₦airaland Forum

Papist:
Are you seriously comparing Vatican City to Saudi Arabia?

Like 90% of Muslims, the guy is deceptive for comparing the Vatican city (which is the largest church inside Rome, in Italy) to Saudi Arabia. Even the Qur'an had been read, many times, inside the Vatican city, though most Christians do not like the Catholic approach to the interfaith dialogue which is almost the easiest way of meeting Islamic demands in Europe and America.

Pastafarian:
you're allowed to practise your faith in a private manner, Christians gather but they are not allowed to do it openly or have buildings dedicated to their faith; the Government guarantees and protects the right to private worship for all, including non-Muslims
infact, Ahamadiyya Muslims are even much more persecuted in Saudi Arabia than Christians cuz they're not even allowed into the country at all

something similar but a bit more relaxed applies to the country "Vatican City"

That's not the answer to my question. You said there are churches in Saudi Arabia and I asked you to mention the name of the church and the place it is located but you couldn't because no single church in Saudi Arabia. If you wear a crucifix you will be arrested in Saudi Arabia. If you carry a Bible you will be arrested, so where is the religious freedom?

I am not talking about the ahmadiya, don't divert please. Saudi Arabia is the land of Mohammed and the most hostile country to the Jews and the Christians. Almost every Friday, Christians and Jews are cursed in their mosques, so why are you technically defending Islamic apartheid and evil orchestrated by Mohammed?

Demmzy15:
OK, I said lynching people is not allowed and those who perpetuated that crime would executed.

So don't complicate any issue here! True2god continue dey flex muscles, I no get ya time!

How is telling the truth related to 'flexing of muscle'. The truth can be bitter and often unacceptable.

There is no any part of the Muslim world that there is no mob violence against any blasphemer of allahh, Mohammed or Islam. It is a standard Islamic practice and the sunnah of the Islamic prophet. If you doubt I will provide an hadith that sanctioned the killing of anyone critical of Mohammed or Mohammed.

gabe:
I just knew it would be muslims that killed him. So insecure about their religion. If u want to die, just go to kano and start arguing that mohammed was not sent by God. Pakistan, a muslim country has blasphemy laws. So stupid they asked facebook to punish blasphemers! In saudi arabia, u cant even go to church not to talk of being atheist. Saying you are atheist publicly will just kill you in any muslim community. Maybe because islam is so full of bullshit a little examining will expose its lies.

Islamic lies are indefensible and the only way to prevent critical examination of Islam is crude violence by the radicals, while the so-called moderate Muslims pay lip service to the terrors of Islamic radicals.

Mohammed, the founder of Islam, had 100% knowledge of the modus operandi of Islam. He said and I quote: I have been made victorious by means of terror (sahih Bukhari 4:52:220).

Pastafarian:
Hehehehehehehehe

there are churches in Saudi Arabia, what they don't want is evangelism

What's the name of the church and where is it located in Saudi Arabia?

Demmzy15:
Being an atheist is not terrorism is an Islamic State, please get your facts right. The moment you kill or influence other people to kill, you become a criminal in an Islamic State. Those guys would be executed for killing, shikena!

Mr lie(nus) you again? It is a criminal offense to be an atheist in Saudi Arabia and an offense punishable by death to apostatize or make comments critical of Islam in Saudi Arabia, Iran or Pakistan. In Pakistan, street mob will kill anyone who blaspheme (mostly bitter truth) against Islam and/or its prophet.

Islam is evil and dangerous to the core.

udatso:
LIARS

Now who should be ashamed of himself?

How did the 3rd and the 4th khalifa die? Who killed Uthman and Ali (the 3rd and 4th khalifa)? You never gave any rebuttal to counter my point.

alBHAGDADI:
Pls, before i answer you, kindly tell me who were the people killing those caliphs.

Your response will show what we have been saying all these while about muslims killing each other, and i think that's the discuss, while the topic is about whether lying is good.

Pls, stay on topic.

He will never touch those questions because they don't want non-muslims to be in the know of 1400-year Islamic bloody history.

udatso:
an ignorant fellow referring someone to another ignorant fellow.
First of all, the battle of badr wasn't the battle Muslims fought Muslims. With all your researches you have done about Islam, I thought you would know this. Well your research was to find faults.

