₦airaland Forum

Respect, bro
Bless your hustle

rusher14:
I'm a hustler.

Okay. I agree with you Mr. rusher. Let us end it here and thank God for our lives for today. I hope the weather is favorable for you over there. There is still time to plan and achieve better things today. What are you into for survival?

rusher14:
Nigeria has better players than Musiala.

one thing about business is care.
Never say this to a anyone one a business page. Every single person is a client now or in the future. You may kindly explain your reason for doing this to feed a certain market niche politely or be silent no matter how sentimental you may feel.

Never soil your business with quick temper and irrationality. Beware!

princeabdul:
leave my business page and take your tears elsewhere ,I'm not responsible for your miserable life.

I really do not know you but I will have to advise you to eat something healthy consistently for at least 4 weeks. Your veins look like bones on your skin. You are not the face of a business and your dressing is aura-toxifier. Well done on your hustle but you do not pull it off. Go corporate, bro and stay corporate. That is better for you.

Did they qualify for the world cup or not?

rusher14:
You used the word "we".

Musiala played for Germany against a lowly England yet played 3-3.

Who is we? I need them. These are professionals that have more contribution in the NFF than you and me. We do not play. Who do you need in the NFF? Did the president of NFF tell you that these men are not needed?

The ones that you need could not take you to the world cup.

rusher14:
We don't need all these people.

Brazilians play for European teams yet Brazil will always be a formidable nation in football.

You will be shocked when your surgeon tells you that he has decided to be unserious in a theatre.

VeryWickedGoat:
Nothing I hate for this life pass crocs. If I see it on you it means you are unserious.

He doesn't have it. Had he that money, he wouldn't improvise. There is a story behind a story. Just be happy for them and wish them more happiness than they have found even in simple things. I have seen royal weddings but the marriages break up in less than a year

donaldking100:
broke men association slogan.
oga bring out money & do things the right way it's done.
it's a once in a lifetime something, & it deserves to be done well.

Why is it always Africa that has to lose in the interracial and black race?

rusher14:
How many of them are mixed race?

Different from having both parents being from a single country.

Bro, we need these people. You cannot build alone. We need all hands on deck. Their contribution opens doors for us. Their participation means success for us. Let us build that mindset. It is more practical.

Bro, you lost. Is like telling those Africans in the French national team that their countries didn't lose. That's low scoring.

rusher14:
We didn't lose anything.

He's mixed race and could have chosen either.

What had he accomplished as a governor?

jeromestarks:
Obi is a good man.
Tinubu is a good man.
Atiku is a good man. But you see that Kwankwaso ba... Na lost course. I am 200% sure he won't win a single state. Not even Kano.

No one has ever married a virgin and have problem of infidelity but those who married women disvirgined by another man.

Think of the case of FCMB banker who had two children thinking he is a father not knowing that the his MD was the one fvcking his wife to birth those children.
The guy finally committed suicide.

Carry out DNA test in your children and you will know that you have made a mistake marrying a woman you did not disvirgin.

I guess it is deflowered, not disvirgin

JackDaAlienz:
My dear, people called Jesus worse names and they even mocked him as "King if jews"
Because Jesus said the Truth

We all know that people don't like to hear the bitter truth, they begin to call you names,insult you and ridicule you for saying the Truth.

You can call me gay
You can call me a bastard
It won't change the hard bitter truth.

Nobody in history of mankind has spoken the Truth and people applaud him.

Moses in the bible was adopted by Egyptians
They raise him like Prince.
Feed him daily, cloth him, care for him

Only for Moses to grow up and join the isrealites and destroy the same Egypt that raised him.
Blood is thicker than water

But Moses was raised by his mother. Not by an Egyptian

Foreigner12:
A farmer actually.
But is that how "carpenter" is spelt?

Okay, thank you. What did he farm? Where did he farm and what did he produce?

According to him, his food was under his sword. Is sword a farm tool?

They are hiding like thieves now. I see them on the thread but in shivering moods.

smachboss01:
e no go reply

Okay, let us take it from there.

since you confirmed that it was Allah's knowledge. Was it allah's knowledge that Mohammed spread the legs of two naked men apart and kissed their penissesss?

LegalWolf:
It seems you are not following the conversation. I answered you that Al-Haythami knows Allah since he studied his law. So what did I say there that is different from the gibberish yo u are saying now?? Even after given you my one-word answer, did I not ask if you want more elaboration or not?


And wait let's clarify...who told you Al-Haythami was a contemporary of the prophet? What nonsense have your people been feeding you. Like I said, its impossible to defend the idi0t yhwh without sounding stupid. Please bring it on!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Aside the sleeping with an underaged, killing infidels, owning and selling slaves, killing men and possessing their wives, spreading men's legs and kissing their penisses, What work was Mohammed known for before he was allegedly called by God?

hahahaha

Deltafirstson:
Truly, this man is senior advocate of nonsense.
It's we Nigerians that are asking for Tinubu not opposition parties. We the voters.

thank you

Oddfinder001:

As it is now, TINUBU have wasted wat wud have being a southern ticket if not for obi..
And a fine gentleman was called judas and insulted because of this man. All of una wey call star boy judas, how is dat going for u guys now? Mumu people

hahaha how did I get in the picture?

