DeepSight: Oh if it's that, my brother you are on point. It's so exasperating.
Many people seem to think that merely recognizing the complicity of the West in Africa's problems means that one is tied to the past, one is lazy, one does not take responsibility and that one is not actively looking forward to self improve. This is not true. Two things can be true at once and we can hold more than one thought in our heads at once. My friend Tctrills is so far gone in his desperation to defend the West and all Caucasians that he even claimed neo colonialism does not exist. Such statements are so cringe worthy that one doesn't know where to start from in responding.
As for being the "original humans" that is a misconception. All humans on Earth today are descendants of the same "original humans" and the truth is that those who remained in Africa suffered significant geographic and climatic disadvantages which slowed civilization.
This video will correct your view of Charlie Kirk. And you are welcome
DeepSight: You are the one having problems with honesty. Rather than admit both you and the racist you are defending goofed, you are trying to revise what you said. You said that the Civil Rights Act went too far. Charlie said worse: he said it was a mistake. And I have shown you that the CRA did no such thing as introduce affirmative action. It squarely did not.
Saying that "it led to" affirmative action is an altogether different thing from what both you and Charlie said already. And to the extent that it even contained provisions AGAINST racial quotas NOBODY can blame the Act for Affirmative Action! Period!
I will not waste further time on this - you have just lied and you should be ashamed of having to lie. Integrity and intellectual honesty count.
Now, address the question I raised about BEEE in SA.
Your comprehension is a big problem. From the beginning all I said was that the civil rights movement went to far, it led to Affirmative action. Are you saying I am wrong or are you just confused. As for calling me a racist, I take it as a joke. That's your go to word for anyone who is not on your side. You will grow pass that. I believe it's just a phase.
I see that you are too lazy to research Charlie Kirk's statements. So let me help you with a link. A fact checking site. And I completely agree with Charlie the great.
DeepSight: It is you who needs to research properly, and perhaps Mr. Kirk should have as well. That would not have saved him from his racism though. Here goes:
As I said, the Civil Rights Act did not legislate Affirmative Action.
Title VII & Title VI prohibit employment discrimination and discrimination in federally funded programs - thus the Civil Rights Act is an anti-discrimination law. It states that employment decisions should not be made "because of an individual's race, color, religion, sex, or national origin."
This is exactly what it set out to do because of the overwhelming existing discrimination against Black people. I hope you understand that we are talking about a movement and a law that saved blacks from segregation, much systemic discrimination including housing discrimination and accompanied with the Voting Rights Act empowered blacks to vote by removing many of the systemic impediments blocking blacks from voting.
Note that: Title VII includes a specific section (Section 703(j)) which states that employers are not required to grant preferential treatment to any individual or group due to an imbalance in the number or percentage of protected groups in their workforce. This language was intended to prevent the act from being interpreted as a mandate for racial quotas.
Thus it is very very wrong to claim that the Civil Rights Act was problematic or "went too far" with respect to affirmative action.
Affirmative Action actually arose thereafter though executive orders and judicial pronouncements in the context of the succeeding period and the zeitgeist of the time which was directed towards restoring as much equality as possible.
Now let us be clear here - you have failed to show any problem with the Civil Rights Act and as such both you and Kirk are wrong here and he remains racist for his abominable statements about it.
And when it comes to affirmative action, we will address that separately. Because it appears you dont understand the fundamental underpinnings of its philosophy. First, let me ask if you know of Black Economic Empowerment and Emancipation (BEEE) as implemented in South Africa. What do you think of it as an example of affirmative action and is it racist?
Did you have problems with understanding what I wrote? I only said that the civil rights movement led to Affirmative action.
DeepSight: So I am to understand that your issue with the Civil Rights Act is Affirmative Action. Is that all, before I proceed? Because it appears that you also dont know that the Civil Rights Act did not provide for Affirmative Action.
Read what I wrote and the links I sent and you will understand. But if you still lack understanding, let me know where you come short. The civil rights did not stop at giving equal rights to all it ended up giving some more than others. You comprehend?
