₦airaland Forum

Billyonaire: No photographic evidences of their achievements ? I hardly travel locally. I depend on you people to show me pictures.

You are a bloody cretin!

One of those moronic Nigerians that are bamboozled by elephant projects.

So it is pictures you want to see?

person!

deshclones: Fvcking 35yr old man...u r bereft of any ideas..all u do is hurl insult..see d way you gladly showed the entire NLanders who u really are..sagamumu dat cannot indulge in an honourable debate with his juniors..I am ashamed of u and sorry for your folks..go on and take more pics in more reflected lifts..that's what you do best apart from hurling insults ..monumental cretin ala fucktardeen

You should be ashamed of yourself and how people keep on pointing out that you are a cretin on your threads anytime you open a thread to demonstrate your immense fucktardism.

https://www.nairaland.com/995725/girls-sha#11509583

https://www.nairaland.com/703056/getting-married-girl-3rd-class/1#10449029

Can you see how moronic you are?

Now shut up!

antitpiah: Well I understand you have tremendous sympathy for him, and perhaps you enjoy is clownish, often petulant, attitude as well, but there comes a times when people like you need to intervene before he ends up at Yaba. Yaba, from what I have been tell by people like him, wont be this nice to him.

Cretin, did you go to school?

antitpiah: Well as far as NL is concerned, the mad man is not hypothetical, he is for real. It is just a matter of time before he pulls a Columbine.

Go and learn to spell.

As I told you, you are not getting your own back at the world by being a troll.

You were bullied in school by the happening guys and chinned by the girls? Tough! Live with it and stop being bitter.

[quote author=Missy_B]The crowd is just as stùpid as, if not more than, the hypothetical mad man.
Your time is given to only those important to you, otherwise, the action is - ignore.[/quote]If the olympic 100m final is taking place without Usain Bolt. All the international camera lens would be focused on Bolt during the race and at the end of it.

antitpiah: LOL

He is they class clown, what do you expects? Have you ever been to Yaba? The street peoples aka mad men attract the must crowd for a reason. The irony of Sagamite's popularity is that he thinks we are laughing with him when in fact we are laughing at him.

Learn to speak proper English, community college mooron!

2buff: Well then stop calling her. Shikena!

Even when she gives in and flashes, still delay for about a day before responding.
Dont be so quick to lick her fingers whenever she deems it fit to extend them to you.
This is how some girls make pets out of grown azz men.

You too, get her hungry for your attention and starve her till she begs. If she doesn't get to that point, then she doesn't care.

But come oh...when was the last time any of us got in touch with God? Are we this girl?

GBAM!

My scoring


newacca - 8

He had a more holistic approach to his answers. He looked beyond Godfatherism and identified other issues, I think he missed out some though that are more important than the ones he mentioned (e.g. policing). He did give good points of the impact of all issues he identfied. His write up is good because he stuck to relevant points and did not dabble in unnecessary verbosity. Great read and write up.



breezy047 - 7

He had a more holistic approach to his answers. He looked beyond Godfatherism and identified other issues. He did not identify what the main cause of corruption and our developmental crisis were in his view though, he merely alluded to some other likely (not main) causes. He did give good points of the impact of godfatherism and its forms. He gave a case study to show Godfatherism is not necessarily a driver of corruption and lack of development, which indicates it probably cannot be the main cause. His write up is good because he stuck to relevant points and did not dabble in unnecessary verbosity.




Shymmex - 6

He did not prove that Godfatherism is the main cause of corruption and our developmental crisis, he merely attributed these problems to godfatherism. He completely ignored other possible reasons of corruption and developmental crisis and critique them to show they are not the main ones or are less impactful than godfatherism. He did give good and dynamic points of the impact of godfatherism and its forms.



coogar - 5

He did not prove that Godfatherism is the main cause of corruption and our developmental crisis, he merely attributed these problems to godfatherism. He completely ignored other possible reasons of corruption and developmental crisis and critique them to show they are not the main ones or are less impactful than godfatherism. He did give good points of the impact of godfatherism and its forms.



chucky234 - 4

He did not prove that Godfatherism is the main cause of corruption and our developmental crisis, he merely attributed these problems to godfatherism. He completely ignored other possible reasons of corruption and developmental crisis and critique them to show they are not the main ones or are less impactful than godfatherism. He also made fundamental generic assumptions like "God-fatherism is also reponsible for the shallow and poor decisions elected government officials make daily". Really? There are not other reason why elected officials make poor decisions? He did give decent points of the impact of godfatherism. His right up is good because he stuck to relevant point and did not dabble in unnecessary verbosity.



cheddarking - 2

He did not prove that Godfatherism is the main cause of corruption and our developmental crisis, he merely attributed these problems to godfatherism. He completely ignored other possible reasons of corruption and developmental crisis and critique them to show they are not the main ones or are less impactful than godfatherism. He simply piled his write up with quotes, with majority of his argument points not his own thinking. Throw in the conjecture of when he attributed Godfatherism to Boko Haram. He did give some crumbly points of the impact of godfatherism.

Pussyclat, I can see you.

Viewing this topic: Donlittle(m), aso ebi(m), D sage, Ogetogeo(m), cheddarking(m), Sagamite(m) and 3 guest(s)

You are running? I thought you said you are leaving for a party.

You are running from the abattoir?

talina: Wow you guys!

Let me throw in a bit... The courts(at least here in the west) do not make valid evaluations about who is the best parent for a child to reside with,sadly. Ask any lawyer.

When a couple gets married,the wealth and debt accumulated while they are together is split 50/50. Child support is based on income,and spousal support is optional. I think its greedy for a woman to ask for spousal support unless some out of the ordinary circumstance is at play.

Thank you!

But, according to MJB, when the courts make the judgement, that is the Truth and Facts. Lets ignore the premise and default bias. The court is right. Lets not do what "smart people" (as he himself said) do and evaluate. The court is right!

Cheddarking, put your argument here.

MRbrownJAY: NO, i am telling you that it is a FACT that the SAUDI LAW believes that a 2yr old would be better raised by his father....and therefore, if any cases were to be tried there, the judgment will surely favor in that direction.

as a smart person, i would rather that both the parents be EVALUATED, before deciding on who is more suited to care for the child.......but different countries have different laws, and therefore we should follow them (or stay away from such places).

Thank you! You are nailing yourself

You said you made your assumption that the wife deserved £21m because the courts that looked at the case said so. So who are we to question it? You refused to take into the consideration the premise.

The fact there is that the premise in the UK is to shaft the man (as you yourself agreed to earlier), so there is no evaluation, the judges ARE ORDERED to make an assumption that it is joint money, not evaluate who really did the work and made it.

So surely, if a Saudi court says a husband is best to raise a 2 year old, you will not quesion it and you will agree the husband deserves to be awarded custody. YOU SHOULD ALSO refuse to look at the premise that the Islamic law shafts women.

You should be like an unsmart person (like you did with the UK) and not evaluate each parent's real capacity to take care of a 2 year old and just believe the court, that looked at all the evidence, is right. Who are you to question it?

So you know smart people (like me) like real, solid evaluation? Not moronic premises of a court like UK or Saudi?

Stop dodging the question:

Tell me, from your understanding and intelligence, what has more influence on an individual: Their nurturing or their marriage.

When you finish answering that, tell me, which do you (from your capability of making assumptions) think will have more influence: The mentorship of parents over about 25 years from birth or an 11 year marriage of a man from his 30s.

I wait.