₦airaland Forum

Ohyoudidnt:
No, it seems like you're mixing things up a bit. The Qur’an didn’t repeat the mistakes of the Torah; it actually corrected them. Aaron wasn’t the one at fault; it was al-Samiri. That’s some serious quality control.

Yeah I should be believe the above statement because your Quran says so. a book filled with historical blunders and theological inconsistency.
Let me ask u a question?
Who should I believe to tell the story of the Yorubas accurately. The native Yoruba historian in Ile ife who is also an ifa priest or an illiterate Sudanese man who never visited any Yorubaland but claimed God has revealed to him the true story of the Yorubas. Who should I go to If I want to learn the ancient story of the Yorubas.

Ohyoudidnt:
And to clarify, al-Samiri doesn’t automatically mean Samaritan. Tafsir existed long before Western critics offered alternatives.It could come from a clan called Samirah, or it might be derived from the root s-m-r, meaning watchman. That’s solid evidence, not just a guess.

samirah a solid guess? based on what? what clan is samirah, where are they from? who are they? what ancient land are they linked to?
what's the archeological or historical evidence for this samirah as a people or land?
Oh, it's just a guess and because it's in the tafsir- a solid guess!!!!!very interesting

well I can also guess that the first king ever to be crowned is Oduduwa in ile ife because the yoruba ifa oracle said so. solid guess, I should think.
u think above is ridiculous? That's exactly how u sound.

and dont even dare attempt the watchman definition for as- samiri because u would only expose your Quran more. The Samaritans defined their names as watchman. The question is samaritans are watchman of what? what are they watching over? when did they become watchman?

Ohyoudidnt:
On another note, the two Philistines argument is really just midrash gymnastics with no archaeological support. If you can twist Genesis with rabbinic rewrites, don’t be surprised when Muslims interpret al-Samiri with a bit more linguistic nuance.

Really! so all of a sudden theological exegesis means nothing but historical evidence is valid and thrumbs theological claims because u are now attacking the bible.
earlier u rejected western historical anachronism claim for samaritan in the Quran but now u are hyperventilating and supporitng over the same western anachronism claim in the bible.
According to u, academic scholars are wrong when they claimed Quranic mention of as-samiri is anachronism, but they are correct with the anachronism of philistine mention in genesis.
this is the most extreme form of cognitive dissonance I have ever seen.

U guys dont need this, look at what u are doing to yourself just because Quran must always be right and can never be wrong. In the course of defending the Quran, objectivity must be thrown out and falsehood embraced if that's what is needed to save the Quran.
A faith that lacks objectivity cannot be a true religion and its followers are best described as blind adherents.

Ohyoudidnt:
The Philistines in the Bible are a dead-end anachronism. In obvious contrast, the Qur’an’s Samiri presents a mystery with several valid interpretations. That’s a significant difference.

Obviously your brain didnt tell u that the author of Genesis wrote at a time the philistine already occupied the Land.
according to historians, the philistines arrived in canaan around 12th century BC which is around the time of the exodus. Moses wrote the Torah at a time the philistines were already in the Land. He employed familiar geographic or ethnic names for earlier periods so readers can identify the region or people group.

Ohyoudidnt:
The Bible’s Philistines are a proven historical error, the Qur’an’s Samiri is an open linguistic puzzle. Know the difference before crying‘blunder.

so that means Quran is not a clear book but a mystery that leaves more confusion than answers.

funny enough, there's internal evidence in the bible itself that destroys the anachronism claim of the historians something Quran couldnt do.
Yes, the midrash insists the philistines in Genesis is different from the later sea people of the coastal lands and they could well be right.