Dpsychologist: Let’s be brutally honest — Black Tax is slavery dressed up as culture.
For those unfamiliar, Black Tax is the cultural expectation that once you start earning, your salary belongs not just to you, but to your parents, siblings, cousins — sometimes even uncles and aunties. Sounds noble, right? But here’s the hard truth:
Many people in their 20s and 30s especially firstborns are stuck living like they’re still broke, not because they don’t earn, but because their family’s demands never end. Everywhere in Africa, once you start earning, you’re automatically turned into the family’s ATM especially when not born with a silver spoon . It doesn’t matter if you’re just starting out, if your salary is small, or if you’re struggling yourself — the moment you collect that paycheck, you owe everybody.
They call it “responsibility.” But let’s tell the truth:
It’s financial exploitation.
It’s entitlement disguised as love.
It’s one of the biggest reasons young Africans will NEVER break generational poverty.
The Trap
A graduate earns ₦70k.
₦20k to mum.
₦15k to dad.
₦10k to sibling.
Another cousin calls for school fees.
Uncle calls for “urgent 5k.”
At the end of the month, guess what’s left? Zero. No savings. No investment. No future. Just endless poverty cycle.
And when you dare say “No,” you’re suddenly the wicked, ungrateful child.
The Irony
Here’s the painful part:
The same parents who drained their kids often never saved or invested when they were young. They now dump the responsibility of their own financial failure on their children.
Instead of empowering the next generation, they enslave them with guilt.
And let’s be real — how many families use this money wisely? At times, it goes into wasteful spending while the “breadwinner” suffers in silence.
The Hard Truth Nobody Wants to Hear
If African youth keep paying endless Black Tax, nobody will ever be rich. One person cannot save a whole clan. Period.
👉 A child’s duty is not to fund laziness, poor planning, or entitlement. 👉 If you destroy your own financial future to please family, you will just create another generation of broke people.
The Conversation We Need
Should young Africans build themselves first before carrying family on their back?
Is saying “NO” selfish, or the only way to break free?
At what point does “support” turn into slavery?
Until we face the truth, Black Tax will keep Africa chained to poverty.
What’s your take? Are we ready to break this culture, or are we too afraid of being called “selfish”?
You don't really understand. Asian are much more closer to their families than you blacks and that's what makes them super competitive and successful in Europe and America.
Same with the Jews. These people prioritize family and community. They invest in their family and community and it makes them successful.
It's not a black thing, it's a good thing
Black Americans on the other hand have destroyed the family system. Their men don't take care of their babies talk less of their parents and they have become a failed community.
DeepSight: That is a wrong understandimg of what happened.
I will come back to that. But first, so that you dont run away -
1. Explain how the Civil Rights Act went too far.
2. Have you watched Joy Reid. Do you understand that we are talking, in her case, about one of the best students regardless of race?
The problem with you as an inverse self hating racist is that you will assume, like Kirk, that any black person you see in a position of privilege, did not merit it.
But I just did, the civil rights movement led to Affirmative action and CTR. Click the link below to study and learn more
I will not Joy Reid's personal experience. But the link I shared with you about the Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard would educate you on the subject in totality not just one person's experience.
I don't even need to believe Joy. She is not really important when I can get the entire facts. Thousands of Asians were denied entrance because of policies that stemmed from the civil rights movement
DeepSight: And there is nothing worse than self-hating inverse racism, where one becomes the slavish defender of racists and the "house-slave" the "Uncle Tom" and the "Uncle Rukus" who is always to be seen condemning his race in favor of the views of racists who hate him.
You keep taking of slavery. Oga slavery is over move on. The oyibo is not your problem. Tinubu is. You are living in an 1830 mentality but you call me the slave. I have moved on but you intentionally choose to remain a slave. Note: I was never a slave and I wasn't even born at the time. Oga move on.
You dont seem to understand that (a) Requirements are not reduced for Pilots (b) neither are they for those taken into Ivy Leavue schools - or the best schools generally.
