Saintohia's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Saintohia's Profile › Saintohia's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 (of 18 pages)
AnanseK: What does he need to function properly ? He has enough cassava bread - 1 billion Naira for last year alone.^^^^^^^^ Stop all distraction for not having a core northerner (Muslim) as president You people should stop insisting on having your person head any organization or system, even when is obvious that such person doesn't fit into such position. ... then we would start counting for him. |
Ngwakwe: This is the moment I will always remember the bravery of Orji Uzor Kalu for scolding and embarrassing his colleagues (Mbadinuju the then Governor of Anambra, Nnamani of Enugu State, Udenwa of Imo State and Egwu the then Governor of Ebonyi State) for supporting the mass arrests and sundry extra judicial killing of members of MASSOB by the orders of OBJ.^^^^^^^ No cop (s) can try or dream to do that in Aba, Bxxxxx would've multiplied the number of evil agents dead by now. |
stuhporh: [b]^^^^^^^ The NPF cannot be framed by MASSOB, if they are efficient. NPF arrested MASSOB members and detained them, meaning that they are in NPF custody. On punctuation being awful, please correct the below: Ihemere madu dika gi amaghi ihe bu na ejighi asusu gi kuziere gi ihe n'uloakwukwo. .... to see who understands language semantics more. |
The first mistake was allowing a Boro Haram staunch man to head NPF. Ask people who knows about Jos crisis and how he was indicted. A dog would always give birth to dog, he wouldn't change but would rather be using his agents in disguise to continue their evil mission.. This wouldn't and can never happen in any other state except Nigeria. |
stuhporh: [b]stuhporh: How can some people be so gullible to believe everything, they hear, and instantly too.^^^^^^^^ You couldn't think out of the box yourself. In whose custody were they should NPF fail to show or prove they are still alive? |
[quote author=~Bluetooth]Well if killing the trouble - makers will make Nigeria safe,then kill them all afterall boko members too are Nigerians and they got killed for making troubles.[/quote]^^^^^^^ You sound like the greatest 21st century fool. Anytime you want to compare things, it should be apple for apple, ok? |
AnanseK: and they think certificate though exam cheating is equal to merit. See the kind of dumb president they gave us^^^^^^^ If you don't know what to say read the post and shut up, ok? Which cheating is more than giving someone who scored 15% in JAMB exam ( from the north) admission to high institution on federal character (enhanced stupidity) and refuse the person that scored 85% from other region admision on merit? I'm not GEJ fan, which of you people's earlier president did better than him and Nigeria is almost yielding to its elastic limit? Have your people allowed him to function normal since he ascended as Nigerian president? We refused to be fooled. |
AnanseK: The thread is not about the the north. It is about the Igbo COAS ihejirika's nepotism . Placing Igbo's in senior military position at the expense of all other groups in the country. The Yoruba officers sidelined by ihejirika are much more in number than from any other group. Yorubas have a right to complain. This man ihejirika is dangerous.^^^^^^ You people cannot deceive us, ok? The fuss is not about Ihejirika's recent army promotions, is all about the north and some souls SW that thinks that's the easiest way to convince Nigerians on why GEJ should change the COAS and probably replace him with a Muslim, unfortunately neither GEJ nor Nigerians fell for that rubbish. For Nigeria to make any progress, federal character (enhanced stupidity) must give way for merit, the North should better start learning to leave with it in one Nijireya or tell it to the birds. |
Yazmin: Ode! Ewu gambia! Mumu!...who told u abba moro is a 'mallam' or even of hausa fulani extraction? He is idoma from benue state and was d campaign director of david mark in the 2011 elections. Because the Op says 'mallam', with ur coconut head u don't have an idea of who the person really is $ next u open ur wide mouth,supported by ur illiterate brain and spew poo!!! Zombie kawai!^^^^^^ You lack good home training and sound like your brain run in one track, is my reply the OP where Mallam was used as part of his name or did you see me use Fulani / Hausa in my post? Learn to respect other people, though it would be difficult to inculcate that into you since your IQ is approximately -1 ( minus one). |