The evidence is rooted in the genealogy consideration mentioned in Genesis 10

Genesis 10:13-14 states that the Philistines descended from Mizraim:
“And Mizraim was the father of the Ludites, Anamites, Lehabites, Naphtuhites, Pathrusites, Kasluhites (from whom the Philistines came), and the Caphtorites.” (Genesis 10:13-14)
This genealogical note implies that some branch of people/Canaanites known by the same root name-“Philistines”-existed well before the major influx of Aegean-related Sea Peoples in the Iron Age. The text ties them to local parent groups (Kasluhites and Caphtorites), suggesting that “Philistines” could apply to an earlier group inhabiting the region- Abimelech, king of the philistines, which later merged with or was supplanted by the larger or more famous wave of Philistines.
The biblical record demonstrates consistency within its own narrative by referring to Philistines in the patriarchal period (Genesis 21, 26) and also describing them under the term “uncircumcised Philistines” in the era of the Judges and early monarchy.

So the septuagint and the midrash could be correct to differentiate the two philistines because there is internal evidence in the bible to support this.

Quran woefully failed to provide any explanation whatsover to this as-samiri mystery that could explain its anachronism both within or outside the bible. And that's why its now called a sophisticated mystery and solid guess at best.

Ohyoudidnt:
The argument that the Qur’an is incorrect for mentioning a Samiri during the Exodus is built on a misunderstanding. The Arabic term al-Sāmiri isn’t the same as the later term Samaritan,”which is linked to Samaria and came about centuries afterward. In Semitic languages, nisbah names (like al-Miṣri, meaning the Egyptian) can refer to a tribe, a region, or even a descriptive title not just a nation state that developed later
Biblical texts also use names that are retrojected. For instance, Abraham is described as encountering Philistines (Gen. 21:32–34), even though the Philistines didn’t actually settle in Canaan until much later. If we were to reject the Qur’an for this reason, we’d have to apply the same logic to the Torah.

It's like u guys don't understand your religion.
Quran is meant to be the quality control over previous scriptures according to Muslims. If the Torah makes a mistake of placing wrong people in inappropriate historical settings, should the Quran repeat such mistakes or should the Quran corrects such mistakes.

But U are here telling me because the Quran repeats the mistake of the Torah, then such error should be overlooked in the Quran.

Isn't that the reason we say Torah was written by Men. And that's why we say the Quran was also written by Men.

Ohyoudidnt:
In truth, al-Samiri might simply refer to a tribal or regional identity that would have been recognizable to the audience of the Qur’an, rather than being an anachronism.

This is nothing but a conjecture, a mere guess. An attempt to cover up the historical blunder in your Quran. It's your duty to bring evidence that as-samiri can be applied to specific things apart from Samaritans. Give us the names of those things.
U didn't bring any but simply assumed as-samiri could mean other things.

Ohyoudidnt:
Therefore, the accusation of poor historical knowledge falls apart. It’s a misinterpretation of Arabic usage and a double standard when it comes to scripture.

U simply can't save the Quran from this. Anachronism cannot work for as- Samiri because it creates more problem than it solves.
Whether as Samiri is the name of a person, land or tribe is irrelevant. The question is what is the meaning of that name, what is the etymology of as samiri, where did that name come from?
All research ever done by both islamic and non Islamic scholars have traced the name as Samiri to Samaritans.
There's nothing to indicate an alternative or contradicts it.

Ohyoudidnt:
Indeed Samaritans in Arabic is As-Samiri. However The Qur’an tells the story of As-Samiri, who was a contemporary of Musa who's actions led the Israelites off course. It shouldn't be confused with the Samaritans who came about much later as a distinct sect. The resemblance in their names is purely coincidental.

Really as per the highlighted. The problem with the Quran is it was written with poor knowledge of historical context and that's forcing U Muslims to disregard historical reality.

What does Samaritan mean? Can we have a Samaritan without Samaria.
What is the root word of Samaritan?

There is no way a Samaritan will be present during that exodus journey. It just doesn't make sense.

It's like saying when Mungo Park came to west Africa, he met someone who is a Nigerian.

Even Samaritans definition of their own name still makes it illogical for a Samiri to be present in that Israelites journey.

U guys should just give it up, Quran wasn't dictated by God. It's impossible for God to have revealed the Quan
Embrace the reality and free yourself from cognitive dissonance.

honesttalk21:
When it comes to theological truth, Islamic theology makes a clear distinction between conceptual truth and subjective opinion.