So, some Asian took Harvard university to court about 2 years ago and we're able to proof that many Asians were denied admission even when the got higher SAT scores that blacks who were accepted.
I don't care if anyone takes me seriously by the way, the fact is the fact. When your instinct is to defend even the worst racist statements then there is a problem with an inferiority complex.
You should care if you are taking serious. I have never defended racist I defend Charlie because he wanted everyone treated equal. That's the opposite of being a racist you would agree. Now let me ask you, if Harvard or any university denies a person admission because of his race, is that racism? If yes, that's what Charlie was fighting against. That's some of the reverse racism that the civil rights movement enabled. Reverse racism is nothing but racism.
DeepSight: Even if I let that slide - and I dont - go ahead and explain why Kirk said the Civil Rights Act was a mistake.
Be careful as you do so.
First, you have made yourself the racist police which is very ugly. It's not healthy at all. Now to your question, in Charlies own words, the Civil Rights movement went too far. Is he right to say it went too far? We could argue that. I think he was right though. But making yourself the race police is just awful. I know the number of times you have called someone racist since we started talking. No one can honestly take you serious when you use that word because you have abused it.
G0odharddick: Dude the discussion was on Russia and not north Korea. You should be able to know the difference between democracy and authoritarian
No, the discussion was on religious and non religious nations. China is an authoritarian nation so why did you mention China? You brought in China and left out North Korea. Please explain your reason for this.
G0odharddick: I didn't mention North Korea sir. Wetin concern me concern north Korea. Dude the discussion was on Russia and China, not north Korea
Oh you want to leave north Korea behind. Smart of you. But this is important. Does being nonreligious make a nation rich? Use North Korea as case study. The west because freer, richer and more peaceful under Christianity. But they are losing all these as they become less religious.
It will only make sense to compare Russia to fellow western nations not African nations. And compare china to Japan it's more religious neighbor.
DeepSight: Who made the original version of this statement and why is it that Kirk derided and condemned him?
You lose the point. One or 2 of the statements were made by Martin Luther king Jr. And Krik never critized him for any of these statements. Krik was often critical of Rv King for other reasons not for his statement about equality. Please don't conflict issues
G0odharddick: How's the life of those russians now as compared to the life of Nigerians as regards Nigeria being one of the most religious country in the world?
Do you understand causation and coalition? Is North Korea poor and backwards because it is nonreligious?
G0odharddick: Those countries you mentioned esp china and Russia are living great lives. Are you aware 5k people just fled their homes to Cameroon due to insecurity in the country?
G0odharddick: Religion should completely be banned 🚫
Esp those head slamming people!
Who else noticed that nairaland has greatly improved? The dark mode feature is awesome. I have increased my offer, Seun let me know when you're ready to sell nairaland for #120million
This is exactly what happens when a nation becomes less religious. They start to reduce people's freedoms. They begin to ban religion and opposing views. We have seen it in China, Russia, and North Korea. Now it is happening in Europe.
The freedoms you presently enjoy, from freedom of speech to freedom of worship to ending slavry, were all fought for and given to the world by Christian nations.
CoronaVirusPro: Everyone inherited religion and I must applaud His Excellency, President Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu (GCFR) for saying the truth.
Henceforth, we must desist from doing same to our children. Brainwashing them with sky daddy stories about how a man died for their sins in the Middle East.
We must start introducing them to the marvels of science and technology and how it transitioned, and the possible future.
The notion of stuffing the brains of young kids with fictional religious stories must stop if the country intends to be competitive in the future.
Religious studies should be banned in all primary and tertiary institutions. We can’t keep telling kids how a man used one fish and a loaf to feed 40,000 people. It’s utmost stupidity.
Teach your kids what you want and allow others to teach their kids what they choose. There is no evidence that kids who don't have religious parents are smarter, happier, or more successful. So coming here to prescribe to others what to teach their kids is unwise.
DeepSight: Statements made by Charlie Kirk that have been noted and criticized for their content regarding race and ethnicity include:
On Black Americans and Affirmative Action:
"If I see a Black pilot, I'm going to be like, boy, I hope he's qualified." - The Charlie Kirk Show, 23 January 2024.
