₦airaland Forum

Kobojunkie:
Apparently they are making enough to pay their small rent,live and continue their business. Or are we now to attack the size of their biz? I think the point here is they are able to make a living, no matter how small where they are now. My question again to you is where else do you think they can market similar goods and services and still make the same level or even more? Where exactly would you rather these people move to? hhmmm . . . . Ok
To farm, you need land, and average cost of land is in the hundreds of thousands, even millions( plot) in the villages. So, how do you expect them to afford cost of land, tools and the rest ? Are you going to pay for all this? Or how exactly do you expect them to deal with these costs if sending them to farm in village is the agreement now.

Are we also assuming here that everyone who has a village OWNS A HOUSE/Has relatives who OWN A HOUSE AT LEAST in the village? Is that the assumption we are all operating on here?

This friend of mine is never happy except when with buddies drinking some liquor

Potassium bromate (KBrO3), is a bromate of potassium and takes the form of white crystals or powder.

It is typically used as a flour improver (E number E924), strengthening the dough and allowing higher rising. It is an oxidizing agent, and under the right conditions, will be completely used up in the baking bread. However, if too much is added, or if the bread is not baked long enough or not at a high enough temperature, then a residual amount will remain, which may be harmful if consumed. Potassium bromate might also be used in the production of malt barley where the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has prescribed certain conditions where it may be used safely, which includes labeling standards for the finished malt barley product.[1] It is a very powerful oxidizer (E° = 1.5 volts comparable to potassium permanganate). Bromate is considered a category 2B (possibly carcinogenic to humans) carcinogen by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC).[2]

[edit] Bans
Potassium bromate has been banned from use in food products in Europe, as well as the United Kingdom in 1990, and Canada in 1994, and most other countries. It was banned in Sri Lanka in 2001[3] and China in 2005. It is also banned in Nigeria, Brazil and Peru.

In the United States, it has not been banned. The FDA sanctioned the use of bromate before the Delaney clause of the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act went into effect in 1958—which bans carcinogenic substances—so that it is more difficult for it to now be banned. Instead, since 1991 the FDA has urged bakers to voluntarily stop using it. In California a warning label is required when bromated flour is used.

Japanese baked goods manufacturers stopped using potassium bromate voluntarily in 1980; however, Yamazaki Baking resumed its use in 2005, claiming they had new production methods to reduce the amount of the chemical which remained in the final product.[4]

michelin89:
Go rest your yansh for that side.

I love you too.

Wait a minute . . . .
Is it a must that everyone must live in Lagos?
Why suffer in Lagos while some have family homes in the village empty?

xxcarolxx:
A little irish history, The irish slave trade began in 1600 when james 11 sold irish prisoners to english settlers in antigua montserrat to name a few of the countries. During the 1650 over 100,000 children were taking from their parents and sold. Africian slaves were considered more valuable than an irish slave, an africian slave was sold for 50 pounds as an irish slave was sold for 5 pounds. If an irish slave was whipped or killed it didnt matter as they were cheaper than africans. If an irish slave rebelled he was hung by his hands and his feet set alight or either had their heads chopped off and placed on pikes to serve as a warning to others. The english then began to breed irish women with african men to save money on slaves also these mixed race kids were also sold at market at a higher price. Yes they were bound on their rat infested slave ships.

Following the arrival of twenty Africans aboard a Dutch man-of-war in Virginia in 1619, the face of American slavery began to change from the "tawny" Indian to the "blackamoor" African in the years between 1650 and 1750. Though the issue is complex, the unsuitability of Native Americans for the labor intensive agricultural practices, their susceptibility to European diseases, the proximity of avenues of escape for Native Americans, and the lucrative nature of the African slave trade led to a transition to an African based institution of slavery. During this period of transition, however, the colonial "wars" against the Pequots, the Tuscaroras, the Yamasees, and numerous other Indian nations led to the enslavement and relocation of tens of thousands of Native Americans. In the early years of the eighteenth century, the number of Native American slaves in areas such as the Carolinas may have been as much as half of the African slave population. During this transitional period, Africans and Native Americans shared the common experience of enslavement. In addition to working together in the fields, they lived together in communal living quarters, produced collective recipes for food and herbal remedies, shared myths and legends, and ultimately became lovers. The intermarriage of Africans and Native Americans was facilitated by the disproportionality of African male slaves to females (3 to 1) and the decimation of Native American males by disease, enslavement, and prolonged wars with the colonists.

As Native American societies in the Southeast were primarily matrilineal, African males who married Native American women often became members of the wife's clan and citizens of the respective nation. As relationships grew, the lines of distinction began to blur. The evolution of red-black people began to pursue its own course; many of the people who came to be known as slaves, free people of color, Africans, or Indians were most often the product of integrating cultures. In areas such as Southeastern Virginia, The Low Country of the Carolinas, and Silver Bluff, S.C., communities of Afro-Indians began to spring up. The depth and complexity of this intermixture is revealed in a 1740 slave code in South Carolina: all Negroes and Indians, (free Indians in amity with this government, and Negroes, mulattos, and mustezoes, who are now free, excepted) mulattos or mustezoes who are now, or shall hereafter be in this province, and all their issue and offspring, shall be and they are hereby declared to be, and remain hereafter absolute slaves

The first known Virginia statute punishing interracial sexual relations was enacted in 1662. Act XII, 2 Laws of Va. 170, 170 (Hening 1823) (enacted 1662), cited in, Leon Higginbotham, Jr. and Barbara K. Kopytoff, Racial Purity and Interracial Sex in the Law of Colonial and Antebellum Virginia, 77 Geo. L.J. 1967 (1989); supra, at 1993. As early as 1691, Virginia had enacted a statute punishing interracial marriage. Act XVI, Laws of Va. 86, 86-87 (Hening 1812) (enacted 1691), cited in, Higginbotham, supra, at 1995. The antimiscegenation laws and prohibitions were the legal manifestations of an often violently enforced taboo against sexual relations between white women and black men. The punishment in 1691 for marriage between an English or white individual and a black, mulatto, or Indian was banishment and removal from Virginia forever

1663
Maryland Settlers pass law stipulating that all imported blacks are to be given the status of slaves. Free white women who marry black slaves are to be slaves during the lives of their spouses, Ironically, children born of white servant women and blacks are regarded as free by a 1681 law.

1664
Maryland passes a law making lifelong servitude for black slaves mandatory to prevent them from taking advantage of legal precedents established in England which grant freedom under certain conditions, such as conversion to Christianity. Similar laws are later passed in New York, New Jersey, the Carolinas and Virginia.

One characteristic which set American slavery apart was its racial basis. In America, with only a few early and insignificant exceptions, all slaves were Africans, and almost all Africans were slaves. This placed the label of inferiority on black skin and on African culture. In other societies, it had been possible for a slave who obtained his freedom to take his place in his society with relative ease. In America, however, when a slave became free, he was still obviously an African

Beaf:
No, I mean the children my mama and grandmama aborted.

Beaf:
"It" lives in the US.

labalaba4:
That's right, my friend. Just back off slowly, even though it's too late. You've already committed an offence under the Criminal Code of Southern Nigeria by threatening a person's life, even if online. This is also an offence in the Australia, Sudan, the UK and the US, so if our enquiries reveal you to be in any of these jurisdictions, the long arm of the law will certainly catch up with you.