While personal faith can vary from person to person, the Qur’an lays out specifics about God (Allah) that focus on His attributes, oneness, and divinity. Claims that are both internally consistent and rationally sound. So, in Islam, the definition of Allah isn’t just a matter of personal interpretation; it’s rooted in a solid theological and philosophical framework.

In the context of polytheistic tribes, Allah was often viewed as the supreme god above a host of lesser deities, though He wasn’t typically worshiped as an idol.

Arabic speakers likely borrowed the term from earlier Semitic languages, with linguists tracing it back to al-ilah, which literally means the God. This is similar to the Hebrew Eloah or the Aramaic Elah.

The existence of the term before Islam highlights linguistic continuity rather than theological accuracy. Islam took this established term and infused it with a clear, objective meaning, defining Allah in a way that is monotheistic, rational, and consistent.

Ok now that U admitted Arab speakers borrowed the word allah from ancient Semitic languages, can U tell me the name of your God b4 people started speaking Arabic.

Ohyoudidnt:
Emoji Gabrielshow24.

Your objections fall apart when we take a closer look at the language and history involved. Samiri actually points to a tribal connection, not Samaria, and it echoes Jewish stories about a misleading figure during the Exodus. The mention of Mary, the sister of Aaron, is a Semitic expression of respect, rather than a genealogical error. Instead of indicating confusion, these verses highlight how deeply the Qur’an is rooted in Semitic expressions and traditions that aren’t found in Christian texts but have been preserved among the Israelites.

Your coincidental happening on a Reddit post deludes you of the fact that there actually exist reliable reference.

See a few below.

Qur’an 20:85–95; 19:28; 3:35–36

Pirke de-Rabbi Eliezer ch. 45

Sahih Muslim 2135 clearly showing your notice about Mary is very far from new.

1 Chronicles 23:21–22

Let me ask u a question.

what is samaritan called in arabic?
what is the arabic word for samaria?

honesttalk21:
Got you! Been a while.

Stating that Allah is not unique by being referred to as al-ilah misses the point. Etymology reveals only the language's origin, not theological truth. The word God, like the Greek equivalent of Theos, has its roots in pagan beliefs, but it is used to refer to the authentic God in Scripture.

Islam regards Allah as more than just a mere word, but rather an attribute consisting of absolute unity, self-sufficiency, everlasting knowledge and unparalleled power. The Qur'an repeatedly states that no one can attain His essence or authority (Qur’an 112:1-4). Despite the use of language as an attribute, divine uniqueness cannot be negated; the question at hand is whether the attributes and essence described are truly unique.

Everyone has theological truth which is mostly subjective.
Islamic definition of Allah can only be objective if the name Allah originated within the islamic theology. Unfortunately, it's not, thus islamic definition of Allah only makes sense within it's faith.

Arabic speakers had been calling the name Allah b4 Muhammed was born.

So tell us what is the root meaning of the word Allah amongst native Arabic speakers b4 existence of Muhammed and Islam.
When they mentioned the word Allah, what do they mean? Where did they get that word from?
What we fis

honesttalk21:
You see how you contradict yourself. Did you not say moderators or the bots can read normally placed pictures before? A claim in defense of skewing your previous pictures sideways.


Your write-up has a serious flaw:

Allah was never an idol of Quraysh. Historians and even the Qur’an (29:61, 31:25) show the Quraysh already admitted Allah was the Supreme Creator their error was adding idols like Hubal, al-Lat, al-Uzza, and Manat as partners. Islam came to destroy those false gods and restore pure monotheism.


The “daughters of Allah” claim proves the opposite of your argument. The Qur’an condemns this (53:19–23), showing clearly that Allah ≠ those idols. Allah was never depicted or worshipped as a statue unlike Hubal, the Ka‘ba’s chief idol.