"If I'm dealing with somebody in customer service who's a moronic Black woman, I wonder is she there because of her excellence, or is she there because of affirmative action?" - The Charlie Kirk Show, 3 January 2024.
Regarding Joy Reid, Michelle Obama, Sheila Jackson Lee, and Ketanji Brown Jackson: "You do not have the brain processing power to otherwise be taken really seriously. You had to go steal a white person's slot to go be taken somewhat seriously." He further suggested these women were affirmative action picks. - The Charlie Kirk Show, 13 July 2023.
"Happening all the time in urban America, prowling Blacks go around for fun to go target white people, that's a fact. It's happening more and more." - The Charlie Kirk Show, 19 May 2023.
He has also stated that Black pilots are "incompetent" and has denied the existence of systemic racism.
He called George Floyd a "scumbag."
He said, "Just because you're a white person does not mean you have to begin apologizing simply for how God made you," to a virtually all-white crowd.
On Immigration and the "Great Replacement":
"The American Democrat party hates this country. They wanna see it collapse. They love it when America becomes less white." - The Charlie Kirk Show, 20 March 2024.
"The great replacement strategy, which is well under way every single day in our southern border, is a strategy to replace white rural America with something different." - The Charlie Kirk Show, 1 March 2024.
He argued that America was at its peak when immigration was halted for 40 years, dropping the foreign-born percentage to its lowest level ever, adding, "We should be unafraid to do that." - The Charlie Kirk Show, 22 August 2025.
He also stated he is an "incredibly, like, non-negotiating hawk when it comes to immigration," and that the parents of an "illegal" young woman should "go back to wherever she came from with her, because her parents made that mistake with her."
On Other Policies and Concepts Related to Race:
He advocated for the dismantling of "diversity, equity, and inclusion" (DEI) efforts, calling it "the enforcement arm of critical race theory" and saying, "DEI is about trying to destroy the excellence of the country and elevating racial tribal politics."
He criticized the Civil Rights Act of 1964, stating, "We made a huge mistake when we passed the Civil Rights Act in the 1960s," arguing it led to a "permanent DEI-type bureaucracy." He later said the legislation "created a beast, and that beast has now turned into an anti-white weapon."
He criticized Martin Luther King Jr., calling the civil rights leader "awful" and "not a good person."
On Religious and Ethnic Groups:
He claimed that "large dedicated Islamic areas are a threat to America" and that "Islam is not compatible with western civilization." - The Charlie Kirk Show, 30 April 2025 and 24 June 2025.
He stated that "Jewish donors have been the No. 1 funding mechanism of radical, open border neoliberal quasi-Marxist policies, cultural institutions and nonprofits" and that this "beast created by secular Jews... is now coming for Jews." He also said, "Jews have been some of the largest funders of cultural Marxist ideas and supporters of those ideas over the last 30 or 40 years."
On Other Marginalized Groups (often linked to race and ethnicity in his rhetoric):
"If you're a WNBA, pot-smoking, Black lesbian, do you get treated better than a United States marine?" - The Charlie Kirk Show, 8 December 2022.
He has also been cited for "constant comments about Black Americans."
------------------ *Culled
Statements from Charlie Krik to prove he was not a racist but only wanted equal treatment for all humans.
“America should be a country where everyone is treated equally under the law, no matter their race.”
“We must judge people by their character, not the color of their skin; that’s true justice.”
“Affirmative action and racial quotas divide us; real equality means no special treatment for anyone.”
“If racism is wrong, then reverse racism is wrong too. The answer isn’t more discrimination, it’s no discrimination at all.”
“Every American, black, white, Hispanic, Asian, we all deserve the same opportunities based on merit.”
“Our Constitution says all men are created equal. That means no one gets advantages or penalties because of skin color.”
“Racism has no place in America, but neither does preferential treatment. True fairness means equal standards for everyone.”
