Gboliwe:
na wa for you!

barcanista: If you call him a genius based on his so_called letter, then accept my condolence on your mental state

naptu2:

I believe that you are one of the best mods I've seen on nairaland. You are strict but fair. I'm not surprised that people always complain about you because I know that Nigerians do not like strict people, neither do we like restrictions, but restrictions are absolutely necessary to prevent chaos and anarchy.

However, you have just one flaw. You should know that it's not everything that you should respond to. You also need to evaluate your responses. It doesn't help if you try to caution an uncouth fellow by using provocative and insulting words. But this just shows that you are human and thus have flaws like everyone else.

Keep up the good work and continue to enforce the rules in a strict but fair manner and remember, you don't need to respond to everything that's said.

Seun: They will be made to go through compulsory sensitivity training, and if their manners do not improve dramatically by the end of the training, I think we will have no choice but to let them go.

Eklektika:

Typical melancholic.The Most gifted yet most diffident.To even say what you said above shows you are creative.
Take it easy,dont be too hard on yourself.

marcangelo: This implies most introverts are creative.. Bt i gues its Signs of end time... *Sighs* END TIME THINGS..

Localamos: These appear more like the traits of a melancholic person.
.
A mel is creative, but other external factors influence his natural traits and as such, he may not exhibit all these traits while still being creative.
.
One thing that makes normative studies interesting is that behavioral patterns are not a cast on stone. Rather, they are varied , vast and dynamic.

tintingz: Lol... So what happens to the war fought by David, solomon, moses, Joshua the battle of jericho to mention the few, all in the command of Jehova in the bible.

Did they runaway or turn the other cheek?

sangresan: Tdade and all4naija,both of you must belong to the last contingents from Fools' Paradise....You are just wasting your time in cherry-picking and writing crap on here....Tdade on his own is picking the wrong person to argue with...If he hadnt been wrapped up in his ignorance,he would have painstakingly read my posts...I never wrote that the bombing of Japan has anything to do with the end of the War...Go back and read my comments very well...I wrote that the bombing had no bearing on the outcome of the War...Nuclear bomb or no nuclear bomb,Japan would have lost the War....In the ranking of nations with their military capabilities in the '40s,Japan was not even among the first seven.....From this moment onward,I will be using books and reference materials provided written by active actors in the War not faceless Google historians....All what you wrote above are utter crap that has no meaning...They are unimportant addendums to the real issues....The Allied Powers had earlier agreed how the War would be fought at the Tehran Conference and Yalta Conference....LT Colonel David Glantz(an army historian) of the US Army is the foremost authority on the World War 11....If you want to know the real military capabilities of Japan,Germany,Britain,USSR,France,Italy during the war etc,read Glantz books...Also,you will learn of the behind the scene decisions and reasons for these.....The operation that crippled the Japanese Kwantung Army was nicknamed Operation August Storm by Glantz and it was launched by the Soviet Red Army.....Germany had been defeated by May 8 and the US and other allied powers told the USSR to open a Pacific Front against Japan at the Tehran Conference..The US had been fighting Japan in the Far East before then..As at this time,Japan and the USSR had ceased all hostility from their 1939 all-out war with the Japanese heavily defeated....The US and the USSR had an ironclad plan to divide the conquered territories between the two nations...They did so in Korea,Germany,Vietnam etc....But the US changed the trend in Japan..The US had to use a newly acquired weapon on Japan to lay claim to it and stop the spread of Communist which the USSR was sure to impose on Japan if they had conquered the Japanese Islands as their Army were already marching towards Tokyo...This singular decision was the bedrock of what later came to be the Cold War between the US and the USSR..Infact,Glantz wrote that many Japanese preferred to commit Seppuku(mass suicide)as the Soviet Red Army approached from Manchuria....Before I find time to properly address the issue,pls lay your hands on books written by ACTIVE PLAYERS in the war rather than dwelling on articles written by those who depend on hearsay e.g When Titans Clashed : How the Red Army Stopped Hitler by David Glantz: University of Kansas.....Also Hiroshima in History:The Myths of Revisionism by Robert James Maddox: Uni of Missouri....Also, Racing the Enemy:Stalin,Truman,and the Surrender of Japan by Tsuyoshi Hasegawa( A Japanese who witnessed it all):Belknap Press...Cheers

sangresan: Tdade,I have typed the response to your diatribe since Sunday but I am yet to get the time to properly type it....We are talking about the World WAR 2 while you are hampering about the Russo-Japanese war bof 1904-05....The war was never an all-out war and at no time was Russia in danger of being invaded....It is just like saying that the Viet-Cong were powerful than the US Army during the Vietnam War..What a childish claijm!.....Russia didnt fight an all-out war with Japan in 1904...They had not less than 300,000 troops in Poland to quell the political agitations in that land..They also had more troops in homeland Russia which they never called to service....So,you are the one deluded......Why is Russia still in control of Japanese possessions like the Kuril and Sakhalin Islands till 2mao...more later

sangresan: I am just reading up on past comments...It is now clear that a retard has been let loose on this thread...Half-education is a bad thing......How can a sensible man come out in 2013 to justify the use of Atomic bombs during the World War 11?....The War was practically over by that time...I REPEAT ,'THE WAR WAS PRACTICALLY OVER AT THE TIME THAT THE TWO BOMBS WERE DROPPED ON JAPAN'....The retard is even saying that Japan defeated Russia....How could that be?...Even mighty Hitler with over 10,000 armoured tanks and his wonderful U-boats on the Eastern Flank couldnt defeat Russia not to talk of Japan....We arent even here to discuss the World War but McCain's stupid letter to Pravda....

pitypec: u just said bomb pearl why did'america use nuclear weapon why didn't they bomb them back look at d difference btw bomb and nuclear weapon.

adami 1: This so call America & western countries will never stop their media propopanda & double standard, America was the only country that use nuclear bomb against other country killing over 50 thousand japanese, nobody raise d issue at d United Nation till today and they ar still modernising their Nuclear Bomb everyday,they are figthing terrorist & they are giving terrorist weapons & money to kill innocent people in syria just because of crude oil, look at what is happen in Afghanistan & iraq, they went there because of crude oil, they succeded in distabilising the counties, no peace there till today,weopon of mass destruction was never found in iraq, one million civilians was killed by George Bush & Tony Blair, nobody raise d issue at d united nation, international criminal court can not prosecute Bush &Blair because their contries are above d international LAW but I.C.C can prosecute Kenyan president & his deputy because 1,000 people die during election violent.

BizBooks: Quoting Victor Ikpeba



Apart from Gervinho, how many other African players play for Arsenal? In case you do not know,
every black player on that team is from France.

Ola Johnson: This woman and her husband should read about the French Revolution of 1789, how the wicked, selfish Queen Marie Antoinette misled her husband the king, Louis XVI. Their action cost their lives and put an end to monarchical government in France.

fkaz: Ewoooo Jesus christ on earth

Demdem: Wonders shall not end.
How can a bag of rice be ur Jesus on earth

Katsumoto:

Have you seen the land mass of the old soviet bloc. That should never have been one country. There are too many small groups in Nigeria and a break up will expose them to further oppression. My position is not anti-breakup. I am simply stating that the problems in Nigeria can be solved by common sense and tolerance. Do you think Nigerians will develop common sense and tolerance after breaking up? They will simply find new ways to oppress other new fellow citizens.

ShyM-X:


True that.

However, are the "owners of Nigeria" ready to talk and effect something like that?

That's the crux of the matter.