The Year of the Elephant (Surah al-Fil) was a known historical event, not a pagan myth. The Qur’an uses it as proof that the same Allah who protected His House then would aid His Messenger now.


Name ≠ concept. Arabs used the name “Allah” before Islam, just like Christians say “God” though the same word once described Zeus or Odin. The name remained, but Islam purified the meaning. Allah is the God of Abraham, not the corrupted version of Quraysh.

If “Allah” was just a pagan idol, explain why Arabic-speaking Christians before and after Islam have always called the God of the Bible “Allah.” Were they worshipping an idol too?

You now divert to other questions haven seen your earlier games of questions defeated. It all appears to be play for you.

Let's start from the beginning
Can U tell us the etymology of the word 'Allah'

SmartPolician:
The two major religions are centred around the Middle East. To date, those folks have no regards for women and so are Islam and Christianity.

Pls don't lump Christianity with any other religion when it comes to treatment of women.

If anything, modern Christianity is being blamed for the excessive freedom in today women's hand.

A woman has equal rights to man when it comes to Christianity. There's no restriction placed on a woman that's not on the man.

In Christianity, A woman is supposed to be pure for marriage so also is the man. Unlike in Islam where the man can sleep around as much as he likes but it's the woman that should be caged and covered to preserve her because she's gold.

keemsleek:
Has much as I respect people's religion, this topic is off it. If a religion respects women it won't diminish the right of a woman or wife. A woman should have a say and not been kept has a stand by. I told someone no woman wants to share her man but a religion you say respect women cafed themand they can't take so they accept thier fate in pains. The only way I will agree with you is that Muslim women when it comes to purity are better off than any other religion.

Have U tried orthodox Judaism or deeper life Christians? The later even carry purity enter marriage.

PerfectStranger:
Long epistle no point. He should do house chores while the woman go fend for food.

Mr man swerve.

As if most women don't contribute significantly to household expenses despite shouldering all the domestic responsibilities.

So what does the man do? Contribute half of household expenses and then what?

Let's reverse the role, women should go out, bring half of household expenses and then do nothing; while men should do all house chores but also contribute 1/3rd of home expenses.

Now does above seem fair to u? I guess not. That's exactly how women feel with your selfish and irrational demands U place on them.

It's obvious some of U don't think things thru before vomiting it out.

PerfectStranger:
Quiet your mouth oga. What do you mean by servitude? Taking care of the house and doing what a woman should do in a home is servitude to you?

The problem with the black man is he loves being Narcissistic without any tangible achievement to show for it.
The black man's overbloated ego is too big for his own neck to carry. He has achieved nothing, built no civilisation for his woman and children to proudly inherit; yet he's the first one to force his woman to carry mount Everest on her shoulders just because nature fortunately made him the head of the house.

Since it's just house chores and should be easy, how about U do it yourself. If U are able to do it without feeling the stress, I believe your wife would also learn not to complain.

PerfectStranger:
Stop acting like those requirements ain't achievable for a full time house wife.

Our parents in those days did even way more and still kept the family in order.

Y'all Gen z's see everything as slavery.

And what does she get in return for the chattel servitude she's subjected to?

Men that can hardly work enough to sustain themselves not to talk of the household is making ridiculous demands.

Maybe she should make her own dream list of an ideal man and let's see if the husband can meet up.

IT'S NOW OBVIOUS CANADA IS ON ITS WAY TO SELF DESTRUCT, SOMETHING IS DEFINITELY BROKEN.

A homeowner is facing assault charges for allegedly injuring an intruder at his home in Lindsay, Ont., according to local police.

The Kawartha Lakes Police Service says it responded to a call on Kent Street at about 3:20 a.m. on Monday.

According to police, the resident had woken up to find an intruder inside his apartment. The two had an "altercation" and the intruder suffered life-threatening injuries, police say, and was later airlifted to a Toronto hospital.

Police say the homeowner is facing charges for aggravated assault and assault with a weapon.

The alleged intruder, 41, is also facing charges, including breaking and entering and possession of a weapon for dangerous purposes. Police say the intruder was also already wanted for unrelated offences.