FaceTanke:
U, Adam and Moses have confuted me

Which two are not similar? How can you have two different fragments containing different verse to rhyme? Produce the original one that mohammed accredited.

Then provide an archaelogical evidence of your quran. Christians are endevouring to unearth the Bible because they are confident in the word of God.

No single Muslim country is willing to grant archaeologists the freedom to unearth the quran. Why? hahaha They are sure that calamity will befall the islamic world.

Christians are beating their chest and investing tons of money in discovery fragments of the Bible. Why not do the same?

AntiChristian:
But one sentence shatters your pictorial argument and that is; of the 25,000 manuscript of the new testament discovered, no two are exactly the same!

Logically your discovery is a ruse!

The new testament was not initially planned by Jesus to be a book! Even Paul wasn't aware of your Bible till some nameless founding fathers compiled some books while rejecting others to determine a Canon that suits them!

Who has ever memorized the whole Bible in the language of Jesus to transmit it to the next generation?

A lie will always fall short!

Well, thank you for giving me the honor to answer you in a reverse position. Here is my opinion:
ALLAH. That is a one-word response.

Now, why did I so answer? He was a respected islamic studies graduate, an islamic scholar, trained by a respected islamic guru. All his works were solely on Islamic education and studies. Moreover, his work was based on eyewitness report. He went further to provide the names of the eyewitnesses to authenticate his hadith. To concretize his respectable work, he was a contemporary of Mohammed and he lived within the vicinity of Saudi Arabia. He was closer to Mohammed that Al Bukhari. Therefore, his eyewitnesses were no strangers to Mohammed. According to Islamic history, that scholar remained a devout and righteous muslims until his death.

That gives all indication that he was a professional who was willing to tell the truth regardless of who gets offended by it. This Hadith was published in an Islamic publishing press and for Muslims.

In addition, his work is preserved INSIDE the islamic library and has been for thousands of years.

So, why was it difficult for you to answer that? Do you accept my response as the fact or is there something to dispute about it?

LegalWolf:
You’re the one playing dumb here. I asked you if the roles were reversed, how would you have answered it? What type of response were you expecting from me?

Like I’ve said countless times, it’s not a matter of my response. Your framing of the question is unintelligible. Despite making sense out of it, you’re still bitching away from the debate.

Saheeh Bukhari
Volume 8, Book 77, Number 611:
Narrated Abu Huraira:

The Prophet said, “Adam and Moses argued with each other. Moses said to Adam. ‘O Adam! You are our father who disappointed us and turned us out of Paradise.’ Then Adam said to him, ‘O Moses! Allah favored you with His talk (talked to you directly) and He wrote (the Torah) for you with His Own Hand. Do you blame me for action which Allah had written in my fate forty years before my creation?’ So Adam confuted Moses, Adam confuted Moses,” the Prophet added, repeating the Statement three times.

Surah 26:10 ˹Remember˺ when your Lord called out to Moses, “Go to the wrongdoing people—
Surah 26:16 Go to Pharaoh and say, ‘We are messengers from the Lord of all worlds

Therefore, from the time of creation, almost 2000 years Moses stayed alive.

AntiChristian:
Abeg what grammatical rule was broken in Arabic and English? This is what you should discuss.

Can't Allah use 1st & 3rd person pronoun for Himself?

Nothing is wrong with the Qu'ran but you head!

Even simple English grammar you don't understand not to talk of complex literature.

Allah is not comparable to any of His creatures!

No be only non-binary!

Sir, no reasonable God can ever use such impossible pronouns to identify himself.

Even kindergartens know their pronouns.

After the caliphate took over Arabia, Cyprus, Turkey, Armenia, Israel, Egypt, and Jerusalem. In fact, they controlled the entire Asian continent and a portion of Europe. After the Siege of Jerusalem in 636. They went burning the Bibles manuscripts one after the other. They tried to bury the Bible from the 7th century to the 20th century. That is for 1300 year they destroyed every Bible evidence that they could find. They destroyed almost all the evidence on the original scriptures by fire. And, they began writing and editing their quran.

Thanks to God, they did not know that the earth can store vital evidence for archeologists that provided relics of the past to authenticate the Bible's veracity. The dead sea scroll was a shocker for Muslims when it was found in 1947.

All these evidence predate the history of Islam and are tangible proofs that refute the claim of the Bible's corruption. Every fragment is a survivor of the ruthless Islamic destruction of the word of God that Mohammed during is lifetime attested to being from God. Mohammed read it and the lie that he couldn't read is a fallacious.

The New Testament has been preserved in more manuscripts than any other ancient work of literature, with over 5,800 complete or fragmented Greek manuscripts catalogued, 10,000 Latin manuscripts and 9,300 manuscripts in various other ancient languages including Syriac, Slavic, Gothic, Ethiopic, Coptic and Armenian. More continue to be discovered as archaeologists continue to unearth the ground.

