as desensitization is concerned, the medium is the message‐‐of normalcy. So far, gay Hollywood has provided our best covert weapon in the battle to desensitize the mainstream.”

86 “Not so many years ago, all of these statements would have been unbelievably offensive to most Americans, even if they contained no reference to ‘homosexuality,’ precisely because they all advocate coercive tampering with peoples most private domain, their thoughts, opinions, and beliefs, Kirk and Madsen call it ‘transforming the social values of straight America…’”

87 Let’s look at the mechanics of their strategy for ‘transforming’ society into what they feel would be a more acceptable form. The authors continue. “Would a desensitizing campaign of open and sustained talk about gay issues reach every rabid opponent of homosexuality? Of course not. While public opinion is one primary source of mainstream values, religious authority is the
other. When conservative churches condemn gays, there are only two things we can do to confound the homophobia of true believers. First, we can use talk to muddy the moral waters. This means publicizing support for gays by more moderate churches, raising theological objections of our own about conservative interpretations of biblical teachings, and exposing hatred and inconsistency. Second, we can undermine the moral authority of homophobic churches by portraying them as antiquated backwaters, badly out of step with the times and with the latest findings of psychology. . . .

Even if I was initially doubting these J12's post objectively as some form of propaganda from the other side full of unsubstantiated conjectures. (Yes, I do work hard mentally to be objective) I cannot fault it especially these quoted parts.

IT IS EXACTLY WHAT IS HAPPENING TO THE "T"!

When I talk about brainwash, this is EXACTLY the tactic I see them using and feeding the next generation of kids to the point these kids have not only become vocal supporters of homosexuality, they have become dogmatic, militant and aggressive supporters who are so brainwashed they are not willing to tolerate, talkless of listen to, any differing views. While they are simulteneously screaming tolerance.

As I have always said, the advent of homosexual acceptibility has never come across as a logical process. I HAVE ALWAYS SAID ON NL that it looks like a systemic mix of cons, pity and dragooning.

They asks for a little bit saying it is "harmless", let you get used to it and then ask for more which they sell as "harmless" again. The perfect act of brainwashing.

The dragooning has come to a point, in the UK, it is okay to praise homosexuality and no one batters an eyelid, but if you talk against it in public, there is some form of punishment. Basically lets be tolerant and live and let live but only pro-gay views are acceptable in that tolerance. Hence feeding the brainwash to impressionable kids that that stance is the only one acceptable in public. And these misled kids see themselves as the self-appointed protectors of homosexuals. They have been tactically ventriloquized to have a "just cause" to fight for, that makes them feel part of something important. Then they vomit the platitudes they are fed that are easily destroyed but yet they remain dogmatic because it is their "just cause". Just like the quoted stated.

ANYONE IN THE UK should WATCH any TV interview by TV presenters on gay issues and see the soft questions they throw to the pro-gay debater, while they are aggressively throwing very much harder and "you-are-at-fault" questions at the anti-gay party in the studio. It is a field day. The purrrfect Orwellian social engineering!

I have said it SEVERAL TIMES ON NL! They use the TV as the Trojan horse! Every programme that the youths watch and love gradually gets gay characters introduced (the message of normalcy ) and ALWAYS these gay characters are generally good people, everyone that likes them is good and everyone that has an objection are made to appear have something wrong with them.

Then you see the pro-gays talking about being enlightened and progressive stance. Funkified!

The only thing missing from this write-up which I have mentioned before is how they piggyback on racism/civil rights by association to suppress white people's views. They keep on harping that crap of anti-gay is like anti-black, which makes any sensible whiteman reluctant to appear to hate blacks. There is nothing similar between blacks and homosexuals. The former are normal, the latter are deviants.

Smartie gurl: hahahahahaha! Am sowie Mr. Waz jst askin sha.

She seems to be trying to be a he-she now.

Smartie gurl: yeah am fine. Hope u ain't picking up on our newbies?

I have self restraint.

Shollypopz:

Are you for real?

Smartie gurl: lolz! Sagamite is that you? Is being a while u knw.