Self-defence: What's acceptable under Canadian law?
While people do have the right to defend themselves and their property if they believe they are facing a threat under Canadian law, those rights "are not unlimited in Canada," Kawartha Lake Police Chief Kirk Robertson issued a statement.

"The law requires that any defensive action be proportionate to the threat faced," Robertson said.

"This means that while homeowners do have the right to protect themselves and their property, the use of force must be reasonable given the circumstances."


In his statement, Robertson also acknowledged that the case has generated "significant public interest and emotional responses."

"The Kawartha Lakes Police Service appreciates the community's engagement and concern. However, the negative commentary about the officers and their actions is unjust and inaccurate," Robertson said.

So someone with a gun breaks into my home and canada police is telling me I'm expected to show restrain and be careful how I deal with the intruder!!!

These weak, political correct laws are the root cause anarchy and civil disobedience in the west. This was how UK started, now that country is on the brink of a civil war.
I can only pray for Canada because they just dont know what they are inviting on their head.

pocohantas:
You wish. The same post you quoted was blocked. Or did you see any post missing in my profile? As for your likeness, I am sorry I do not care. Keep it and your apology. Use that energy to care for your parents. Take care.

Pocohantas don vex finally. Who should I call to beg her now🤔🤔🤔


As per the matter on ground
We already concluded. Since we are all forming busy and nobody wan gree, let's open care home and dump elderly parents there.
Shikena.

pocohantas:
Good you have read the thread and quite convenient of you to hop on my mentions with passive aggresion and try to play the victim. I do hope you can take the advice there because I won't be this nice next time.

Have a nice day, Son-With-Abandonement-Tendencies.

Isn't that the reason your initial post was blocked?

Nairaland spam bots don't care about anyone's raging moment anymore. U write anyhow, u get blocked
anyhow.

Alright 🏳️🏳️🏳️🏳️🏳️🏳️🏳️🏳️🏳️🏳️🏳️🏳️

Funny enough I really do like your posts because u are one of the sensible and pragmatic feminist I know both here and offline
Your feminist arguments do makes sense, but yesterday own dey somehow.

Ok apology for any offense caused, though I still stick to my irrefutable point.

pocohantas:
Of course imploring you to take care of your BIOLOGICAL parents is emotional rant without substance. The wife that doesn't want to do it is HEARTLESS and you the biological child is not. Why exactly did they born you?

Ok I've heard u Madame Feminista.

https://www.nairaland.com/8501362/guys-always-avoid-troublesome-ladies

Lukuluku69:
Methuselah, I am not even talking about the Crusades or the Crusaders who left Europe hoping to retake a supposedly Holy Land. A Land that has been inhabited by Semites for Centuries. No, I am not talking about about that.

I am talking the Wars Christian Europeans fought within themselves while professing the same Faith.

I am talking the atrocities of your Christians Forebears when they enter The Americas, when they entered the India Sub Continent, I am talking their treatment of the Aboriginal of Australia, of New Zealand.

Methuselah, you lived long enough so you should remember them all or your memory only works when Islam and Muslims are mentioned?

Christians have killed more Christians than Muslims have. Methuselah, Research it and edify yourself.

Lukuluku people fight irrespective of ethnicity or faith.
People of same tribe or faith fight each other. It's normal social dynamics of life.
Yorubas fought each other for 30 years despite speaking same language.
U Muslims even fought each other countless times because of the same religion U profess. Your early Muslim leaders burnt and killed each other in wars because of disagreement on Islamic faith.
Ali the great grandson of Muhammed was killed and beheaded in battle of Karbala by fellow Muslims.
It was constant war amongst Muslims community immediately after the death of Muhammed. They couldn't settle their dispute amicably without shedding blood on battle field.
The truth remains the islamic religion is too violent, Your religion started and spread with bloodshed and that mentality is what majority of U guys hold onto in this 21st century.

