SIRTeee15's Posts
Nairaland Forum › SIRTeee15's Profile › SIRTeee15's Posts
Expanse2020:slowpoke U don't know anything about your Koran, U don't even understand anything about the religion. Imagine challenging me on who named the holy spirit angel Gabriel. The average Muslims knows nothing about the Koran, they don't even read it. The only thing in expanse brain is to kill anyone that insults muhammed. That's all he knows about islam. That's the only thing he reads in the koran- kill the infidels. Now here's what the Sunni Muslims call holy spirit.
|
[quote author=Expanse2020 post=128533489][/quote]So this slowpoke cannot tell us who existed first btw Moses or Abraham. U have to go and check in a so called corrupt book for the answer. What if the corrupt book was lying and gave the wrong answer. I thought the Koran was meant to be the quality control when reading the bible. So how would U know if bible is correct when Koran is clueless about the question. I repeat u have to be a slowpoke to believe the Koran is the word of Allah. Even a primary school pupil will write a better theology. |
petesunday:Produce the video. |
Expanse2020:This dumb guy didn't even understand my question. I'm not asking U who first landed on this earth. I'M ASKING YOU WHO WAS ANCESTOR OF THE OTHER? WAS ABRAHAM THE ANCESTOR OF MOSES OR MOSES THE ANCESTOR OF ABRAHAM. THIS IS MY QUESTION..DUMB. give me a clear verse/passage in the Koran that shows who was the ancestor of the other. For example this verse in the bible makes it clear who existed first btw Moses and Abraham. Exodus 3 When the Lord saw that he had gone over to look, God called to him from within the bush, “Moses! Moses!” And Moses said, “Here I am.” 5 “Do not come any closer,” God said. “Take off your sandals, for the place where you are standing is holy ground.” 6 Then he said, “I am the God of your father,[a] the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac and the God of Jacob.” At this, Moses hid his face, because he was afraid to look at God. Here God was talking to Moses and told him He is the God of Abraham. This shows Abraham existed b4 Moses. Now go to your Koran and bring me a clear verse or passage that shows Abraham existed b4 Moses. That's what I want to see. |
Expanse2020:So U cannot give me a single verse in the Qur'an that makes it clear Abraham existed b4 Moses. Just one. So then the question now is how did U know Abraham came b4 Moses? From the bible?....so U believed the words of a corrupt book to know which one of the patriarch of banu Israeli came first. Ladies and gentlemen this is why Islam makes no sense. It lacks clear, detailed and sound theology, it's doctrines are inconsistent. Koran is meant to be a complete book but U need to read the bible b4 the stories in the Koran can make sense. Koran claim it's a clear book. Yet different sects of islam can't agree on what exactly is the holy spirit. Sunmi say holy spirit is angel Michael while shia insists it's the spirit of God. Both Sunni and Shia read about the holy spirit in the same koran which claims to be clear yet arrives different conclusion on the holy spirit. I keep saying it, U have to lose your brain or play dumb to be a Muslim. |
Maynmaynmayn:Stop quoting me I don't want to talk to u As u can see, this thread was sane and lively when U were away. |
LordReed:The core beliefs of christianity consist of what is needed to attain salvation thru Christ Jesus which is atonement, repentance and redemption; then gaining eternal life into the kingdom of God via grace. Any other thing is secondary. To achieve the above, a believer must accept 1. Jesus is the saviour of the world, he came to this world to redeem humanity and reconcile them back to God. 2. Jesus died, resurrected and ascended into heaven. 3. Salvation is only thru the precious blood of Jesus Christ and nothing else 5. Jesus is the ONLY way to the Father and U call upon God in his name. 6. The reward for following Jesus is eternal life and immortality in afterlife. 7. Above is possible because Jesus is the son of God which makes him divine. A Christian must believe Jesus is the son of God and acknowledge the divinity that comes with the title. Being son of God means Jesus is pre-existence, he's the same substance and divinity as the father. He's at the right hand of God which means he's of the same status and should be worshiped/honoured same way as the father. Now everything I wrote here is in the bible and attested in Jesus own words. The problem is some confusionist are going about looking for where Jesus said he's God in unambiguous term- whatever that means. Unfortunately some Christians fall for the trap and ask the same naive question. But it's ok, so long as a Christian acknowledge Jesus is the son of God and worship him as the eternal king of kings and Lord of lords, it's fine. Trinity is not jealous, your ignorance will be cured in heaven. Jesus did not even come to the world to prove he's God in the first place. He didn't announce himself as God, that's something he want us to discover by our self. So LordReed, did Bart Erhman said any of my highlighted point contradicted themselves in the textual manuscripts we have? If not, then he's just a waste of time. Claiming Christianity is a lie because the scriptures couldn't agree on the day Jesus was crucified or different numbers of people that saw Jesus after his resurrection seems to me like a attention seeking behaviour. |