Yazmin: Ode! Ewu gambia! Mumu!...who told u abba moro is a 'mallam' or even of hausa fulani extraction? He is idoma from benue state and was d campaign director of david mark in the 2011 elections. Because the Op says 'mallam', with ur coconut head u don't have an idea of who the person really is $ next u open ur wide mouth,supported by ur illiterate brain and spew poo!!! Zombie kawai!^^^^^^ Is Mallam one of his names? |
miiraaj: I smell igbo in the report.^^^^^^^ It doesn't matter what you smell in the report, you should be more concerned on its validity. Is the report true? |
The question is, why has Mallam not responded or acted on this? You all know the answer, the culprit is not from SE and is seen as his follow Mallam because the names given are also those of Mallams... They want to control everything that would aid their pissing agenda, while the effects on the Nigerian society is not something they bother about. |
igbo boy: ^^^ u get time o...u must be new here, she is the forum's ogbanje. She gets really Hot whenever she sees an igbo post^^^^^^ I'm not new nwanne, her words irritate. |
Desola: seems like literacy is the cankerworm which rather than eat fruits, takes permanent residence in your brains and subjects people from your part of the world to illiteracy and render you useless when it comes to spelling.^^^^^^ Stop that insult baby girl, is English language her first language? Would you've corrected her if she used Igbo or Yoruba language? You can only do that if you're her English teacher, but that's not the case, ok? |
Prof Corruption: Well, it's difficult to fault your stance but a lot of folks here are putting in more emotion than logic. But you don't break a law because you don't like it, you repeal it.^^^^^^^ Do you really understand that the fuss is not really about Ihejirika's appointment, they only think that's the easiest way to convince Nigerians on why he must be changed for a Muslim COAS, that's what they're fighting for. I want you to figure that out, then you will align with me that they don't have a case. Must they impose what they think favors them on Nigerians? .... Without minding the effects on others We've to stop them, this country belong to all of us. |
Aggrippa: walahi trust me some people are deliberately relentlessly determined to make these SE people perpetual slaves.^^^^^^^ Convince me on how you would accomplish it? You are saying you still support federal character that have made the north to completely stop thinking and schooling because they believe a position must be given to them when they don't merit it. The north cannot continue to drag everybody backwards, the earlier you understand this, the better for the north and the entire Nigeria, ok? |
Prof Corruption: The highlighted is true. But you must realize that Ihejirika ll not be there forever. Another man tomorrow might just pack Northern generals there and because someone has done it before in the name of "merit", there would be no basis to question such a move. A merit that is not defined is nothing short of nepotism.^^^^^^ Yeah , but that's not gona start overnight. Someone has to initiate using merit instead of backward federal character. The other annoying expect is that nobody has complained ( or is complaining) on the federal parastatals having majority of northerners, most of them are not learned enough to run or hold such position which is the reason such parastatals don't and will never do well. They should slow down and stop insisting on controlling everything not minding if they're not qualified for such. |
HAH: This the reason the army refused making Igbo chief of army since 1966, ironsi became COAS and it led to the first coup in Nigeria and it led to first mutiny as well.^^^^^^^ The reason for you to let them be when they wanted to, your mistake huh! Learn to practice one Niajireya on merit. |
bestman09: Is it now Ihejirika's turn?+ 100 |
Must the north always drag everybody back? Federal character must certainly give way for merit, to enable the country make progress. Northerners should be thankful to the SE, because even the fake population they count on, normally have above 10% Igbos which means they should also be giving more than 10% of their so called federal character quota to SE. |