Bring proof showing that the 4th killed the 3rd and the 5th killed the 4th. Stop dishing out false information especially when you have nothing to back it up

Since you need hard evidence, will you deny or repudiate the quran and hadith below?:

Mohammed said: I have been given the smallest expression bearing the widest meaning and I have been made victorious by means of terror (sahih Bukhari 4:52:220).

Mohammed also said that the life and property of kafirs are not secure until they say: there is no god but allahh and Mohammed is his messenger. (sahih Bukhari 4:52:196), (Sahih Muslim, 1:31 [see also 1:130, 1:32, 1:33]) and also Qur'an 9:29.

The issue is that over 90% of Muslims worldwide are ignorant of Islamic history and are lazy to research it while the remaining 10% who are informed lie about it outrightly because of the embarrassment that it usually cause to Islam. Islam is built on LIES to the ignorant kafirs and on history revisions.

My questions to you are:

1) Who killed Ali Ibn Abi talib, the 4th khalifa, the son-in-law of Mohammed?

a. Muslims
b. non-muslims
c. the Americans.

2) Who killed the grandchildren of Mohammed?

a. Muslims
b. non-muslims
c. the Americans

3) Who killed Othman, the third khalifa?

a. Muslims
b. non-muslims
c. the Americans

4) What caused the sunni-shia civil war:

a. leadership tussle
c. Money
c. war booty.

If you can answer these questions very honestly, you will understand the bloody history of Islam.

alBHAGDADI:
Am sorry, but you are just making assumptions.

Can you provide us with a video of Christians denying their faith and accepting islam when confronted by Boko Haram?

From the time of Yahshua, his disciples to till now, Christians have been dying for their faith. The Kenya mall attack by Islamic terrorists and the ISIS killings proves it, where Muslims were separated from the Christians with the Christians killed on the spot. They could have denied being Christians but they didn't.

You speak of people fleeing from Boko Haram. Who won't do the same? Or do you expect them to go embrace Boko Haram's cruelty? That's stupidity. But when they are trapped by Boko Haram and they are given the choice to accept Islam and live it declare Christianity and get killed, they will accept Christianity. Who would want to accept a cruel cult?

Now, you talk of Boko Haram killing Muslims too and bombing mosques as a justification that Boko Haram is unislamic. May I remind you that the killing of Muslims by Muslims didn't begin today. All the caliphs in Islam were killed by fellow muslims in bloody war. So, if we are seeing it's fruit today, note that it isn't anything new.

Thanks bro. Right from the days of the Islamic caliphate Muslims have been killing fellow Muslims for the sake of allahh. The first Islamic battle, under Abu Bakr (the first Islamic khalifa), the battle of Badr, Muslims slaughter Muslims.

During the reign of the second khalifa, Omar, Islam split into the sunni and the shia. This split led to the first Islamic civil war which claimed thousands of lives.

The 4th khalifa killed the 3rd khalifa, the 5th khalifa killed the 4th khalifa, and the cycle continued. The first coup plot in the medieval era was carried out by Muslims against their fellow Muslim. The first political assassination, called 'hasashin' in Arabic (the genesis of that word) was carried out by Muslim against their fellow Muslim. So Muslims killing Muslims is not a new thing because the foundation of Islam was watered with blood, right from the formative years of the religion by Mohammed Ibn abdulahh.

So when Muslims attempt to exonerate their religion from any fault by claiming that Islamic terror group are not true Muslims because they also kill their fellow Muslims, I asked them to go and read the history of Islam. If Islamic terrorist are not true Muslims, then Mohammed, Abu Bakr and Omar are also not true Muslims.

Mohammed said: I have been given the smallest expression bearing the widest meaning and I have been made victorious by means of terror (sahih Bukhari 4:52:220).

Mohammed also said that the life and property of kafirs are not secure until they say: there is no god but allahh and Mohammed is his messenger. (sahih Bukhari 4:52:196) and also Qur'an 9:29.

(Sahih Muslim, 1:31 [see also 1:130, 1:32, 1:33]).

This man na serious apari, according to Yoruba people.

Ayaba03:
Who ask u? Religion is not by compulsion. It is your business not ours. May almighty Allah forgive and guide ur soul for d lies you type here.

Fight those who do not believe in allahh or the last day....(quran 9:29).

ilynem:
Marrying of widows might be commendable. But why did he stop others from marrying more than 4?