The quran has NONE. No fragments till date. And, mind you, no nation has ever conquered the caliphate to destroy any evidence. Saudi was never burned down. They have an Islamic museum there for thousands of years that should house all these evidence. No city in Arabia was ever burned. So, logically all evidence should stay green and fresh. Sadly, NONE. Zero. The only evidence they present was written before Mohammed was born.

Look at the oldest quran and see how they erased and edited lies. They kept on editing for years to remove mistakes but they failed at it. Second picture is a comparison of the oldest quran and the new. pay attention to the diacritics. In Arabic language Every diacritic is a letter and can change the meaning of a single word even up to 40 times in some case. You can get 40 different words by simply moving the diacritic from letter to letter in a single word. Who decided which diacritic goes for a word is the main allah.

Sir, why should I waste my time on you. Simple interrogation and you failed but produced the biggest taqiya response in the universe. Whose knowledge did that author who confirmed that Mohammed spread the legs of a naked man and gave a mouth action go to an ISLAMIC Institute to learn?

You do not read through lines and letters. I wonder who you represents in the court. Even after I rebuffed the doctrines that you are bringing forth, you still insist on bringing it to me. You act like a malprogrammed bot.

LegalWolf:
This is ad hominem and you’re clutching on straws. You asked an unintelligible question, I pointed it out to you that your question as framed does not make sense. You gave a cue on how you want it answered and I responded. Now you’re typing this gibberish. Do I take it that you’ve abandoned this argument? Did I not give a one word response and even ask permission elaboration. So how am I breaking the rules?

Can I start asking questions about trinity, resurrection and authorship of the fable book cAlled Bible?

hakeem4:
I heard it is very popular in Iran

It is in the gulf. These women end up as cougars (if they are wealthy), lesbians, or daytime prostitutes.

Thank you

TOPCRUISE:
Which people did not allow him to rest.

LegalWolf:
Lol, like I said your question is unintelligible. Or perharp, the way you frame your thought is defective. But let me take a cue from your example to answer your question, Al-Haythami has knowledge of ALLAH too since he specialized in HIS laws as a faqih. Mind you, he is a Shafi'i scholar while I am a Maliki student. But nevertheless, hope that answers your question.

So

Sir, your level of cognizance is comparable to a primitive rat with swollen brain cells. You cannot answer a simple question and you want to debate? I like to be silly but your level of silliness is below the radar of human acceptance.

You were bragging for a debate. You see the reason why I do not like debating muslims? A simple question will never get an answer till eternity. I understand that you are being deceitful. You will never accept the truth even when it is glaring. You have simply jumped out of my question to the explanation of a dead man's history. I am on the work of this dead man. The excerpt right in front of us. You set the rule here to give a one-word response. You are breaking that rule.

So, do not ask for any debate from me ever. You are not trustworthy.

LegalWolf:
It is not a matter of you accepting the insults. It's basic fact that the question is unintelligible and yhwh is an idi0t. Now let me put the question to you that 'whose knowledge are you a man of'? How does that sound? Is it not basic commonsense that the question does not make any sense?

I would have asked you to ask yhwh, but he is also an idi0t. So now I'm stuck...dealing with two idi0ts - one bigger and the other a worshipper of an idi0t. What an irony. Please make sense of that question so I can answer you and move to more interesting conversation on the trinity and resurrection.

Anything you say, I agree. But we have to return to the topic. Haha you are barking like a dying rabid dog. The question is like a big bone that you can neither swallow or vomit.

I will rephrase it again.

You had earlier confirmed to me that Ali ibn Abu Bakr al-Haythami was a scholar of KNOWLEDGE. Here is your response:

LegalWolf:
Now your question was 'Do you consider the above scholar a man of KNOWLEDGE?"

The simple answer is Yes I do.

You are a lawyer so you are not new to interrogation in this framework.
The above author of the Hadith whom you confirmed a man of KNOWLEDGE wrote that Mohammed spread the legs of a naked man apart and kissed his penisss. Mohammed did this to Hussein and to Hassan. Two distinct male. To perform this act, he must have pulled their underwear to get them naked because obviously they were naked.

Again, that author was a well-respected author who was educated in one of the highest Islamic institutes and by a highly famed and respected guru in Islam. His Hadith is preserved IN THE ISLAMIC INSTITUTE and is critically acclaimed and endorsed as one of Islam publication. The production and edited were endorsed by the highest institute in Islamic.

Therefore, my question is: Whose KNOWLEDGE was in that author a man of?

I will give you an example to the basic in Christianity. Timothy knew the holy writings. So he was a man of the knowledge of God. Psalm 1:1 said that the man with the knowledge of God is happy.

You cannot go on playing ignorant and acting like a slime. Act your age and stand tall to the height of your education and profession. You are not a baby for crying out loud. You are a lawyer and should be able to read to understand.

surah 56:67 In fact, we have been deprived ˹of our livelihood˺.”

Who is depriving allah of his livelihood?

Allah is WE and OUR.

How do you know the number of kids that they have? Do not ever say that of a human being again. Never you compare

MufasaLion:
They should focus on having a better apartment instead of breeding like rodents in a studio apartment.