[quote author=Rhino.5dm]So, ki ni big deal? If the man favours his people? clear case of giving a dog a bad name to hang it. Who are those shouting and trying to skin this man alive because he is ibo? Even though, I don't support any corruption or trying to hold brief for him but I want to shamelessly say here that the recruitment process in Nigeria military has alway been like this, right from the time immemorial. Those without sin should cast the first stone!. Now, where were these people writing petition when small town like Zuru emirate council in Kebbi State produced many generals? The likes of General Ishaya Bamaiyi, Musa Bamaiyi, General Sani Sami? Jakolo?? No one complained when Musa Bamaiyi and Ishaya Bamaiyi, both Generals and brothers from thesame parents became ministers simultaneously? Where were these people when General Ishaya Bamaiyi the then COAS enlisted truck loads of miscreants from his village into the Nigerian army disregarding the due process and the useless quota system? Many of which can't even write their names? There was a time when more than half of recruits in Kaduna Jaji came from his village and at thesame time populating NDA with Zuru indigenes. Yes, quote me anytime!!!! Selective Promotion Where were they when Obj promoted Nuhu Ribadu from mere Assistance Commissioner of Police ( ACP) to Assistance Inspector General of Police (AIG), the first of its kind in the history of the Nigerian police blatantly against the recommendation of Police Service Commission?[/quote] |
nagoma: You have no shame. As if it was not purely igbo officers who staged the first ever coup in Nigerias History. It was the bloodiest coup , an ethnic coup that hunted down and killed anybody important in the Nigerian army or in politics , provided he was not Igbo. They started us on this roller coaster ride, you cannot change history and your ihejirika is trying to re- enact the Igbo wicked annihilation and tragic destruction.^^^^^^ It was never an Igbo coup, read below carefully: "WITH regard to the January 15, 1966 coup, being branded an “Igbo coup”, Ndigbo do not believe that it was, given (among other considerations) that Zik was president (albeit ceremonial) and Ironsi was the head of the Army. Ndigbo were not marginalised. So what was an “Igbo-coup” in 1966 supposed to achieve for Ndigbo? Dr. Okechukwu Ikejiani was convinced in his autobiography (p.369) that it was not an “Igbo coup”, “even if most of the officers were Igbo and the executors had been misled”. The Special Branch Report on the events of January 15, 1966; Brigadier Hilary Njoku’s blow-by-blow account of how the coup was foiled (“Tragedy Without Heroes”); Peter Enahoro’s 743 page bombshell of a book titled: Then Spoke The Thunder; the published accounts of planners and executors of the coup namely Major Adegboyega (“Why We Struck”), Colonel Gbulie (“Nigeria’s Five Majors”); and now the unpublished manuscript of Major Emmanuel Ifeajuna (revealed in some detail by Odia Ofeimun) have raised very serious doubts reading the branding of the January 15 Coup as an “Igbo coup” for the domination of Nigeria. The facts simply do not add up. I shall stop at this point until the national conversation becomes much more rigorous especially in the scrutiny of the “Ifeajuna Manuscript” (because known facts of the January 15, 1966, suggest that Major Ifeajuna not Major Nzeogwu was the brain behind the coup). For example, the Special Branch Report is explicit that planning of the coup began in August 1965 but Major Nzeogwu joined only in October 1965. We in the East have been vaguely aware of the “Ifeajuna Manuscript” but did not know that Chief Obafemi Awolowo knew of it and had obtained the actual manuscript (whose major revelation was that the coup-makers intended to make Chief Awolowo Prime Minister) as far back as 1967, as Odia has revealed. Achebe reveals in the latest book that he had read the “Ifeajuna manuscript” having received it from Christopher Okigbo. If only he and Citadel Press had published it! With this background on the January 15, 1966 coup, why then did the counter-coup, the revenge-coup of July 1966 not stop at “revenge” killings of officers and soldiers of Igbo origin? Achebe had written earlier in one of his published essays and in his latest book that if the “revenge-coup” had stopped with