Mohammed must have read 'the 48 laws of power' one of them which says: 'do not attempt to outshine your master'.

Muslims are commanded, by allahh through Mohammed, never to have more wives than Mohammed. Mohammed can marry whoever he wants and whatever quantities he wants (Qur'an 33: 37-50) but Muslims Muslims must not exceed 4.

Who said allahh did not give his one and only apostle a special privilege!

The lady and her advisers didn't do a perfect job. She should try next time in kirikiri prison.

The story looks 90% fake. The whole things no join wella.

Haroun13:
Of course. The dawah must continue, in order to spread the truth of Islam.
It's left for them to accept it or not. But definitely, it will testify against them, and testify for us on the day of judgement, In shaa Allah

Does this truth include a man of 54 years sleeping with a girl of 9?

alBHAGDADI:
What proof do you want other than the fact that a 25yr old boy called Mohammad married a 40yr old rich entrepreneur widow?

He is no different from the yahoo boys of nowadays who marry old white women just for money and green card. He was a gigolo.

No sane man, @ 25, will marry a 40yr old woman without any string attached. Using today's standard, Khadijah was a millionaire lady, an entrepreneur but unfortunately a lonely widow who desperately needs a man to fill the vacuum left by her late husband and Mohammed was readily available to fill the vacuum.

Aside from Khadijah, Mohammed never married an older woman again, he even encouraged Muslims to rather go for virgins because, according to Mohammed, that's where the ultimate enjoyment lies:


Narrated Jabir bin 'Abdullah: I was accompanying the Prophet on a journey and was riding a slow camel that was lagging behind the others. The Prophet passed by me and asked, "Who is this?" I replied, "Jabir bin 'Abdullah." He asked, "What is the matter, (why are you late)?" I replied, "I am riding a slow camel." He asked, "Do you have a stick?" I replied in the affirmative. He said, "Give it to me." When I gave it to him, he beat the camel and rebuked it. Then that camel surpassed the others thenceforth. The Prophet said, "Sell it to me." I replied, "It is (a gift) for you, O Allah's Apostle." He said, "Sell it to me. I have bought it for four Dinars (gold pieces) and you can keep on riding it till Medina." When we approached Medina, I started going (towards my house). The Prophet said, "Where are you going?" I Sad, "I have married a widow." He said, "Why have you not married a virgin to handle with each other?" I said, "My father died and left daughters, so I decided to marry a widow (an experienced woman) (to look after them)." He said, "Well done." When we reached Medina, Allah's Apostle said, "O Bilal, pay him (the price of the camel) and give him extra money." Bilal gave me four Dinars and one Qirat extra. (A sub-narrator said): Jabir added, "The extra Qirat of Allah's Apostle never parted from me." The Qirat was always in Jabir bin 'Abdullah's purse. Sahih Bukhari 3:38:504

Narrated Jabir bin Abdullah: While we were returning from a Ghazwa (Holy Battle) with the Prophet, I started driving my camel fast, as it was a lazy camel A rider came behind me and pricked my camel with a spear he had with him, and then my camel started running as fast as the best camel you may see. Behold! The rider was the Prophet himself. He said, 'What makes you in such a hurry?" I replied, I am newly married " He said, "Did you marry a virgin or a matron? I replied, "A matron." He said, "Why didn't you marry a young girl so that you may play with her and she with you?" When we were about to enter (Medina), the Prophet said, "Wait so that you may enter (Medina) at night so that the lady of unkempt hair may comb her hair and the one whose husband has been absent may shave her pubic region. Sahih Bukhari 7:62:16

Mohammed was also obsesses with virgins for maximum sexual satisfaction.

udatso:
I think it takes a young man of strong will and self control who is marrying for the first time to marry a widow almost twice his age. It's something you definitely can't do cos your lustful eyes can't stand it.

Khadijah was like a sugar mummy to the prophet of Islam. And besides, Khadijah called the shot, financially, in that relationship because she was a very rich woman and a former boss to Mohammed hence it will be almost impossible for Mohammed to toy with her emotion.

Mohammed became a polygamist and a serial womanizer as soon as Khadijah died. During Khadijah's lifetime, Mohammed sought no sex slaves, sought no strange women, but was very loyal to his former boss cum wife.