No Christian nation went to battle of started a war with fellow Christian nation because of the faith. Battle amongst European nation has to do with greed, expansion, political dominance or what have U. Never about religion.

The crusade was about taking back Christian territories seized by Muslims. The Muslims were the aggressors, the Christians just had to respond.

As regards the slave trade. The Arab Muslims took 12 million slaves out of Africa while the European Christians took 15 million. Can't see much difference.

But the question is what happened to the 12 million slaves taken to the Arab land. Where are they today?
That's the question U should ask yourself as a black Muslim Lukuluku.
Where are the descendants of the black slaves taken out of Africa to the Arab world?
Answer the question Lukuluku?

EnkayDezign:
The problem with Nigeria isn’t that just one side is extremist. No! Actually both sides are extremists when it comes down to their respective faiths. Hence, the wanton violence and retaliatory attacks that we see whenever a few miscreants get up to mischief.

Sadly one party always thinks of the other as being the more ‘violent’ one. No introspection whatsoever.

Mr man stop lying and learn to say the truth for once.
U mention xtian extremists, name one.
Just one Christian extremists in Nigeria going about killing people and destroying properties in the name of Jesus.
The answer is none.

pocohantas:
Take care of your parents.

There is no one you guys have time to take care of. Not your own kids, not your parents. But there is always time for sidechicks. Women work too. At the places you work, there are women there. Yet we take care of our kids and parents. The time you used to type this epistle can be channelled into taking care of them. Take care of your parents. It is not impractical inequality.

emotional ranting with no substance.

bye, madam feminista

pocohantas:
I didn't ask you not to stand by what you say. I said you should learn to care for your own parents. It is not rocket science.

Taking care of parents is not rocket science but who has the flexibility of time to do it btw a married son and married daughter.

Taking care of elderly needs time and attention and that requires time off work or other engagements. Can a married man afford such luxury?

When my wife was working, we use to take turns to take time off work when our daughter was sick, but she had to do it more because I'm self employed- thus need to work to bring funds home. If I don't work, I don't get paid.

This is the social dynamics we talking about here, reason why daughters are best adapted to take care of parents.

Everything should not be about negative feminist energy.

Eventually, if we continue to insist on this impractical equality, solution will be to open care homes in naija and kuku dump our parents there. because no man who has responsibilities on his shoulders will stay at home to take care of elderly parents just because his sister insists on 50-50.

As per the op, bringing an elderly to your home needs full approval of your wife. Except she's a heartless woman, we all know the responsibility of caring for your mum will fall on her by default. If she's not ready for such, don't impose it on her.
All these talk about u caring for your mum is just emotional pleading. Except U plan to resign your work and stay home, any other thing is empty words

Mr aviation, don't fall my hand by giving in to illiterate cyber bullies.

That girl deserves jail time, the fact she got away with it because of public empathy doesn't negate the fact she was wrong.

KWAM 1 didn't assault anyone and was almost killed by the pilot if not for his instinct. He assaulted no one.

That girl fought both the aviation crew and the security, she also damaged airline property. Why she wasn't jailed I what I will never understand.

The only reason she had public support is because her endowment was made public not because people felt she was right.

And I already reiterated, if she felt her dignity was violated she should institute a civil suit against ibom air. But to make her look innocent is a big no.

Keyamo should focus on training airport security on importance of emergency, attending to crises on time. They should also be trained on the use of tasers, handcuff and restraining tactics. All these should be used on unruly passengers who think they are too big to follow simple airline instructions.
Safety in the aviation industry is of utmost priority.

Lamasta:
You are yet to show me where a passenger was stripped naked and it was posted online by the airline cos I can see you are trying to justify what is bad...

Nobody stripped her naked, she stripped herself naked by fighting half naked.

The public show of her endowment is not my headache. If U feels so aggrieved join her in launching a civil suit against ibom air. It's a civil suit not criminal.

Or u want me to show u video of police in saner clime manhandling half naked women who resisted arrest?
because I can show u plenty.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UonKm5VqHCM?si=2I7GU_F9jIt7zj2j

Lamasta:
The video you sent and the ibom air counterpart are they the same

Ndi saner clime. See more video of people dragged off the plane in your sophisticated clime.