“We should unite as one people, not divide into groups fighting for special privileges.”
“Equality is not about giving some people a head start. It’s about creating the same rules and opportunities for all.”
“I don’t want special treatment for myself, and I don’t want it for anyone else, just fairness across the board.”
Charlie Kirk’s message is built on the principle that all Americans should be treated equally under the law, without racial preference or special treatment. He argues that racism is wrong in every form, including so-called “reverse racism,” and believes policies like affirmative action create division instead of fairness. In his view, true equality means judging people by their character and merit, not their skin color, and ensuring that everyone, regardless of race or background, has the same opportunities. For Kirk, justice and unity come from one standard for all, not separate rules for different groups.
Charlie Kirk believes all Americans should be treated equally under the law, without racial preference. He rejects racism in every form and argues that true fairness comes from judging people by merit and character, not skin color.
DeepSight: Statements made by Charlie Kirk that have been noted and criticized for their content regarding race and ethnicity include:
On Black Americans and Affirmative Action:
"If I see a Black pilot, I'm going to be like, boy, I hope he's qualified." - The Charlie Kirk Show, 23 January 2024.
"If I'm dealing with somebody in customer service who's a moronic Black woman, I wonder is she there because of her excellence, or is she there because of affirmative action?" - The Charlie Kirk Show, 3 January 2024.
Regarding Joy Reid, Michelle Obama, Sheila Jackson Lee, and Ketanji Brown Jackson: "You do not have the brain processing power to otherwise be taken really seriously. You had to go steal a white person's slot to go be taken somewhat seriously." He further suggested these women were affirmative action picks. - The Charlie Kirk Show, 13 July 2023.
"Happening all the time in urban America, prowling Blacks go around for fun to go target white people, that's a fact. It's happening more and more." - The Charlie Kirk Show, 19 May 2023.
He has also stated that Black pilots are "incompetent" and has denied the existence of systemic racism.
He called George Floyd a "scumbag."
He said, "Just because you're a white person does not mean you have to begin apologizing simply for how God made you," to a virtually all-white crowd.
On Immigration and the "Great Replacement":
"The American Democrat party hates this country. They wanna see it collapse. They love it when America becomes less white." - The Charlie Kirk Show, 20 March 2024.
"The great replacement strategy, which is well under way every single day in our southern border, is a strategy to replace white rural America with something different." - The Charlie Kirk Show, 1 March 2024.
He argued that America was at its peak when immigration was halted for 40 years, dropping the foreign-born percentage to its lowest level ever, adding, "We should be unafraid to do that." - The Charlie Kirk Show, 22 August 2025.
He also stated he is an "incredibly, like, non-negotiating hawk when it comes to immigration," and that the parents of an "illegal" young woman should "go back to wherever she came from with her, because her parents made that mistake with her."
On Other Policies and Concepts Related to Race:
He advocated for the dismantling of "diversity, equity, and inclusion" (DEI) efforts, calling it "the enforcement arm of critical race theory" and saying, "DEI is about trying to destroy the excellence of the country and elevating racial tribal politics."
He criticized the Civil Rights Act of 1964, stating, "We made a huge mistake when we passed the Civil Rights Act in the 1960s," arguing it led to a "permanent DEI-type bureaucracy." He later said the legislation "created a beast, and that beast has now turned into an anti-white weapon."
He criticized Martin Luther King Jr., calling the civil rights leader "awful" and "not a good person."
On Religious and Ethnic Groups:
He claimed that "large dedicated Islamic areas are a threat to America" and that "Islam is not compatible with western civilization." - The Charlie Kirk Show, 30 April 2025 and 24 June 2025.
He stated that "Jewish donors have been the No. 1 funding mechanism of radical, open border neoliberal quasi-Marxist policies, cultural institutions and nonprofits" and that this "beast created by secular Jews... is now coming for Jews." He also said, "Jews have been some of the largest funders of cultural Marxist ideas and supporters of those ideas over the last 30 or 40 years."