the killing of soldiers and officers, it would have been seen and regarded by Ndigbo as a “horrendous tit-for-tat”, and the exodus of Ndigbo from Nigeria, secession and war would never have taken place. I agree with him. So why then were ordinary civilians killed? Why and how did northern civilians get involved with soldiers in executing the pogrom? Why did the pogrom continue even after the May 29, 1966, broadcast by the military governor of the North; Chukwuemeka Odumegwu-Ojukwu’s appeal for calm to Easterners in the North on May 30, 1966; and the statement issued by the Supreme Military Council on June 8, 1966? Why did Ndigbo have to flee from Lagos and Ibadan? (I fled the University of Ibadan where I was a scholarship student, our Igbo lecturers, professors and Vice-Chancellor, Prof. K. O. Dike, also fled.). How did matters degenerate to this stage as the Federal Government became impotent to protect Ndigbo as citizens of Nigeria? Why did non-Igbos except for very few (like Wole Soyinka, Tai Solarin notably) lose their voices as they looked on at the horrors? Ndigbo ascribe to this silence and acquiescence of non-Igbos that they (non-Igbos) believed that the pogrom served us Ndigbo right. It was a very bad feeling at the time. This bad feeling needs now to be expurgated. But before then, the feeling like expired breath needs to be exhaled. Ndigbo in 1967 expected Chief Awolowo to speak out especially on the non-implementation of the Aburi Agreement, which had become the “sticking point” on which secession was declared (“On Aburi We Stand”). At the Enugu meeting on Sunday, May 7, (p.81) Chief Awolowo had said that: “With regard to Aburi, I was taken into confidence by the military governor of the West, and I can assure you that he was quite as valiant as he could be in seeking to get the decisions taken at Aburi implemented, and during my recent discussions with Gowon, I told him that it was improper, most improper, for any civil servant to sit in judgment over decisions taken by the highest authority in the land”. He continued: “I have met a lot of people in Western Nigeria; not one of them suggested that the stand you (Ojukwu) took was wrong. On the contrary, they all supported the stand you took (on Aburi)”. One can, therefore, imagine how horrified Ndigbo and Biafra were when the Biafra Information network reported that apart from Chief Awolowo’s defence of starvation policy, “Awolowo’s attitude towards ceasefire and peace talks proposals were negative throughout. On arrival in London, he said: “The rebels had committed a crime and must be punished”. These statements were quoted verbatim and are reported by Suzane Cronje on page 115-116 in her book: The World and Nigeria, published in 1972. Ndigbo were perplexed by such a drastic change of attitude and since the end of the war, have asked themselves why it was that these things happened. Ndigbo do not accept that the “Igbo-coup” (spurious as it was) was reason enough to have produced a pogrom of the ferocity of 1966. We believe that the pogrom resulted from deep-seated hatred of Ndigbo. Havard-educated Prof. Amy Chua formerly of Princeton, now of Yale in her 2003 bestseller titled: World on Fire (346 pages) posits that ethnic cleansing assaults and ethnically targeted confiscations in a country are not spontaneous; they are always sponsored and encouraged by governments. In her analysis, such acts are triggered by circumstances such as the January 15, 1966 coup, fueled by hate-filled demagogues, passionately supported by an aroused and angry “indigenous” majority motivated by tremendous feelings of grievance. So it appeared to have been with Ndigbo who had become labelled in a half-insulting and half-admiring manner as “Jews of Nigeria” in the 1960s. Prof. Chua without being specific to the Igbo (who she discussed severally in her book) lists behaviour, which “indigenous majorities” find objectionable as “acting insularly”, indulging in “conspicuous consumption” and the “flaunting of their ethnic pride”. Achebe in his latest book has been more specific on the tendencies that Ndigbo must put in check as they interact with the others. Ndigbo have listened to Achebe’s admonitions and advice and are using their tongues to count their teeth, but are insisting that the other micro nations in Nigeria should do likewise, because these other ethnic nationalities also have their