budaatum: Maybe you failed to read properly, so let me post it again in bold red so you can not miss it.
Now comment please. I'm dying to read what you say.
My brother, I am not getting your point here. I think you need to explain. I posted that Memphis, Tennessee is the most dangerous city in US, then you send a video about racism in a different city in Tennessee. I don't understand the reference. Are you saying that the racism in that city is the reason for violence in Memphis, Tennessee.
budaatum: It doesn't, exactly, but now I think of it, a racist state will limit opportunities for those they are racist against, who may then resort to crime to feed themselves.
Think of it like, I don't let you work to feed and house yourself. You might resort to dodgy activities or beg to feed yourself. And I'll call you lazy of course, to fit my narrative, but I would be the evil one responsible for your supposed laziness.
But I do not know if the video is true, so pinch of salt please.
You need to calm down the video you showed was not about Memphis, Tennessee, So why are you trying to misinform.
Memphis, Tennessee, is the most dangerous city in the US, not the city mentioned in your video.
DeepSight: This is a terrible analogy. You need to compare apples for apples. You cannot just take one city with a totally different culture and mixture of people, history and social interaction and draw a comparison with a city half way around the world, the capital of an African country and then say aha!
What is wrong with you people. How would it sound to you if I took Chicago and compared its crime rate to Abuja's? For heavens sake. You didnt even stop to consider the prevalence of guns under the gun laws of one country as opposed to the very different scenario in another country. The right thing to do would be to compare violent crime among the social classes in each city itself.
And drop this nonsense about taking responsibility. We are more than up to that. The problem is that as far as you are concerned white people must not be held responsible for anything whatsoever!
Wow so you are this smart. You understand that culture has a great part to play so do not act dumb when we say that black culture in America has gone completely insane.
How about I give you a better analogy.
How come, there was less black on black killings in the 40s when the blacks were much more poorer than today. Since you claim that the blacks are committing more crimes because they are poorer than the whites, the blacks in the 40s were many times more poorer than the blacks today so what change?
Statistically, the rate of Black-on-Black homicide and violent crime was significantly lower in the 1940s than it is today. I have given you the best analogy so let's hear your answer.
Talking about guns and gun laws, Chicago has tighter gun laws than Boise Idaho and is much richer, how come more crimes are committed in Chicago
budaatum: Funny you mention Tennessee. I'm currently watching a video about Pulaski, Tennessee, and the vultures make me ask why it's a dying place, which I'll let you decide.
raumdeuter: Many people say it that whites and black, infact all Americans should return to the era of family staying together and that will improve outcomes, cos statistically children raised in a 2 family household have a higher chance of being successful in life Its only racist when its to perpetual victims who want to take zero personal responsibility for their outcomes and seek to point blames at something other than themselves
DeepSight: Listening to you one would think that whites dont kill whites.
You always have a way of coming to the wrong conclusion. So if I say that the whites in America should return to saner times when there were much less white on white killings, would that also be racist or is it only racism when we tell it to the blacks.
Anyway, let's look at some stats Below are the Victimization Rate per 100,000 people for blacks and whites respectively 21.3 3.2 Your blacks murder themselves at a 7x rate.
budaatum: Return to when blacks had to step out the way for white people to walk past?
Return to when black people had to lower their eyes when white people spoke to them?
Return to when black people dare not enter spaces designated as white only spaces?
Return to when black people were not able to register to vote?
Do you want to return to the "sane society" that benefited whites only?
Don't you like black people at all, tctrills?
I honestly don't know what you are replying to. No one says blacks should return to when blacks had to step out the way for white people to walk past.
How about we just simplify it by asking blacks to return to having fathers at home and young black men not killing eachother.
You are making it seem like if they return to having a sane society, they will again be segregated.