Mohammed married Khadijah because of her wealth, and as soon as Khadijah died and Mohammed could no longer manage her business properly, Mohammed went into fighting the infidels with the sole aim of getting war booty, sex slaves and taking jizya from the non-muslims (Quran 8:1, 47, 9:29).

This reminds me of a particular mosque in Yaba, opposite the new plaza. This mosque, till date is occupied by the Hausa people whose major business is currency conversion (bureau De change), buying and selling stolen gold, phones and laptop.

In fact many stolen phones are sold and bought in that mosque. This illegal business is still taking place, in that place, till date.

analice107:
Every Muslim is a thief by default. It didn't even start with Moharmad. It all started with the woman who brought sorrow and tears into this world, Hagar the mother of Ismael.

She was called in to help bear Abraham a seed, Albeit, illegitimate, but instead, she tried to steal another woman's husband.

Ismael haven been born, grew up to discover another son has been born into the family, sort to take the place of chosen Seed.


The thiefing, pedophilic moharnad came along stealing all Principal Characters in Jedo-Christian faiths giving them Islamic names and forgetting the minor Characters.

He stole the Bible, plagiarized it and claimed the Bible is corrupt only the koran is holy. No wahala, but, muslims can't stop quoting from it to validate their thiefing religion.

He stole Moses, stole David, stole Solomon, forgot Isaiah, Jeremiah, stile Daniel, forgot the other three Hebrew kids.

He stole Mary, but forgot Joseph.

Stole Jesus but forgot his Apostles. He hates Apostle with a passion because Apostle Paul took Christianity to the Arab world.

Islam has been stealing from inception. It didn't start with this man.

So funny, stole some left some. In Islam the apostles of Jesus never existed, Jesus never had a disciple. The Quran is a case of a bad photocopy machine which omitted so many vital information from the original document.

Ganjafama:
Mohammed was a sex freak. If even a goat comes wearing a hijab he would mount it.

If an old man of 54 (profit Mohammed) can have sex with a nine year girl (Aisha), I fully accept your assumption.

Haroun13:
First, a war cant be holy.
Second, Jihad means "striving", I.e, to strive. Hence, any action that involves striving to please your creator is jihad.
Second, jihad can only involve physical fighting, if it is in striving against a tyrannical, and oppressive ruler. For example, Quran 4:75, where Allah asks the believers if they won't fight for the oppressed among men, women and children, who cry to Allah, to raise for them, someone who would liberate them from oppression.


First, there is nothing like "taquiya", it's taqiyya.
Second, it doesn't mean lying, it means concealing one's true intentions.
Third, it is a shia practice, and according to a shia brother, they only do it when in danger.
Fourth, from the above points, it is clear that annunaki has no point, but in an unsurprisingly desperate attempt to fault Islam, keeps making a fool of himself.
I challenge him, or any other christian to bring me one verse of the Quran, or one authentic hadith that says that Muslims should lie to advance Islam.
Merely looking at it, it is absurd, because you do not lie to present the truth, it doesn't work.
So, if Annunaki cannot provide any evidence to that effect, he shall be known as a liar, because he makes this claim a lot, but cannot produce evidence. Also, if he avoids this post, he also makes himself a liar.
The choice is yours, bring your proof, or label yourself a colossal, habitual and perpetual liar.

NOTE: The response is for those seeking truth. If you do not accept it as truth, then bring evidence stating otherwise, or become a known liar.

Muhammad makes Hitler look like an amateur.

"Allah's Apostle said, 'The Hour will not be established until you fight with the Jews, and the stone behind which a Jew will be hiding will say, "O Muslim! There is a Jew hiding behind me, so kill him"'" (Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 177).

true2god:
Muhammad arranges the assassination of the old man Abu Afak on page 675 of the biography of Mohammed by Ibn Ishaq.

Muhammad approves the murder of an old one-eyed Bedouin man, by Amr bin Umayya, one of his Jihadist thugs on page 674-5 in the biography of Mohammed by Ibn Ishaq.

true2god:
Muhammad orders the killing of Abdullah bin Katal’s and one of his singing-girls on page 550-1 of the biography of Mohammed by Ibn Ishaq.

Muhammad arranges the assassination of the old man Abu Afak on page 675 of the biography of Mohammed by Ibn Ishaq.