Hey, cutie. Yeah! Hope you are good?

dayokanu: Abi ooo

Justin Beiber would marry in 8yrs time and one girl would claim it was her emotional balance that made him money or Zuckerbergs wife would claim it was her psychological balance that made facebook

That is an "intellectual point" in a person's world. Part of a profound "intellectual debate".

Osareime: Everything was not so easy. There was discipline. Detention if you fail to do morning duties, if you were late, if you broke school rules. And the detention wasn't fun. You learnt to study, and you learnt to use your time wisely. You learnt valuable life lessons that is my point.

Sounds good. I just hope they can remain like that in the long run and don't increasingly get funky.

For all the Adesoye college, Crisland and Atlantic hall places that made parents pay through their nose for their kids back in the day so the kids can have a funky life, I am yet to see the results. They just paid exorbitant school fees for their kids to eat ice cream, jollof rice, speak phone and dance like P. Diddy. Unlike LJC, I don't recall any of them ending up in top unis.

Osareime: I advocate for boarding schools because children at that age need to learn to deal with all kinds of characters. When a child is a day student they do not learn TOLERANCE the way those in boarding house will.

The beauty of boarding house is that you learn from teachers but learn also from your peers from so many different backgrounds.

I know for one I learnt to deal with different people differently, I learnt to speak up for myself, I learnt to mix social life, sports and academics to excel in all.

I learnt the importance of looking tidy, organised and being responsible for myself.

For homosexuality one has to guard and pick one that doesn't allow for that.
In my boarding house we didn't use bunks and two people sharing a bed was one of the most serious offences one could commit. It was grounds for suspension or even expulsion.

Even at home a child could learn bad character. I would rather allow my child learn early to be responsible and be able to deal with peer pressure.

A good boarding house is a very good experience I would advice every parent to take advantage of.

So well said.

I never learnt the tidy side. I learnt how to tell juniors to do it for me though.

www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/slums-nurtured-nani-711802

www.portugaldailyview.com/whats-new/cristiano-ronaldo-the-humble-chosen-one

And some moronic person would now turn around saying that some woman should take a share of their money because they would not have the emotionally and psychologically balance to buy a house without her.

And the cretin would call it "intellectual debate".

londoner: @sagamite....u like that?

Dude, whatever floats your boat.....lol

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bwppNIh_0Yk&

londoner: Btw...sagamite....u r a lil freaky deaky huh?....lol

Anyhoo....back to the positive thread about low cuts on black women.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w2_D9eYpSnk&

FXKing2012: They fought it in court cos they werent willing to pay as much as they were being asked to pay, not that they werent willing to pay at all.

I now know why I'm finding it very difficult to differentiate btw u sagamite - crying shallow moronic eeeediots.

Poverty is in deed a disease.

Here is what the person said:

"Again rich folks dont go crying over divorce settlements, only poor and average dudes do."

"Little wonder the likes of Michael Jordan, Johnny Depp, Bernie Ecclestone, Rupert Murdoch, Mel Gibson, Harrison Ford, Steven Spielberg, Tiger Woods, Madonna, James Cameron, Paul McCartney, Kevin Costner, Kenny Rogers, Lionel Richie, Donald Trump, Michael Douglas, Mick Jagger, etc etc didnt find it outrageous to settle their exes big time and didnt go about calling them thieves after the settlement.

Only poor and average people go on ranting about divorce settlements. If you are truly rich you will not even lose sleep over it because what you will still have left after the settlement is way over and beyond what you can spend in your lifetime."



Product of a failed education system.

So rich people are not happy to pay divorce settlements now?

Cretin!

I am never wrong! You are dumb beyond levels of acceptability to qualify as a human being.

dayokanu: Kobe Bryant who compained about it wasnt rich enough or McCartney who fought it in court wasnt rich, Deinde Fernandez who fought divorce settlement wasnt rich

I now understand why Sagamite has strong convictions that you are a cretin

When it is so easy to test and fail the assertion a person is making during a period his IQ is being questioned, then you know that person is a pure pathological person!

