₦airaland Forum

must you know?

show him the mean side

latest srk news

After Priyanka Chopra it was Shah Rukh Khan’s turn to host a party for their common Hollywood pal Gerard Butler. Despite smoking a peace pipe recently with Aamir Khan, it was too much to expect him to attend a party at Mannat but filling in was Imran Khan with girlfriend Avantika. Also seen was Farhan Akhtar, who is said to be negotiating with King Khan for the lead role in their film by Reema Kagti after Aamir turned it down. Anyways, as per tradition, the party went on till the wee hours,

(slideshow follows at link below but guests shown, no SRK picture here)
[url=http://www.dnaindia.com/slideshow.as, 252707&sldid=1]http://www.dnaindia.com/slideshow.as, 252707&sldid=1 [/url]

yeah it's happend at times how are you?

;d

MRbrownJAY:
As an airplane is about to crash, a female passenger jumps up frantically and announces:"If I'm going to die, I want to die feeling like a woman."
She removes all her clothing and asks: "Is there someone on this plane who is man enough to make me feel like a woman?"
A man stands up, removes his shirt and says: "Here, iron this!".

that's funny

;d ;d

tell him today na2day

tell him/her to please call goodass4 me

Bush and Condaleesa rice

George Bush: "Condoleeza! Nice to see you. What's happening?"
>Condoleeza Rice: "Sir, I have the report here about the new leader of China."
>George: "Great. Lay it on me."
>Condoleeza: "'Hu' is the new leader of China."
>George: "That's what I want to know."
>Condoleeza: "Yes." what I'm telling you."
>George: "I mean the fellow's name."
>Condoleeza: "Hu."
>George: "The guy in China."
>Condoleeza: "Hu."
>George: "The new leader of China."
>Condoleeza: "Hu."
>George: "The Chinaman!"
>Condoleeza: "Hu is leading China."
>George: "Now whaddya' asking me for?"
>Condoleeza: "I'm telling you Hu is leading China."
>George: "Well, I'm asking you. Who is leading China?"
>Condoleeza: "That's the man's name."
>George: "That's whose name?"
>Condoleeza: "Yes."
>George: "Will you or will you not tell me the name of the new leader of China?"
>Condoleeza: "Yes, sir."
>George: "Yassir? Yassir Arafat is in China? I thought he was in the Middle East."
>Condoleeza: "That's correct."
>George: "Then who is in China?"
>Condoleeza: "Yes, sir."
>George: "Yassir is in China?"
>
>Condoleeza: "No, sir."
>
>George: "Then who is?"
>
>Condoleeza: "Yes, sir."
>
>George: "Yassir?"
>
>Condoleeza: "No, sir."
>
>George: "Look, Condoleeza. I need to know the name of the new leader of
>China. Get me the Secretary General of the U.N. on the phone."
>Condoleeza: "Kofi?"
>George: "No, thanks."
>Condoleeza: "You want Kofi?"
>George: "No."
>Condoleeza: "You don't want Kofi."
>George: "No. But now that you mention it, I could use a glass of milk. And
>then get me the U.N."
>Condoleeza: "Yes, sir."
>George: "Not Yassir! The guy at the U.N."
>Condoleeza: "Kofi?"
>George: "Milk! Will you please make the call?"
>Condoleeza: "And call who?"
>George: "Who is the guy at the U.N?"
>Condoleeza: "Hu is the guy in China."
>George: "Will you stay out of China?!"
>Condoleeza: "Yes, sir."
>George: "And stay out of the Middle East! Just get me the guy at the U.N."
>Condoleeza: "Kofi."
>George: "All right! With cream and two sugars

SRK and Aamir
[b]Recently, megastars Aamir Khan and Shah rukh Khan appeared together at an event called ‘Fair Rights for Friday Night’ to explain the Bombay film industry’s stand on profit-sharing with multiplexes. As many remarked, it would be wonderful to see the two stars together on-screen. However, it would be considerably difficult. To understand why it requires exploring the cine-mythic spaces of both and delving into the recent history of the nation.

Both actors have redefined the idea behind ‘filmstars’. Their characters wander the world with the wonder of a traveller, returning to a soul that believes equally in the divine, the individual and the social.

