₦airaland Forum

buhariguy:
akpabio will be in jail

Will you announce it to everyone or wait till you get to the Court of Justice before you start singing?

MaxIntheHouse2:
Guy continue your business on Nairaland jàre if you have any interest in the Good News of God's Kingdom you can approach me for a Bible study but if not then goodbye!

Little wonder, simple questions like

Where Resides the Jehovah of the Jehovah's witnesses are impossible for you to answer!

Your answer at best will be similar to the answer of the Muslims!

Have a nice day!

MaxIntheHouse2:
Guy continue your business on Nairaland jàre if you have any interest in the Good News of God's Kingdom you can approach me for a Bible study but if not then goodbye!

You want me to come and learn bible from Maximus the servant of Allah aka Hubal, the Believing Muslim! !?

You forget that Mohammed himself is an Antichrist!

Your identity is truely revealed clearly!!

MaxIntheHouse2:
Whatever you may like to type my guy WHATEVER makes you sleep well!

I hail you Maximus the servant of Allah aka Hubal, the Believing Muslim! !

Your identity revealed clearly!!

alobright17:
my question is the matter about who’s a saint or not ? For Natasha is lying until she prove otherwise because truth is just one . Both of them can never be telling lies at the same time , so the accuser bears the responsibility of proving evidence of her claim til then she’s a lair .


What is all this have I said this one is guilty or the other one is a lair ?

I guess you have information that the rest of us dont have.

Even our laws presumes innocent until proven guilty!

MaxIntheHouse2:
Ọmọ you and i aren't on the same page so go and sleep!

Maximus the servant of Allah aka Hubal, the Believing Muslim!

Sorry!
Sleep well!

alobright17:
is the matter at hand about who is a saint or what?

The problem is taking sides to judge the other!

Have you heard me say that Akpabio was guilty!
Neither have I said Natasha is a liar!

There lies the difference!

achorladey:
Na him mode of operation. He packed lies upon lies on top my head for one thread so tey my comment gets banned instantly whenever I try refuting the lies.

Can he learn!?
No!

He is so full that anything different from what his Oyinbo Replacement of Jesus in Brooklyn tells him, his brain locks up but he still has to open his mouth today something

Maximus692:
Please continue cracking your jokes jàre i'm glad Love800 can see how bitter all of you are for saying he chose to become one of Jehovah's Witnesses!

Servant of Allah aka Hubal, we know you!

Maximus692:
You're becoming funnier than i thought!

Be at least a little Humble , it will save you!



Arrogance wouldn't allow him to know that there is a vast difference between Surrender and Submitting.

Submission is Willing Obedience by Choice

Surrender is Unwilling Obedience because you were Conquered or Subjugated

Islam is SURRENDERING to the Will of Allah it is not a SUBMISSION

You wouldn't learn because of the spirit of arrogance in you.

Maximus692:
So you suddenly came back after saying goodbye to me for telling you to focus on preaching the Good News and leave Muslims alone.
Well keep your question if you won't answer mine!

Of course, even with no answer he will keep talking!
SHIO!

Maximus692:
Walahi talahi you are good in cracking jokes!

Servant of Allah, we know you!

Maximus692:
You don't even understand the meaning of that word "BELIEVER"

Well the word believe means trust and to trust in someone connotes submitting to what such a person says.

For your information all the faithful ones in the Bible SUBMITTED or SURRENDER to the will of God!

Arrogance wouldn't allow him to know that there is a vast difference between Surrender and Submitting.

Submission is Willing Obedience by Choice

Surrender is Unwilling Obedience because you were Conquered or Subjugated

Islam is SURRENDERING to the Will of Allah it is not a SUBMISSION

You wouldn't learn because of the spirit of arrogance in you.

Maximus692:
Which country on this planet have you heard that there is war, terror or violence and it is said that Jehovah's Witnesses are behind it?

It was a simple question, answer it!

Maximus692:
Walahi talahi you deserve an award as a Comedian!

And you keep on SWEARING!

Even after knowing the full meaning of what you said!?

Indeed, By their fruit they are known!

You can't learn because humility is far from you.
You can't know because you are not of Christ!

achorladey:
Anything you type he wants to use as means to play victim, hatred or persecution game. I want to show him a screenshot where during World War I or II and on Christmas day those fighting were at peace even shared things.

He thought those fighting wars don't know what they are doing. They are just bloodthirsty, killing machine, war machine or war mongers.

Instead of learning so that he can correct himself, he is busy writing something else.

Does Muslim mean Believer?

Do you now agree that Muslim does not mean Believers!

Do you agree that the word Islam literally means “surrender” and Muslims are those who practice Islam.

Do you now know that, Muslims are people who have Surrendered and (not even submission) to the will of Allah.


It's interesting you say you are a Muslim because Muslim mean Believer!

Learn to Learn bro!
It takes humility to learn sometimes!

alobright17:
Then the SP remain innocent until proven guilty, what do you think about this ?

I judge neither of them.

Why?

1. Neither of them is a saint
2. I wasn't present at any of their engagements
3. I am not privy to any documented evidence between them

Maximus692:
Walahi talahi you've proved what you are today.
Thanks for coming out plainly!