I don't insult people on NL, I am honestly just educating them on what they are. I am serious.

kandiikane: What BS? You mean yours? You have mixed up being a strong black woman for a ghetto black woman. They are two different things.

What you're doing is the same as saying strong black man means thug, guns and hoodies. Obama is a strong black man.

I'm a black woman, whatever typical means, I do not know but I know threatened men try to change the concept of a strong black woman to ghetto woman. Which is messed up and shows insecurity.


Anyways, we shall not derail this thread any further. We can continue with this whenever a thread comes up on it.

Yes, strong black men mean thug, guns and hoodies.

You are either a man or not, there is nothing positive about strong black men and it is normally used by hopeless people like cap28 who never prepared themselves and strived to be the best and then claim the white man is holding them down while a black man is the strongest president in the world based on the vote of white people.

I don't do "We blacks", I do "We intellectuals" or "We sensibles". Obama is one of the 2 latter, not a strong black man. 2Chainz and Waka Flocka are strong black men.

Continue saying black women intimidate, it just means: more never-been-married black women, more successful black men taking a flight-for-quality (they are insecure ), more being left with the dregs of society black men (they are very secure, strong black men ) that baby-mamayouup and help make you "strong" black women demonstrate your "intimidation" while single-handedly raising kids.

I am not interest in a strong black woman, I am interested in a sane woman.

Majority of you black women are so good at "intimidating" men to the point you all men of all races talk about black women's attitude negatively. You scare us!!! I am biting my nails out of insecurity!


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qOgT9Ifw6Io

kandiikane: When black men feel threatened by strong black women they start uttering rubbish and making them out to be like the average black ghetto women.

Strong black women is not the same as ghetto woman.

There are black single parents because majority of western black men are useless. They do not have ambitions or a future.

OMG! You sure sound like the typical black woman!

I am glad I have old explanations that shows I am not making it up. I just have tremendous clairvoyance. I am a solid social observer.

https://www.nairaland.com/1120970/should-lady-house-chores-fiance/8#13354961

What is there to be threatened about?

Avoidance or flight-for-quality is "intimidation"? Only in a black woman's world.

Because I don't want to eat in McDonalds and prefer to go to a classy restaurant means I am intimidated by McDonalds? Please cut the BS!

CohenJane: I felt very sorry when I read your post quoted above. I felt sorry for your innocence. My conclusion is that it is either you are either not residing in this country, you are not a citizen of this country or you have left the country in a long time.

You know what, all those things can never happen in Nigeria, I'm sorry to disappoint you.

I know, I know, I know!

Definitely not under this uninspiring cretin called Jonathan!

delors: Misinformed? Maga! I aint talking about Loyola Jesuit Abuja...thats for the ajebos like FGC Ijanikin...we know whassup abeg...I am talking about LOYOLA COLLEGE Ibadan, Agodi...of the 90s....even the name of the area self fit make u repent! It was a life-threaening, life-changing, life-denting, life-bending experience I nor fit try again...

If they can just package this description with this description:

Osareime: The academic life was great. We had the best WAEC result for years.

Nice programs and events that I look back now and really appreciate.

All in one school, I would fire my children straight there.

J12: 2. Nobody is born gay

Inconclusive in my view, but I suspect some are.

I would be more interested in finding root causes and developing cures where possible rather than stewpid acceptance and integration.

Osareime: I went to a private boarding school in Abuja and it was beautiful. There was no bullying because the management was American and Nigerians trained in America. At a point teachers were not even allowed to tell students to kneel down. The food was good. We ate 5 times a day and good food. (not home quality but good).

Ice cream, salads, drinks, yogurts, chicken and many others were normal. The bathrooms were always clean, hot water flowed in harmattan. It wasn't home but it was comfortable.

The students were from good homes. I made many many good friends there.

The academic life was great. We had the best WAEC result for years.

Nice programs and events that I look back now and really appreciate.

Although I lost a lot of classmates in a plane crash in 2005, (RIP angels), I loved my boarding school experience.

I would love for my children to have an experience like that.