Aamir Khan appeared on-screen in late 1980s and was an overnight sensation. He carved out an extraordinary filmic space, playing ‘everyday underdogs’, organising work through path-breaking moves new to an entropic film industry. In 1993, however, the unthinkable happened. After two notable filmic beginnings, SRK burst onto the screen powered by the force of psychosis. His manic thirst for revenge in Baazigar held a strange but strong attraction for audiences.

Against a backdrop of social unrest, SRK portrayed more screen villains, an insane stalker, a demented lover. With each successive psycho, he endeared himself more to viewers who loved his stammering deliveries, his shaky laughter and tightly-controlled overacting.

Then, DDLJ happened and it removed ‘Bombay’ from Bombay cinema. SRK was a Shammi Kapoor-like lover-boy cavorting against Swiss hills, New York nightclubs and the Thames. Bombay cinema now féted cosmopolitan mobility alongside conservative ‘Hindu Punjabi roots’. SRK encouraged a new cult of filmic personality, exploiting bodily appeal, engineering film gimmickry and boasting a love of money that broke all notions of brashness. SRK played unabashedly to India’s newly-moneyed middle class. In all this, Aamir Khan’s brand of cinema dug its heels deeper into Indian soil. His most noteworthy screen character was Bhuvan. Lagaan’s nomination at the Academy Awards took Aamir to a new, cosmopolitan viewership. Then, with an ‘airy’ Akash in Dil Chahta Hai, a rich Bombay playboy in a ‘business class’ world, Aamir’s range of characters dealt with the marginal, peasants, sportsmen, drop-outs and terrorists who challenge the system with varying results.

Around his 2006 blockbuster Rang De Basanti, India’s honeymoon with liberalisation was beginning to wane. With farmers’ suicides, soaring crime rates and crumbling infrastructure no longer easily swept under mall sales, Aamir’s ‘DJ’, advocating the vigilante killing of corrupt politicians, clicked. SRK’s lover-boys remained entertaining but rang a tad hollow against reports of the ill-treatment of Indian brides wedded to NRI grooms, limits closing on Indian emigration and indeed, the quiet appearance of the global recession.

Recently, the two stars have attempted switch-arounds with their roles. SRK’s portrayal of a Muslim hockey coach in Chak De India and later, a stodgy, small-town husband display his attempts to break out of his own glossy mould. Aamir’s ‘smash-hit’ portrayal of a millionaire seeking violent revenge in Ghajini displays his moving away from characters grounded in the social, legal and mundanely sane. They reflect the twists and turns India is taking as its new history unfolds. Its popular culture mirrors its emotions and mischievously suggests its dreams. The movements of its stars reflect changes in audiences, driven by transformations in experience, politics, landscapes and ideas.

Casting Aamir and SRK together would be an enormous filmic feat. Two diametrically opposed meta-characters, rooted in deeply contradictory socio-cinematic terrains, might be reconciled. Perhaps some of the biggest divergences in recent Indian history might find common ground. Until then, we-the-viewers can only be grateful for ‘Friday nights’ and their promise.[/b]

okay

Leilah:
When I was younger I had an arranged marriage through the mosque. It didnt work out and I have a child from that marriage. Thankfully, five years ago I married again to someone who I loved and knew well and still do.

perfect example of the downfall of arranged marriage

tell her why me why am I stuck with her?

izeek:
u fucking aint ready.

if you can not post without insulting then do not bother to post at all

Deshannel:
R u findin trobles geting maried?

my dear I am not yet ready to get married, but I have someone I love really love and he is talking about
marriage how do I really know he's the one cos some people can be professional pretenders

work with her, it things gets tough eat her

how do you really know that this person is the one? am not talking obout sweet talk, romance and stuff cos that is the characteristic of pretenders. so how do we really confirm that yes he/she is the one for marriage?

MRbrownJAY:
.
BTW: there are many more marriages than these two you pointed, what about:
TROPHY WIFE MARRIAGE
GOLD DIGGER MARRIAGE
MARRIAGE OF CONVENIENCE

haha

OBVIOUS:
Love is not a valid reason to get married to someone. Love fades.

I disagree with that. real love dosn't

much more clearer thanks