own faults. It is when the various ethnic nationalities treat each one another with reciprocal understanding and tolerance that a national character will begin to emerge and the nation will face the 21st Century world with hope and optimism. As we embark on this new journey, Achebe insists that there are no-go areas like pogrom, mass-killings and ethnic-motivated violence. In his lecture: Africa Is People in Paris 1998 he said, “Our humanity is contingent on the humanity of our fellows. No person or group can be human alone. We rise above the animal together or not at all. If we learned that lesson even this late in the day, we would have taken a truly millennial step forward”. I hope that Achebe’s traducers are listening. We all can begin now to build the new Nigeria of our dreams; a Nigeria that caters for the basic needs of its citizens; a Nigeria that is a pride to Africa and Black peoples of the world, if we mean to do so: This is what Achebe’s book exhorts us to do and I suspect this is why he paid a tribute to Madiba, Nelson Mandela at the end of the book. Achebe has not changed one bit. In the Trouble With Nigeria published in 1983 (almost 30 years ago), he had said: “I believe that Nigeria is a nation favoured by Providence. I believe that there are individuals, as well as nations who on account of peculiar gifts and circumstances are commandeered by history to facilitate mankind’s advancement. Nigeria is such a nation. The vast human and material wealth with which she is endowed bestows on her a role in Africa and the world, which no one else can assume or fulfill. The fear that should rightly haunt our leaders (but does not) is that they may have betrayed irretrievably Nigeria’s high destiny.” He then asks and answers for us a very disturbing question: “We have lost the twentieth Century; are we bent on seeing that our children also lose the twenty-first? God forbid!” In his keynote address at the “Guardian Silver Jubilee” in Lagos on October 9, 2008 titled: “What Is Nigeria To Me?,” Achebe said: “Being a Nigerian is abysmally frustrating and unbelievably exciting. Nigeria needs help. Nigerians have their work cut out for them - to coax Nigeria along the path of useful creative development. We are the parents of Nigeria, not vice-versa. A generation will come if we do our work patiently and well - and given luck - a generation that will call Nigeria father or mother. But not yet.” He concludes his thoughts on There Was A Country: as he writes (p.252) “Nigeria’s story has not been, entirely, one long, unrelieved history of despair. Fifty years after independence, Nigerians have begun to ask themselves the hard questions: How can the state of anarchy be reversed? What are the measures that can be taken to prevent corrupt candidates from recycling themselves into positions of leadership? Young Nigerians have often come to me desperately seeking solutions to several conundrums: How do we begin to solve these problems in Nigeria? Where the structures are present but there is no accountability.” This is Achebe for us, a world-acclaimed writer deeply concerned about his people and his country, Nigeria; an extra-ordinary person, very clear-headed but reticent. He is not given to frivolities. Consistency is his hallmark. Whenever he speaks, he is blunt, fearless and to the point, but always measures his words. At almost 82 years of age, he has spoken again that it is not too late for us to mend our ways and salvage our destiny. So fellow Nigerians, what are we waiting for? Let the national conversation begin on the way to truly transform Nigeria into a great nation" • Concluded. • Nwosu is a former Minister of Health, Federal Republic of Nigeria. |
KenGali: I believe the majority of Igbos are reacting to this on the surface. It brings to us a lot of responsibility in thought and action. Why? |
He should involve the Crime Investigation (CI) network to get this solved. That's my favorite TV station, with what I've learnt there, I can resolve this just that I wouldn't have the time. Complex cases are solved there. They wouldn't even use psychic detectives for this because it's not complex. |
Dede1: This is old slide joke. If you switch Mali with Sierra Leone, the colonialists will tell you Republic of Freetown shall be created however the black market diamond smugglers and Sierra Leonean pagans are not letting it happen. Africans should be allowed to create countries out of selfless patriotism as oppose to colonial constructs.^^^^^ Your last sentence is part of the WEST conspiracy to perpetually tie Africa down since they refuse to think. |