Lukay99:
Are you God? How can you decide who's a better Muslim between two people you know very little about their private life

OK bro, your point has been noted. Your logical contribution to this thread will be appreciated.

Do you believe in sahih Bukhari's hadith and Ibn Ishaq's biography of Mohammed?

tbaba1234:
Lol, the problem is that you have no knowledge but try to come off as someone who has a clue. You did not even know that Ibn Ishaq is not considered reliable.

The above is just pure falsehood.

As regards the story you posted, Do you know the background story? Do you fully understand the context? Of course not!!

You can read a little more here:

https://www.google.com/amp/s/discover-the-truth.com/2015/01/24/kab-bin-al-ashrafs-killing-deception-was-the-prophet-p-annoyed/amp/

Biko, keep me out of your ignorant propaganda.

Thank you.

I don't get your point, do you mean Ibn Ishaq and Bukhari fabricated falsehood against your prophet? Do you mean your prophet did not send an assassin to kill his enemy, as narrated by Bukhari and collaborated by Ibn Ishaq?

I really need to know what you are trying to prove.

tbaba1234:
Ibn ishaq biography of Muhammad is full of unverified/false stories and narrations.

If you want to learn about Islam, you can learn from more authentic sources.

Ibn Ishaq's biography of Mohammed correlated with sahih Bukhari's hadith by over 90%. See one of the correlations.

sahih Bukhari 5:59:369_______:

Narrated By Jabir bin Abdullah: Allah's Apostle said, "Who is willing to kill Ka'b bin Al-Ashraf who has hurt Allah and His Apostle?" Thereupon Muhammad bin Maslama got up saying, "O Allah's Apostle! Would you like that I kill him?" The Prophet said, "Yes," Muhammad bin Maslama said, "Then allow me to say a (false) thing (i.e. to deceive Kab).The Prophet said, "You may say it." Then Muhammad bin Maslama went to Kab and said, "That man (i.e. Muhammad demands Sadaqa (i.e. Zakat) from us, and he has troubled us, and I have come to borrow something from you." On that, Kab said, "By Allah, you will get tired of him!" Muhammad bin Maslama said, "Now as we have followed him, we do not want to leave him unless and until we see how his end is going to be. Now we want you to lend us a camel load or two of food." (Some difference between narrators about a camel load or two.) Kab said, "Yes, (I will lend you), but you should mortgage something to me." Muhammad bin Mas-lama and his companion said, "What do you want?" Ka'b replied, "Mortgage your women to me." They said, "How can we mortgage our women to you and you are the most handsome of the 'Arabs?" Ka'b said, "Then mortgage your sons to me." They said, "How can we mortgage our sons to you? Later they would be abused by the people's saying that so-and-so has been mortgaged for a camel load of food. That would cause us great disgrace, but we will mortgage our arms to you." Muhammad bin Maslama and his companion promised Kab that Muhammad would return to him. He came to Kab at night along with Kab's foster brother, Abu Na'ila. Kab invited them to come into his fort, and then he went down to them. His wife asked him, "Where are you going at this time?" Kab replied, "None but Muhammad bin Maslama and my (foster) brother Abu Na'ila have come." His wife said, "I hear a voice as if dropping blood is from him, Ka'b said.They are none but my brother Muhammad bin Maslama and my foster brother Abu Naila. A generous man should respond to a call at night even if invited to be killed." Muhammad bin Maslama went with two men. (Some narrators mention the men as 'Abu bin Jabr. Al Harith bin Aus and Abbad bin Bishr). So Muhammad bin Maslama went in together with two men, and sail to them, "When Ka'b comes, I will touch his hair and smell it, and when you see that I have got hold of his head, strip him. I will let you smell his head." Kab bin Al-Ashraf came down to them wrapped in his clothes, and diffusing perfume. Muhammad bin Maslama said. I have never smelt a better scent than this. Ka'b replied. "I have got the best 'Arab women who know how to use the high class of perfume." Muhammad bin Maslama requested Ka'b "Will you allow me to smell your head?" Ka'b said, "Yes." Muhammad smelt it and made his companions smell it as well. Then he requested Ka'b again, "Will you let me (smell your head)?" Ka'b said, "Yes." When Muhammad got a strong hold of him, he said (to his companions), "Get at him!" So they killed him and went to the Prophet and informed him. (Abu Rafi) was killed after Ka'b bin Al-Ashraf."

