₦airaland Forum

Maynmann:
Only an illiterate will call atheism a group with members, people that don’t believe in santa are they a “group”?

Just ignore him. .

He wants to come and defend what he doesn't understand .

kkins25:
Like i said, any ex-nember of any group will say something similar, even ex atheist, will tell you atheism is just an escape route to go and sin.

You continue to show your biases ,and I'm not suprise .What you have said above doesn't happen in real life . It has never happened .

Not every ex- member will say the same thing .

Some will say good things ,others will say bad things .

But you are trying to blur the lines because you want to defend your friend .

When one visits Google play store to download something from there ,the first thing they usually do is to check for ratings and reviews from others about it before deciding what next to do .

I'm sure you must have done that several times in the past when you visit there to guide your decision ..And, if you have ,why are you trying to downplay its importance ?

More positive reviews and ratings is usually an indication the product is good , while the opposite is a warning for one to be careful

It is called user experience : An important factor in guiding anyone in choosing what to buy or not, whether online or offline .

There have been so many negative "reviews" from ex menbers of Amorc which the organisation has not been able to successfully counter. They just put up feeble defenses or issue empty threats and express anger . That all.

You don't know what you are saying

It's only a foolish person that will insist on learning from their own experiences alone .





.

.

.

.

.

.

I hope @KKins25 has not left the thread .

I have enough for you to read .

More are coming . Stay tuned

Maynmann:
😂, and the “special knowledge” they are teaching them in the occult is very basic.

Very very

THE DELIMMA OF BEING A MEMBER OF AMORC


According to the Rosicrucian Order AMORC, there are certain rules members have to follow absolutely in order to continue to receive protection of the Egregore of AMORC. These rules are clearly spelled out in the monographs of AMORC and the Rosicrucian tradition.
Besides paying your membership fee to AMORC and other important points I have mentioned in previous post, members must (or must not):
1 Cannot criticize the Rosicrucian Order AMORC and the teaching of AMORC and its spiritual leaders (terms use for the officer of AMORC visible and invisible)
2 Members must not read writing that is critical of AMORC.
3 Members must voice their opinion against writing that are critical of AMORC (the reason given for this last one is that if a member is not willing to voice opinion against writing that are critical of AMORC, it means that they do not believe deep inside in the teaching of AMORC and is therefore not worthy of the protection of the egregore of AMORC.)
And this is the dilemma. You cannot read a book that is critical of AMORC and you must take position for AMORC against such book. This smells fishy to me.
So fear is the force that push members of AMORC into criticizing so harshly Pierre Freeman for his book “The Prisoner of San Jose”.
I welcome any feed back about this dilemma.


Copied

THE DELIMMA OF BEING A MEMBER OF AMORC


According to the Rosicrucian Order AMORC, there are certain rules members have to follow absolutely in order to continue to receive protection of the Egregore of AMORC. These rules are clearly spelled out in the monographs of AMORC and the Rosicrucian tradition.
Besides paying your membership fee to AMORC and other important points I have mentioned in previous post, members must (or must not):
1 Cannot criticize the Rosicrucian Order AMORC and the teaching of AMORC and its spiritual leaders (terms use for the officer of AMORC visible and invisible)
2 Members must not read writing that is critical of AMORC.
3 Members must voice their opinion against writing that are critical of AMORC (the reason given for this last one is that if a member is not willing to voice opinion against writing that are critical of AMORC, it means that they do not believe deep inside in the teaching of AMORC and is therefore not worthy of the protection of the egregore of AMORC.)
And this is the dilemma. You cannot read a book that is critical of AMORC and you must take position for AMORC against such book. This smells fishy to me.
So fear is the force that push members of AMORC into criticizing so harshly Pierre Freeman for his book “The Prisoner of San Jose”.
I welcome any feed back about this dilemma.

Continue .

He says there only a handful of enlightened members you will meet . The rest are rascals . Not "open eyes" with no "mind to think " zombies

Go to Quora and read testimonies of exmembers and judge for yourseif . Both good and bad .

The majority always carry the vote . Those ones says ,NO! With a big warning sign

Maynmann:
Bwahahahaha.
Ignorant prisoners.

They need to be pitied . They were looking for power ,but ended up being disempowered and turned into zombies

Another one ,Don't a be victim . I was almost a one .

"Amorc demystified . Frree easy fast download

https://pdfcoffee.com/amorc-demystified-via-seventh-degree-by-pierre-s-freeman-4-pdf-free.html

Hello ,

More "hundred hand" information is coming .

Stay tuned

budaatum:
I'm not using a dictionary to determine what is first or second hand for me, triple, especially not where you were concerned. It would be absurd for me to consider any evidence you give as first hand evidence for anything not to talk of your "dem say".