naptu2: Sanusi is a prince of Kano. The mischievous poster was insinuating that it was sanusi that planned the attack so that he can become emir.^^^^ You figured out the guys message. |
kingsceemark: Tribal war lords, oya over 2 you guys. I know wetin dey una mind. anything wey una like make una talk, E no comot anything 4rm BIAFRANS. The GOD of ISRAEL always on dem side. KA CHINEKE MEZIE OKWU^^^^^ Okuko toro gi uto na ofe, Amen. |
ajas baba: what is all this nonesense now after some years boko haram will come out and say they want to sue the FG for damages...........PLS ALL THIS PEOPLE SHOULD BE FORGOTTEN FOR GOOD^^^^^ Be sure you are joking,ok? Do you really know anything about Biafran war? |
Pat Utomi / Donald Duke Saint Ohia / Fashola ( though Fashola must hands-off Tinubu & ....) With Buhari given EFCC to run. |
Great development as this would create more jobs and boost Lagos GDP. Lets see if this would force other states to start thinking. |
Ikengawo: He's 100% right. People use corruption as a scapegoat because they're too lazy to think when in reality it's the mentality of the people and attitude that's holding the country back. America is very corrupt. What we call bribes here as called Lobby's in the US and Lobbyists (Bribers) get offices in Washington DC and websites. They pay politicians to do what they want the politicians to do and pay the media to do their own bidding, but the country functions. Everything from inflated contracts to cronyism and ballot manipulation, is in the US openly^^^^^ You mixed it up . A standard road should have a speed limit, hence it's also the responsibility of the govt. to regulate and prosecute those speeding above a particular road limit. Are you saying that the president has convinced and proved to Nigerians on why federal roads should not be maintained and dualized? Bribe and Lobby are entirely two different things, You bribe to influence right judgement or change the truth from being told, while you lobby to quicken a process ( not having the intention to influence or change what is generally known to be wrong). You can lobby or give what is termed tip in U.S.A., those are completely different from bribe. Btw, do you know about U.S. "FCPA" and it's implication? |
Continued WITH regard to the January 15, 1966 coup, being branded an “Igbo coup”, Ndigbo do not believe that it was, given (among other considerations) that Zik was president (albeit ceremonial) and Ironsi was the head of the Army. Ndigbo were not marginalised. So what was an “Igbo-coup” in 1966 supposed to achieve for Ndigbo? Dr. Okechukwu Ikejiani was convinced in his autobiography (p.369) that it was not an “Igbo coup”, “even if most of the officers were Igbo and the executors had been misled”. The Special Branch Report on the events of January 15, 1966; Brigadier Hilary Njoku’s blow-by-blow account of how the coup was foiled (“Tragedy Without Heroes”); Peter Enahoro’s 743 page bombshell of a book titled: Then Spoke The Thunder; the published accounts of planners and executors of the coup namely Major Adegboyega (“Why We Struck”), Colonel Gbulie (“Nigeria’s Five Majors”); and now the unpublished manuscript of Major Emmanuel Ifeajuna (revealed in some detail by Odia Ofeimun) have raised very serious doubts reading the branding of the January 15 Coup as an “Igbo coup” for the domination of Nigeria. The facts simply do not add up. I shall stop at this point until the national conversation becomes much more rigorous especially in the scrutiny of the “Ifeajuna Manuscript” (because known facts of the January 15, 1966, suggest that Major Ifeajuna not Major Nzeogwu was the brain behind the coup). For example, the Special Branch Report is explicit that planning of the coup began in August 1965 but Major Nzeogwu joined only in October 1965. We in the East have been vaguely aware of the “Ifeajuna Manuscript” but did not know that Chief Obafemi Awolowo knew of it and had obtained the actual manuscript (whose major revelation was that the coup-makers intended to make Chief Awolowo Prime Minister) as far back as 1967, as Odia has revealed. Achebe reveals in the latest book that he had read the “Ifeajuna