This incident was also written by Ibn Ishaq: Muhammad arranges the beheading of Kab bin al-Ashraf on page 364-9 of Ibn Ishaq's biography of Mohammed.

true2god:
Muhammad orders the torturing of treasurer of Khaybar tribe, Kinana on page 515.

Sahih bukhari also reported this Mohammed's invasion of the Jewish tribe of khaybar and his subsequent 'marriage' to saffiyya. Note that safiya was a prisoner captured by Mohammed's men as a war booty. Also note that safiyya was also betrothed to kinana before Mohammed's men killed him which paved the way for Mohammed's marriage to saffiya. It will be interesting to note that, according to the Quran, the waiting period before a marriage can be consummated between a man and a divorced woman is 3months. Let's see the Quranic injunctions below:

Divorced women should keep themselves in waiting (before remarrying) three cources; and it is not lawful for them to conceal what God has created in their wombs, if they believe in God and last day; and their husbands have more right of taking them back during this, if they want reconciliation; they have (rights) similar to against them and men are a degree above them; and God is mighty and wise

(Al-Quran 2:228)

In surah Al-Ahzab it is stated:

O ye who believe! When ye marry believing women then divorce them before touching them then there is no iddah, you have reckon with.

(Al-Quran 33:49)

They above law was broken as shown below when Mohammed and his sahabas invaded the Jewish town of khaybar:

Narrated Abdul Aziz:
Anas said, "When Allah's Apostle invaded Khaibar, we offered the Fajr prayer there (early in the morning) when it was still dark. The Prophet rode and Abu Talha rode too and I was riding behind Abu Talha. The Prophet passed through the lane of Khaibar quickly and my knee was touching the thigh of the Prophet. He uncovered his thigh and I saw the whiteness of the thigh of the Prophet. When he entered the town, he said, ‘Allahu Akbar! Khaibar is ruined. Whenever we approach near a (hostile) nation (to fight) then evil will be the morning of those who have been warned.’ He repeated this thrice. The people came out for their jobs and some of them said, ‘Muhammad (has come).’ (Some of our companions added, ‘With his army.’) We conquered Khaibar, took the captives, and the booty was collected. Dihya came and said, ‘O Allah's Prophet! Give me a slave girl from the captives.’ The Prophet said, ‘Go and take any slave girl.’ He took Safiya bint Huyai. A man came to the Prophet and said, ‘O Allah's Apostle! You gave Safiya bint Huyai to Dihya and she is the chief mistress of the tribes of Quraiza and An-Nadir and she befits none but you.’ So the Prophet said, ‘Bring him along with her.’ So Dihya came with her and when the Prophet saw her, he said to Dihya, ‘Take any slave girl other than her from the captives.’" Anas added: "The Prophet then manumitted her and married her."

Thabit asked Anas, "O Abu Hamza! What did the Prophet pay her (as Mahr)?" He said, "Her self was her Mahr for he manumitted her and then married her." Anas added, "While on the way, Um Sulaim dressed her for marriage (ceremony) and at night she sent her as a bride to the Prophet. So the Prophet was a bridegroom and he said, ‘Whoever has anything (food) should bring it.’ He spread out a leather sheet (for the food) and some brought dates and others cooking butter. (I think he (Anas) mentioned As-Sawaq). So they prepared a dish of Hais (a kind of meal). And that was Walima (the marriage banquet) of Allah's Apostle." (Sahih al-Bukhari, Volume 1, Book 8, Number 367)

Narrated Anas bin Malik

When Dihyah protested, wanting to keep Safiyah for himself, the Apostle traded for Safiyah by giving Dihyah her two cousins. The women of Khaybar were distributed among the Muslims.
Ishaq page 511

The Prophet conquered Khaybar by force after fighting. Khaybar was something that Allah gave as booty to His Messenger. He took one-fifth of it and divided the remainder among the Muslims.
Al-Tabari, Vol. 8, p. 130

The above quotations are 100% Islamic sources. If we repudiate Ibn Ishaq, as being unreliable, did bukhari or al-tabari make thing smoother and better? If all Islamic sources did not present Mohammed in a positive light, how about the Koran?

Muhammad orders the killing of Abdullah bin Katal’s and one of his singing-girls on page 550-1 of the biography of Mohammed by Ibn Ishaq.