Of course, by their fruit yesterday shall know them

Let me teach you what Jesus taught us about swearing

Mat 5:34-37:
"But I say to you, Swear not at all; neither by heaven; for it is God's throne: Nor by the earth; for it is his footstool: neither by Jerusalem; for it is the city of the great King. Neither shall you swear by your head, because you can not make one hair white or black. But let your communication be, Yes, yes; No, no: for whatever is more than these comes of evil."


But you come to me swearing by the name of your God , Allah!?

FYI:
"Walahi talahi" mean "By Allah, by Allah" or "I swear by Allah"

You have just expressed the kind of fruit the tree of your life can bring forth!

Shame!

Maximus692:
Ask the whole world that question and get the reward of hypocrisy let everyone know who you are on the inside! Luke 6:45

Can't you answer simple question?

Maximus692:
Ọmọ the word "Muslims" means Believers.
So Jehovah's Witnesses are PEACEFUL believers!

Shame on you!
And you call yourself a former Muslim?
Just as you swallowed Taqqiya you are regurgitating it out to people who you think are less informed.

Muslim does not mean Believers sir. I wonder where you learnt that.

The word Islam literally means “surrender” and Muslims are those who practice Islam.

Thus, Muslims are people who have Surrendered and (not even submission) to the will of Allah.





So you see why even you acknowledge that you JWs are Muslims!
LOL!!

Quran 5:111
"Bear witness that we have surrendered (unto Thee), we are Muslims."

Maximus692:
Wolves, Tare, Goats yet three different persons looked critically at this group and said:







Thank God it's all happening life on this forum!

You fit all like a glove!
Wolves, Tare, Goats = JWs

Maximus692:
Beg God to forgive you and repent, ọmọ repent before it's too late.

"Did you say JWs are less violent" shey?

Well this is what others have observed:

Are you more violent than Muslims?
Yes or No!?

frankson1:
Which court did Lietasha sue Akpabio for sexual harassment if she was telling the truth??

Has Akpabio sued Natasha for false allegations made against him?

!

achorladey:
Loooool!

You know despite how they love to go against other Christian denomination they hardly go hard on the Islamic religion, more like they are sympathetic to their belief. Most time their religious publications tend to seek areas where the Muslims align with christian beliefs than go against them.

They are the same as far as I am concerned.
Both are willing to Bend their Scripture to align with the consensus of their Scholars (for Muslims) or the consensus of their Governing Body (for JWs)

Both are willing to Ignore the Truth if it doesn't align with their consensus
Bot are Willing to tell lies to support their flawed consensus.
Both Reject the Nature of Christ and the Holy Spirit.

Only difference,
Muslims incorporate violence
JW are less violent

Maximus692:
So those three posts are chest beating by Jehovah's Witnesses shey?







Ọmọ repent and stop hating the truth whom God has blessed no man can curse! Isaiah 5:20

You are not even close to my challenge to anyone who is of Christ Jesus
Because
Your fruit has shown that you are the Wolves in Sheep Skin
The Tare within the Wheat
And the Goats amongst the Sheep!



Sorry!

Maximus692:
Wow!
Jehovah's Witnesses are peaceful believers!

Why do you tell lies about what I didn't say?
Its the same spirit of Taqqiya as Muslims!

To Maximus
Muslim=Believer

SMH!

alobright17:
we’re not here talking about who’s a saint or not because both of us and all those critics of both parties are not saint , we’re trying to find evidence to the accusation made and the accusation isn’t wether Akpabio is a saint or not .

Even if you toast a babe and she refused and then accuse you of rape with no proof will the judge say oh you’re guilty all because by the way you’re not a saint ? Be sincere with the answer let’s see .

If I was Natasha o, no public pressure will make me release my evidences until we meet in court.

I don't know about you

achorladey:
They will say others are false Christians and those criteria they say makes others false Christians is the very same thing they feed on as spiritual food and as truth in their kingdom halls.

When you point it out they take cover.

To me,
JWs averagely are peaceful Muslims without the Mohammed!

alobright17:
What is she going from one platform to another instead shutting up and wait for court case ?

In recent times you know number of footballers getting destroyed by false accusations from ladies E.g Mendy of Manchester City at long last the guy was innocent .


Now why are people like you siding the accuser even without evidence on what basis are you siding her , over just a claim she made ? Don’t you know anyone can make a claim even against you ? I thought there’s a saying that you’re innocent until proven guilty?


I can side with the accused until proven guilty. Someone like Natasha if she has any iota of evidence would’ve posted it even before court case .


You’ll see that in the end this lady will never provide anything called evidence since there’s none .should we bet ?

I am not sliding anyone!

Is Akpabio a saint?

It is not ethically wrong for Akpabio to want to date Natasha, it is only ethically wrong if he is punishing Natasha for not agreeing to his whims!
Neither of them are saints!

frankson1:
Which court did Lietasha sue Akpabio for sexual harassment if she was telling the truth??

Which makes better sense?

buhariguy:
what evidence?

Sexual harassment in what way,
Did akpabio touch her or rape her in the presence of her husband?

You should have answered the question rather than ask "What evidence!?"

What will you do if you have Evidence?

alobright17:
Have you reviewed Natasha's claimed and also asked why she's not posting evidence? Or your duty is just to review one side of the devide?

If you were Natasha, would you have posted your evidences so that Akpabio will have enough time to manufacture counter-evidences and defence to it
OR
Wait till court hearings where Akpabio would be forced to answer to those evidences on the fly?

Which makes better sense?