manuscript” having received it from Christopher Okigbo. If only he and Citadel Press had published it! With this background on the January 15, 1966 coup, why then did the counter-coup, the revenge-coup of July 1966 not stop at “revenge” killings of officers and soldiers of Igbo origin? Achebe had written earlier in one of his published essays and in his latest book that if the “revenge-coup” had stopped with the killing of soldiers and officers, it would have been seen and regarded by Ndigbo as a “horrendous tit-for-tat”, and the exodus of Ndigbo from Nigeria, secession and war would never have taken place. I agree with him. So why then were ordinary civilians killed? Why and how did northern civilians get involved with soldiers in executing the pogrom? Why did the pogrom continue even after the May 29, 1966, broadcast by the military governor of the North; Chukwuemeka Odumegwu-Ojukwu’s appeal for calm to Easterners in the North on May 30, 1966; and the statement issued by the Supreme Military Council on June 8, 1966? Why did Ndigbo have to flee from Lagos and Ibadan? (I fled the University of Ibadan where I was a scholarship student, our Igbo lecturers, professors and Vice-Chancellor, Prof. K. O. Dike, also fled.). How did matters degenerate to this stage as the Federal Government became impotent to protect Ndigbo as citizens of Nigeria? Why did non-Igbos except for very few (like Wole Soyinka, Tai Solarin notably) lose their voices as they looked on at the horrors? Ndigbo ascribe to this silence and acquiescence of non-Igbos that they (non-Igbos) believed that the pogrom served us Ndigbo right. It was a very bad feeling at the time. This bad feeling needs now to be expurgated. But before then, the feeling like expired breath needs to be exhaled. Ndigbo in 1967 expected Chief Awolowo to speak out especially on the non-implementation of the Aburi Agreement, which had become the “sticking point” on which secession was declared (“On Aburi We Stand”). At the Enugu meeting on Sunday, May 7, (p.81) Chief Awolowo had said that: “With regard to Aburi, I was taken into confidence by the military governor of the West, and I can assure you that he was quite as valiant as he could be in seeking to get the decisions taken at Aburi implemented, and during my recent discussions with Gowon, I told him that it was improper, most improper, for any civil servant to sit in judgment over decisions taken by the highest authority in the land”. He continued: “I have met a lot of people in Western Nigeria; not one of them suggested that the stand you (Ojukwu) took was wrong. On the contrary, they all supported the stand you took (on Aburi)”. One can, therefore, imagine how horrified Ndigbo and Biafra were when the Biafra Information network reported that apart from Chief Awolowo’s defence of starvation policy, “Awolowo’s attitude towards ceasefire and peace talks proposals were negative throughout. On arrival in London, he said: “The rebels had committed a crime and must be punished”. These statements were quoted verbatim and are reported by Suzane Cronje on page 115-116 in her book: The World and Nigeria, published in 1972. Ndigbo were perplexed by such a drastic change of attitude and since the end of the war, have asked themselves why it was that these things happened. Ndigbo do not accept that the “Igbo-coup” (spurious as it was) was reason enough to have produced a pogrom of the ferocity of 1966. We believe that the pogrom resulted from deep-seated hatred of Ndigbo. Havard-educated Prof. Amy Chua formerly of Princeton, now of Yale in her 2003 bestseller titled: World on Fire (346 pages) posits that ethnic cleansing assaults and ethnically targeted confiscations in a country are not spontaneous; they are always sponsored and encouraged by governments. In her analysis, such acts are triggered by circumstances such as the January 15, 1966 coup, fueled by hate-filled demagogues, passionately supported by an aroused and angry “indigenous” majority motivated by tremendous feelings of grievance. So it appeared to have been with Ndigbo who had become labelled in a half-insulting and half-admiring manner as “Jews of Nigeria” in the 1960s. Prof. Chua without being specific to the Igbo (who she discussed severally in her book) lists behaviour, which “indigenous majorities” find objectionable as “acting insularly”, indulging in “conspicuous consumption” and the “flaunting of their ethnic pride”. Achebe in his latest book has been more specific on the tendencies that Ndigbo must put in check as they interact with the others. Ndigbo have listened to Achebe’s admonitions and advice and are using their tongues to count their teeth, but are insisting that the other micro nations in Nigeria should do likewise, because these other ethnic nationalities also have their own faults. It is when the various ethnic nationalities treat each one another with reciprocal understanding and tolerance that a national character will begin to emerge and the nation will face the 21st Century world with hope and optimism. As we embark on this new journey, Achebe insists that there are no-go areas like pogrom, mass-killings and ethnic-motivated violence. In his lecture: Africa Is People in Paris 1998 he said, “Our humanity is contingent on the humanity of our fellows. No person or group can be human alone. We rise above the animal together or not at all. If we learned that lesson even this late in the day, we would have taken a truly millennial step forward”. I hope that Achebe’s traducers are listening. We all can begin now to build the new Nigeria of our dreams; a Nigeria that caters for the basic needs of its citizens; a Nigeria that is a pride to Africa and Black peoples of the world, if we mean to do so: This is what Achebe’s book exhorts us to do and I suspect this is why he paid a tribute to Madiba, Nelson Mandela at the end of the book. Achebe has not changed one bit. In the Trouble With Nigeria published in 1983 (almost 30 years ago), he had said: “I believe that Nigeria is a nation favoured by Providence. I believe that there are individuals, as well as nations who on account of peculiar gifts and circumstances are commandeered by history to facilitate mankind’s advancement. Nigeria is such a nation. The vast human and material wealth with which she is endowed bestows on her a role in Africa and the world, which no one else can assume or fulfill. The fear that should rightly haunt our leaders (but does not) is that they may have betrayed irretrievably Nigeria’s high destiny.” He then asks and answers for us a very disturbing question: “We have lost the twentieth Century; are we bent on seeing that our children also lose the twenty-first? God forbid!” In his keynote address at the “Guardian Silver Jubilee” in Lagos on October 9, 2008 titled: “What Is Nigeria To Me?,” Achebe said: “Being a Nigerian is abysmally frustrating and unbelievably exciting. Nigeria needs help. Nigerians have their work cut out for them - to coax Nigeria along the path of useful creative development. We are the parents of Nigeria, not vice-versa. A generation will come if we do our work patiently and well - and given luck - a generation that will call Nigeria father or mother. But not yet.” He concludes his thoughts on There Was A Country: as he writes (p.252) “Nigeria’s story has not been, entirely, one long, unrelieved history of despair. Fifty years after independence, Nigerians have begun to ask themselves the hard questions: How can the state of anarchy be reversed? What are the measures that can be taken to prevent corrupt candidates from recycling themselves into positions of leadership? Young Nigerians have often come to me desperately seeking solutions to several conundrums: How do we begin to solve these problems in Nigeria? Where the structures are present but there is no accountability.” This is Achebe for us, a world-acclaimed writer deeply concerned about his people and his country, Nigeria; an extra-ordinary person, very clear-headed but reticent. He is not given to frivolities. Consistency is his hallmark. Whenever he speaks, he is blunt, fearless and to the point, but always measures his words. At almost 82 years of age, he has spoken again that it is not too late for us to mend our ways and salvage our destiny. So fellow Nigerians, what are we waiting for? Let the national conversation begin on the way to truly transform Nigeria into a great nation. • Concluded. • Nwosu is a former Minister of Health, Federal Republic of Nigeria. |
.
Where were they when Obj promoted Nuhu Ribadu from mere Assistance Commissioner of Police ( ACP) to Assistance Inspector General of Police (AIG), the first of its kind in the history of the Nigerian police blatantly against the recommendation of Police Service Commission?[/quote]