LordReed:Did U read his blog? He made it clear the core belief of Christianity is not affected by textual variants. He expressed that statement clearly. Not all Christians belief Jesus is God...have U heard of Unitarian Christians? Not all Christians believe in the trinity, purgatory, infant baptism. Above are not core Christian beliefs. They are not requirement for our salvation. But all Christians believe Jesus is divine. All Christians believe Jesus is the son of God. Believing jesus is the son of God is what makes him God in the first place. All Christians believe in his virgin birth, he's the saviour of the world, his death, resurrection and ascension. The above are the core message of the gospel and the faith. The textual variants didn't negate any of this. Not believing in trinity doesn't make u an unbeliever. It only shows u don't have a full understanding of who God is. U are not destined for hell because u reject the trinity. Bart Erhman discovered nothing. If U guys had been reading your bible as u listen to this atheist, U would have known they discovered nothing. Or better still, engage some of us here on this questions, U would understand Christianity better. |
LordReed2nd: In those days Caesar Augustus issued a decree that a census should be taken of the entire Roman world. 2 (This was the first census that took place while[a] Quirinius was governor of Syria.) 3 And everyone went to their own town to register. Jesus was born during the reign of Herod the great who died 4BC. Quirinus became governor of Syria covering Judea in 6CE after the removal of one of Herod's son archeulas- this must have been 10 yrs after Jesus was born. When Quirinus became governor, he conducted a census for taxation purpose in Judea region in 6CE. This census was well known in history because it elicited a Jewish revolt led by Judas of Galilee. Now Luke wanted his readers to understand that the census he was referring to wasnt the popular one conducted in 6CE but an earlier one which was done few years prior. It's been said Quirinus held administrative power in the Syria region prior to becoming governor as part of a dual governorship with Gaius Sentius Saturninus, the former holding military and the latter political power. Luke 2.2 in greek koine could also mean ‘this was the registration before Quirinius was governor of Syria.’ This would mean that before the ‘famous’ AD 6 census of Quirinius, another one was carried out. Qurinius wouldn't carry out anymore census after the disastrous one of 6CE. 'this the first census' mentioned in Luke 2.2 could only mean prior to 6CE which was during the reign of Herod the great. |
budaatum:Na smart guy now. The fool and his money will soon part. Don't worry, he's going to write another book soon to keep his sheepie happy....why Jesus is not superman. Man must chop and fools must stay gullible. |
LordReed:I don taya for your Mata. Bart Erhman confirmed the core Christian beliefs do not change despite the different textual variants. What's he's harping on is different theological interpretation of the doctrines which to me is not unexpected. Christian denominations dont agree on same doctrines based on different interpretation of the scriptures. So what's the new thing he discovered? The question is did he expose Christianity as fraud or false. The answer is no. Has any atheist scholar come up with anything that depicts Christianity as fake? The answer is No So if u lose your faith because the scriptures didn't agree on the day Jesus was crucified, then maybe Jesus didn't die for u in the first place. Read his submission here on his own blog. https://ehrmanblog.org/who-cares-do-the-variants-in-the-manuscripts-matter-for-anything/
|
Expanse2020:Let's me open your eyes to the truth. Honesttalk and ohyoudidn't, U can join and learn the truth. Have U guys ever wondered why your miracle embryology in the Koran did not mention the female egg called ovary. Muhammed spoke a lot about how the human is formed in the womb. The Koran is filled with verses described fetal development. Yet Muhammed didn't mention the ovary which is as important as the sperm for fertilization and embryogenesis. The miracle of Koran didn't know anything about the woman's egg that is needed for baby to be formed. The Quran, in all its discussion of human reproduction, does not mention the role of the ovary, implying instead that reproduction is caused simply by storage and mingling of the male semen in the female womb. Your almighty Allah was definitely deficient in knowledge not to know the ovary from the woman is necessary for a baby to be formed in the womb. I have searched the whole of Koran from first to last chapter, I didn't see anything about the egg of a woman. What a miracle book of fraud and deception. Although visible to the human eye, the female egg is very small and unknown in the 7th century - this appears to explain its omission in the Quran. Since the medical scholars in the 7th century didn't know anything about the ovary or female egg, Muhammed also did not know and that's why it's not in the Koran. Allah didn't tell him anything. |
Expanse2020, show me which stage of embryology can the fetus be described as congealed blood. Muhammed heard nothing from God. He only regurgitated what was the common knowledge of his time and put it inside the Koran. Below is Galen whose human embryology copyright Muhammed stole and claimed it's from Allah. That's fraud in case u don't know.