I hear you . Information can be verified ,and I know how to go about that

Second hand information is a synonym for fake news . I'm sure you don't know that

Read the books I shared the links and come back and tell me it's hundred hand information .

Another book

The prisoner of San Jose

How I escaped Amorc mind control .
This is easier to download . No subscription
https://pdfcoffee.com/the-prisoner-of-san-jose-pierre-s-freeman-pdf-free.html

Maynmann:
Thank you!

You are most welcome .

Buda won't read it . He has been barred by his cult not to.

PDF free download

https://www.scribd.com/document/505737131/Tales-of-the-Puppet-Master

kkins25:
Common triple, buy any atheist book too. buy any ex Muslims book. ex buddist book.. You'd find the similar theme-- lies

Quit .Those I share are for people like you looking for evidence

I don't need that to know what Amorc is.

You don't know much about me .

So rest .

Modified . Are you a member of Amorc or freemasonry ?

kkins25:
You see where your fails you



The page your referenced is a Christian, and is judging the Armoc based on his Christian values. Therefore, his view of ARMOC is subjective.

Then buy the book
Or speak with ex members

I will post others . More is coming

Harvey Spenser taught the nonsense of the Aryan race ? True or false .

Is that subjective too

kkins25:
Jesus is God.
I am the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. Are these true?
Jesus rose from the dead. Is this true?
Jesus walked on water. Is this true?

Why asking me those ?

Did you smoke something this afternoon ?

I'm not a Christian .

Ask your friend or you check my profile

"Interviewing a witness to a crime gives a police officer first-hand testimony about what exactly happened " copied

My friends testimonies are corrabrated by other exmembers all over the net

"Interviewing a witness to a crime gives a police officer first-hand testimony about what exactly happened " copied

First hand ,Meaning ;

budaatum:
"Friends who were once there" is not, "first hand information" triple. Just thought to inform you it's second hand information at best.

I'm very correct . Yours is not the full meaing

First hand information is from what you experienced directly yourself and what you get from someone who saw something happened and recorded it to share it with others .

Get a current dictionary . The one you bought in the 80 s is outdated .

I have friends who were once there ,so I have first hand information .

Get the below and read it

kkins25:
Interesting. Claims the Freemasons are brainwashing people to join them, then goes ahead to do exactly what freemasons do, but differently. That is, bring people to Christianity.

On what authority?

I'm not a Christian and some others who have shared that article elsewhere have not done so because they were trying to convert anyone to their faith .Some may have ,but not everyone .

And besides I cannot find anything therein that's persuasive to convince someone like me to join Christianity .


If you read it very well ,the author had only announced his decision to return to Christianity because it was the only thing he could think of at that time after what he observed about the organisation .

If he were a Muslim , he naturally would have
returned back Islam .

Adherents of other religion would also do the same, or remain irreligious after waking up from it.

If someone has been scamming you and you later wake up from it , would you remain with them and allow it to continue?



Even if it is true he wants to draw people to Christianity , does it then mean that what he said about Amorc are lies ?

Answer me?

I will post others one',s written by agnostics ,atheist ,etc . Read them and come back and tell me they are all trying to convert people to what they currently subscribe to .


Focus on the main thing and stop looking for something else that doesn't exist .

budaatum:
Sorry triple. That was a typo.

That would be the trinity "me" that exists, which includes the physical body and the mind that thinks and reasons in buda and that which some refer to as buda's soul.

And no, it does not "own" like you own a car or your phone, because those things are separable from you while a soul can not be. You can't put a soul on a table like you can a phone or a car.

Then what is soul simply put.
What does the word, soul ,actually refers to ?

What you explained I suspect , is Rosiscrucian perspective about the soul .
.But It's not clear enough .It only makes sense theoretically and it's of no practical value to make anyone understand who they are .

Others have disagreed with it.

The soul is the real person occupying a body to make use of it .
I'm soul . I don't have soul .

But you said soul is part of "me"that's not making sense .

budaatum:
That would be the trinity "me" that exists, which includes the physical body and the mind that thinks and reasons in buda and that which some refer to as buda's soul.

And no, it does not "own" like you own acar or your phone, because those things are separable from you while a soul can not be. You can put a soul on a table like you can a phone or a car.

How do you put soul on a table independent of "me"?

And what is the nature of this soul you are talking about ?

Maynmann:
Buda lacks knowledge, that’s why I’m asking “you” bud.
You should know the word “you” are using, so “you” won’t alleviate buda more than your poo.
First start by translating “soul” to your local language or you can do well and painstakingly search for the origin of the word.


“you” are not buda, bud, one of your names is just buda, i was referring to buda as poo and urine not “you”.
You lack knowledge of what “soul” is, like a typical theist.

Oh

A million thanks for the Bible verse. It aptly describes him .