I repeat that girl got off lightly.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xLUmdTEF_J4?si=rSC8fQuleV6Y2znm



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VrDWY6C1178?si=AesVDUFwBc7pULZC

The 2nd video, the guy was forced out because the flight was overbooked and he was one of the passengers that was picked to come down.
When he refused, they called security on him to force him out.

Make Una dey play, Una never ready. The safety of the flight comes first, not your emotional whims.

Lamasta:
The video you sent and the ibom air counterpart are they the same

Yes they are the same. Unruly female passengers forced and bundled out of the plane by security forces.

If the woman's dress wasn't torn in the video I sent, it's because she was sensible enough to dress decently in public.

If your Comfort girl choose to leave the house without a bra and wearing a loose top, it's nobody's headache but hers.

Lamasta:
Show me one country in Europe where passenger was dehumanized and stripped naked because she slapped an air hostess or you forever remain silent instead of typing something else

Mr this can never happen in Europe, see how a woman was dragged out of a plane and bundled into a police car.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xtBc0E2JTi0?si=01sEJ_CHjtsBRM_-

That girl got away with that nonsense lightly. Try that abroad and see shegepromax. Them no send U.

U engage in a public fight half naked, U now complaining your endowment was in public display. Whose fault? Next time learn to wear bra b4 leaving the house.

She is free to sue ibom air if she feels aggrieved, that one no concern me. As far as am concerned, she should be punished and made to serve as a deterrent to others.
Nigerians and their arrogant behaviour. Simple instructions, they find it difficult to follow. Nonsense.

Lamasta:
Show me one country in Europe where passenger was dehumanized and stripped naked because she slapped an air hostess or you forever remain silent instead of typing something else

Mr this can never happen in sane clime

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/united-airlines-flight-nigerian-woman-kicked-off-white-man-smell-pungent-a8349306.html

Exceed15:
Find out bro

China govt does not promote any religion and is in the constitution. Today china is officially an atheist country..

Do U have comprehension problem? Where did I say govt promote religion.

I wrote spirituality is very common amongst the populace. This has nothing to do with govt.

lonelydora:
Na English you dey speak o. You watched the half video. If she sues that air hostess, she will cash out hands down.

I wish she can try it so all U people can calm down.

Una go push that girl enter kirirkiri permanently.

Lamasta:
And you think the diaspora will dehumanize her this way for her offense ba?

Someone that will be tased, handcuffed and dragged out of the plane.
Then she will be charged to court, na with plea deal she won't end up in jail.

U guys don't know anything about this sane clime. People have been kicked out of plane because of inappropriate dressing or body odour. And there's nothing U can do about it.

U better be careful abroad when flying especially as a black person. U would be embarrassed and nothing will come out of it.

Efuaye:
All of you condemning Comfort's behavior have probably never been provoked or pushed to the wall!
If you face the same embarrassing situation and the kind of humiliation from the airline staff as the girl did you might behave in like manner.

U guys will push this unruly girl to jail. U think the court or due process cares about your emotions or her endowment displayed to public.

That's how U people pushed that corper girl into NYSC extension.

She was detained because she was unruly during flight and the crew wanted the security to take her away. She was meant to stay in the plane until the security arrive. Eventually, when they came, she refused to go with them which led to being forced out of the plane.

As per her indignity, that's a civil case not criminal. She's free to sue ibom air or whatever for compensation. But he go shock Una the case won't be straight forward as U think.
If U start fighting in public, anything can happen including your clothes ripped apart.

Deefirm:
The rush by Ibom Air to put up that stupid statement, the madness by AON and NCAA tells how low our institutions (Private/Public) have degraded to! Nonsense, I pray they pay heavily for this, and the stupid judge who gave the remand order without a fair hearing, all of them PAPA!

I hope U will also say the 6 months ban imposed on KWAM 1 is uncalled for.