|
Expanse2020:Below are the embryonic stages of a human fetus. Now show me which stage looks like congealed blood.
|
TenQ:Leave am. I will expose him as a quack now. He's not the first and won't be the last. |
Expanse2020:At no stage in fertilization or embryology does a fetus look like a blood clot or concealed blood. Stop the lie. The blood clots that are seen in miscarriage is from the mother's womb. That's why when pregnant women bleed. We specifically ask them if they have seen tissue because this is actually the fetus and it confirms miscarriage. Blood clots only does not confirm miscarriage. |
Lukuluku69:More, lie lie lukuluku69 The killing of asma bin marwat The scholars are unanimously agreed that a Muslim who insults the Prophet (Sallallahu Alaihi Wasallam) becomes a Kaafir and an apostate who is to be executed. This consensus was narrated by more than one of the scholars, such as Imaam Ishaaq ibn Raahawayh, Ibn al-Mundhir, al-Qaadi Iyaad, al-Khattaabi and others. (Al-Saarim al-Maslool, 2/13-16) Asma bint Marwan wrote a poem against Muhammad (Sallallahu Alaihi Wasalam) insulting him, Upon hearing the poem, Muhammad (Sallallahu alihi wa sallam) decided to have her executed. Ibn Sa’d’s Kitab al-Tabaqat al-Kabir describes the death of Asma bint Marwan: “Then (occurred) the Sariyyah of Umayr ibn adi Ibn Kharashah al-Khatmi against Asma Bint Marwan, of Banu Umayyah Ibn Zayd, when five nights had remained from the month of Ramadan, in the beginning of the nineteenth month from the Hijrah of the apostle of Allah. Asma was the wife of Yazid Ibn Zayd Ibn Hisn al-Khatmi. She used to revile Islam, offend the Prophet and instigate the (people) against him. She composed verses. When the apostle heard what she had said, he said, "Who will rid me of Marwan's daughter?" `Umayr b. `Ady al-Khatami, who was with him, heard him, and that very night he went to her house and killed her. Umayr Ibn Adi came to her in the night and entered her house. Her children were sleeping around her. There was one whom she was suckling. He searched her with his hand because he was blind, and separated the child from her. He thrust his sword in her chest till it pierced up to her back. Then he offered the morning prayers with the Prophet at al-Medina. The apostle of Allah said to him: “Have you slain the daughter of Marwan?” He said: “Yes. Is there something more for me to do?” He [Muhammad] said: “No. Two goats will butt together about her. This was the word that was first heard from the apostle of Allah. The apostle of Allah called him Umayr, “Basir” (the seeing). |
Lukuluku69:Jesus!!!! U people will do anything to exonerate your prophet. What did your prophet do to the stupid blind man who killed his wife and the innocent baby? That all I want to know. |
Lukuluku69:A blind man had a female slave who had borne him a child (umm walad) who reviled the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) and disparaged him, and he told her not to do that but she did not stop, and he rebuked her but she paid no heed. One night she started to disparage and revile the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him), so he took a dagger and put it in her stomach and pressed on it and killed her. There fell between her legs a child who was smeared with the blood that was there. The next morning mention of that was made to the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) and he assembled the people and said: “I adjure by Allaah the man who did this to stand up.” The blind man stood up and came through the people, trembling, and he came and sat before the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him). He said: O Messenger of Allaah, I am the one who did it. She used to revile you and disparage you, and I told her not to do it but she did not stop, and I rebuked her but she paid no heed. I have two sons from her who are like two pearls, and she was good to me. Last night she started to revile you and disparage you, and I took a dagger and placed it on her stomach and I pressed on it until I killed her. The Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “Bear witness that no retaliation is due for her blood.” (Classed as saheeh by al-Albaani in Saheeh Sunan Abi Dawood 4361). |
Lukuluku69:Lukuluku dey lie small small now. How can u say no one was killed for slandering your prophet. Na wa o. Such a bold face lie in the public. Make Una dey fear this God o. |
LordReed2nd:Watch 1.5 hrs of Bart Erhman doing shalaye when he himself admitted his gist of a book didn't nullify the core Christian belief. U watch and tell me if he actually denied ever saying the quote I brought up here. That's all I care about. |
Igbek76:America ruled Afghanistan and installed a puppet govt for 20 good yrs b4 bowing out. Let's see how long Russia can hold on to eastern Ukraine. |