I don't see how returning to a sane community where they are no longer a community of murders, irresponsible fathers and abortionist women means a society that benefits whites only. Trust me, if blacks stop killing blacks, it benefits blacks more than whites.
budaatum: Actually, the black community was more subjugated and oppressed, and they wouldn't have told you that "was more sane" for them, which is why they rebelled against it and fought for things to change!
Your point if I am getting it is that as a community, the blacks of today killing themselves are a more sane society that the blacks in the 40s who did not kill themselves, who did not have these levels of fatherlessness, drug use and general foolishness?
THEDEEPSIGHT: No one wants you dead, you simply dont deserve your very existence and freedom. These things were won for you by the people you denigrate. They were won by the blood and suffering of the people you insult. And you praise and defend those who tortured and killed them.
Disgusting.
You don't want me dead but I don't deserve to live because of you. You need help. And stop disgracing yourself. Point out any post where I praise and defend those who tortured and killed them? You are just a rotten hopeless person. You will tell any lie to sell your stupidity. But it's ok, I am used to you.
THEDEEPSIGHT: Stop being silly. No one has wished anyone dead or expressed a desire to kill anyone. But it will forever remain true that those who support the denigration and enslavement of human beings do not deserve their very existence. Because supporting such is actually antithetical to life! Period!
tctrills can try as much as he wants to smear me and claim I said what I didnt - what I said is clear and any sensible person understands it.
Who has the time to smear you? You already did that to yourself. I wonder the wickedness that woke you up this morning only to start researching for faults on Charlie. And all you can come up with is nonsense. Then you begin to throw tantrums and emotional blackmail once we replied
raumdeuter: You can take any idea to a right winger and he will debate with you Do that to the left and they want to kill you like they did Charlie Kirk
It's just crazy. Deepsight wants me dead just because his ideas are weak and wrong. Where did it go wrong with these people?
DeepSight: You do not deserve to exist., I stand by it. No one who defends the utter BS you defend deserves to exist.
If you like say I am calling for your assassination. That is your business. I certainly am not. I only know that you do not deserve to exist and the world would have been better if you were never born.
People who deserve life cherish it and they also cherish the freedom and dignity of human beings. You cherish neither.
Failure You will watch me live and continue to point out your poor arguments. I dont need to get emotional like you because I have the truth on my side. You support black-on-black murder, fatherlessness, and abortion, but claim to support and cherish the freedom and dignity of human beings. No one is fooled; we know you. You are fueled by hate and inferior arguments I really don't care if you want me dead because you are powerless and inconsequential.
THEDEEPSIGHT: If you offered anything beyond insults I would more than welcome and discuss.
You are the one who began the emotional blackmail, so dont pretend to be insulted. I know you too well; you are a pro in hypocrisy. I gave you a response, and you began to cry that I should be ashamed of myself for not condemning Charlie. Oga, this doesn't work on me, you of all people should know that by now. I dont shame you for your views, no matter how foolish they are, so do not try it with me.
bemeruca: I have been telling him. The blacks who tend to move away from this victimhood and blaming all the time are attacked and hated by the likes of deepsight, the ones who always subscribe to victimhood often close their eyes on black on black crimes, hatred on their own and losts of degenerate things coming from the black culture in the US.
Charlie explicitly called that era evil in deepsight's own post, he clarified when asked but deepsight does not care.
He is a sad and sick fault-finder. Charlie has been dead for months now, but he is still trying to dig up skeletons. What kind of crazy person does this?
I know the boy Deepsight. He always says I accuse him of being dishonest, but he keeps proving me right. He has no shame. He loves to fight dirty. He does everything to sell his poor arguments
bemeruca: That's why I have been saying it's people like him attacking other Africans in South Africa. They are always looking for what to blame for their problems
Deepsight has a sick and dark mind. He is always hunting for whom to hate. I am sure he is a very sad person. People like him should be avoided in the real world.
DeepSight: And you know what psychological group trauma the segregation and discrimination was inflicting? Its truly a shame that people like you exist.