I personally would like my kids to face some slight hardship in school, not have everything laid out for them. That is not the world they would be pushed out to eventually, especially in Nigeria.

That is just my preference.

colombiana: Ur papa don become president before? Dis one wen u get the full knowledge of good governance

You are a person!

And the person that clicked "like" on you comment is a person!

Cretins like you cannot be aware that, apart from common sense, those that are well educated actually know what good governance is.

Cretinous product of a failed education system!

smakati: He already scored some major points by the suprise inspection, but unfortunately he messed it up with his comments ( although I don't want to believe he said that)....I drive past that police college every sunday and I always think ''here is a waste of premium property''......what 'they' should do is to build another academy in a less developed area (e.g ogun or even bauchi, yes bauchi), with this they will have available land for expansion in future......we need to plan ahead in this country, its like we are only interested in short term solutions.......am sure the original builders of the ikeja academy didn't envisage that things will turn out this way......I can go on and on but what difference does it make, according to our constitution I need to be 30-35years before I can become a senator/representative/governor and 40 years to become a president......am just 24years.....so my voice is not been heard in this country....its just noise on social networks.....I guess I will just wait till am 30....but for now, I will 'siddon look' and pray there will still be a Nigeria for me to change when am 30.......maybe I am growing pessimistic **sighs**

You are so fcking right!

EXACTLY what I was thinking when I was driving past it to the airport on my last visit to Nigeria.

Sincere 9gerian: This report by Punch is most likely false, mischievous, fallacious and ridiculous.

Punch is a WELL KNOWN opposition news media organisation. As I post this comment, I'm watching Channelstv Sunrise programme. One of the presenter (the male) confirmed that he was there live and commended the president for coming, though he said if not for the Channelstv exposee, the president wouldn't have come.

Most importantly, the Channelstv owner, John Momoh, was there live and accompanied Mr president all thru. Mr president couldn't have allowed him to accompany the team if he saw something wrong in what Channelstv had done.

The Channelstv that started all this reported Mr president's visit very well and nothing of such was contained in any of their report. Channelstv has been beating its chest since yesterday for triggering what led to Mr president visiting the police college.


I must also add that if indeed Mr president said those things in the same context as Punch and Nations (another ACN media house) reported, then Mr president erred in my opinion. No effort must be spared at exposing any rot ANYWHERE in the system, provided security of the nation will not be breached. Everyone must be held accountable.

The reality is that there's so much incompetence and nonchallance in the public sector. Most times even the SIMPLEST of things (as little as dusting of ones table or cutting of grass) are left undone because of govt property mentality.

Whatever, is the case, the police college will not remain the same again.

The main issue there is not what he said, it is the virtually nothing or incompetence that you are guaranteed he would do afterwards.

Anyone with a brain would do the following as basic:

- Order for the police budget obtained for the training college for at least the last 6 years.
- Call those in charge of the budget to come and explain how the budgetary allocation was utilised.
- If no tally with what is on the ground, suspend/retrench those responsible for the budget.
- Ask for the performance appraisal of those suspended and retrenched.
- Any of their superiors that has appraised them as performing during that period should be suspended or retrenched too.
- Get lawyers to advise on presidential powers and see if you have the powers to probe their private lives.
- If no powers, get your party members to raise a bill to give that power.
- Probe the police officers lives and compare with their salaries, anything over they cannot explain is seized or forfeited.
- Then take them to court and send them to jail.

I can guarantee you that the person you are defending would not do half of that basic. He is way too daft. I came up with that in less than 10 minutes. The person you call President cannot come up with that in 3 years. He is a FOOOOOL!

C me o: To me, I see as the most careless statement I have ever heard from him in recent times, afterall the picture attached to the news shows that the report is true.

Make you no let me insult you o!

This is the most careless statement from Jonathan? Are you serious.

My friend, this is the typical statement from the person Nigerians voted for because his name is Goodluck and he has had luck getting to presidency so he would bring them luck.

These kinds of statements are normal and expected from the cretin!

SeunPlus: The interview is kinda slow

Yes, because you have not done yours.