SIRTeee15:Those who abandoned their faith because of atheist bible scholars like Bart Erhman don enter one chance bus. They don't know people these celebrity scholars are only doing it for the money and fame. When critiqued by sound academic scholars, they admit and speak the truth. That's what we have been crying here but they won't listen. The Christian faith is the only one that is archeological, historical, logical and philosophical valid. It's the undeniable truth. The right thing for any atheist to do right now is to jump out of that one chance bus with instant alacrity. Budaatum it's not too late to reverse and join the victory train to Beulah. LordReed there's space for u too in the train, don't be shy to embrace the truth. Kkins25, U no kuku sabi the atheism concept in the first place. Abandon the conspiracy junks and join the productive train to Beulah. Entrance ticket is free. That girl forming knowledge on this thread, too much knowledge begat sorrow. The fear of God is the beginning of wisdom. Our deluded fake doctor here, let's forget the past. Hop on the train and be rel to yourself. We dont need your dangerous treatment on the train. There's the balm of Gilead. Except you scamming people and making money off their ignorance. I really don't understand why someone will be stubborn to insist on being atheist. The evidence against it is overwhelming. |
LordReed:See another evidence...at least your new found god admits to the truth when confronted with it. Don't U want to be like him. https://christianapologetics.org/biblical-items/the-elusive-bart-ehrman-quote/
|
budaatum:U talk too much, no substance. Bring evidence, that's what I want to see. The verse u referring to clearly states man shall not live by bread alone but by words that come out of the LORD. So where can we find the words of this God. Which book contains the word of the LORD. Definitely not the ancient Egyptian books because they never called their God YAHWEH. So tell me the books that has the words of YAHWEH. And lest I forget YAHWEH definitely called himself the supreme God of the world. Read the book of Isaiah from cover to cover. FYI the book of Isaiah was written in 700bc b4 the Israelites came in contact with any greek or Roman or European that will influence the status of YAHWEH. You can imagine a deity calling himself The supreme and universal deity, and the God to all people and nation at a time most deities were clannish pantheons. That how powerful and certain the God of the bible is about himself. Pls read the book of Isaiah and see what God says about himself b4 coming here with more conspiracy theories. As an atheist your principle should be the same against all religion. If I was brainwashed to accept Christian religion by the white man, is it the same for the Muslims? Especially as Islam entered yorubaland b4 any foreigner set foot on the territory. Or are u saying it would be better to embrace Islam and worship Allah. Does that make sense to U as an atheist. because I don't understand your inconsistency rants here. If u want to be atheist be one. If u want to be Muslim sympathiser show your face and let's know how to deal with u. Debating exegesis with U is a waste of time. So let's discuss evidence based theology. |
LordReed:How do U know it's not Bart Erhman. Have u read his book misquoting Jesus. U people seem to hold this guy in some god-like infallible esteem. Read page 252 of misquoting Jesus Q&A edition, the statement is there. https://isjesusalive.com/are-the-doctrines-of-christianity-effected-by-textual-variants-even-bart-ehrman-says-no/ |
budaatum:The verse up there has nothing to do with your claim. I noticed u always yapping about indoctrination of foreign religion via colonialism. Let me ask u some questions since U quoting the Koran, When was the first mosque built in yorubaland. Do U know balogun Aare Latosa, the great warrior of the kiriji war died a Muslim. Was it Arabic colonialism that made him drop his ancestral worship for Arabic one? I'm not in the mood for your up and down conspiracy junks. Christianity hasn't changed, this was the conclusion of liberal experts in bible scholarship. You can't know more than them. These are statements from Bart Erhman, read about him if u don't know him.
|
budaatum:I believe in Christianity because it's historically, archeological, philosophical and logically valid and real. It's not a make believe faith. Even today, U can test it and confirm it's validity. budaatum:Can U tell us the bible verse that states the highlighted. budaatum:Did any of the Egyptian gods ever claimed to be a universal supreme deity? I do t think so. Then why should waste my time on such deity when it doesn't acknowledge my existence? budaatum:There's no religion or faith that has been scrutinised or critiqued like Christianity. Yet all bible scholars- am talking of liberal/secular agree the core tenet of Christianity remains the same since it began. It's never been changed. I'm happy to discuss the validity of John gospel with u if u sincerely want to learn. |
JASONjnr:Learn to ask question and stop skipping bible study class. Your ignorant questions have answers. Do siblings born of the same mother and father have the same DNA. Do homozygous twins have the same DNA. And in case u don't know, our DNA as a human race is 99% similar, it only differs by 1%. That should tell u something. Even if u reject the Adam and Eve story, humanity genealogy ame from one source. |
, |
SIRTee15: |
LordReed:Literal or exegesis? Or let me ask, how do I interpret scriptures to your own understanding? LordReed:I told u I don't debate Christians on nairaland so don't know if they will agree with me or not. LordReed:Do not share the literal interpretation or exegesis? Which one. Pls if u do not answer above questions, I will end the conversation. The answer u looking for is already in my previous answers. |