On Other Marginalized Groups (often linked to race and ethnicity in his rhetoric):
"If you're a WNBA, pot-smoking, Black lesbian, do you get treated better than a United States marine?" - The Charlie Kirk Show, 8 December 2022.
He has also been cited for "constant comments about Black Americans."
------------------ *Culled
I can bet, you just copied and pasted. You really don't know the contest. Charlie never made a single racist statement, he only told the truth. And yes, when you reduce the requirements for black pilots, everyone, not only Charlie should not be comfortable having a black pilit in the cockpit.
Palestinian resistance groups are not anti-Semitic.
They’re fighting for their homes and lands usurped by invaders.
During World War II, Muslims hid Jews in mosques to protect them from Nazis.
During WW2, the Arabs took the side of Hitler. The then leader of the Palestinians (the were not called Palestinians at that time) was on the side of the Nazis. Let's not rewrite history. Is it possible that some Muslim hid a Jew at one time or the other? Yes. But generally, the Arabs were on the side of Hitler.
They have already accepted parts of the deal tonight. The rest is up for discussion.
PS: The bold is not what I meant.
Brother, I guess you are most disappointed in Hamas. They chose peace. Also, no human living or dead has contributed more to global peace in the last century than Donald J Trump. And he did exactly what I prescribed. Stop spoiling the Palestinians. Let them understand that the have no other option. It's either peace on the might of the IDF is unleashed. Stop begging people to make peace. This is what Clinton should have done in the oslo accords. Force them to get sense.
tunde1200: You called yourself Christian a d you're hating Muslims is whatever you have in your head. May be that's what you are thought in Bibles class or pastor
What is wrong with you. Where did I say that I hate Muslims? You are just a liar. Did I even tell you my religion. I don't hate Muslims but I don't have to accept Islamic terrorism just to make you happy.
madridguy: I wish the Britain didn't go around the world to cause war between brothers, bomb people home land and forcefully tear brothers apart using borders.
An average Arab man belongs to the Middle East where he is free to do as he wants. The long throat of the Britain made them to wage war to innocent people in their home land to steal their OIL.
If you are a Nigerian living in the UK with your family, please get a Muslim name for your children if you consider them living in the UK for a very long time.
Before the British came, the Arabs and middle easterners where living in perfect peace and harmony. Who are you fooling? These people were always at war. One tribe or family fighting another. They were never peace loving. In fact, thanks to the British, the middle east is the most peaceful it ever was. Right after the death of Mohamed, these so called brothers began to drop themselves like flies
DeepSight: Appointing Trump and Blair as governors of Gaza remains a joke. And you are still silent on Blair. Deliberately. Because you can see the extreme absurdity.
And no, I dont believe the bold because you will have no reason to trust them not to r/ape and kill your women and children.
Wait, Hamas thinks the US will rape and kill women and children? Oga let's forget it. With you, this war has no end. And you are super lucky, Hamas thinks just like you do. So thumbs up to you. Your dream has come to pass. For the rest of your life you have a reason to blame Israel on Nairaland. I am sure you are super excited.
DeepSight: So you honestly mean that if you are in a war with a man who has laid siege to your house.
And he does so with the cooperation of his best friend who funds and arms him.
You will accept a deal from your attackers which says the best friend should takeover the running of your house.
Please this thing is getting weird. It appears no matter how absurd the white side is, you will support whatever they say.
Yes, I will if the deal allows the women and children in my house to survive. Again you forgot to add some facts to your Scenario. You left out the part that the friend of your enemy has been the one feeding you and your family since the war began and has brought about peace many times you and his friend are at war. More than once, he has stopped his friend from smashing you off. Even the land you currently occupy (Gaza), we compelled his friend to give it to you. Now I have added the facts you left out, does it not change anything? But even without the scenario, you actually prefer the war to continue because the US is friends with Israel? Don't you see that with people like you, this war can never end? You once acted like you wanted peace but you don't bother to pretend anymore these days
Foreign Affairs › Re: The Racist Views Of Charlie Kirk by tctrills: 4:43pm On Oct 05, 2025