A young Black man today faces a substantially higher risk of homicide death from Black offenders (overwhelmingly intra-racial) than Black Americans faced from documented "white supremacist" racial terror violence (primarily lynchings) during the Jim Crow/segregation era (roughly 1877–1950s, peaking earlier).
From the above, tell me, which is the saner society?
Stop pretending to be emotional. You are not a woman, so no one is buying your emotional blackmail
DeepSight: Can you see the revolting thing just written by Tctrills above?
These people are pathetic and sickening.
I feel like throwing up.
Lol When you can't face the truth, you pretend to be sickened. If you are not capable of handling the facts, you should have learnt not to mention me because you know I will always give you truth bombs. You can play to the emotions of your fellow race police with words like revolting, pathetic, and sickening, but we know it's just a show. You guys are just show guys, pretending to know what's best and giving you useless morals that haven't helped anyone, to the rest of us. Please do not ever mention me unless you have the capacity to engage.
DeepSight: I was watching a Youtube show on Charlie Kirk / Erika Kirk. Came across some of his utterances again.
I had to sit back and wonder, befuddled, how people argue that this man was not racist.
His words - verbatim -
KIRK – “When blacks in America did not have the same rights they have today, they were less murderous, there were less break-ins – why is that?”
QUESTIONER – “Are you trying to say that blacks thrive under subjugation?”
KIRK - “No, I am not, I am asking you the question, the data shows they were actually better in the 1940s. It was bad, it was evil, but what happened, something changed.”
How do the likes of raumdeuter, bemeruca, tctrills, TV01, basilico and company wish to spin this.
cc: Ishilove (I copy you because you once claimed to me he was not racist I believe), Ijebos, cococandy
PS: This specific exchange took place during a live event at Utah Valley University (UVU) in Orem, Utah, on September 10, 2025, just before he was shot.
I am sure that if you decide to be honest and present the entire transcript, it will show that Charlie Kirk was not suggesting a return to subjugation but a return to a more sane black society as it was before. What could be more noble? It is funny that no one in the so-called black movement or among the Dems is actively advocating for these things. Who is talking about the black-on-black crimes? Who is talking about fatherlessness in the black community? Who is talking about the insane abortion of black babies? The very people you call racists are the ones fighting against these failures in the black community, while those you love, people like the Obamas, have become pros in the blame game and victimhood. If you want to improve black america, give them character, not money.
DeepSight: I was watching a Youtube show on Charlie Kirk / Erika Kirk. Came across some of his utterances again.
I had to sit back and wonder, befuddled, how people argue that this man was not racist.
His words - verbatim -
KIRK – “When blacks in America did not have the same rights they have today, they were less murderous, there were less break-ins – why is that?”
QUESTIONER – “Are you trying to say that blacks thrive under subjugation?”
KIRK - “No, I am not, I am asking you the question, the data shows they were actually better in the 1940s. It was bad, it was evil, but what happened, something changed.”
How do the likes of raumdeuter, bemeruca, tctrills, TV01, basilico and company wish to spin this.
cc: Ishilove (I copy you because you once claimed to me he was not racist I believe), Ijebos, cococandy
PS: This specific exchange took place during a live event at Utah Valley University (UVU) in Orem, Utah, on September 10, 2025, just before he was shot.
My brother, you have made yourself the race police but the truth is that you are actually more racist than everyone you call out. You spend your time researching who is racist and who isn't when you should be working on yourself. The only one with s problem is you but you will never realise it.
For you to claim that Charlie Kirk statement is racist shows that you are just a racist and a fault finder.
Now this is the prove. If I say that under British colonial rule, Nigeria was a far safer and better society, does that make me a racist?
The US supreme court is returning the US to its constitution and to a colour blind society. There will no longer be majority minority district. Obama did not need a majority minority advantage to be president. Everyone no matter your race can now compete on equal ground. This is clearly the ruling of the decade. I love this. The racial gamesmanship is over.